Bitcoin Forum
June 01, 2024, 07:48:46 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 [120] 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 »
2381  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers on: May 24, 2016, 03:05:03 PM


You won't find a project in Crypto that is already finished and big business. All big projects are work in progress and about future potential. Or do you believe Ethereum is already worth it's marketcap for real? Or Factom, my favorite, also not the system yet it will be after the release of the full protocol.

The question is not, if a system is perfect at launch. No project ever was, and Ethereum was pretty scary btw. (and still is in my opinion). The question is, if a team has the ability to realize what is planned - and if they are able to work hard, if they are serious and legit. And of course it's also about the potential business-model.

The thing is: If you analyze all this in LISK, there may be weak points like everywhere. But what I'm totally sure about: The idea has a lot of potential. The team is legit and hard working and growing. And they have a plan.

Just for example: Many believe the marketing is just about the price. But it's not. It's out of the conclusion that a project needs attention, not just because of exchanges and trading, but even more to grow, to attract Devs to develop for LISK. And the combination of a lot of attention and financial incentive (not too cheap prices) is very promising.

If it will work out as planned, and if they are able to avoid mistakes that would be hard to solve, LISK has a lot of potential. In short- and even more in longterm.
2382  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers on: May 24, 2016, 02:16:00 PM
Lisk is risk.

Disclaimer: I hold ETH




I would say, ETH is also not without some risk. Take a look at the ETH-chart. ;-)
2383  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers on: May 24, 2016, 01:09:31 PM
many big coins including Etherium have suffered a hard dump preparing for LSK launch Cheesy.


ETH is even forming a double-top which is never a good sign in a chart. Good timing for LISK.

eth went up because of the dao the dao is coming to a close now so its obvious it will fall back but alot of eth has been locked up so its primed for tasty pump. when i dont know as long as lisk  tops out and il sell then and get into eth for that pump.

I see DAO more as a risk for the ETH price. Everytime DAO invests, it will release ETH or even sell it itself. And it won't be just about the real sell-pressure but also and even more about the psychological dynamic. Why should anybody buy ETH if he knows that there is a multi-million-dollar-proposal? And just btw: If ETH goes down, DAO loses also Marketcap.

If I would hold a lot of ETH I wouldn't see DAO as a good sign but more as a threat.

2384  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers on: May 24, 2016, 12:57:35 PM
many big coins including Etherium have suffered a hard dump preparing for LSK launch Cheesy.


ETH is even forming a double-top which is never a good sign in a chart. Good timing for LISK.
2385  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers on: May 24, 2016, 12:29:24 PM
Ethereum is going down pretty hard. In best case it's anticipation/preparation because of Lisk. 

I actually doubt it is. If it was, BTC would go up.

You don't understand how things work.
We need fresh money from outside habitual cryptomarketcap to come into or we are death

That's untrue. There is a lot of money in crypto. Just Poloniex has a daily volume of $ 15,707,784 (last 24h). Most of it is ETH.

Plus: In the ICO 3908 investors participated. Poloniex has > 100,000 accounts. They don't show it anymore but back in December and January I've made some screenshots. Most likely there are more than 120,000 accounts now.

And my guess is: Many Ethereum holders will also buy Lisk - just to be on both trains and maybe with some confidence that Lisk could repeat the price dynamic of ETH. It's not impossible to see very high future prices.

Under the line there is some room for buy-pressure if it hits Poloniex and I don't know why they would not add it soon, hopefully today.
2386  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers on: May 24, 2016, 11:45:15 AM
Ethereum is going down pretty hard. In best case it's anticipation/preparation because of Lisk. 
2387  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers on: May 24, 2016, 12:14:53 AM
so i have been checking with my buddy who works a polo about lisk, he says 100% they will list it but as of today they still auditing the wallet code as it is buggy thinks it will take them a week to 10 days to throw it up, also says lisk is struggling to decide to delay the launch until polo is ready because he says they got no real exchanges line up just shitty yobit c-ex and blue trade or whatever it is called so don't be surprised if in the last minute a delay is announced at least it will mean a real exchange is ready

Nice try Mr-One-Post.  Cheesy
2388  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers on: May 23, 2016, 02:52:58 PM
Hope bittrex so i could sell all and buy DAO ico(130 millions).
I think 90% of lisk holder will dump to buy DAO.

Maybe i will buy later lisk, but priority is DAO now.

It won't make too much sense to dump Lisk to buy DAO. DAO is very expensive now and will become more expensive every day. The marketcap is very high ($162 Mio) and even if it's a very interesting and innovative idea, it's safe to say: There will be problems. Why? There is a conflict of interest in the concept.

Imagine you have a lot of DAO and most DAO-holders also have a lot of ETH. There is a proposal you believe would be a good decision, but you know: If you a majority would vote for it, DAO will invest and that means: sell. DAO will sell ETH or will give ETH to a project to invest in it. That means it will lose Marketcap until there is a return. ETH will most likely also go down because ppl will anticipate sell pressure if a proposal goes through. How many will vote for a longterm-decision that still involves a lot of risk and take the loss in short-term because DAO needs to sell?
 
And why should DAO be worth more on the exchange than the money it has? Because they will make a lot of money?

Let's say they start with $180 Mio and DAO invests in a project, like slock.it or whatever. And let's say DAO invests $10 Mio. How much time will it take to make profit? And will there be profit? And even if, will it be that much profit to justify prices above a current marketcap?

The question in DAO is: Who will definitely benefit? Those who will get money from DAO. That's safe. Nothing else is safe.

Plus: Why should I give my money to an "institution" in which a majority will decide - or those with the biggest voting power? I like it more to make my own research, my own analysis and my own decisions. I don't trust a majority and I don't trust groups with a lot of power. And like I said above: The majority will always have to face a conflict of interest between short-term-loss and possible long-term-profit - which will always involve the risk that there won't be any profit but a loss.

