Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 06:31:06 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 [102] 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 »
2021  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: CGMINER CPU/GPU miner overclock monitor fanspeed in C linux/windows/osx 2.0.8 on: December 06, 2011, 08:42:09 AM
Cut off temperature has nothing to do with fan speed. Its where the gpu is "turned off", for instance if the fan fails. I think its enabled by default, to set the temperature, just click G(pu) > C(hange settings) > GPU #> A(utomatic) > C(utoff) > set temperature. Has to be over 70C. Just stop your fan to test it.
2022  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Point for Bitcoin! Point for Linux! And point for Ubuntu!! on: December 05, 2011, 11:21:21 PM
I dont see the need. I wouldnt mind if it made it in to the ubuntu repo, but lets face it, any linux newbie having even easier access to install the client isnt going to solve any of the problems bitcoin faces. He still wont have an easy way acquire bitcoins or spend them. He is not even going to find it in the repo's unless he searches for it.
 The idea that the ubuntu software center would use bitcoins for commercial apps, well, I think thats a bit optimistic Smiley.
2023  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: BitMinter.com * Now with merged mining! * on: December 05, 2011, 11:07:51 PM
With that, and I will submit this question to the Commodore forum, how do I upgrade the GPU?  Any suggestions on where to get one, and the docs on how to install it?

You cant.
To anyone unfamiliar with the new (or old) C64:
http://www.commodoreusa.net/CUSA_C64.aspx

There is no standard PCI-e expansion slot, nor even room for a powerful GPU, let alone a powerful enough PSU. Dont bother asking, it cant be done.

btw.. $999? For an Atom based all in one, seriously? That makes Apple look like a bargain!

Quote
And in case I don't figure these things out before you read this, how do I get into litecoin mining?

Download the litecoin client, it has a miner app built in. There are faster miner apps, but it will get you started:
http://litecoin.org/

Then sign up for a pool. Until DrHaribo supports litecoin mining on bitminter, I would suggest this one:
http://pool-x.eu/index

And to trade litecoins for bitcoins, use any exchange that supports it, like
https://btc-e.com/exchange/ltc_btc
2024  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: BitMinter.com * Now with merged mining! * on: December 05, 2011, 07:28:15 PM
My question is: Can anything be done to make this faster? 

No. Sorry to say it, but your hardware is simply inadequate for bitcoin mining. CPU mining is useless with any cpu, even with a 6 core Core i7 its a complete waste of time, never mind with an Atom. I am surprised your videocard supports OpenCL at all, Im guessing its not the onchip GPU but an nVidia ION? Either way, its almost as pointless. Anything other than relatively recent and mid/highend AMD videocards is pointless.

What I would suggest is mining Litecoins with the atom CPU. Litecoin uses an algorithm that does not benefit from OpenCL, so it can only run on cpus, and even with an Atom you will mine some at least. you can trade litecoins for bitcoins. Should make you a few bitcoins per month, rather than a few bitcoins per century Wink.
2025  Other / Off-topic / Re: Fukushima enters "China Syndrome" stage on: December 05, 2011, 09:35:01 AM
Most of these scare stories on hot particles rely on a 30 year old widely discredited paper. For some perspective:


In summary: in very broad terms (within a factor of ~ ± 3) the results of a very large number of animal studies and a growing number of in-vitro studies are in agreement regarding the lack of evidence to support a significant hot particle enhancement factor.  Human evidence is limited but does not support any significant hot particle enhancement.  All of this is in stark contrast to the claims made more than 30 years ago, which fuelled so much concern, that this could be as much as 5 orders of magnitude.

http://www.cerrie.org/committee_papers/Paper_6-02.doc

If you like to read the full report, including data on leukemia as a result of nuclear bomb testing, have a look here:
http://www.cerrie.org/pdfs/cerrie_report_e-book.pdf

Humans have this irrational fear for radiation. I dont want to trivialize what happened in Japan, but the idea that its life threatening to people across the globe is ridiculous. Breathing "5 hot particles" is probably about as dangerous as eating a banana.

