You are clearly not reading my response well.. Nothing is wrong with professional testers. It seems, you are neither a professional nor a tester. I never claimed to have 50 BTC. You are conjuring up this number. If anything, nobody is taking you seriously. I will now stop feeding the trolls.
Criticism is welcome, but please don't make that your only goal.
Thank you. Happy cracking.
Ok, you don't have 50BTC, but you should provide some proof that there are any funds as a reward for this challenge you are offering. Claiming that you have private keys from some address means nothing. No one is trolling you here, they are just pointing out the shortcomings in your offer. It would be even better if you leave certain funds in escrow so that the potential tester hacker knows that in case of success, there is a guaranteed reward |
|
|
|
But unfortunately on the above topic I do not find a scam attempt or a scam has been performed yet. There are many people who offer such service and they possibly get clients too. If the service is mutually fine between him and his clients then there are no flag to create or support.
I don't see elements of fraud here either. He even claims that he has no intention of charging for his method. I do not plan to sell anything here, its simply a recommendation. I dont want your money, I want you to win.
If you found my information helpful you can donate to something I like, not more, not less.
However, I advertise for all crypto casinos since 2017 and I earned 6 figures on each of the big ones.
@Stakefast six-figure earnings from each of them is through advertising or using your gambling method? Also, what do you think about sharing your strategy with this member, who otherwise has a lot of backend experience in casinos? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5482508.0 |
|
|
|
I want to again draw your attention that each service in its own way assesses this aspect, on different services unfortunately this date is different, someone takes into account that we previously worked and was rebranded, someone else does not, someone else just considers that this is the first mention on the Internet, not taking into account that the business could only work offline, there is no manipulation!
If everything is fine, I don't see any reason for you to state everything clearly, this is how you left others to speculate about your past. Now you expect us to take everything at your word, and you have only just activated here. I saw earlier some companies that did rebranding, but it was more cosmetic, small changes in the visual appearance. In most cases, companies that do a complete rebranding, change of name, site, or business registration do so to distance themselves from a previously bad reputation. It would be much more fair if you were transparent. |
|
|
|
Is the SSL working for you? it shows insecure to me.
Yes, I also have a no-certificate alert. If you decide to ignore the warning, there are pages behind it that look like they were designed in the '95. index page, which contains a frame with an index1 page... It seems that some kids found a very old tutorial, on how to make the first website.  |
|
|
|
We are talking about the effects of the mixer ban on the forum, they mainly look at signatures, paid posts and whether someone has written more or less before. But what about the actual effect of the mixer ban and reduced discussions about mixers? Here is an example https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5491818.0 One guy registered to report a potential scam from a well-known mixer here. A few days ago, information appeared about a problem with this service, so the question arose as to why this user did not do research first. But where should he do research? on a forum where the presence of mixers is prohibited? Just a couple of months earlier, there would have been much clearer warnings. Of course, Bitcointalk cannot cover all cases, but it has certainly lost part of its importance as a relevant source of information, due to the exclusion of the mixer. |
|
|
|
Evo nove kampanje, [OPEN] HugeWin.com - Trusted Casino | Sig Campaign | Up to $80/W➥ No minimum quota/maximum 20 posts ➥ Posts after 23:59 UTC Sunday will be counted towards the following week. H/L/Sr ' More 1000 merits: $4/Post
H/L/Sr Member: $3/Post
Full Member: $2/post
Nije najplacenija, ali svakako zvuci mnogo bolje od lordovih kampanja. Pri tom menadzer najavljuje da je dugotrajna i da ima dovoljno mesta u njoj. Ne znam ni da li neko odavde uopste nema kampanju (osim Joca97) a hteo bi. Friends, we have long-term plans and a lot of open slots!  |
|
|
|
I have now provided the hash and the self signed certificate in the original post for your reference.
First, you need to prove that there are some coins behind everything. Why would someone spend time proving anything to you, when you have, for example, only 0.001BTC in your wallet? Proof that at least 50 Bitcoins are there will stimulate anyone to try the hack. Also, who even considers this serious and worth any effort? https://blot3d-36601.portmap.host:36601/ |
|
|
|
Updated signature and avatar. |
|
|
|
|
46 - examplens
54 - examplens
|
|
|
|
OP, @YoMixScam, it would be very useful if you could confirm what you stated here. icopress has already suggested that you somehow publish a letter of guarantee to be sure that your claims are correct. If you don't want it to be public, you can do it through private correspondence with one of the verified members here, whose words we don't doubt. If you're going to use a service, shouldn't you do a little research and make sure there are or haven't been any issues before sending money? If there are, then use another service right?
The thread containing the mentioned post has been viewed 1540 times since its opening. icopress's post was seen much fewer times. So the news went almost unnoticed by a large number of members. The information was transferred to the altcoinstalks forum in a thread that has been viewed 3300 times so far. Also, a very small number of different people saw such info. Even with research, it is quite possible that he would not have come across this discussion. I see this problem of lack of information partly in theymos' decision to ban mixers and open discussions about them. Without the mixer ban on Bitcointalk, I'm sure everyone would have been warned much earlier in a much more transparent way. I'm wondering how you were able to send about 30,000-40,000 USD to a site that I had never dealt with before or had the necessary trust? It's weird !!!
It happens. Until just a few months ago, Yomix was very present here and considered a stable service. I have used it myself a couple of times. |
|
|
|
Btw the date recorded on the website page is in UTC+8 but i can adjust it on forum's timezone.
It is definitely better to be synchronized with the time zone of the forum. note: I'm glad that you finally presented your tools here. Or maybe you did earlier, but I didn't see it. |
|
|
|
What's the purpose for this? I don't think there's not a lot of people that are using faucets in crypto anymore, they're discontent with how little the amount that faucets give and the value.
