Sounds to me just like a parlay bet, do you have to win all the bets that you're combining on the bet builder tab or not? Because that's how you can win in parlay bets right? By correctly predicting all the right events or wins in a game. Probably the only difference of parlay and this one is that bet builder is just for one game, so if you're betting on a low odds team, you can maximize your wins by adding other predictions and to me, it's a pretty risky thing to do especially if you add who's going to score the most or who gets the first score.

It's not rigged but more like it favors the house more often, rigged means there's no chances that you will be winning so I don't exactly think online betting or gambling is exactly rigged. If you really don't trust the website that you're playing on then don't play there anymore, that's the only solution. You can always find other gambling websites that's more trustworthy when it comes to their games so there's really no excuses why you keep staying on that casino or betting site if you feel like you're being cheated on your bets or games. I also would like to add that there's also organizations that ensures fair gaming so I don't know how they will be able to rig games.

This link can be helpful in understanding that there's organization that's ensuring there's fair games in an online casino although this only has a Filipino jurisdiction so it might be not that helpful.

Here's some house edge samples online.

That's one way to describe being approachead by these scums, they entice you with great returns for your money in hopes of you buying into their schemr but when in reality, their signals don't have any semblrance that they're working, maybe because they want to make it big quickly so they lie, cheat and steal from you, that's why it's important that we're asking the right questions.

Definitely with you on this one, signal groups aren't that accurate anyways and you're better off learning about trading yourself and learn the basics on analysis and how to make a good entry. The only time that I would probably give in to these signal groups is when those signal groups are giving their services for free and I don't think there's no way that a scam or even your run of the mill signal group would do that because they know that they're not the real deal and they just want to fool as many people as they can before bailing out of the group or before they can go radio silence. If they invited me to this and it's free then expect me to join those groups and also they have to show results that their signals are correct or even close to what they're saying.

It's all skill, luck is out of your control so how can you train something to the point of improvement if you don't have any direct control over it? It's common sense so I don't get how people have a hard time thinking over which is important. Some say that it depends on the game but fuck that because that's not true, luck will never be a factor that can contribute to your gambling success so just improve solely on skill in gambling, maybe if real life was some kind of a role-playing game like Dungeons and Dragons or Diablo, you can probably argue to me that luck can be improved as we have an access on our own character stats and we can choose which attributes we want to allocate are points on. Another noteworthy thing to add is that if you're aiming to be successful in gambling, prepare to be frustrated because gambling should be fun and gambling competitively is not the way to go gambling because being competitive and too serious about it is going to suck the fun and enjoyment out of it.

Even if you try that and you pull off the survey, you can never be sure that someone is being truthful to you in your survey especially if the questions in the survey is a bit confusing and people that answer them don't want to reveal too much about their gambling habit then you might expect some discrepancies or even wrong data. Given that people are pretty stickler if not paranoid when it comes to security, the anonymity of crypto will be a big hindrance to your intention of trying to get data for this thread's question. If you're setting your data on judt the forum members then you're probably going to get 90% since there's a lot of people that's interacting here in the Gambling board.
I think so too but there's also the possibility that they're not a bitcoin investor because there's already thousands of altcoins out there and I don't think that bitcoin is their introduction to the world of cryptocurrency is entirely true anymore. But that's a slim chance and just my baseless opinion at best so you're probably right about these gamblers being a bitcoin hodler.

You're probably better off having a bet with your friends irl if you want to bet on this match. T1 is a solid team all throughout the competition so I am not surprised that betting sites don't want to give a really generous odds to T1. I guess you just have to take the odds anyway, still a guaranteed win for you, take what you can take in terms of wins.
Wow, that's a pretty big move for Valve to remove DPC to get teams to qualify for The International, for me it's a bad move because it kind of removes the filter that Valve has to select which team is going to get into the biggest DOTA 2 competition, it's supposed to be the best of the best competing for the Aegis of Champions and the million dollars worth of prize pool but I'm excited how they plan to change the qualifications to get there, but for now, I am surprised and unhappy.

One of the basic ways to con people, you create a problem and then somehow there's people out there that wants to help you out. I am 60% sure that it's a scam because that's a possibility but the it will only go to a 100 if I can see that the person who has posted their problem show a proof that they've got a problem and that there's really an issue and that someone was able to solve the issue and so far I am not happy with what I am seeing, I am like that one American Dad meme where he's looking at the meter to see if it crossed the line.

