Laszlo could have used 1 sat/vB, but he instead chose to use 4,191 sat/vB over paying in transaction fees by 4191 time because in that particular block which contained only his transaction and the coinbase transaction. laszlo could make that transaction even without paying any transaction fee. I just checked transactions included in blocks 56000-58000. 561 (non-coinbase) transactions were included in those blocks. 560 out of 561 transactions have been made with zero fee and laszlo's transaction was the only one paying fee.
|
|
|
With importing your seed phrase from the close source wallet to a trusted open source wallet, you don't really increase the security of your fund. Create a new wallet, make a transaction and send all the fund to the new wallet.
|
|
|
Transaction hash: d7e78df4ba2ebf7ee4469568cc7fb452bb4abd326b195d5951c3b215d5bcf645 Amount sent: 0.03142558 BTC • $846.39
The transaction has been confirmed and provided that you have withdrawn the fund to the correct address, you should see that on your wallet. Note that you didn't receive 0.03142558 BTC in that transaction. That's the value of the UTXO used by the exchange to make your transaction. You received 0.00684531 BTC. The rest was sent back to the sender as change. Edit: You have received two other transactions as well and your balance should be now 0.10731957 BTC. Does your wallet show a different value?
|
|
|
Yes, I used it to send and receive money from gambling websites (never used any mixers though). But there is nothing in their terms which forbids this.
That's explicitly stated on Blockchain.com User Agreement. It seems that you missed that. 15.2 When accessing or using the Services, you agree that you are solely responsible for your conduct while accessing and using our Services. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, you agree that you shall not:
(b) use the Services to pay for, support or otherwise engage in any illegal activities, including, but not limited to illegal gambling, fraud, money laundering, or terrorist activities; The gambling website you withdrew fund from has been probably considered as an illegal gambling operator by blockchain.com exchange.
|
|
|
As already mentioned, there was probably a change included in the transaction. Let me explain it in more detail. Whenever you receive a bitcoin transaction, you actually receive a UTXO (Unspent Transaction Output) and when you want to send bitcoin to someone, you have to spend the UTXO in full. Let's say you have received 0.1 BTC in a bitcoin transaction and now you want to send 0.05 BTC to someone. Your transaction will include 1 input and 2 outputs. The input will be the 0.1 BTC you have received before. One of the outputs will belong to the recipient and the other one will belong to yourself which is the change. The change will be 0.05 BTC minus transaction fee.
|
|
|
For example when Laszlo Hanyecz paid 10,000 Bitcoins for two pizzas back in 2010 was there a transaction fee? Here is the transaction made by laszlo for buying two pizzas. a1075db55d416d3ca199f55b6084e2115b9345e16c5cf302fc80e9d5fbf5d48dAs you see, laszlo paid 0.99 BTC as transaction fee. Also, has the maximum number of transactions per day always been 100?
There has been never a maximum number for transactions that can be made per day.
|
|
|
>> Transferring their fund by importing the 12 words into other wallets like Electrum might be a good step or any wallets that support importing BIP39 seed phrases.
As already mentioned, this doesn't change anything. You should create a new wallet using a safe tool on an safe device and move all the fund to that. But they use something "nonstandard derivation" for non-BTC coins and I haven't been able to import the seed into other wallets (Exodus, Trust wallet).
No need to import your seed phrase into other wallets. Create a new wallet and send all your coins to that. Note that both Exodus and trustwallet are close-source and there's a possibility that the same thing will happen to them.
|
|
|
yes im sure its the hacker adress
No. You are wrong. That's bitfinex hot wallet address. If someone hacks your wallet, steals your bitcoin and then send the fund to Bitfinex, binance or any other exchange, does it mean your bitcoin has been stolen by the exchange? If your fund has been stolen and it has been moved to that address, it means that the fund has been deposited to bitfinex. That's all.
|
|
|
You can pay for 5sats/byte if you're not in hurry, maybe it only need 24 hours your transaction will be included into the block by the miner.