2026  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: Persistent USB install on: December 05, 2011, 09:00:45 AM
Did you copy a persistence file to the stick? Also when booting, by default I believe it boots in to a regular, non persistent mode.
2027  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: Persistent USB install on: December 05, 2011, 08:37:45 AM
Persistent means just that; your changes are permanent. However, at least with regular ubuntu live sticks, not everything is persistent. For instance updating your drivers will not. Not sure if that was changed in linuxcoin. But for sure any apps or scripts you put in your home folder will be kept.
2028  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: CGMINER CPU/GPU miner overclock monitor fanspeed in C linux/windows/osx 2.0.8 on: December 05, 2011, 08:24:10 AM
Meh, for the average idiot, what AVG is doing may not be so bad.  If you knowingly installed cgminer, you will probably know its safe, if you dont know what it is, you are likely a victim of a trojan.  That warning AVG gives is actually fairly accurate, its potentially an unwanted program users should be made aware off.
2029  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: BitMinter.com * Now with merged mining! * on: December 05, 2011, 07:32:17 AM
Here is what I do; register at an exchange that trades namecoins, like
https://btc-e.com/

Generate a namecoin deposit address, enter that in your bitminter account settings. That way all your namecoins are transferred to the exchange where you can sell them for bitcoins or USD.
2030  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: New ATI 5850's for $120! 3.3mhash/$ on: December 04, 2011, 05:00:10 PM
sounds like a lot. Im getting 369 @900 Mhz using cgminer.
2031  Other / Off-topic / Re: Fukushima enters "China Syndrome" stage on: December 04, 2011, 03:26:00 PM
Pure scare mongering. Without saying what particles and how big, its utterly meaningless but, 10 "particles" per day of anything is ridiculously small. One could call natural uranium particle a "hot particle" but its abundant in our environment.  UK Health and Safety Executive regulations restrict long-term workplace air concentrations of soluble uranium to 0.2 mg per cubic metre (!). Make an estimate of how big that "hot particle" is and how much you breath in 24hr and do the math. And lets not mention what an average Iraqi (or US soldier in Iraq) inhales every day in the form of depleted uranium dust.
2032  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [70 GH/s PPLNS] BitMinter.com *** Merged Mining! *** on: December 04, 2011, 02:26:20 PM
If the variance in two pools is the same, then switching between them or staying in the same one makes no difference luck-wise. They both offer the same chances for future payouts. The exception is when you can know something about future payouts, as is the case with proportional pools.

Look, I'm sorry, since I use to stand with the underdogs and I like the pool, BUT I made about 9 BTC in november mining on Bitminter, while I am making 0.5 BTC/day on BTCGuild. I have an analogy about chances which may explain why smaller pools seem to underperform more often than not: If you bet on black or red playing roulette, you have a 50%/50% chance to win, but if you bet on a number, you have 1/72 chances, if I remember well, so you might gain more if you are lucky (only at roulette, since poolmining you get the same fraction of winning in bigger and smaller pools), but rarely *if ever*. Most likely, you would end losing most of the time at any given time.

Of course, in the loooooooooong term, smaller pools should perform like the biggest.

And in the short term chances of a small pool doing far better than the big pools are the same as doing worse. How much did you make in september and october? Past month was terrible, but youve already had the bad luck, switching to another pool now cant undo that, it can only consolidate your loss with almost no chance of making up for it.

Anyway, its your call of course.
2033  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [70 GH/s PPLNS] BitMinter.com *** Merged Mining! *** on: December 04, 2011, 01:28:25 PM
If the variance in two pools is the same, then switching between them or staying in the same one makes no difference luck-wise. They both offer the same chances for future payouts. The exception is when you can know something about future payouts, as is the case with proportional pools.