I am really happy that there's more and more people becoming more vigilant and aware of different types of scams, this kind of thing happening results in these scams losing their influence over many people because now a lot of people are already asking questions and the scammers aren't prepared to answer any of them, they got too complacent about their method that they didn't expect them to ask questions so they haven't prepared any answers. I wouldn't say that I'm a good person but when a stranger asks me for help, I always try my best to help out knowing that there's a possibility that it's a prelude or their way into introducing me to a scheme but I know that when I do that, the possibility of scam is likely so don't try what I do because you might not realize it sometimes that you're already being scammed.

I love your set up and I can imagine it, hoping that I can replicate the action in a Virtual Machine but my problem is that wouldn't this be a dangerous thing that you're sharing your set up to other people and how it all interconnects because you're giving away a vital information about your bitcoin and your wallet so I just hope you know that there's a possibility that this sharing of your set up can backfire to you someday. Plus your way of saying that no one will be able to bypass your set up will just make malicious people try harder, I mean a dox will definitely be your weakest point.

If it's in a bank account then expect that the physical currency has already circulated back to the economy or has been exchanged already with the origin of the currency. I don't know about other foreign currency but US accounts for their currency being lost in an annual scale so they print out to offset or balance the circulation with consideration to the projected lost currency. I'm not familiar with how foreign reserve makes for an indicator of the positive or negative movement of the economy so I can't say much about it, maybe I'll learn something about that, any video recommendations to start with the basics?

Pricing is a matter of cost in labor and sometimes for most luxurious products, subjective opinion of the manufacturer. Now I get that the second part might not be true entirely given that there's really some luxurious products that are expensive due to cost of production and the specialty in labor but I have to tell you that there are some luxurious products out there that are a total bullshit in terms of being priced at, for example is the luxury bags and expensive shoes, I don't believe that they're built how they're advertised to be built, I think they're built by just high-end sweatshops especially the luxury shoes. It's also our fault as a consumer, we blindly consume stuff and so we enable them in a way from producing more shit we don't need but they advertise that we need.

To answer your question on who's making it harder for the masses, you don't have to choose which one because these two are cooperating to make things happen for them only. The government does the laws that will protect the companies of these billionaires that will pay them the most and the government also owns the police force that will protect the property of these billionaires while the billionaires will be busy pocketing all the money they can stuff in their pockets and pay off the politicians if not the whole government so they can be on your side even if the people are getting more and more rowdy to protest the exploits that the billionaires use so they can be where they're currently standing on and they're also helping with the funding on the politicians that serve their best interests.

Same thing, I don't plan to go astray with my plans too because I feel like if I ever do that, it's going to make me feel like I've cheated on myself in a way that I broke my promise. Waiting for the bitcoin value that I've set to sell makes it easier to stick to my plans which is great because my plan is pretty simple although I feel like I am not consistently following a part of my plan that involves buying whenever I can but I can't really blame myself for that as I am a working man and the bills won't pay itself so that's I guess the only problem I have with the plan, I think I haven't astray even if I don't consistently invest in bitcoin whenever I get my paycheck but for everyone who will read this, you can judge for yourself.

How are you so sure that this graundnut oil is in demand in a lot of countries? There should be some statistics on that to help support your claim plus, I've been watching a lot of Business Insider lately about different products that are expensive or in demand and so far I haven't seen a video about this one and I'm not even familiar with the nut so I don't know if it's a real stuff. My advice to you OP is to pitch this business idea like Shark Tank or Dragon's Den, you need proof of concept, proof that there's demand and proof that you can sell it on a city scale at the least because I assume that the manufacturing equipment isn't going to be cheap so go back to the drawing board and learn how to sell your product in the forum, other people in the forum can help you create a better post so people won't be put off by a wall of text.

I agree that one meal won't be enough to see a perfect representation of the standard of living but if you actually try and make it daily in the span of a month, you can probably calculate the average food cost that a household spend on one meal of the day, the time of meal is a big factor though. But what I've suggested is flimsy though as you've mentioned, location of where they've got their food would also be a factor and those locations might or might not be a melting pot of different working classes in a population. In my country, I can't be exact too as I still live with my parents so I don't spend money on food so I can't be sure how much is one meal but if we're talking lunch which is when I spend my money, I would say that around 1$ to 3$ is what I spend but the 3$ is big already, that's for when I really want to satisfy what I'm craving during that time or for a long while.