Conclusion: In my opinion DAO is very interesting and will be interesting to watch. There will be much to learn out of it. But out of investor-perspective... I don't understand why so many believe it's a good buy.

I agree it makes no sense to get into the DAO right now (at least via selling LISK). But I'm not sure your conflict of interest holds water.
And let me state I am interested in both the DAO and LISK (and a few other ICO's) and I look forward to LISK having its own DAO as well.

If there is a proposal for a DAO investment that is accepted, why would: 1 - they invest in a project with a far out return that can hurt them? (They would have to manage this.) 2 - they invest in a project that is just going to cash out the ETH? (Look at ETH and BTC both, many of those with lots of "tokens" used those tokens by investing in other companies and those "tokens" were often passed on as such, not necessarily cashed in. This is money after all.
I think you are looking at this from one perspective. You did not take into consideration that the voters of the DAO will HAVE TO consider the points you brought up and if they do and still vote on it, it will have to be for a good reason.  

You describe something like an ideal scenario in which I don't believe. The majority won't even vote for or against a proposal, just hoping for higher prices on the exchange. And the majority of those who will vote will mostly follow the marketing of the leaders. It's very likely that a group will have a lot of power and a lot of influence and make decisions out of own interest. That's totally normal and we see it every where. DAO won't be different but it will involve some more risks.

Quote
I really think it is a weak argument to primarily look at the first of its kind type of thing in the DAO, purely from a one sided perspective as you did. I'm not saying your arguments have no truth to them as they do, but you only presented that one side and it is clear to anyone who understands this tech, that you just focused on that one side and that distorts the argument of course, as you present it as the data set and not a part of a larger one.
You say "who understands this tech" but I don't speak about the tech. I see the tech as another risk, but I mainly focus on the "social-experiment-part". And some dynamics are predictable.



Quote
The DAO's value can be worth more than the money it has in it for a variety of reasons. The most obvious would be something along the lines of a PE ratio, which is forward looking. The DAO (or a DAO on LISK too) allows people to crowdfund in an incredible flexible way, removing the normal borders. Another reason would be one of a lack of regulation due to the before mentioned reason (And I would imagine this can of course be a negative as well.)
Under the line DAO needs to make money. And if that works out, the price will also rise above the real marketcap because ppl would begin to anticipate success. Nothing else will be real.


Quote
Nothing here is safe, huge chance but we are talking another Black Swan type thing here. We know not what it can do and all that it can disrupt.
Black Swans are unexpected events and therefore not predictable. Conflicts in DAO are predictable. It's not safe to predict if DAO will become successful or not, but the conflict in interest is obvious. DAO will have impact on ETH and the ETH-price is the main-factor for the value of DAO. It's even possible that it will be all good with DAO's decisions but problems in Ethereum and a falling ETH-price would lower the DAO-value. It's also possible that everything is good with Ethereum and DAO will invest in a very good project but the selling of DAO/ETH will have impact on the price, maybe just out of psychological reasons (anticipation of selling). Remember the Bitcoin-price after the Ethereum-ICO. Everytime they just moved some Bitcoins the price went down. And the DAO-marketcap is 5 times or even more above the ETH-ICO-value (I believe Ethereum made about $30 Mio in the ICO, but not sure if correct).


Quote
Re. Plus - Invest in what you like, but don't make your personal opinions one of reason for the rest. Crowds generally decide much better than individuals do. You can see this trend across many spaces and I'm not exactly sure why but it is there. But that is your reason right there. Another one would be -  If you are not an institutional investor (i.e. rich) you can't invest in many things. Economic discrimination, I mean protection. lol
Like everybody else I just write my own opinion. I don't say that anybody else should make decisions based on my arguments. One of my opinions is btw: I don't believe that Crowds generally decide much better than individuals. Especially in Crypto we often saw the opposite.


Quote
 
I agree with your conclusion though.  Grin
Many ways lead to rome! Grin
2389  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers on: May 23, 2016, 01:55:32 PM
Hope bittrex so i could sell all and buy DAO ico(130 millions).
I think 90% of lisk holder will dump to buy DAO.

Maybe i will buy later lisk, but priority is DAO now.
Plus: Why should I give my money to an "institution" in which a majority will decide - or those with the biggest voting power? I like it more to make my own research, my own analysis and my own decisions. I don't trust a majority and I don't trust groups with a lot of power.
While I agree with a lot of what you said, it is conceivable that the DAO will have opportunities to invest in projects that you as an individual do not - people may go direct to the DAO to raise money rather than on bitcointalk, for example.

If this becomes a trend then you may have no choice but to have some funds in the DAO in order to access certain opportunities.  

Yes, right. DAO will be able to invest in projects I couldn't do alone. But I wouldn't buy DAO now because of this possibility. I would only buy it if I believe that there is a proposal that could work out in Longterm.

But the problem is more: DAO has a huge marketcap. The marketcap is also the money DAO will "work" with, try to make more. And if we just think about quantities for now:

If they should start with about $180 Mio...

1. If DAO invests a lot of money, let's say $50 Mio in the first 6 months....

...it's not safe that there will be profit, but it's safe that it will give away this money and lose marketcap. It's also safe that there will be sell-pressure on ETH. It's also safe that people will anticipate that sell-pressure. That means: It would also lose marketcap because of a decreasing ETH-price. And how long will it take to make profit out of $50 Mio? Why should the price of the DAO-token rise in such a scenario?


(btw.: DAO is a great risk for ETH itself on the market!)


2. If DAO invests only little amounts, let's say about $5 Mio in the first 6 months.....

...it's also not safe that there will be profit, but even if, it wouldn't add much to the marketcap and I don't know why that should lead to higher prices of the token.


What we know is: Crypto-Investors are not patient. The majority doesn't make much research and analysis but makes impulsive bets and aims for short-term-profits. A couple of months is already "long-term" in Crypto. And DAO will give away money for a long time and there will be a lot of uncertainty if there will be any return or even profit.

