Funny how the solution to a poorly-performing ponzi is to tell 'investors' to buy more of the imaginary hashpower it is selling.

I'm calling bullshit on that claim. That's Josh Garza style of exaggeration.

Where do you get that number from?

This is another quoted post where he has since deleted the content. In it he uses the same, 'why do you think they'd steal your paltry balance when there is so much btc going through the site every day' vapid evasive answer that 'Admin' himself uses in one of his rare posts here.

FYI, for anybody who isn't aware, if you have a few bitcoin addresses and you moved 1btc through them back and forth a few hundred times, they would show as having had several hundred btc's worth of transactions.

So, when you marks send in your btc on the assumption that this scam wouldn't bother stealing it remember that the whole premise of the fraud is to mislead you and showing balances and transaction totals that are so large is part of the con.

Here you go, his very first post which has since been deleted by him, but is nicely quoted for us by another user. That is why people full-quote on this forum, because scumbag shills like to edit their history when it begins to look a little suspicious over a longer period of time.



My guess is that this information about the other address belonging to scrypt.cc might lead further down a rabbit hole he'd rather we didn't explore.

ThorSWO has 188 posts, every single one of them shilling for scrypt.cc in this thread.

I think it is pretty clear that he is involved with the scam.

It's such a fine line between stupid and, uh...

An anonymous criminal is unlikely to give a flying fuck about people on the internet calling him and his scam out for what it is. Certainly not in a, "I'll show them!!1!11!!" dreamland scenario where he suddenly decides to take all the filthy lucre he scalped from you marks and actually build something legit with it, not when he can simply move on to his next scam op and scalp you all some more under a different name.

The general principle I have seen discussed by others who feel the same is that you challenge the member to justify their support for a known scam and, when they can't, if they are not willing to remove their promotional links or posts then it is justifiable to rate them as knowingly supporting fraud.

As far as I'm concerned any member with Hero or Legendary status who is willing to promote these scams should be hit hard with -ve Trust.

jdebunt has offered to write a fucking article for them in that thread.

I'm asking him to retract or at least make it an expose.

Genuine lol, bravo, +1 Internets to you !

@n2004al The way it 'works' is quite simple, you send them money and they don't mine anything because they aren't actually a cloud mining firm.

Me and ThePhwner have an, 'Attack Empire'?! Cool. I did not know that. Hey, ThePhwner, where have you parked the Death Star? I wanna take it for a spin.

I get it, you're pissed that your little essay was dismissed so easily. How about you actually respond to some of the questions raised in the dismissal?

For starters the essay, if you insist on calling it that, asserts there is LITTLE DOUBT that scrypt.cc is mining on the Chinese pool F2Pool, but provides absolutely FUCK ALL reasoning or evidence to support this claim.

Fancy having a go at dreaming up a reason for that bizarre assertion?

^^^ What does that even mean?

I know you struggle to comprehend basic thinking beyond MOAR PROFET!!!1!!!NOMNOMNOM!!1!! but, here's the thing, the point I was making is that the user referred to that article as though it were news when it is merely promotion.

News reporting is supposed to be an unbiased arbiter of information, not an advert for a fucking scam with a referral link to it.

Let's see, you consider it to be a 'news' website?

You *do* know, right, that it is simply referral-link click-bait?

See, this?

Hover over it with your pointer

ROFL, it would appear that the scrypt.cc 'investors' in this thread are in direct competition with the equally-dense XPY Paycoin crowd for who will win in the "It's probably time I accept that the majority of cloud mining sites are scams and withdraw my bitcoin from them" race.

https://paycointalk.org/category/19/cloud-mining

It is simply an example of the gullible being repeatedly milked over and over again until they are out of cash or finally manage to connect the dots and understand why they are 'marks' and not actual 'investors'. All that is needed is for one of the two groups to have an epiphany of reason and to start a run of withdrawals before the other group does. Last one to wise up loses all their funds! Exciting times.


Who will win? The inarticulate fanboys from btc scrypt.cc thread or the Paycoin desperadoes?

:grabs popcorn:

I guess this'll be the era when Homero had convinced Uncle Stu that he was the living embodiment of Bill Gates, Steve Jobs and Mark Zuckerberg all rolled into one tubby waistcoat-wearing goon and that Silicon Valley would be banging down the door to buy a license to use his 'invention'.

I'm getting the feeling that's pretty much how Stu and Josh's financial relationship went, that Garza kept conning him into believing he had the skills to pay the bills and before long he'd own a chunk of something which would be the next billion-dollar internet enterprise.

Poor ol' Stu. Too dumb and too rich.

As has been pointed out previously, though, given the massive resources both financially and influentially that H. Josh Garza could have capitalised on through Stu, to have simply opted for a fractional mining/ponzicoin scam was a wasted opportunity. He could easily have head-hunted himself some brains and employed a team who could have created a genuine cryptocurrency platform in partnership with Cantor and received Wall Street's seal of approval.

It is utterly irrelevant whether they are full Ponzi or fractional-mining Ponzi, it is still a fraudulent operation which has sold at least 500GH/s of Scrypt 'mining' they don't have to 'investors' under the guise of not being a full Ponzi or a fractional-mining Ponzi.

I assume you must be the author of the article seeing as how quickly your recently-created account posted about it, care to elaborate on your last sentence?

There's still no reason given for why it is claimed that the largest Chinese cryptocurrency mining operator in the world (F2Pool, known to mine with their own hardware, btw) is really, according to the claim, simply acting as a pool for a Brazilian mining farm.

Little doubts? That a Brazilian Scrypt mining farm which has sold 500GH of supposed hash power would be mining through a Chinese mining pool which predominantly mines with its own hardware?

How on earth did he come to that bizarre conclusion?


No, it has over 1000 GHs, not 100,000

Except, of course the 60GH figure I quoted for the entire Scrypt altcoin network total, outside of Litecoin, refers to the entire Scrypt altcoin network total, not just that which is mined by 'unknown' miners.

This is what I keep having to repeat, even if the ONLY mining on every single non-LTC altcoin was being done by scrypt.cc it would still not be enough to make the numbers work for their claims.

Yes, we know that you 'tards and 'turds are fed up with us repeatedly making sure that the scrypt.cc scam details are front and center in this thread, but as you and your equally-complaining ilk fail to understand, we don't care that you don't like it and that you'd rather see it buried under flurries of shill and fanboy posts. Your not liking it does not factor into our decision to continue discussing the fraudulent operation that is scrypt.cc and their continued lies about being a cloud mining operation instead of the Ponzi-scheme that they are.