It should be okay now. Could you try it again? - you can use any of your mail-accounts.

I've copied your question into the slack and will post answer once I have it.

A little bit paradox to speak of "real news" and that others would provide it 5 times a week. ;-)

And which project delivers more real news? For example: Ethereum-news of the last months were about hacks and hardfork and a lot of DDOS-attacks.

Through their App (IOS or Android): https://www.lykke.com

They'll just remain in treasury. But there will be another ICO in some months:

"(...) 6–8 months, when we expect to have our second ICO (we hope at a higher price)."
https://medium.com/@pullnews/crowdfunding-the-future-exchange-16cffe9b53bb#.271500ib2

It's a massive market with huge problems. Just google "mortgage + fraud" or " + scandal" or "mortgage crisis" etc. It could even be called a "natural market" for a system like Factom.


The Mortgage Fraud Scandal Is The Biggest In Human History
http://www.businessinsider.com/mortgage-fraud-scandal-2010-10?IR=T




And what we're speaking about here is "big data":

Mortgage Market & Big Data Analytics

About this Viewpoint

The financial crisis and the prevailing economic downturn have put the mortgage market in turmoil in the recent past. The malfunctions of the market can be attributed to multiple factors. Most important ones are recklessness and lack of scientific intelligence about market behavior and upcoming trends. More importantly, an unconnected approach to decision making has often led to the downfall of the system resulting in bankruptcy of various enterprises. Analyzing available data to gain insights that help in decision making is the call of the era. While the availability of data is not often a challenge, the right usage of data has often faced road blocks in terms of limitations of systems, lack of processing power, slowness of processing and/or a lack of application of scientific analytics to business. This paper aims to analyze some of the possibilities that have emerged due to path breaking technology and combination of business and scientific analysis. This paper will look at better decision making capabilities and business opportunities that could emerge through the use of Big Data analytics in the mortgage sector.

(...)
http://www.tcs.com/sitecollectiondocuments/white-papers/bfs-whitepaper-big-data-mortgage-market-0313-1.pdf



"Ever since the first lending automation systems hit the market in the 1980s, mortgage technology budgets have steadily expanded. Today, mortgage lenders spend more on technology than ever before. It’s therefore ironic that with all the money allocated for loan origination platforms and ancillary systems, little if any budget is directed toward data integrity. It would be easy to classify this as a shortcoming on the part of each individual company, but when cases of substandard data are evenly spread throughout a given industry, clearly something else is at play.

Those of us who have spent more than a few years in this industry can understand how this syndrome developed. For decades, mortgage firms have been focused on near term profits and seizing market share wherever possible to survive. This short term focus has eclipsed the ability of most to do effective long range strategic planning. The resulting negative effects on data quality are incontrovertible. Many lenders across the country now have bloated databases full of loan files that are incomplete, lack consistency, or both.

(...) "
https://motivitysolutions.com/data-integrity-and-mbi/

Btw: What I consider more and more is the possibility that M2 is not late because it's hard to develop. It surely is not easy, but I believe it's possible that they already do a lot business-stuff. DHS for example and now they hire mortgage-experts. I wouldn't be surprised if they have much more in the pipeline than "just" the next milestone.

Nice!

Factom really seems to target the mortgage-industry which isn't surprising but obviously they see reasons to accelerate.

Lykke is not just registered in Switzerland, also in the UK. And Richard Olsen is not the only one from Switzerland and not the only one who is not from Russia. But either way I'm not sure why you believe the word scam is appropriate.
 

Scammers?

And btw: The team is pretty much international if you would like to educate yourself: https://lykke.com/leadership.php

Richard Olsen (CEO) for example is from Switzerland.

But to answer your question: A web-based terminal is under development.

 

You are just not informed. They answered all questions that were ask several times and they've said that launch will be next week and that there will be a wallet in place etc. It's all good.

They will have a wallet in place when they launch. Just click on the post-history of the CEO and the official account. No need to worry.

They've said next week. Here and on Twitter - without exact date yet as far as I know.

Yes. He worked for mastercoin and that was no scam. It's omni now. But of course there also were projects that failed. I'm not too informed about all that because I never cared about mastercoin.

But it's often that some people mix up intentionally fraud (scam) and fail - and failed projects are usual in a new market. This market is in best case about innovations, about trying things out, about trial and error. And we, as Investors need to know that to act self-responsible. There is never a guarantee for anything. Who wants to be safe shouldn't invest - but maybe also not keep his money in the traditional system which could (I would say: should) be considered as intentionally fraud. ;-)

Btw: I don't know of any good project without scam-accusations. In Factom it's rare in comparison.

It's the typical Crypto-blame-game. Who is new to crypto can't be trusted because he is new. Who was involved in other projects that didn't work out perfectly is a "scammer". And David Johnston didn't do anything else than promo for some other projects as far as I know. He is no Dev. To call him a scammer would be the same to say Poloniex is a scam exchange because they've listed projects that failed.

But, to add this: The Dev's said in the telegram-chat that an orderbook is coming soon and Sergey Ivliev also showed a screenshot.


********
I know I repeat myself, but for all who are new to this - and to those who are not new but didn't listen to my super-smart-advices yet ;-)


Core-Team-Members often give additional infos when they have time and answer questions directly. Even Richard Olsen is online from time to time.

I really have no doubt that it's true. In general investing is always a risk and we are in a "high-risk-market", but in comparison to other projects, I'm convinced that Lykke is one of a very few pearls. Since I'm in Crypto (2013) I looked into a lot of projects and I personally focus very much on the teams behind because in my opinion it needs it all:

1. A great idea
2. Skilled people who are able to develop and deliver
3. Skills on the business-side
4. In best case connections
5. Honesty

And Nr 5 could also be Point 1, because nothing is worth anything if a team is dishonest and just in the game to make money on the back of their investors and the market. In Crypto are a lot of projects that are no clear scams but at the same time shady and some could even be called "long-term-scams".

Lykke is really different and much better than everything I've seen so far, because everybody already can see proof for all those points. I don't know of any project that already has delivered so much before going into the public. And what they really care about, more than other Crypto-projects is "consumer-friendliness" - it is already visible that they focus very much on useful design and easy-to-use-aspects to lower all possible barriers that could avoid wider usage. Additionally: Security.

And in my opinion that are two points that are still missing in Crypto which is a problem for wider adoption in general (Bitcoin included).

When it comes to the business-side and connections: Especially because of their founder/CEO, Richard Olsen, it's more than just potential. I mean, he is co-founder and former CEO of oanda and like a combination of "market-scientist" and businessman and also idealist and he is very respected since decades - he as a person is already a bridge between the worlds (Crypto - established system).


I even believe that this could go viral. Reason is especially the combination of:

1. userfriendly
2. security

Plus: Constantly increasing demand in general.

And what is underrated even in Crypto is the potential of digital assets as colored coins. Most Crypto-Investors focus on Cryptocurrencies or other tokens like ETH-Gas etc. But the "real economy" will focus on solutions to trade real value they can issue easily as colored coins.

So far I can't see any weaknesses...

They didn't give an exact date yet (as far as I know) but said "next week":