And what I believe is most likely: A lot of proposals will be blocked, won't even reach the minimum of participation. But, if I should see that DAO will invest in a project I really believe in, it will be enough time to invest in it... but not before there is a decision and not right after. It will be about longterm and in the meantime I don't see much reason to believe that the price will stay up or even rise.
2390  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers on: May 23, 2016, 01:29:34 PM
Hope bittrex so i could sell all and buy DAO ico(130 millions).
I think 90% of lisk holder will dump to buy DAO.

Maybe i will buy later lisk, but priority is DAO now.

It won't make too much sense to dump Lisk to buy DAO. DAO is very expensive now and will become more expensive every day. The marketcap is very high ($162 Mio) and even if it's a very interesting and innovative idea, it's safe to say: There will be problems. Why? There is a conflict of interest in the concept.

Imagine you have a lot of DAO and most DAO-holders also have a lot of ETH. There is a proposal you believe would be a good decision, but you know: If you a majority would vote for it, DAO will invest and that means: sell. DAO will sell ETH or will give ETH to a project to invest in it. That means it will lose Marketcap until there is a return. ETH will most likely also go down because ppl will anticipate sell pressure if a proposal goes through. How many will vote for a longterm-decision that still involves a lot of risk and take the loss in short-term because DAO needs to sell?
 
And why should DAO be worth more on the exchange than the money it has? Because they will make a lot of money?

Let's say they start with $180 Mio and DAO invests in a project, like slock.it or whatever. And let's say DAO invests $10 Mio. How much time will it take to make profit? And will there be profit? And even if, will it be that much profit to justify prices above a current marketcap?

The question in DAO is: Who will definitely benefit? Those who will get money from DAO. That's safe. Nothing else is safe.

Plus: Why should I give my money to an "institution" in which a majority will decide - or those with the biggest voting power? I like it more to make my own research, my own analysis and my own decisions. I don't trust a majority and I don't trust groups with a lot of power. And like I said above: The majority will always have to face a conflict of interest between short-term-loss and possible long-term-profit - which will always involve the risk that there won't be any profit but a loss.

Conclusion: In my opinion DAO is very interesting and will be interesting to watch. There will be much to learn out of it. But out of investor-perspective... I don't understand why so many believe it's a good buy.
2391  Local / Announcements (Deutsch) / Re: [ANN][LISK] Lisk | ICO | Dezentrale Anwendungen & Sidechain Plattform on: May 21, 2016, 02:15:05 PM

Here are the statements Max made. I will keep updating this post while the meeting continues.

Lisk Community Meeting Summary

Our agenda is looking the following:

In the beginning we will tell you where we stand at the moment. That means we will talk a bit about:

- Testing
- Network Stability
- Current Team

From there on we progress to the work we are doing at this moment. Our current work consists of:

- Launch Date
- All necessary tasks until launch
- Marketing

Finally, we will talk a bit about future development. What you can expect of Lisk in the future.

- A few hints about our Long Term Roadmap
- Apps in Development
- Development Plan
- Core Apps

After that is done, we will transition to a traditional AMA. So you can ask all kind of questions to us. 🙂

Testing

As you know we pushed out many versions in the last few weeks within the 0.2.x branch. Many of you had problems with the fork 3 issue. With every version we released the issue got smaller. With 0.2.3 we are finally at a state at which we can launch Lisk. Before the launch we will release another Lisk client with the number 0.2.4 in order to finalise the client for launch.

We want to thank everyone who participated during the tests and if you have any specific question about it, feel free to ask us in the AMA part later in the meeting.

Network Stability

This is an extremely important part of a cryptocurrency. It needs to run 24/7. With the latest update we finally got to a point at which we can say that our network is stable enough to be released. It's not perfect yet, but we did *a lot* during the past month alone. So you can expect *major* advancements in the coming months as well. Later on I will tell you a few things about our development plan, the network stability will be an important first part of it.

The next update 0.2.4 will contribute a lot more to network stability. It will be the final version we release at launch as 0.3.0.

Network Stability -> Stress testing

In terms of network stability I also want to point out that we successfully stress tested the network. We included a lot of transactions into the blocks, which are currently artificially limited to 25 transactions per block. The network survived. 🙂 So after we enhanced and optimised our code more, we can also increase the maximum transaction limit.

Transactions per block

This is important in order to be more secure from attacks. The more transactions a block can contain, the more expensive an attack becomes. In terms of transaction load of the network with 25tx/block, we are already at a point at which we could support a lot more users than there are right now. 🙂

Developers

As you know we recently hired @fixcrypt and @isabella. They are a huge help for us and are contributing greatly. We are very happy that we took this step before launch. Now that the launch is coming closer every minute, I want to make clear that we will begin to scout new developers shortly after launch. For that purpose we created an extra page on our website: https://lisk.io/careers

This is our current status on development progress, network stability, testing, and hiring. We have added a lot to Lisk since we began our journey early January. We have come a long way, but this is just the beginning.

Thanks to our extremely active community there are issues raised on GitHub every day. Please note an issue is not a fatal bug, but often just an enhancement or a glitch. These issues which often were quite important, and the problems with the "fork 3" error we had in the past weeks forced us to neglect the pre-launch roadmap a little bit.

I assure you that we didn't forget it. We will finish it up as soon as possible after launch. We did a lot more than stated on the pre-launch roadmap. As the changelogs are showing.

For example a feature which was not mentioned in the pre-launch roadmap is the complete back end switch to a new database engine. This allows us to scale past our previous limitations. If you want you can ask a few questions about the switch later. 🙂

This concludes the current status. Let me get to the current work and preparations for launch.

As you know, we will finally launch on May 24th! We are EXTREMELY happy about it. We are excited to see Lisk running in the wild, evolving into the next big thing in the technology world.

This date is final, we are putting all our efforts into that date. However, please note that this is still software development. While the day is 100% secure, we can't announce a specific time yet. We may be able to do it closer to launch (e.g. 23rd), but I can't give you one at this moment.

We are aware that a launch time is necessary. We will try our best to give you one. We just can't announce it today. We try our best to announce it on 23rd.

