If the transaction got confirmed - which you can check on a block explorer, e.g. https://live.blockcypher.com/btc/ - then you already received the coins.

In order to spend them, you have 2 options:

1) Either wait for core to sync and access them using armory (if you want to continue using armory) or
2) Export the private key of that address and import it into a lightweight wallet which does not require to have the whole blockchain downloaded (e.g. electrum).

You can export the private keys by going to: wallet properties -> backup wallet -> export key list.

0755 is the octal notation of the permissions.
And the first 0 means that there is no sticky-bit set. If you'd want to set the sticky-bit, you would have to add 1 to the first number,  so 1755(in octal notation only; in decimal, you'd do chmod +t).

Whether a file is a directory, socket, etc.. is seen with ls -l at the first character of the permissions (d, s, ..), but they are not set using the first digit of the octal notation 

Are you sure ? What is the reason for that ?

A hard drive costs around 25$ and basically any CPU would be suitable. You could even use a raspberry pi to run a full node.




Yes, definitely.




What are your limitations ?
Are you going to start a service which sells goods but can't afford a 50$ device to run a full node ?

If you can not run your own node, the only option is to rely on a 3rd party.

You could either query an API provided by a blockchain explorer or query an electrum server.




I guess you mean to provide the master public key to derive multiple addresses ?
In this case, yes. You could go for electrum.

Not as long as you only move personal data (documents, pictures, music, etc.. ).
I hope you don't see executable files as personal data. As long as you don't, you are most probably fine.

Just don't copy your whole hard drive over. And try to not copy any software over (which always is a mess with windows anyway).

I doubt that.

Win7 is missing a ton of security features, which are included into win10.
I mean..sure it is not like winXP, which is an open door for every script kiddie, but it is still far away from being secure (at least the individual computer, not talking about your network since i don't know what your protection there is).




Just a question out of curiosity, does your company do regular penetration testing ?
Whenever i see Win7 computer in a company (working as an IT security consultant), there almost always is a misconfiguration which allows lateral movement. And in a terrifying amount of cases it is possible to get domain admin privileges.

And in case of a malicious cleaner/trainee (which are some test cases in my company), win7 computer mostly won't resist attacks. Once an attacker is inside of a network, win7 computer are the #1 target (besides XP which can be found from time to time too).

The line saying that the hash matches was this one:






Yes.
The line from above says that:





No.
What you have done is:
Downloaded tarball -> verified it.
This means you are now free to safely install it.

If you however use the PPA method, you are adding a private repository to your list of repositories.
Then, if you'd do apt-get install .., you would be downloading the files again from this repository.

In your case, just untar the files and install them. You verified them.

Please note that the PPA method isn't unsafe per se.
But since you already downloaded and verified the tarball, stick with that would be my suggestion.

Ach quatsch 

Ich ignoriere den restlichen Teil eines Posts auch häufig, wenn ich irgendetwas lese was im ersten Moment falsch oder sinnlos wirkt.
Fällt mir dann in der Regel auch erst einen Tag später auf.

Shit happens 

You won't be able to find a private key with an associated balance. That's pointless.

Instead of creating countless threads regarding this topic, do some simple math. You will realize that you wouldn't find a private with some balance even if you'd use all computer on the world within your lifetime.


You are asking extremely basic questions. If you can't google it yourself (which can be found within 5 minutes because you are asking questions which have been answered already multiple times), ask someone to create a script for you.
If you are ready to pay for it, i'll do it. But you won't have any success in finding free bitcoins.

Besides the fact that you whole approach is extremely inefficient, it is a shame that you can't find the information yourself on how to randomly generate private keys and derive the addresses.


I am out. Either pay me for creating such a (useless) script, or do it on your own.

Just click on move topic in the lower left corner of this page.

---

Please always make sure to archive evidence.
I archived the posts of the user where they mentioned their telegram:


Archived post stating the telegram ID.


Archived post stating the telegram ID.


Archived post stating the telegram ID.


Archived post stating the telegram ID.


Archived post stating the telegram ID.



This account has 0 posts. Might be deleted already.
But i believe LoyceV has his posts (if he had one at all) archived.

