The thing burns 6.4W max. That shouldn't be too difficult to dissipate with passive cooling.

It looks like there's an official answer now: click PROFILE, click Account Related Settings, and scan the QR-code. It has BTCT in the code.

I don't think this means what you think it does. If you need to pay for it, it's not friendship. It's acting.

Thanks, she loves it! She's been ill at home for the past few days.

I won't order anything for privacy reasons, and I know I'm not the only one.

Verified!

That's it, thanks
Until the 2024 edition of course

Lol. Nope, you don't qualify to vouch for others:

I don't even want to know how this is made (since I strongly hate AI), but can you get me one with MehMeh (reference link in case this name doesn't ring a bell) on it? She'll love it

I'd tell any 5 year old to ask their parents if they really want to know about Bitcoin.

I'm more thinking of 21,000,001 Bitcoins. By then my account is worthless anyway. Disclaimer: I saw this "offer" from an old account a long time ago, so the idea isn't mine but I forgot who it was.

That's totally allowed, but heavily frowned upon. Almost as much frowning as you get when you buy an account.

Bitcointalk is a community. Account sales and meriting your own post are like cheating the community. It's up to you to choose which path you want to walk.

Can you make this +50 minutes, to account for the increased delay between scraping Coingecko?

Before doing all this for data analysis, have a look at these topics:

That sounds like bypassing the wordfilter:

A bit, but I'm not celebrating yet. I've felt like this a few times before in the past 3 months. More tests later this week.
Thanks

Welcome back. Real life can be unimaginably difficult

I prefer to add Reference links with compelling evidence.

It's allowed (as anything is), but I wouldn't call it correct use of the Trust system as it's not very interesting for others. Use User Notes if you want to keep a diary.

When I tag someone with negative feedback, I want it to be convincing for others. It wouldn't be very Switzerland of me to start tagging people for "maybe".

I'd say: add it when you can. Check my Sent feedback: the few without Reference link either can't have one, or don't need one.

I wouldn't worry about DT too much: just add users with good judgement.

You may like this post:

Thanks again for your flawless timing and lightning fast on-chain confirmation!

In my post
Seriously though, it's up to any potential trade partner to make apply their own judgement of the feedback on an account. I used neutral so it's a warning without harsh consequences. That may change in the future, but I wouldn't be surprised if Ratimov doesn't return.

I'd say: "it depends". User yogg went from +32 / =0 / -0 a year ago to #  +13 / =0 / -43 now. This means the majority of DT removed their positive feedback.
On the other hand, there's this account, where RHavar left positive feedback in 2016, and negative feedback in 2019. This way, it shows a timeline of events and going from trusted to untrusted.

It's more that I don't think the old feedback still applies.

Agreed I love democracy

Neither. There is no such thing as being "overly bullish" when it comes to Bitcoin.