A (theoretical) infinitely large pool has no variance and is almost completely predictable. If you switch to such a pool after a stroke of bad luck at a small pool like ours, you will never make up for the bad luck youve already had. If you stick with the unlucky smaller pool with higher variance, its only a matter of time before the bad luck averages out.
2034  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Noob question about hardware: Why so ATI dominant? on: December 04, 2011, 01:22:17 PM
What on earth makes you think all math is the same or that it is memory bound?
For a start there is quite a fundamental difference between floating point and integer math. The simple truth is that AMD cards have 2-3x more ALUs than nvidia cards and can therefore process 2-3x as many 32 bit integer calculations per clock. Another simple truth is that SHA hashing (and many other similar cryptographic functions) is greatly sped  up by rotate right  register operations. AMD cards have a dedicated 1 cycle hardware function for this, nvidia does not and requires 3 clock cycles for this.

Memory bandwidth or capacity is absolutely a non issue for hashing. Miners clock the memory as low they can to save power consumption and even to speed up mining (!) and bitcoin mining takes like a few megabyte of vram. Anything more is wasted for mining.

Please get a clue.
2035  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Noob question about hardware: Why so ATI dominant? on: December 04, 2011, 09:55:03 AM
Sounds like we have another nvidia fan boy that thinks all bitcoin miners are amd fanboys.

Its really simple, AMD cards have a different architecture that happens to be massively better for bitcoin mining; they have many more but much simpler shaders than nvidia cards (which have fewer, but more complex). For games these different approaches tend to be competitive, for floating point math, nVidia is typically far ahead, but for simple integer math like bitcoin mining, AMD is the obvious choice.
2036  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: CGMINER CPU/GPU miner overclock monitor fanspeed in C linux/windows/osx 2.0.8 on: December 04, 2011, 09:28:28 AM
I have this issue too. If I start some download which consumes 100% of my link, the miners can't reach the pool and, the hashrate slowsdown and, never come up again automatically. So, I need to stop/start cgminer.

Ive had it again today. It does seem related with bittorrent which was running overnight. Now you might expect the cause to be in the router (some routers do not cope well with bittorrent), but also this time, restarting the router didnt solve it. I had to restart all my instances of cgminer.
2037  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: wtf! 5870X2? on: December 03, 2011, 11:48:54 PM
well "dumbass" in that case your post still doesnt make sense since a 5870 comes in both 1 and 2GB versions, and 5870x2 with 2x2GB == 2x 5870 2GB in crossfire.
2038  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [70 GH/s PPLNS] BitMinter.com *** Merged Mining! *** on: December 03, 2011, 12:39:31 PM
Our bad luck forced me to change the pool  Embarrassed. Since the electric costs are very high over here and my gains around (below) zero i had no other choice. It sucks because BitMinter has the best homepage and excellent stale rates compared to other pools.

I know exactly how you feel, and I even pointed one of my machines to another pool for a while. But then I thought it through.. the bad luck already happened. Switching to a bigger pool now just solidifies that bad luck with no chance of reversing it,  as you'll miss out when the luck changes.  It would be smarter to switch to a larger pool after we had a lucky streak.
2039  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: I have 3 5970s on the way; now what? on: December 03, 2011, 10:23:21 AM
As for Antec using a different OEM for a particular product, yes I have considered that and rejected it on the grounds that it is unlikely at best and completely ridiculous at worst.  Antec has/will/does change the model identifier if they change the OEM.  There is always a chance that they would change this policy they have followed in the past, but it is unlikely.

Not sure Im understandig you correctly, but all nearly PSU's are just rebranded OEM products. You can find the oem here:
http://whirlpool.net.au/wiki/psu_manufacturers
2040  Other / Off-topic / Re: Fukushima enters "China Syndrome" stage on: December 03, 2011, 09:06:57 AM
I used to be pro-nuclear, but this is starting to scare the crap out of me.

It scares the crap out of me too. But Im still pro nuclear. Im just not pro building nuclear reactors on earth quake and tsunami prone coasts when the reactor is somehow designed in such a way that a flooding cuts off its electricity supply. I still cant wrap my head around that. As I understand it (but correct me if Im wrong), the only real problem was powering the pumps.  How hard can it be to put some generators in a shelter that can withstand just about anything?
Pages: « 1 ... 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 [102] 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!