Now let's talk about what we need to do until launch:

1. We need to compile a list with all public keys, Lisk addresses and the LSK amount they receive. This will be the foundation of the genesis block.

2. Then we need to generate the genesis block in which every ICO exchange is listed in with the public key and the LSK amount they receive. This genesis block will be released shortly before launch, probably on 23rd. So that everyone can check if they are included correctly.

Please note that all non-validated accounts will be summarised in one single account. This way we can be 100% sure that everyone had his passphrase at least at one point of time (because he validated it). It's necessary so we can't be at fault at this point and people will lawyer up against us.

3. Our development team also needs to finalise the work on the final client Lisk v0.2.4. There are no major changes (in terms of core code) anymore, this way we can stay 100% sure that everything will work at launch.

4. Once we have the final v0.2.4/v0.3.0 client, Oliver will have to provide all the different binaries and docker version for it. We will have to add them to our download page on Lisk.io, do a cross-reading of all resources we have. (FAQ, Website, BTT Thread etc.) This way we will have a uniform web presence with up-to-date information.

5. We will also release several blog posts up to launch. The most important one for you being the guide on how to use the Lisk passphrase to access your LSK.

Many people asked for such a guide and we planned it all along. So stay tuned, it should appear at the latest by Monday on our blog.

Additionally, there is a lot more to do. A lot of small things which adds up to a huge work amount. We don't need to go into detail here. Above's are probably the main points of interest for you. 🙂

Marketing

The last point of the current work agenda point is *Marketing*. We are moving mountains to let everyone be aware of Lisk at launch.

With over 1600 users in the chat alone, and about the same unique visitors on our website today. I think we are succeeding. 🙂

We bought ads on CoinTelegraph and today I will buy some on CoinMarketCap as well. A dear Lisk supporter also bought advertisements on Reddit, I don't know who it is. However I want to thank him for that. 👍

I tried Facebook ads a lot with many different angles in the past. It doesn't work. It's money wasting. 🙂 Facebook ads are only good for bigger marketing budgets (what we have in the future) to create awareness in the subconsciousness.

PR work

We are working together with Transform.PR to get major media coverage. We have worked on a simple, but effective strategy for launch and post-launch.

1. Mainstream outlets for credibility. (I had several interviews with *big*, industry standard news outlets.)
2. Cryptocurrency outlets for publicity and momentum. (Also here I had several interviews with news outlets.) This industry is moving faster. So a lot will come next week here. We have very known friends, who will help us in that regard. 😉
3. Tech/Dev/IoT outlets will be taken care off after launch. They will bring blockchain apps and usability to Lisk.

Additionally to Transform.PR we also hired BitcoinPRBuzz to get us a lot of smaller coverages on several Bitcoin and Blockchain related news sites. E.g. criptonoticias, Bitcoinist, and so on. We paid them for 7 press releases, which will be constantly released every few days. So that there is always buzz around Lisk for the first 2-3 weeks after launch.

This is just an effort to keep Lisk in the media. 🙂 Transform.PR will bring us the big news, while BitcoinPRBuzz will bring us constant smaller news.

Ok guys, now to the last point of my agenda. To summarise it again:

- A few sentences about our Long Term Roadmap
- Apps in Development
- Development Plan
- Core Apps

A few sentences about our long term roadmap

I talked a lot with Oliver about our vision and where we want to go. We have a pretty clear vision in our head, which is not yet formulated on paper. We will release a vision paper a few weeks after launch.

One big feature in our head is that the network will also provide the necessary infrastructure for the blockchain applications. That means we probably will have some kind of a "Delegate Marketplace" in which every delegate can insert his node information and his price. And then the app developers can rent the delegate nodes on the market, to secure their sidechain and applicaiton. This way we can have thousands of delegates on the network, which will have a task. Due to the renting, they can earn money and a constant need of LSK is needed.

More about that and other important features in the vision paper in a few weeks. 🙂

Apps in development

I know of a few community members who are developing blockchain applications right now. I read and heard about online shops, decentralized trust platforms, games, gambling apps, and more. I don't want to announce anything for these users. It will probably also take some time after launch. I just want to let you know that there is app development going on. It will just take a few weeks or maybe even months to get to a point, at which our network has a handful of great applications with real use-cases.

The development of blockchain apps isn't hard, but it's something entirely new. That's why it takes some time to mature.

Development Plan

We will release the Lisk core client as a beta version at launch, and the Lisk app platform as an alpha version. The Lisk core client can be seen as stable at this point of time, however we didn't have much time to fix some issues occurring on the sidechains. These will be fixed and taken care off. But the Lisk app platform will remain a prototyping platform for apps until we get into a beta version for the Lisk app platform.

It won't be dramatically long. So don't worry. 🙂 We just want to make some necessary changes to the sidechains, which will allow us to be more flexible in the future.

One thing is to make it more modular, so that the consensus algorithm can be swapped out. E.g. if someone wants normal PoS or PoW, he can get it. Or if he wants to have a 1min block time, he should only change 1 parameter. For this we need to change some things. 🙂

You can expect that during the first 3 months after release we will put the biggest focus on security, scalability, and optimisation of the whole Lisk ecosystem.

Obviously we will also finish up the pre-launch items and work on other things, but as written above we want to get the perfect foundation to build on in the coming years.

After that we will start to work on new features, core apps, and so on. More details later.

Core ~D~Apps
They are still a thing, yes. The blog post need to be changed to our latest terminology changes though. 😛

Once we feel the sidechains are stable enough to build very reliable applications with, we will work on the core apps.

Quick explanation: Core apps are features built on top of Lisk with our App SDK. They can be created pretty fast, without wasting costly space on our main blockchain.

Core Apps in our focus at this moment are: Messaging, identity (username, name, email, and more), a karma system, and an app rating/commenting system.

Okay guys, you did it. I'm finished! Cheesy

Lisk Community Q&A

I tried to get every question and answer, but there were a lot. If you really want all the information, head to the chat (channel: general) and read everything from 14:21 05/21/2016.