There may not be a lot of people using the faucet, but there are still some. I claim that faucets are useful, especially for all those new to the crypto industry, who will learn more about bitcoin transactions, addresses, fees... Also, the faucet script itself does not have to serve exclusively to bring direct profit, it is often used, for example, as a way for the website to have regular visitors. More traffic on the website brings some other benefits. Nulled is just another term for cracked/pirated digital goods. And surely you know it's illegal to sell such stuff.
Nulled crap always ends up causing more problems than the script itself costs |
|
|
|
From 18 to 39!
theymos reshuffled DT and made a mess  It would be really useful if the banned members were automatically excluded from the possibility of being selected for DT. Banned accounts should be prevented from having any influence on the forum. btw. Another collectable user, with a lot of positive tags, who screwed things up. Those lads would have to be more moderate and careful there. |
|
|
|
Thanks all. I wanted to give crypto a try and I got scammed. No never again.
What happened to you has nothing to do with crypto. You have been deceived, just as if you bought rotten bananas. It is obvious that you don't have enough knowledge about the whole thing, forex trading, and you certainly don't know much about crypto. $250 it's not a lot of money if you learn some lessons from it. So, for example, you will not go tomorrow to buy a screwdriver and decide to be an aircraft mechanic, because you saw somewhere that they make good money. |
|
|
|
Also, your site claims that you've been operating since 2017 and you here is saying that you've been working since 2018. You might want to be more consistent about your details as it reflects your way of doing business.
They have passed verification and analysis on Bestchange, so I'm convinced that they couldn't lie to them for the years of existence. The official information on their page on the Bestchange website says that they are 3 years and 6 months old. So completely different from everything that is mentioned in this thread. In this case, for now, I trust Bestchange, although it is quite unclear to me what this manipulation is about   |
|
|
|
That sounds more like declaration of War on Bitcoin 😲
At the very least this is a significant market manipulation attempt and as far as I can tell this would be the first time the US regime is selling seized coins on a centralized exchange instead of auctioning them off-the-market.
The only question remaining is: are they starting to feel threatened by Bitcoin?
However if affects the market, it will certainly recover. What is good, it is better to happen as soon as possible and to remain without the possibility of manipulation. How accurate are these data? According to Arkham Intelligence, the US Government account holds much more, 212.862K BTC or $14.42B  https://platform.arkhamintelligence.com/explorer/entity/usg |
|
|
|
As far as I know, they(Blackjack.fun) deduct transaction fees from your withdrawal amount using standard Bitcoin transactions If you use Bitcoin as a payment method. Bitcoin may not be the most economical option. You should explore other cryptocurrencies for more cost-effective withdrawals. They support 70+ cryptos.
Earlier I suggested that they implement a swap between currencies, which could be one of the solutions so that users can choose a coin for withdrawal with the lowest fee. I'm not sure how technically feasible it is at Blackjack.fun casino, but I've seen it at other casinos. @blackjack.fun, what do you think about it and is there any possibility to implement some kind of swap between different coins?
These days I wanted to withdraw Bitcoin, but the withdrawal fee was too high for me (around $7-$8), although at that moment the network was not under congestion. You certainly already have other coins implemented, which otherwise have negligible transaction fees.
However, I am a little curious how you determine the withdrawal fee since it is 3-5x higher than it is usually at that moment on the network.
|
|
|
|
Perhaps some of the merit source are inactive or not as active as they used to and that could be another argument for adding another set of merit source to replace those inactive ones.
Merit sources going afk happen all the time. For example one of the Croatian merit sources left forum last September and hasn't been back since. I think I read somewhere that theymos recently replaced one of the inactive merit sources with a enw one but can't remember (or find) who exactly was replaced The increase in the number of merit sources may be conditioned by the previous results. Perhaps a more detailed analysis would give a clearer picture of how the merits are distributed and the possible effects of that. I assume that this statement is not just made up, maybe it is time to tone down the drama surrounding the new merit sources. At the moment, theymos is not considering anyone for the role of m'sources (I believe this will be the case for at least the next 6 months).
|
|
|
|
Hello eXch mod - please refer to this post. I’ve had $211,000 of my funds stolen yesterday and the scammers sent it to your exchange
I'm sorry for your loss. Unfortunately, this is over and no one, not even Exch, can help you. Immediately after the first confirmation, the purchased coins were sent. User funds are not kept for a long time on this exchange, and everything is automated, so the chances it will freeze any transactions are zero. Hm good timing ... or maybe bad dunno, but I have a question about freezing/frozen crypto because of this (eXch being used as exchange in FixedFloat breach according to beincrypto). Even if untrue it piqued my interest in regards to frozen crypto. 1. (to anyone): How does freezing crypto even work? 2. (to anyone): How effective is it? 3. (to eXch): Did you suffer any loss, because of crypto freezing? You are asking the question in the wrong place. There is no coin freeze on Exch. 4. (to eXch): Is there any special treatment in place if it comes to your attention that fraudulently gained crypto goes through eXch? They find out about it only after the exchange is complete, like the one in the @matrixconnor case. Unfortunately, by then it is already too late to do anything. Everyone should take care of their money, they should not expect that someone else will do it for them. |
|
|
|
Usually I don't store funds for exchange, but those funds are there for daily trading. Still, they allow trades but disable withdrawals.
Did I understand correctly, the funds you are talking about were sent directly from Tornado source to Binance? I know of earlier cases where Binance requested verification for funds deposited directly from the mixer, while it was not the case for mixer -> wallet -> Binance. It is the same starting address where the funds came from. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
