The cheapest offer that I'm seeing from the 6 ^[+1] verified copy owners on the @BittBurger's website is 250K ^{[roughly 5.85BTC]} and apparently, you can contact that owner through the same website: TheTimes03Jan2009.com

An in-depth tutorial for those who are thinking of releasing an original series ^{[e.g. requirements, pros and cons of certain routes, etc...]}.

A Bitcoin or crypto-related puzzle of some sort with a bunch of rewards.
^{e.g. main focus should be the history of collectible items.}

Is this also part of the outgoing transactions ^{[apart from the network fees]} or it's just limited to incoming ones?

If your platform is the one with the ".io" domain extension, then based on your privacy policy and TOS pages, the latter part isn't true!

Considering that network fees are constantly changing, I don't think it's a good idea to have static minimum deposit and withdrawal amounts.
^{e.g. when there's a huge backlog, it might lead to a user paying a ridiculous amount of fees to transfer an insignificant amount!}

Indeed, it is ^{[a blockclock mini alternative for the price of a blockclock micro is an absolute steal]} and we can save almost €100 more ^{[minus shipping]} if we go with the DIY route.
^{- Nice catch}

Hello Jon, welcome to the community

• Based on its DIY approach, I understand why it isn't graded, but can you post a video showing the reflections from different angles ^{[just interested in seeing the quality of the finished product]}?
  ^{- It seems the V1.0 sample coin on your website has some room for more polishing.}

---

In case you didn't move this thread to the "Service Announcements" board and you still haven't figured it out, the move topic button is in the bottom left corner of the page.
^{- It belongs to the "Collectibles" board.}

Hangga't maari, gumamit ng mga disposable/throwaway email addresses pag mag sasign up sa mga bagong websites ^{[e.g. testing purposes]}.

Matagal na silang hindi itinuturing as a reputable HW provider sa community natin.

@MrStork

• Quote
  Probably you will be wondering how we prevent of blocking/restriction, anything related to not get seized?!
  Well, that's our job, that's our talent, you don't have to be worry about that... We do that part perfectly.
  If you can't even provide a short/simple "valid" answer to the above question, it only means one thing ^{[there's nothing special about your method]}!
  
  
• Quote
  In another words, your coins comes from legal exchange users, so that means, clean coins (no red flag, no gov tracker, no aml flag, nothing).
  For the most part, you're right, but considering that most of the central exchanges are using various types of AML bots, sooner or later there'll be false positive results ^{[unfortunately]}!
  

Apart from the North American region, the closest thing to a local reseller is a couple of retailers in the European ^[bitshopper] and African ^[bitmart] regions.
^{Note: I prefer not to vouch (DYOR)!}

Didn't you also read the posts of the previous two users you were responding to? They mentioned you were online at that time ^{[proof is literally in the first half of the thread]} and you even had the time to leave retaliatory feedback after the creation of this thread!

• The only good thing about your excuse was making me notice the inactive flag of OP on your account ^{[not sure why OP didn't mention he/she created one]}: Contractual violation flag

This is the dedicated "repository" for the x1 model, but it isn't fully open-source yet ^{[they're planning to release different parts of it in stages (not sure when)]}.

It appears that for some reason, your edited post didn't save properly

You have a point but in addition to what other users have already said, isn't weird that he/she specifically chose 42.022BTC as the minimum withdrawal amount while he/she created that so-called portfolio? Why it wasn't 42BTC exactly?

What happened::
While I was scrolling through the topics on the Lending board earlier, I noticed a user was asking for a 0.02BTC no collateral loan to withdraw his/her 41.90BTC on a newly created platform ^{[less than a month]} that doesn't allow adjusting the minimum withdrawal amount after the creation of their portfolio ^{[the whole story is obviously fake]}!

Scammers Profile Link:
xMillonx

Reference Link:
Need a 0.02 BTC 1 DAY LOAN ^[archived]
Gokoins.com <sup>[screenshot - I couldn't archive it properly due to its currency selection pop-up]
- Creation Date: 2023-12-14</sup>

• Other fake websites with the same template/theme:
  
  • Foretrademiningllc.cloud
  • Coinloaf.net

Additional Notes:
Tagged and "created a flag".

I'm a bit confused why there's a big difference between the amount on the subject field ^[7k] of this thread and the one in the other thread ^[2.167BTC], but I think your best bet would be "Geyser.fund".

It's worth noting that you can get the job done with two dental chairs ^{[one for the general dentist and the other one for the pedodontist]}!

With good time management, you only need one ^{[If I were you, I'd go with more sets of instruments, as opposed to the second autoclave]}.

Most dentists don't have the luxury of having a panoramic X-ray machine in their clinics since it costs a lot, so just get a good intraoral X-ray machine!
^{- If PA isn't enough, just ask them to get an OPG in one of the imaging/radiology centers instead.}

If you're using the latest firmware, it's worth noting that recently, they introduced the "Checksum Verification feature" for the "microSD card route", so before you start using your hardware wallet, make sure everything matches.
^{Note: There are two sha256 hashes [a) Firmware b) File].}

Be careful what you wish for ^{[having more support for other blockchains also means having a larger attack surface]}!

Almost 5 months have passed since I first spotted "Spiral/Blyss not working" and considering that their "dedicated Twitter account" no longer exists, it's safe to say we'll probably not see any improvements in its functionality.
^{- I think we've given enough time for it to come back, so it deserves to be delisted. How about you guys?}

Indeed, it's quite interesting to know the person behind those amazing books was once an active user of this forum, and based on one of his last posts, it appears that the reason behind his gradual disappearance was how this forum was constructed:

• Quote from: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=393735.msg4490316#msg4490316
  Yes, I have an account here, though I find the forum structure cumbersome and have not written here in a long time. Thank you for the support and kind words!

---

Our best bet would probably be Epochtalk ^{[if there'll ever be one]}

That's the norm when there's more at stake.

@bitcoinwarriorAU
Vod is right... Until you can find a way that doesn't allow users to abuse those ratings, none of the ratings left by others should be trusted!

---

On the FAQ page, you mentioned "not to worry about leaking our privacy", but considering that your platform uses Google services in connection with limited sign-in options from certain websites, I don't think it's possible to completely remain under the radar ^{[I hope I'm wrong]}.

I'm looking forward na makita ang araw na majority ng mga mining pools finilter out nila ang mga ordinal inscription transactions para mapilitang lumipat sa ibang network ang mga ganitong users ^{[sa ngayon, ang Ocean mining pool lang ang gumagawa nito]}.

Ginagamit ko ang dalawang wallet na ito dahil sa mga sumusunod na bagay at feature:

- Open-source at may reproducible builds.
- Bitcoin support for both mainnet and testnet.
- Compatible sa isa't-isa.
- Passphrase support.
- Coin control, Tor, custom node, custom fees, RBF and CPFP.