Q: what will our fee structure be for launch? dapp registration, delegate registration, etc?
A: We had the following numbers until now:

Delegate registration: 50
Dapp registration: 100

But! We feel that this may be too high now again, because of the huge success. Therefore we will reduce these numbers once again for launch. Maybe by half.

Q: Is there some news about OKcoin, poloniex or other exchanges?
A: I can't make any statements regarding exchanges. Unfortunately, today you won't get any information about that. Please wait for launch and the exchanges announcements. 🙂

Q: there will be a security standard for all delegate mainnet nodes (ddos protection, ssl,..)?
A: @liskfaucets: Sorry for the late answer. So it's impossible to declare such a standard in a decentralized environment (if we are not talking about protocol standards). We can't do anything, it's not really possible to check from the outside if the nodes are following known security practices.

Q: on the technical side, one thing I see as critical is having a trusted and verified DB snapshot available and updated on a daily basis. Is this in the works?
A: Yes, we are working on that. One reason 0.2.0 / 0.2.1 forked was the corrupt database snapshots. @isabella is working on a solution how we can prevent it. So yes, work-in-progress. For launch we heavily suggest to sync from 0 all the time. It will be very fast in the beginning anyway.

@redsn0w: Yes, in the beginning. That's why Isabella is working on the issue and solves it. I think a few weeks after launch it will be solved.

Q: The prices wont be auto-adjusted somewhow? Adjusting manually will be very inneficient i think.
A: Auto adjusting needs a reference point.

Q: i know right now DAO is a super trendy topic, but is there a DAO in Lisk's future?
A: @LSK In the future there will be something like a DAO very likely. 😉

Q: after start we will have PoS stage ? we must have only online wallets for in and coins on it ?
A: We will start with 101 genesis delegates and then the community can upvote their's and they will slowly replace ours. First week no delegate rewards.

Q: Any updates on IPFS?
A: @BlueStone: I will speak with IPFS in June in Berlin. Before that we will take a look at their white paper. After the meeting we can declare if it is in an usable state or not.

Q: @max: will it be possible to create apps (i.e. messaging) which are 100% free to use without the need to purchase any kind of lisk and/or tokens?
A: @haggis: Yes, this is possible. However the app dev needs to take care of that. (By setting the fee to 0, or implement another system) Be cautious of spam!

Q: @max: will it be a "live" launch or you will do genesis, and announce when network is up and running?
A: @vega: We will do the genesis, forge the first blocks. Check if everything is working correctly. Then announce it once it's stable. Maybe an hour after the first block created.

Q: @max Will you announce bounties for developers? I think that setting $1m aside for bounties would be a huge incentive for hundreds if not thousands of devs to flock to Lisk
A: @someonsomeone: Yes, we will announce bounties for developers. In the beginning these bounties will mainly consists of important features for the sidechains. E.g. a PoS/PoW consensus algorithm, integrating the EVM into it to execute Solidity smart contracts, or allow Bitcoin transactions within a sidechain. After some time we will then go to more "main stream" bounties, like "Create such an app and get XXXXX LSK".
 Nieuwe berichten Ga naar recente berichten

Q: For when a desktop wallet? It will be possible?
A: @jcmartinez: At launch there will be a desktop version for technical users. I hope we can quickly launch an 1-click full client then. Maybe a few weeks after launch. Non-technical users can use https://login.lisk.io to access their LSK at launch.

Q: @max will you release an overview of the budget? How much goes to developers/bounties/advertising/etc?
A: @liskfaucets: Starting with the launch, we will release monthly transparency reports. They will include how much we paid for the different sections like marketing development and so on.
@liskfaucets: Ok, I misunderstood the question. We may give a very rough estimation for every area. Maybe in the vision paper.
 Nieuwe berichten Ga naar recente berichten

Q: how many weight of the genesis delegates will have?
A: @redsn0w: No it isn't. We can offer a maximum of 15% to them. I think this won't be enough to keep them long in the top 101.

there is no way to control vote weight after mainnet launch. but there won't be any rewards until block 60,480

Q: @max: what do you expect, when can we catch ETH ? in what period of time ?
A: @lux-1: ETH has an enormous momentum going on for now. On the one hand it's good for us, because we are being pulled up by them as well. On the other hand it becomes harder to catch up to them.

I think once we took care of a few code related things, e.g. the delegate marketplace, we will have a much more refined version for normal users. So the potential will definitely be there in like 1 year. Please note, in my predictions I'm usually too generous with time frames. 😛

Q: @max: what do you expect, what will be the price on launch day?
A: @lux-1: I don't talk about the price. 🙂

Q: @max: The plan is for Lisk to find and recruit new developers for the Team?
It seems that hiring a SoftwareHouse would be a faster and more reliable way of doing it. Is this beeing considered?
A: @hmachado: I had some interviews with software houses. It doesn't make sense for us. We want people who burn for Lisk, who love Lisk. Lisk should become a family. We don't want to simply hire some 3rd party devs. Additionally, it's a lot more expensive.

Q: what about an internal exchange @max ? could it be possible? Blockchain app to trade (buy and sell lisk) directly on Lisk or also to lend lisk
A: @redsn0w: An internal exchange as a blockchain application would be very cool. At least BTC<->LSK. I think someone will definitely do it in the future. For this every sidechain node would have a Bitcoin SPV installed, I don't see a reason against that.

Q: @max: will there also be a part time position for open position "Designer - Full Time"
A: @jasmine: Yes and no. We just named it full-time. But it's actually not that much work. However the requirements for our designer are extremely high, I'm quite pedantic if it comes to design.

Q: @max ETH is on a roll but they still aren't anywhere near unreachable because at the moment it is just hype without much actual apps doing anything... That is why I think that Lisk should put a priority on getting some top shelf apps up and running
A: @someonsomeone: I agree. That's why we are polishing our sidechains ASAP, then beginn massive efforts for app development.