It might be worthy to expand the "Check URL Before Downloading" part by verification of the signature.
Just verifying the URL is not enough to be secured against all attack vectors.

For example:
DNS-/ARP spoofing.
If your computer is clean and secure, but your network is compromised your DNS request to electrum.org could be resolved to a different IP address.
This would result in visiting a fake-website by entering the original URL.
You would basically download malware from a fake electrum site without noticing it on the first sight.

Verifying the signature is the best way of making sure you are installing the legitimate software you intend to install. And this is a necessary step to be safe.


Additional similar attack vectors exist, which would all be prevented by simply verifying the signature of the file.

Ich kenne leider keine deutsche Literatur zu den ganzen technischen Details. Habe aber auch nie danach gesucht, gibt bestimmt welche.
Aber hier im Forum sollte eig. schon der Großteil gepostet worden sein. Ist halt ein wenig verstreut und man müsste explizit danach suchen.

Aber sonst -> Einfach Thread erstellen und fragen. Antworten kommen bestimmt 

I'd rather not do this. I include single topics into my watchlist where i know i might have to reply later (because of technical issues / questions / to help / etc.) and topics which i am interested in reading.
My watchlist is already large enough 




You are right, i didn't think about that 

Are there any intentions to bring this to other subs too ?

I am explicitly thinking about subs which are for information exchange (Development & Technical Discussion / Technical Support / Beginners & Help).
IMO this would make it way harder to keep track of all (new posts) in a topic where questions might have been asked.

Can we be assured that there are no intentions (yet) to bring that bump button to these boards which highly focus on the exchange of knowledge ?

Basically those two commands posted by TryNinja is all you need to install core.



Did you check whether the hash of the tarball matches the hash in the file AND whether the hash-file is signed correctly ?
Both steps are necessary to ensure you are installing the original file.

If you have any further questions, feel free to ask.

Genau auf diesen Artikel habe ich ja verwiesen, mit der Zusatzinformation, dass es nötig wäre das zu tun um sich sicher zu sein.
Das war in dem Post, den du dann gequotet hast um mir zu sagen, dass ich mit dem "Unsinn" aufhören soll 

No AV will ever find all problems.
In fact they only find a very small subset of malware.




No.




So.. you are too lazy to be sure that your computer is clean ?
Then you'll live with the fact that your PC might be compromised.

Even malware-removing tools won't guarantee you that all malware will be removed.

You have to choose between convenience and security.

If it prints the correct key, but writes the wrong (or nothing) to the file, my solution has been posted.
Just view the code and at least try to understand it. I gave an explanation on how to fix it, together with an example integrated in the code from above.

Nur um das noch ein wenig auszuführen:

Es gibt verschiedene Arten von Transaktionen. Die "klassische" ist die P2PKH (Pay to public key hash). Da ist die Adresse der Hash des public keys.
Daneben gibt es noch P2SH (Pay to script hash), was z.B. für Multi-signature verwendet wird. Da ist der hash (also die Adresse) der Hash des Redeem-script. Also des Scriptes welches die Regeln zum senden der Coins berechtigt.

Insgesamt kann das Thema recht komplex sein, je nachdem wie tief man einsteigen möchte 
Das Grundlegende hat aundroid dir bereits erklärt. Sofern du in der Zukunft gerne näher technische Informationen erhalten möchtest, frag einfach. Hier gibt es genug Member welche ihr Wissen gerne teilen.

All of the personal data and the programs / program data will stay. This includes metamask and all private keys stored by desktop wallets.
Driver issues on the other hand definitely can happen. But after the new drivers have been installed, everything should be working without any flaws again. I don't know what kind of mess windows created on your computer.

The blacklisting does make sense, since microsoft is tying your windows-key to your hardware. I don't know which licence you had, but AFAIK most licence are that you either can install the OS on up to X computer or have it installed simultaneously on X computers at the same time.

But regarding this topic, connecting the hard drive to another computer is definitely fine to gain access to all private keys etc.

But you are encrypting the files on your machine, so you have access to them ? This means trust is involved ?
And if the user is the only one allowed to decrypt the file, why not let him choose a password and use symmetric encryption ?