We assume that there IS a 1xbit signature campaign running. How can we be sure of that? As far as I know, no reputable member has ever participated in any of their campaigns.

So it's possible that they actually hired some scammer with a bumping service, like the ones offered on fiverr, and it's all run by just one guy with his alt accounts. This is already proven partially true, as dozens of connected alt accounts have been exposed that participated in their campaigns, and 1xbit continued to hire them even though they were proven to be cheating. They wouldn't do that if it was a real campaign, and if they were interested in recruiting genuine members.

How do they mislead? It is clearly stated "Multiply your bitcoins up to 4,750x by playing a PROVABLY FAIR HI-LO game!"
Nowhere is the 4,750x guaranteed. It's called gambling.

According to your Terms and Conditions, you give yourself the right to request KYC from players who are using your service in one way or another, this means you can request KYC from any player. Trying to promote yourself as a "NO KYC" casino when you are doing exactly the same as any other casino that implements KYC procedures is dishonest and misleading.

Secondly, you have no right to collect and process the user's personal information if you don't clearly indicate who (which company) is responsible for the processing and security of such data. This is illegal because it violates the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

When you are advertising on a public platform like this one you need to be very careful about what you promote. For example: there is a promotional campaign for a scam casino 1xbit. Most of the people found promoting this casino had been tagged by DT members which means they are being punished by this community because they are providing advertising for a service that is not good for community.
For that reason, I won't promote any website that I know that has negative feedback and I will always check their reputation before promoting any platform.

So, joeperry signed the addresses and proved that he owns the private key of the address that was used back in 2018. Can you do the same, and confirm your side of the story?


What's your point? Just because someone tagged 50 of your alt accounts, you want us to do the same on the joeperry account? But why? What did he do to you?


I don't understand, what partiality? For what reason?
We just wanted you to show some evidence.

You still haven't provided any evidence for your claims. Why should anyone believe you?
Can you prove that you were the owner of that account at any time?

A casino needs to make multiple-thousand-dollar investments in a signature campaign before they can expect to generate even a few thousand views in the first week. And even then, there's no guarantee that this will result in any players besides those already playing at that casino.

So, here's my suggestion for Signature Campaigns. Stick with it for 1-2 months. It is a slow burn, but surely in those 1-2 months you will see an increase in engagement and traffic. At that point, you can decide if it's worth continuing or not. In the end, building a brand takes time.

Yes. If you are carrying large amounts of cash and get casino chips, the floor staff will ID you. This serves two purposes: it tracks how many chips have been given to each guest, and it protects against any kind of money laundering or other criminal activity. If you are given chips and don’t present a valid ID, the casino will confiscate them. The floor staff also knows most of their high-roller guests by name. So, if you’re going to be playing in a live casino, make sure your ID is up to date and keep it with you.

As you have already noticed, OP has been inactive and this topic hasn't been updated since last December. The thread was bumped again only a few days ago. That's why I welcomed him back to the forum. Also, I know that nakamura12 has already suggested buying a copper account, that's why I said "As someone already suggested...", and that was also only a few days ago, so there's no reason to doubt that Chipstars won't follow suit.

It is possible to gamble responsibly. I'm talking from my own experience here. But you must be consistent and careful at all times. Know what you want to do and how to deal with it. Never cross your financial limitation, or else you will end up in big trouble you could not even imagine. The lesson here is that gambling is not something you can throw yourself into recklessly and expect to come out ahead consistently. Even if you can, the long-term consequences of such an approach may be more severe than you realize. Take care of yourself and the people around you.

Your question seems vague to me, so I'm not sure what you actually want to know? Have you read the promotion conditions posted here?

Basically, rule number 6 is the most important and the most difficult part. From your deposit and bonus you will have at least $210 in your account, but that amount must be wagered five times ($1050 in total) with the minimum odds of 2.5 and a minimum of 5 bet selections before you can withdraw it. And, according to rule number 7, you have to do all that within three days.