Seems like people don't have a lot of questions. Mainly speculation and trading. 😛 I hope this is a sign that our information politics are good.

2392  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] FACTOM - Introducing Honesty to Record-Keeping on: May 15, 2016, 10:30:35 AM
Haha, as u say, that s a lot of IFs in one post.

Yes, but there are always a lot of (and even more) if's everywhere.

And more important: The conclusion stays (nearly) the same, that I will stay in Factom.
2393  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] FACTOM - Introducing Honesty to Record-Keeping on: May 14, 2016, 08:38:00 PM
Just a comment on price :

Bitcoin is in a cooling phase now for at least the next 3-4 weeks. Probably staying in the 440-460 range for up to the next month.
There is an opportunity for alt coin prices to take advantage of this window.

You may see Factom rise in this time frame Smiley
As well as some other alts.


I dont think we ll see any major movement in the next month or so of any coin. After that, halving starts to kick in. BTC goes up for sure, the rest, well, we ll see.

most alts did lower in price already as preparation of what will come

i expect in fact a glorious rise of alts after bitcoin halving

and i expect the halving to have much less impact than people belive

that BTC did recover from like 250 to 500$ will be the halving effect

it could spike up to 800 but it wont stay there

500-600$ is what i expect BTC price 2 months after halving

and the guys who shift their BTC towards alts at the halving spike will smile a lot



+1 This is close to what I think will happen. No major BTC growth but still growth. Alts will probably also get lots of attention.

Could be right, but I believe that Bitcoin is very hard to predict. That's why I think more in scenarios and a lot of "if's". Safe is: The Bitcoin-price will play a role for Factom and the whole market. And my guess is, that we will see a rising BTC-price because miners need it after the halving. If it wouldn't rise the result most likely will be more centralization out of economical reasons. That's why I expect a natural price-rise and if that shouldn't happen: manipulation. Not just out of short-term-profit-intentions but like I've said: I believe it will need a higher price.
  


The scenarios for Bitcoin are in my opinion:

1. It could theoretically even go down. It's unlikely but always possible and some problems (Blocksize-debate for example) are not solved yet. And while there might be no objective reason to dump Bitcoins, something like the "Mike-Hearn-Affair" is always possible. Or if Mr. Wright should find his keys and move some early coins, the market might panic... ;-) (but yes, not very likely).

2. It could stay where it is for some time, little up and little downs. It's possible for some weeks maybe, but I believe it's very unlikely over the next months. A stable BTC-price would be my favorite scenario because it would give Factom and others time and room to grow (first), but the halving is not even 2 months ahead: http://www.bitcoinblockhalf.com  

3. It could steadily increase over months. But I'm not sure if that is likely or not. I more believe that the combination of a stable rising Bitcoin-price plus the halving in mind would lead into a hype.

4. Hype: The price could explode like it did in late 2013. And that's what I believe will happen. Not sure when and how high it can go but even new ATH's are possible. I believe even 5000 Dollar are possible. Right before the bubble in 2013 there was the Silk-Road-Crash and the ATH was 13 times above just 2 months later.


I expected scenario 4 earlier to be honest. I expected it already last year and then I believed it would happen earlier this year etc. Maybe it won't happen but I believe it's more a question of "when" than a question of "if". And of course, nobody knows if it "just" doubles or if we will see a new ATH. And it could be that it doesn't happen at all, but it would need bad news.


But, currently I'm nearly all in Factom. And I know that some maybe would ask why I stay in Factom if I believe Bitcoin will shoot up? The reason is: The longer it lasts until the BTC-price goes up, the higher the chances that we could see a rising Factom-price before.

If I should be wrong with what I believe about the BTC-price and it should stay where it is or even go down, Factom has more potential and could be also the safer place to be. Factom is also better if there should be really bad problems with Bitcoin. I don't expect that and in such a scenario projects like Ethereum would benefit more than Factom, but Factom is flexible enough not to be totally dependent on Bitcoin.

If Bitcoin should start a pump soon while Factom still needs some time, the price for FCT's would go down first. That's safe in my opinion. But: With a delay more and more BTC would flow into other projects. And especially because Factom has natural relations to Bitcoin, it would benefit a lot, more than Ethereum which would most likely suffer.



So, my very simple conclusion is:

1) If it's all good with Factom, if there won't be good news but also no bad news, quiet times won't hurt. If it should go down a little bit because Bitcoin goes up, it's just a question of time that Factom would follow - especially if there will be good news in the future and I see no reason why not.

2) If the Factom-team should announce something big before Bitcoin goes up, Factom would establish at a higher price. Maybe even hype before Bitcoin (if that should happen). That's my favorite scenario... first Factom then Bitcoin and then Factom again. ;-)  

3) If Bitcoin should go up and the Factom team would have good news during a hyping Bitcoin, Factom would benefit from the high attention of a hyping BTC-price.

4) If there would be bad news for Factom, and I mean something really bad, a rising Bitcoin-price would make it even worse - at least in short-term and a stable BTC-price wouldn't help much.


The interesting thing is: Bitcoin will have much effect on the Factom-price, in all scenarios. But just in short-term while the most important aspect will always be Factom itself - also in all possible scenarios. That's the reason why there are not much scenarios in which I would sell much Factoids. Just... if the market should drive it up to highs I wouldn't see as rational and if I would expect a hyping Bitcoin soon. Then I would sell, but with the intention to buy with more Bitcoin-value into Factom again at a cheaper FCT-price.

Plus: In Factom it's always possible that they come around the corner with something big. Some may complain about quiet times and a delayed release of M2, but I don't expect that they will announce an announcement. I expect that they will just release it without any "warning" before. That could be a risk for those who sell now or tomorrow or next week. In best case they would release M2 and come up with some great business-news (a great partnership) soon after.

It's also possible that there will be something like a worst-case-scenario somewhere in the future. But that's possible everywhere in Crypto and in (nearly) all investments. So, my basic-conclusion is: Without bad news or at least bad signs I see no reason to sell. And no matter what Bitcoin will do, before all it's a question of time.


