Many people have already done so. That's very easy. Currently, there are many other cryptocurrencies (called altcoin), but none of them have been able to compete with bitcoin.
None of the altcoins have been able to provide the security and the decentralization bitcoin gives us.
Just go to coinmarketcap.com and see how many coins/tokens have been already created.

According to blockchain, no transaction has been between these addresses.
Given the transactions received and sent by 3EkKxC1kDrJc4MvRqkXXyt7mpiA5UCLoRs, it seems to be owned by a custodial service like an exchange and can't belong to your blockchain wallet.

It's impossible that you have made a transaction from this address using your blockchain wallet.

You can use transaction accelerators like ViaBTC when your transaction is unconfirmed and you want it to be confirmed fast.
The case is different here. The transaction hasn't been broadcast to the network and doesn't exist in the mempool at all.

OP already said that he was using tradingview chart. See this post.
Since Tradingview uses the data extracted from Bitstamp by default and Bitstamp's volume has decreased, he/she thought that bitcoin trading volume has decreased.

The chance of winning the biggest prize (The $15,000 Rolex) is 1 in 2 billions.
The chance of winning the $1500 iphone is 11 in 1 billion.
The chance of winning the $500 Amazon gift card is 3 in 100 million.

You can calculate the winning chance of each of other prizes using the following table easily.

It's impossible that you have a transaction that is still unconfirmed after 5 months.
In these 5 months, the mempool has been emptied many times. Also, as mentioned by BlackHatCoiner, unconfirmed transaction are usually dropped from the mempool of nodes.

What you shared above isn't a valid transaction ID and I guess you are using a custodial service that hasn't broadcast your transaction even after 5 months. What's the service you are using?

If you use the online website, you are right. That's not safe. Even if you enter your seed phrase on iancoleman.io and not a fake website, there's still the chance of getting hacked.
Iancoleman is open source and if you want to use it securely, you should download the source code and run it offline on an air-gapped device.
Take note that any online website and any online wallet (including Coinomi) is unsecure.

I would no longer post in this forum, if I believed that my posts are deleted without being reviewed by a human and they are all deleted by a bot.

You are right. Moderatos don't waste their time on monitoring your activity.
Moderators review your posts if they are reported. It's not that they are always looking at your post history to check if you have made a new post.

Tradingview allow you to change the data source.
Just click on "Bitstamp" to see a list including some other exchanges. I don't know why by default it has been set to Bitstamp. Maybe, it's kind of advertising.




Coingecko is a website for tracking different cryptocurrencies prices.
The price and trading volume reported on coingecko is calculated using the data extracted from different exchanges with weighted average formula.

Iancoleman's domain hasn't been changed and I can access the iancoleman.io without any problem.
It's the first time I've heard of the .ch domain and that's probably a fake website created for scamming purposes.

Edit:
I just searched for "iancoleman" on google.
It shows the .ch domain as an advertisement. It's not the first time I see google is promoting scams.

Tradingview extract the data from exchanges and by default it's set to Bitstamp.
If you are looking at the data extracted from Bitstamp, that decline simply means that the bitcoin trading volume has been decreased on Bitstamp and they have lost the competition to other excahgnes.
According to Coingecko, Bitstamp's share from the total trading volume is below 0.15%.

Your information is wrong.
According to Coingecko, the 24 hour trading volume of bitcoin was around 3.5 billion dollars at the first day of 2017 and 2.3 billion dollars at the first day of 2018.
Now, the 24 hour trading volume of bitcoin is  around 36 billion dollars which is around 10 times the first day of 2017 and 15 times the first day of 2018.

Your posts are deleted because someone reports them and moderators agree with the reporter. When you don't make any post, no one see you and your posts aren't noticed by spam busters.

I checked few of your posts. You say things that have been said multiple times in the previous posts.
Click here to see one of your deleted posts on Loyce.club.
You made this post on 25th page of a thread just to say that bitcoin is a good investment and investing in centralized coins is wrong. The same thing has been surely mentioned in the previous 500 posts multiple times.

You should edit to your topic to "How PoS becomes more centralized?"

In POS cryptocurrencies, for validating transactions, you must stake your coins and unlike bitcoin, you don't have to do any work. Therefore, in a POS cryptocurrency, the more coins you have, the more control you have over the network. Since a significant percentage of POS coins are usually owned by the developers, they can have big control over the network.

You may be interested in the the useful thread started by BlackHatCoiner.
[Megathread] The long-known PoW vs. PoS debate

There are many other deleted posts.
If you go to modlog now and search for 854735 (the user ID of len01), you will see that 22 posts have been deleted only in the past 7 days. According to BPIP, 36 posts have been deleted by moderators in overall.

I checked a few of deleted posts through Loyce.club. All the posts I checked had been made in spam mega threads.

I don't really understand you.
In the OP, you were talking about your electrum wallet and signing message an asked how to see your addresses. Now, you are saying that you haven't used electrum and you are using trustwallet.
As far as I know trustwallet gives you a single address for bitcoin and doesn't support signing/verifying messages at all. 

You can see all your addresses in "Addresses" tab.
If you don't see "Addresses" tab, click on "View" at top of the window and select "Show addresses".


If the address belongs to your wallet and you didn't take that from somewhere else, any fund that is sent to that at any time will be shown in your wallet.

This is not accurate.  You can find the public key of an address if there's an outgoing transaction. It's not that any transaction on history of an address can help you to find its public key.  
For making a transaction, you have to reveal your public key, so nodes can verify your signature. Your public key isn't revealed when you receive a transaction.

Take note that by default only the feedback posted by DT members are shown in the trust page and the other feedback are shown as untrusted feedback.
If someone abuses the system and gives positive trust or negative trust to other users without any logical users, then the DT members can distrust his/her judgments, so his/her feedback are not shown by default.
You can also exclude anyone you want from your trust network.

As far as I know two features are missing in the mobile version of electrum. One is coin control and the other one is signing/verifying messages.
If you need coin control feature for your transactions, you can use bluewallet. It's non-custodial and open-source.