Have you ruled out us being alts?

This is by far the best. Feel free to say something to satoshi

The verifAI™ system can detect when you are using fake pictures, and will act accordingly.

As you can see below, next to my name is the text "Verified as the real Satoshi"


I hope this can finally put to rest the claim by CSW that he invented Bitcoin and/or that he is Satoshi.

I can unequivocally say that I have never met CSW, nor have I worked with him at any time. 

If you want to say anything to Satoshi, you can do so in this thread.

Guess which one is me

Yes, and there will be 4 threads complaining about you, and 2 threads complaining that those threads were deleted/locked.

---

Who should I expect to receive a PM from to get my shipping information?

Naw, lol, Bruno is Phinnaeus Gage aka Gleb Gamow, although Gleb is now owned/controlled by suchmoon because Bruno needed money. He has two accounts that are in the top 10 number of posts.

Unlike CH, he is actually a productive member of the forum.

Where is Bruno? He will probably actually provide a real picture of himself, and will far outtroll theymos in this prank.

Updated my information

I am not a drama generator

Ulbricht's lawyers brought this up in opening statements, and in pre-trial motions (? - IIRC), but didn't provide any evidence to back this up, nor did anyone testify to this effect. I don't particularly believe ownership of SR was ever transferred based on the fact that the SR "cold wallet" (was not *really* cold) was found on his laptop when he was arrested that contained the private keys to addresses used in 2012. There is also the fact that, to my knowledge, SR users were never told to start using new deposit addresses, which could indicate new ownership of the site (among other things).

You are correct that the agents working out of one of the FBI field offices, the Maryland office I believe were corrupt and has stolen from Ulbricht via the moderator account of the moderator of SR that was arrested.

I am having trouble finding it now, however I remember reading an excerpt from Ulbricht's diary acknowledging that he was risking a life sentence by doing the prep work to get SR launched (by growing the mushrooms in a cabin). A life sentence for that would probably be unrealistic.

I think we can agree to disagree on who is to blame on the harmful effects of drug use. However the current laws make both possession and distribution/selling illicit drugs illegal. If you believe the laws on the books are wrong or bad, you should try to get politicians elected who will vote to change the laws, or try to get current politicians to change the laws. I don't think it is okay to 'look the other way' just because you believe a law is bad.

It looks like FJ (or their odds maker) is pretty confident whoever gets the Democrat nomination will beat Trump, giving him only a ~39% chance of winning.

Politico published a piece last week saying that, based on economic models, Trump would win in a landslide if the election was held today, and that Trump would win by a fairly large margin in 2020 if economic growth becomes more mediocre than what it is today.   

Regardless of any loopholes or legal technicalities in the law, the EU is almost certainly not going to enforce the UK being out of the EU until mid April, when they will need to either extend the deadline, or the UK and EU will have come to an agreement regarding the terms of its exit.

With the UK parliament being unable to agree to terms of the UKs exit, I suspect the UK will eventually be kicked out by the EU by way of eventually not extending the deadline for the UK to agree to terms. 

I had asked this person to post here, and to answer the following question:
What are your goals in participating in the forum?

I have noticed this user has created a lot of threads in the Beginners section, and answering many questions. As such despite some concerns, I have decided to give him enough merit for him to rank to Full Member, even though he has nearly enough activity to become a senior member. I would have given enough for you to rank up to a Senior Member, however I don't have that much merit.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5114253.0
See the above thread and post.

You can appeal in this thread. You can post the account that is banned, the reason it was banned, and why you believe you should be unbanned and/or allowed to return under a new account. You may also want to include what benefits you can bring to the forum via your participation.

You can post as much information as you can.

Do you not have another account that is also banned?

I would suggest appealing the ban on your other account, if you think you have a reason for it to be overturned. If your other account was banned a very long time ago, theymos might decide to allow you to return under a new account, depending on the underlying reasons for the original ban.

In the meantime, I would suggest you stop posting in any thread that is not appealing your ban because this is not allowed, and will only make it less likely to be allowed back in the future.

Why don’t you post the entire ban message? What is the ban message on your other account?

In general, to my knowledge, if there is no time frame listed, the ban is permanent.

Lauda, TMAN and yogg still have negative trust against CH. I also don’t see him complaining about marlboroza, but I also don’t read his posts closely.

If the ratings are removed, then theymos is going to be less tolerant of the off topic posts. If CH doesn’t stop the off topic posts after getting the ratings that are being applied improperly, then he will get banned.

None of what you wrote in that post has anything to do with the OP of the thread you posted in.

Who reported a post doesn’t matter because it was a mod that reviewed the post and confirmed it was against the rules. You should expect a post that breaks the rules to eventually get reported.

I don’t report many posts anymore because it has turned into a contest for some people and I don’t like that, but that post is probably something I would report as being off topic.

I will just leave this up here:
Technically speaking he might get banned for derailing threads/off topic posting...

Edit: I think part of the reason he is being given so much leaway is because he is ultimately complaining about the trust system being used inappropriately against himself as he has DT rating that theymos has said are not an appropriate use of the trust system (he didn’t address CHs ratings specifically but in his general comments about trust ratings he did say this).

If the ratings were removed then I think he would have less leeway in derailing threads. If you want the rants to stop, you should remove any inappropriate ratings against him and ask others to do the same.