So Mr. Loaded just wake up?  one would think, eh? |
|
|
|
|
i'm just completely flabbergasted here...
|
|
|
|
|
btcbuy.info offers this amazon service exactly, and others too. used it myself a few times to buy amazon codes, add minutes to my cell phone, that sort.
|
|
|
|
worked fine for me on windows 7, chrome. i didn't watch much of it, but it looks good. i have a hard time sitting down and watching long videos about subjects i know already, that's all. i should send this to my gf... but i doubt she cares nearly as much as i do.  |
|
|
|
Is the double-L silent? How do you pronounce Bitllionaire?
With a tongue twisting pause after Bit. i find myself adding an extra i. bitillionaire. bit-illion... *shrug* |
|
|
|
|
anyone got a cup or something? i think this QC talk has left my brain dripping out my ears.
|
|
|
|
probably something ot aim to have in place before 1.0 is released... and since were closing in on .8... |
|
|
|
|
strange. btccharts.com is still working fine for me.
course i'm ALSO not receiving notification emails from this very forum, so i suspect aliens.
|
|
|
|
|
anyone else having issues? the datafeed stopped something like an hour ago for me and i can't restart it with any success. just closes it's own window... and i'm terribly lazy so i don't want to go in to the command line and run it to see if there's a useful error... *ahem*
|
|
|
|
Unbelievable!
it really does boggle the mind, doesn't it? we all thought we understood this whole bitcoin thing ot one degree or another, but i've yet to see anyone not floored by this action. that would be me. welp, there's me proven wrong. |
|
|
|
Unbelievable!
it really does boggle the mind, doesn't it? we all thought we understood this whole bitcoin thing ot one degree or another, but i've yet to see anyone not floored by this action. |
|
|
|
|
the boxcar/caboose bit - would these be... well, deliverable? like, to land, to convert into a structure?
|
|
|
|
21.22...or not... guess that's your new 17 month high though. |
|
|
|
I'm curious...why does a brand new bitcoin sending address generate for every single transaction? Your wallet must be MASSIVE with all kinds of receiving addresses. Are you doing that for security purposes?
a lot fo different sites that accept bitcoin do that for book keeping purposes. use a different address for everything, then you have an obvious receipt of the transaction, without having to figure out which send to the address it was. |
|
|
|
While the first customers might get ASIC its doubtful later customers will make any profit from them. It will be a race to the bottom imho
Bullshit. With 400W maximum electricity consumption, even those in batch #3+ will pay-off their machines sooner or later. complete agreement. especially if we rig solar or wind such power sources. i'd be shocked if it wasn't a better investment then any interest rate a bank offers. of course, the increasing value of bitcoin is an even BETTER investment, at least the last year or so... 6 months ago it was 5 bucks or so, after all. |
|
|
|
What is that plug? Australian?
i asked i nthe other thread, apparently chinese standard, and aussie too. |
|
|
|
|
that... isn't a standard american 120v plug... if i'm not wrong, it looks like a 240v plug. i wasn't aware avalon's needed such.
|
|
|
|
i say do both. two games. one permanent, one that resets. thus people who want to can knowingly take the big risks, and those who just want a game can have that too.
This would certainly satisfy elux's concern (post above yours). But a warning of sorts on the page would be warranted: The last player to purchase has the potential of not being able to procure a buyer. As a game, the way it's currently set up is not that bad. But, what if this wasn't a game, and structured as a viable endeavor without any losers? That's what I propose here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=139532.0for my btc, i'd go with the actual chance to win something. but i'm sure there's an audience for the other as well. And you don't want the viable endeavor affiliated with the gaming one, not saying that it's a bad thing. hmm. honestly, i don't know. i think i, personally, would be fine with them being associated. but i don't own bitcoingem or anything, so i don't really get a say. |
|
|
|
i say do both. two games. one permanent, one that resets. thus people who want to can knowingly take the big risks, and those who just want a game can have that too.
This would certainly satisfy elux's concern (post above yours). But a warning of sorts on the page would be warranted: The last player to purchase has the potential of not being able to procure a buyer. As a game, the way it's currently set up is not that bad. But, what if this wasn't a game, and structured as a viable endeavor without any losers? That's what I propose here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=139532.0for my btc, i'd go with the actual chance to win something. but i'm sure there's an audience for the other as well. |
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/jgarzikMy wife informs me that a package from China arrived. Will investigate when I return home. #Bitcoin Moment of true I think I'd leave work early for that oh shit! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
