They don't but somehow, they've managed to master the art of convincing their customer of the need to purchase more than a single device of the same kind ^{[refer to some of the comments in their subreddit]}.
^{- They seem to enjoy taking advantage of their ignorant users (SMH)!}

• Quote
  We planned to ship Ledger Stax earlier this year, but it has taken our display provider months more than they originally expected to ensure every screen matches our quality standards.
  Wait, what?! I didn't know they had any
  
  
• Quote
  Often when v1.0 products come to market, they're really v0.9. This delay with the screen has allowed us to deliver a product in Ledger Stax that is truly beyond v1.0 at launch.
  IIRC, there was also a delay with Nano S Plus, but there were still a lot of issues at its launch!

Yes, I was referring to these two...

• Quote from: Pmalek on August 26, 2023, 03:58:17 PM
  If you check the main list without any active filters, you will notice that these two HWs are positioned all the way to the right with a 'Discontinued' notification under their pictures. I think that's pretty clear for anyone looking at the page that they are no longer for sale.
  
  You have a point, but OP mentioned in another thread that his/her "goal is to help users choose the correct wallet to buy" and if some of them are already discontinued, then perhaps they shouldn't be in the main list... Having said that, I noticed few of their "authorized resellers" still have them in stock, so perhaps placing another button beneath the discontinued and linking it to this exact page wouldn't be a bad idea.
  

Great addition, but I noticed the size & materials filters didn't have the materials and dimensions options in them... I understand why you excluded the latter, but I think it'd be better if users could also tick the materials of their choice ^{[even if it means adding roughly 10 more options to that section]}.

---

BTW, do you have any plans to move discontinued hardware wallets to a different page ^{[there are two at the moment]}?

Siguro it has something to do with the fact na malaki yung chance na hindi nila macover lahat ng mga uri ng scams at yung mga paraan ng pang-iwas nito, tapos palaging nageevolve pa yung mga scams ^{[sa ibang salita, mag bibigay sila ng false sense of security (unintentionally) pag pinili nila ang ganitong route]}.

Hindi pa rin ito sapat na dahilan para ituring natin sila as a safe/legit project, dahil baka tayo pa yung magiging unang biktima.

Unfortunately, nag improve na yung mga nagbebenta ng mga fake followers kaya hindi masyado obvious kung totoong tao yung mga followers nila o hindi.

I'd like to see the difference between the edited and unedited versions being highlighted in the change history section ^{[useful for longer posts]} and while you're at it, perhaps you could extend the edited version up to 10 minutes as well

May point ka, pero considering na padami ng padami yung mga wallet na may auto-conversion feature, hindi mahihirapan yung mga gustong gumamit ng ganitong business model.

Maganda sana, pero mukhang maliit masyado yung target nila na customers dahil tinayo nila ito sa loob ng isang university ^{[limited exposure]} kaya I'm having mixed feelings...

Nice addition, but I think it could've been better if it automatically deselected itself when navigating to a different page ^{[as it stands, it requires removing them one by one]}.
^{- FWIW, I'd love to also see a comparison option for the seed backup page.}

Unfortunately, hindi ganito ang case para sa lahat at yung tinutukoy niya na article was from last year pa kaya hindi ito accurate... As a former miner, hindi ko nirerecommend na pumasok sa ganitong field without having a complete team na kayang irepair yung mga faulty boards ^{[or ibang issues]} dahil sooner or later, magkakaroon ng mga ganitong problema at pag need mo pa ipadala sa ibang lugar para sa repairs, magkakaroon ng maraming downtime ^{[sa ibang salita, mas matagal yung ROI]}.

Only if I use or rather force HTTPS on it and since it appears that there are no redirects to HTTPS, then I have a feeling some of your users are suffering from the non-stop circular progress bar that appears on some of its sections ^{[e.g. latest resources and hardware lists (it's worth noting that templates loaded perfectly)]}.
^{- BTW, I noticed HW prices are partially overlapping a text.}

So there are a lot of ifs ^{[e.g. the sell order or rather the execution of your clients have to be at the right time in order for them to make a profit]}!

A few of the previous users raised their concerns with regard to the safety of their funds and I also think you should focus on that.

I hope not ^{[most of the users on this forum care about their privacy + I wouldn't recommend meeting up with a stranger that thinks you might be a wealthy investor]}!

On the contrary, every little detail matters!

I don't think an independent person needs to be part of a team

A small update after a brief ^[ish] hiatus:

- I'm getting "Connection timed out Error code 522" for both of the following explorers: localbitcoinschain and coincap
- It appears that the situation with learnmeabitcoin hasn't improved (it's "4,019 blocks behind" and the last time I reported, it was "2,476 blocks behind"), so it's probably an abandoned project.
- Spiral isn't responding to any of my search queries!

Small correction kabayan: Magiging isang transaction, pero magkakaroon ito ng maraming inputs and outputs!

Mukhang nakalimutan mong itranslate ang part na ito

Mas maganda siguro kung kasama yung mismong word na refund sa bandang huli ^{[para mas clear]} at sa pagkakaalam ko, hindi automatic yung process ^{[kailangan pa natin mag padala ng ticket]}.

But your FAQ section says otherwise ^{[you might want to edit those parts (e.g. this)]}!

Considering that some of the scammers tend to move their assets after a year or two, I think you should extend the period in which your AI barks

You're correct, but it's worth noting that there are a lot of false positive results as well ^{[unfortunately]}.

IMO, there's value in it, but I'd still combine it with the traditional tools.

In addition to what @Pmalek said, they are planning to also distribute it in their "GitHub repo", so with the necessary tools you can flash it by yourself.

As someone who recently purchased and tried one of those classic handheld Tetris game consoles in a public market, I can guarantee you such things will always attract some attention ^{[mostly from the older generations, but still...]}.

You nailed it... They could've gone with other shitcoins for the tower name, but clearly, they know the only way to expect a good outcome from announcing such projects is by masking out the part that shows their true nature.

Looks can be deceiving ^{[the only thing that they care about is making some adjustments to fill their pockets more (unfortunately)]}!

To Royse777:

I've been feeling a little burned out for the past few months, so I've decided to take a break from the forum ^{[long overdue (not completely, just from participating in signature campaigns)]} to allow my body to have enough time to rest and reset... Hopefully, I'll get another chance to work under you in the future
^{- Thank you for everything (the same goes for YoMix)}

You're right... There's a small change in its format, in order to know if you can actually sign a message with the address that you're staking here. Follow the format of the previous user ^{[@Bitcoinislife09]}, but there's no need to quote the previous comment unless nobody has verified and quoted their signed message.

Pag level 3 verified ang account mo, then baka nga connected ito sa levels natin... Sa akin kasi naka level 2 ^{[downgraded from level 3]}.

---

Ngayon ko lang napansin na nag release pala sila ng article nung isang araw tungkol sa mga changes: What changes can I expect from the Coins app upgrade?
^{- It's nice to know that sa wakas, isang 2FA code lang ang pwede natin gamitin sa Coins and Coins Pro.}

I still don't know the whole picture, but from what I've gathered so far, it seems that you're refusing to directly address their concerns and instead, you're looking for a way out of the situation ^{[this is how it appears from the outside]}, but that's not going to work here:

• Quote from: mprep on July 21, 2014, 05:27:51 PM
  Q: Do you moderate/delete (possible) FUD, accusations and untrue information?
  A: No. We don't have enough time to check every single piece of information and verify the validity of the sources. Also, just like scams - too much room for bias and abuse.
  

You're very welcome... It finally got it's first confirmation
^{- Thank you for the kind gesture (I appreciate it), but it's really fine}

Edit:
You're very welcome