An appropriate comparison but I agree that bitcoin will continue to stumble and fall but the only catch with how bitcoin is going to stumble and fall is that when bitcoin falls, I am sure that it's definitely not going to be a fall that's comparable to it's last fall. What I mean is if bitcoin were to go down right now is it's going to hit some invisible price floor and that isn't going to be investing lower than last time that it got so low or maybe even the current lowest is probably the highest in the previous price cycle. So to refute your claim that stumble and fall again isn't entirely wrong, maybe you're always dealing with absolutes so you're adamant about it.

Totally agree, can't really caught spending money on things that don't return value, style or impression on me. Choosing the product you're buying should at the least be able to help you elevate yourself in terms of the 3 things that I've mentioned before, if it doesn't help then don't buy it. If we're basing solely on that phrase or motivational words then it's really correct and logical because rich people are the kind of people don't look at how much they're spending, and being rich should mean that you've got a lot of money. To me, the full motivational should be "Being rich=not looking at the price tag no matter the cost as long as it provides value to you positively overtime like watches and baseball cards."

Now, if OP were to release it to the public for free for a free trial, it would be a different story because once it proves itself to be a bot that can generate you a profit then it's a different story because there's proof already so then we won't mind paying for the bot but that's only possible if OP releases the bot for free but right now, it's as you're saying, it's too good to be true so it's not worth being excited about it.
It's kind of contradictory of you to say that bots don't work and then at the next paragraph, you're saying that arbitrage bots are profitable although I won't dispute that trading isn't a guaranteed profit since that's true and obvious unless you are a God. Maybe your concern can be something that can be easily solved I mean that multiple exchanges then probably a programming voodoo could be useful to create that and there's a lot of IT industry people that can do exactly what you're describing, it's probably a matter of how you plan to your steps into building that arbitrage bot.

What in the heavens above did I ever mentioned that I am attempting to support my income by gambling, you've clearly misunderstood what I've typed so it's not entirely your fault, I have to just be better at structuring my sentence so there's some comprehension to be had but I digress, what I've said is that the conditions that I would stop gambling is:

• when I got a family and a kid to raise
• and that my support for that family in terms of finances wouldn't yield me any extras that I can use to gamble
• I've got some chronic bodily problem that's going to require maintenance that's going to cost me money

I hope that this list will clear out what I was trying to say, I really don't know why you've replied those stuff because I don't see the connection of you quoting my reply. I didn't even mention any wins in my post, what the hell are you talking about? Have you read my reply to the post or just skimmed through it? To humor you for the sake of argument, you're stating the obvious regarding what you need to do when gambling and why you have to stop gambling, also there are times that some people are just so unaware that they're slowly being too self-destructive about their gambling habits so if a prophet needs to tell them to stop then so be it.

Your metrics for playing for fun isn't really an accurate definition of "playing for fun", not all who play small amounts of money aren't playing for fun and not all who are playing with a lot of funds to back them up are playing for fun and vice versa. My point is that the metrics for playing for fun isn't measured with how much you're spending because you can't really measure the fun in exact and logical terms, plus you can't really tell if someone really did have fun just by their facial expressions or by asking them. Also, if they're playing for profit, wouldn't that imply that they're doing just fine with their gambling so they're probably the least of worries when it comes to chasing losses?
Totally agree with what you're saying (I guess I can't really disagree since we're saying almost the same thing), most people are simple and some of us are just trying to make them as a complicated individual when they're predictable most of the time. Maybe the factor to breaking through this so-called loop would be the strength of will of the individual that's in question like the people who can quit gambling when they want to or the people that can never get enough of gambling high that even if they lose a lot already, they still want to play.

Now that you've mention if they are good or bad friends, that could be a factor to whether you will continue to gamble or not but we have take note that even your good friends are getting the high that your getting when you win so they can't really be entirely blamed if you continue to gamble when you've already secured a win. Another thing about endurance of your physical body when gambling, you're not really moving much and it's not like you're thinking too much when you're playing on chance so I don't think that you're going to be easily tired. About your last statement about letting them, that's impossible to do especially if you're having fun at gambling, you're going to definitely want to be involved with your friend's gamble.

With our exchanges so far, let's just agree to disagree on this topic and probably meet somewhere in the middle. Maybe there's just a lot of differences in people that some might easily be influenced and some aren't easily influenced or some are strong willed but wants to please their friends when they're having fun.