The last time miners included transactions paying the fee rate of 5 sat/vbyte in the blockchain was around 40 days ago. If you make a transaction paying the fee rate of 5 sat/vbyte now, it would be around 80 vMB from tip and it's very very unlikely that it will be confirmed in the next 24 hours.
|
|
|
Sad day for Atomic Wallet users, It's (another) stark reminder. Not your keys, not your coins.
Atomic wallet is a non-custodial wallet and gives you the private keys. The problem with Atomic wallet is that it's close source and there is no way to know how the keys have been generated and whether the user is the only who has access to the keys or not.
|
|
|
It's sad news, we thought that using a non-custodial wallet is safe, in fact, there's no really safe over the internet.
It's safe to use a trustworthy open-source non-custodial wallet (preferably on an airgapped device) and that has been said many times in many threads on this forum. It's not that any non-custodial wallet is recommended. Transferring their fund by importing the 12 words into other wallets like Electrum might be a good step or any wallets that support importing BIP39 seed phrases.
You don't make your wallet more secure, just with importing your seed phrase into a secure wallet like electrum. You should create a new wallet and send all the fund to that.
|
|
|
Not sure when this change has been introduced, but for sure it was before V4.4.0.
The option to disable RBF was removed in the version 4.4.0. In versions 4.3.4 and before that, you could choose whether or not you want your transaction to be flagged as RBF.
|
|
|
AFAIK, for the wallet, it'll only mark it as RBF and show a warning that it can still be replaced by the sender.
This seems to be correct. According to this article, unconfirmed transactions that have been flagged as RBF are highlighted in pink and they display a message saying " Be careful. Until it confirms, the transaction could be replaced/redirected by the sender". ilib, are you sure that Bitpay doesn't accept RBF-enabled transactions?
|
|
|
I’m confused on how the transaction has a feature of bump fee and remove since you can’t remove it once there’s a bump fee option because it was already unconfirmed on blockchain.
According to OP, the transaction was local. Most probably, it was an unconfirmed transaction which was dropped from the mempool after a while. This means that the transaction wasn't in the mempool of nodes and it was shown only in OP's wallet. By the way, note that there is no such thing as " unconfirmed on blockchain". Unconfirmed transactions are not in the blockchain at all. They are in the mempool.
|
|
|
I doubt your wallet had been hacked. If your wallet was hacked, the hacker would steal all the fund and broadcast the transaction. Why should the hacker make a transaction sending only 0.016 BTC while you have 0.066 BTC? Why didn't the hacker broadcast that transaction himself? So I am also advising users of Electrum Wallet to update their wallets time to time to avoid cyber attack.
If your device has been compromised, you should format your hard drive and reinstall your operating system. You can't make your wallet secure, just with installing a new version of electrum.
|
|
|
Do you mean that when you send or receive USDT from one wallet, immediately there will be another transaction added with a separate token that is not the exact same USDT sent or received?
OP is talking about a smart contract which allow you to make transaction sending zero token without owning the private key. Here is a topic made by wwzsocki about the same thing before. Watch out for this NEW TransferFrom Zero Transfer Scam!
|
|
|
As you can see I can't click on "next"
You shouldn't enter your passphrase there. Enter your 24 words without the passphrase and click on "Next" button. After that, you will see a new window in which you will be asked to enter your passphrase.
|
|
|
How to generate a 24 words seed with a passphrase ? I just tested to select "add words" and put a password when I import a seed but it's impossible to click on next.
It should work. You probably did something wrong. Use the above command on console to generate a 24 word seed phrase. Create a new wallet. Select "Standard wallet" and then "I already have a seed". Click on "options" and check "Extend this seed with custom words". Enter your 24 word seed phrase, then your passphrase and click "Next".
|
|
|
That public key starts with Xpub
The master public key starts with xpub, only if your wallet is legacy. If your wallet is native segwit (which is the default wallet type, when you generate a new wallet on electrum), your master public key would start with zpub.
|
|
|
|