Not a very tempting offer, if you ask me, but if you like that conditions, go for it.

It's just so scary to see how easy it is to get into bad habits and really not know about it. I have found this out the hard way. At one point, I just became hooked and was playing all the time and all I could think about was how much was left in my bank account. I couldn't focus on anything and it just wasn't easy. I started having health problems and that's when I knew I had to change.

It took me several weeks to get myself back together but now I know that I shouldn't have played that much and when you start gambling you have to put your limit so that you will not end up over that amount. You have to take your priorities into consideration and you have to make sure you will not end up losing your life.

That's exactly what I was thinking. Some players probably use such low betting odds to gain other benefits from them, as you mentioned. Maybe there is some kind of wagering requirement, for example when clearing bonuses, or for advancing to a higher tier and achieving VIP benefits. If a bet is very small, that might not give an advantage, as you said. But if a large bet is placed on a small odds, it might be worth betting for that reason.

I'm not siding with the casinos on this, but that's probably what the regulators and authorities are asking them to do. Similar to how banks ask you for a statement about the source of funds when you want to deposit or withdraw a large sum of money. Only thing that I find unfair about casinos is that they do not ask for this information when making deposits or when registering, but when withdrawing money after winning. So basically, people that move large sums of money into the casino are not being asked to do this, but people that just won a moderate amount of money are.

OP, welcome back to the forum. We haven't seen you in a while.  

To start with, congratulations on launching your online casino. As some already suggested, it would be a good idea to take a Copper membership, create a more attractive ANN thread, and present your website more effectively. Check out some of the topics of other casinos. Also, maintaining active participation in the forum and answering members' questions will be of great benefit to the site. Don't forget to post information on games, deposit bonuses, and other promotions on the website and of course, let people know when you have some good news. This will boost user interest and help the casino live up to its potential. Don't forget to check your competition, check out what they have to offer, and compare them to yours. You may even want to consider some promotional campaigns on the forum to encourage new members to join you. Good luck!

Gambling with bots (such as for dice games) and using the auto-bet feature on the site are two entirely different things. The auto-bet feature allows a user to place a series of bets according to certain conditions (martingale, reverse martingale, etc.) while the gambling bot offers complete control over the strategy of the bet and can use various strategies. I'm not going to explain the differences between them, but usually, the gambling bot has many features that the site's auto-betting feature doesn't have.


The bot does not make the decisions on your behalf. As the bot follows pre-programmed rules, it is still a human decision because you determine how it should behave in various scenarios.

I understand what you're saying. There's no denying that majority of crypto users do not like KYC on any platform, least of all on an online casino. I agree that people hate it, but we also have to understand that it's a necessary evil. Many gambling platforms already require some form of verification due to legal regulations and the KYC has been the price you pay for compliance. But, if casino sites want to attract more players, the best thing they can do is to add bonuses that are designed to help newcomers enter the game. After all, even if we don't like KYC, we accept it since it is the price we have to pay to use the platform. Why not give newcomers some benefit for their compliance, such as bonuses to make the experience more fun?

There has already been a suggestion that it would probably be best approach for the casino to give players the option of filling out KYC details (with the welcome bonus) or requiring KYC only when withdrawing larger amounts.

My opinion is that Tether can be frozen, because it is a centralized currency, no matter which type of wallet you use. It is an integral part of their source code.

Definitely true. In the end, it's all a matter of personal preference. Because the truth is that cryptocurrencies will be beneficial to many people without much, if any, risk. Just like anything else in life: don't expect big rewards without any work. For my personal opinion, the transition of cryptocurrencies to everyday life comes step by step: first in the online world (with payment of goods in bitcoin or other goods/services), and after in retail. 

I can sympathize with your frustration, but don't confuse freedom of speech with following the rules of the community. Besides, moderators are people too and sometimes make mistakes; they have emotions and opinions just like everyone else. As you can see, no one has deleted your post in this thread.