And if we would compare different Bitcoin-price-scenarios in relation to ETH... While Factom will benefit of all scenarios, except bad news for Factom itself, Ethereum will benefit most likely just out of one scenario: A falling Bitcoin-price and even more if there are fundamental problems with Bitcoin. But if the Bitcoin-price should go up and solutions for the limited blocksize should be found, Ethereum could come into trouble while Factom would benefit.

2394  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] FACTOM - Introducing Honesty to Record-Keeping on: May 13, 2016, 03:41:34 PM
This is all very nice and dandy but there s still only one question on the table. M2?

I think you should just sell your Factom as you obviously no longer believe in the project.

It s not that I do not believe in the project. All my other project I m involved with, I get to have a daily or at least weekly communication with the DEV team. With Factom team, it s once a month, maybe, if they feel like it. This makes me feel they care more about end users then Factoid holders which s also acceptable from business point of view.

However, this is not ACCEPTABLE from my point of view. Still, no point in polluting the thread with this argument, I understand I am not relevant for Factom at all so let s drop it.

crazyivan has a valid point, the interests of Factoid speculative holders is different to Factoid users now, so there is some conflict of interests here. I am a speculator too as I bought in the ico before everything was known, like everyone else, and I don't see myself using factoids anytime soon for their intended purpose. I want Factoids to moon so I make some returns, but the dev team probably don't care about that. Factoid users probaby want stable price.


There is no conflict of interest because between Investors in Factoids and User of Factom. User don't need to care about the price of Factoids. For them it's always about the price of Entry Credits which are fixed: $0.001 They don't even need to know about the existence of Factoids. They can buy EC's with Dollar - Credit-Card etc.

If there is a conflict, than it's about short- and longterm-investors. Short-term-speculation needs news, as much attention as possible, "hype" and "soon". For them it's about the communication of a team. Often enough they buy the announcement of an announcement to sell into the real release (buy the rumor, sell the news). Longterm-Investors want to see the real value increase: The use of the system. So, the system is priority. Second: Business side... partnerships. 

And kind of funny but also kind of weird is how Crypto changed/changes the feeling of time. A month is a year, so there should be something to celebrate at least once a month (exchange-christmas). I know that feeling. But for those who do all the work, a month is still a month.



Good post! I didn't realise entry credits had a fixed price, and I agree that crypto time is accelerated to ridiculous extremes now where days feel like months in other industries. I consider myself a long term speculator, so I'm holding factoids for at least 1-2 years. I suppose anyone who doesn't day trade is thinking something similar now, hold until crypto is mainstream, then sell a % for a life changing return


My strategy is nearly always the same: I buy into a project that I see as promising and then I watch the development over time. And that's never boring, because I highly focus on "context". Every piece of information, even if it doesn't seem to be directly relevant for a specific project, can be helpful to get a bigger picture, which is needed to evaluate correctly what is relevant. And over time it all together becomes clearer. In some projects I believe to see more negative than positive signs and I sell. In some it's the other way around and I buy more.

In Factom I bought nearly to all prices. Most of my FCT's in the first three months after launch, but I also bought in early January and I bought the last weeks after the "pump-n-dump" in march.

I still believe that a lot of ppl come to wrong conclusions about Factom because they try to understand and evaluate it out of a wrong context. But Crypto has already changed and Factom is one of the projects that are different, not just the system but also the team. Exactly that is good and not bad.
 
2395  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] FACTOM - Introducing Honesty to Record-Keeping on: May 13, 2016, 01:06:19 AM
This is all very nice and dandy but there s still only one question on the table. M2?

I think you should just sell your Factom as you obviously no longer believe in the project.

It s not that I do not believe in the project. All my other project I m involved with, I get to have a daily or at least weekly communication with the DEV team. With Factom team, it s once a month, maybe, if they feel like it. This makes me feel they care more about end users then Factoid holders which s also acceptable from business point of view.

However, this is not ACCEPTABLE from my point of view. Still, no point in polluting the thread with this argument, I understand I am not relevant for Factom at all so let s drop it.

crazyivan has a valid point, the interests of Factoid speculative holders is different to Factoid users now, so there is some conflict of interests here. I am a speculator too as I bought in the ico before everything was known, like everyone else, and I don't see myself using factoids anytime soon for their intended purpose. I want Factoids to moon so I make some returns, but the dev team probably don't care about that. Factoid users probaby want stable price.


There is no conflict of interest because between Investors in Factoids and User of Factom. User don't need to care about the price of Factoids. For them it's always about the price of Entry Credits which are fixed: $0.001 They don't even need to know about the existence of Factoids. They can buy EC's with Dollar - Credit-Card etc.

If there is a conflict, than it's about short- and longterm-investors. Short-term-speculation needs news, as much attention as possible, "hype" and "soon". For them it's about the communication of a team. Often enough they buy the announcement of an announcement to sell into the real release (buy the rumor, sell the news). Longterm-Investors want to see the real value increase: The use of the system. So, the system is priority. Second: Business side... partnerships. 

And kind of funny but also kind of weird is how Crypto changed/changes the feeling of time. A month is a year, so there should be something to celebrate at least once a month (exchange-christmas). I know that feeling. But for those who do all the work, a month is still a month.

2396  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] NeuCoin - Easy to use, free to try, focused on micropayments - Official on: May 12, 2016, 01:49:21 PM
i havent logged into bitcointalk in months...found better things to do with my time
but just checking in...cant believe this thread is alive still lol... not surprised
neucoin is dwindling away to nothing...supporters are still hoping.  hilarious!




It's like the thread about Paycoin - still alive while Paycoin itself is dead. ;-)
2397  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] FACTOM - Introducing Honesty to Record-Keeping on: May 12, 2016, 09:35:05 AM
Usage chart was updated with two new user application entries, Synapse and Aliyun. Looks like just a few test entries so far

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1RUZLxxoAfT3C5jIJ144DLYdztYe_sqrKqbTlZuD05-s/edit#gid=445871101

Wow, that are good news! It's presumably just testing at the moment, but definitely promising.


Not sure if it's about those two companies, but if, it would be great:

http://www.thesynapses.com/home

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yun_OS (....also called Aliyun OS)
2398  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] FACTOM - Introducing Honesty to Record-Keeping on: May 09, 2016, 05:20:57 PM
The falling FCT-price has nothing to do with Factom. It's because of the rising Bitcoin-price.
2399  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] FACTOM - Introducing Honesty to Record-Keeping on: May 08, 2016, 07:34:11 PM
To tell u the truth, that s my feeling exactly, that the team does not give a shit about Factom community. They needed us during the fund gathering phase but now final consumers are what they care about.

Yes, I d gladly sell now but the demand s so weak I dont want to crash the price and lose money. So I have to find another way.


You are funny. Everybody who bought into the ICO is more than just safe in the profit zone. Calculate it! Some weeks ago I was critical about the wallet because it didn't work for me and some others but now it's all fine. To say they don't give a shit is simply not true. They just don't do babysitting.  


The last update was this:



Our latest binaries v0.3.7.0 have been released, read more about it on our blog:

https://www.factom.com/factom-technical-update-binaries-v0-3-7/

That's 10 days ago.

What do you expect? That they post their diaries?

And, don't take it personal, but it seems as if you want them to work, so you can be happy about a rising price, while you didn't do your homework very well. Just look above, your theory about the price. I understand that Factom can be confusing for those who are new to it, but those who are invested since some time should know that stuff.

And do they work? Today is Sunday, but obviously yes:

factomd
Milestone2 work
Updated 20 minutes ago
https://github.com/FactomProject/

What do I expect? I expect them to follow fucking deadlines. The deadline for M2 was Q1, that was 35 days ago. All we ve got since then is "just around the corner". The only reason why I ve got into Factom is cause the team sold me the story about honesty, hard work, innovations and dedication. For now, I see only empty promises and that stuff I ve seen with almost any other coin including Josh Homero Garza and his Paycoin. So pls, spare me just around the corner stuff and let me know when we re going to see M2.

Nothing personal but compared to Ether and the amount of work and project produced by their team, Factom s kindergarten. And yes, I am a competitive person, I like to see my own team wins.


I can't let you know when M2 will be released because I don't know it. I'm not from Factom. I believe they can't predict that safely themselves. They do testing and they won't release it until it's totally stable. And everybody should want exactly that: That they do it as perfect as it can be. Factom is already used (or tested, not sure) by some bigger companies. They can't rush things out because some would like to see a pump in price or because of comparisons with Ethereum.

Btw: Ethereum was announced 1 year before Factom! At the same time Factom is most likely earlier at a stage that it really can (and will) be used.


And to say you would just see empty promises like it was known from Mr. Garza and XPY. Sorry, but that is a 12 on a Ignorance-scale from 1-10.  
Factom is the total opposite to those kind of projects. And they already have delivered a lot. I don't know of any project with that much progress on all fronts. They are constantly working on the tech, they are constantly working on the business-side and I don't see any reason to complain about the price.

And just btw: Last year, after Factom got my attention because they hit Polo, there were also some complaining. The price even went down below ICO-price and the volume was below 5 Bitcoin for a lot of days. I bought at any price, because I figured one thing: Factom never got the attention out of the crypto-community it deserved. The ICO can hardly be called successful. But exactly that was and is a big opportunity. Why? Because the ICO was also the decision about total supply and marketcap. It was totally undervalued.

How is the market-situation now? On a higher level but the same regarding the principle. The total supply was traded multiple times at the current price range (subtract the last pump which had nothing to do with development, just hyping/manipulation). The rising Bitcoin-price is pressure on all others but it's not safe that Bitcoin won't come under pressure itself. Some big ICO-projects (like Lisk) could cash out. The Blocksize-problem is still not solved. Maybe another Satoshi will confuse us all... That's why I stay in Factom. And I believe: It won't need much and it will shoot up. Maybe this month, maybe next month, maybe in October. I'm happy if it's stable where it is. The rest is patience.


And: If the Bitcoin-price should explode because of the halving, ETH will come under pressure. ETH could come under pressure because of the DAO-ICO as well. The Factoid-price also would suffer because of that and already did. But: Differently to Ethereum a rising Bitcoin would be free PR for Factom, because Factom is seen as connected to Bitcoin while Ethereum is seen as a competitor while it's not really a competitor to Factom. Think about that.

But, just to say that as well: I don't write all this to avoid that you sell. If somebody would like to dump his FCT's it wouldn't change one bit, just the distribution.

2400  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] FACTOM - Introducing Honesty to Record-Keeping on: May 08, 2016, 05:52:04 PM
To tell u the truth, that s my feeling exactly, that the team does not give a shit about Factom community. They needed us during the fund gathering phase but now final consumers are what they care about.

Yes, I d gladly sell now but the demand s so weak I dont want to crash the price and lose money. So I have to find another way.


You are funny. Everybody who bought into the ICO is more than just safe in the profit zone. Calculate it! Some weeks ago I was critical about the wallet because it didn't work for me and some others but now it's all fine. To say they don't give a shit is simply not true. They just don't do babysitting.  


The last update was this:



Our latest binaries v0.3.7.0 have been released, read more about it on our blog:

https://www.factom.com/factom-technical-update-binaries-v0-3-7/

That's 10 days ago.

What do you expect? That they post their diaries?

And, don't take it personal, but it seems as if you want them to work, so you can be happy about a rising price, while you didn't do your homework very well. Just look above, your theory about the price. I understand that Factom can be confusing for those who are new to it, but those who are invested since some time should know that stuff.

And do they work? Today is Sunday, but obviously yes:

factomd
Milestone2 work
Updated 20 minutes ago
https://github.com/FactomProject/
Pages: « 1 ... 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 [120] 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!