Are you sure your developer is using a single API only? I'm not a developer by any means, but perhaps he/she is using multiple APIs without noticing a conflict in certain parts and that might be the reason for inaccurate data...
^{- The issue that I reported last month in regards to BTCitcoin value still exists!}

Have you tried checking it with different browsers?
^{- I didn't encounter any issues in Chrome.}

I have limited knowledge in regards to NFTs as a whole, but IIRC, the POAP NFT that came with the genesis edition of the S Plus had restrictions or rather wasn't made to be like a regular NFT, so I think the same would probably apply to this one as well ^{[I don't think they'll be able to easily sell it]}!

I agree with you... Even though "they've fixed most of it", I'm still surprised to see a couple of apps are still missing after roughly 4 months!

---

Considering that only a few users have posted so far, perhaps it's time to find them from other threads:

e.g.

• BitHD Razor review ^{[and Trezor One (by Rath_)]}
• Safepal hardware wallet review and opinions ^{[by Lillominato89]}
  
  • Same thread but another user ^{[by TedMosby]}

Did plagiarism check on that part and it led to another similar website (syncconnect.org), but it asks users to scan a certain QR code instead... After that, I did the same for all of their offered services and that led to a bunch of other scam platforms (reconnectmyapp.com ^{[their scam page isn't configured properly]}, daapreconnect.com and hrouvr.com ^{[it also shows an error that forces users to connect manually]})!

After visiting their "How it works" page, it's quite clear that they're just an exchange/swap aggregator, so you should try contacting the platforms that are listed as their partners ^{[even though they're clearly lying about having a partner]} and see if they have anything to do with the swap in question.
^{Note: I'm not implying that I'm ruling out the possibility of them being a bunch of scammers!}

Thank you for the warning... I'm surprised their offers still pops-out on Trezor Suite ^{[the same thing probably applies to Ledger Live and other HW brands that use their services]}!

I looked around but couldn't find anyone that recently complained about withdrawal issues on Coinify ^{[it's worth noting that it's the exact opposite for Voyager's users]}, so perhaps there's still some hope.

You nailed it ^{[I was hoping it'd have fewer node restrictions in comparison to Trezor Suite, but as things stand, it offers fewer options]}.
^{- I hope someone does the latter part of your quote.}

You have a point, but isn't it easier to just connect ^[directly] our Bitcoin Core nodes instead? As someone who uses Windows OS, I decided to not deal with the hassle of running an Electrum server in the past ^{[CMIIW but AFAIK, it's still a similar case for Windows users]}.

Yes, exactly

It's an attractive design, but I feel the content on the homepage is a bit all over the place ^{[especially when viewed on larger screens (e.g. desktop)]}, so IMO it just needs a bit of minimalist approach to make it flawless
^{- It'd be nice to also see everything in dark mode.}

Did they alter the foundation letters' color into black or is it just because of the reflection?

I was excited to see their app, but I'm a bit disappointed that it only supports certain types of nodes ^{[e.g. running on Tor and Electrum servers]}.
^{- Skip to "0:08 seconds on this" video.}

Or you can go with the traditional way of using duck tapes and plastics to cover other areas instead

Yes, may chance parin na maghingi sila ng panibagong submissions kung naexpire na ang mga nasubmit mong documents dati at kung hindi ako nagkakamali, gumagamit din sila ng automated systems so malaki din ang chance na magkaroon ng false-positive result.

I'm not familiar with those websites, but if they ask for upfront payments ^{[in 99% of cases, they do]}, they're probably a bunch of scammers as well!

---

Found a couple more websites with similar content:

• WealthyLifeInvest.com ^[archived]
• BitPE.net ^[archived]

Yes, I understood that part before and that's exactly why I think it's not that safe! Essentially, it'll lead to fusing two different digital footprints together ^{[even if there's a single hop in-between]} and that could go wrong in various ways ^{[e.g. when an analysis company traces those transactions, there'll be collateral damage]}.

Judging by the articles they've featured in before ^{[e.g. this one]}, it seems that they first launched in Canada so I don't think it's limited to wealthy UAE residents...
^{- They've also used the following line in various places on their website: "Limited to 10,000 members worldwide"}

Personally, I wouldn't label it as "safe" if it's going to create a bridge between someone else's previous history and the other user!

I had a brief experience with a few analysis software tools in the past and IIRC, "most" exchanges returned with medium-risk ML scores!

If I were you, I'd remove that section completely ^{[it's not that hard to connect the dots if everything you've listed in there is accurate]}!

A signed message would be nice

Pag dating sa traditional banks, I highly doubt magooffer sila ng ganitong products, pero I have a feeling na at some point in the future, ilan sa mga digital banks natin ang magkakaroon ng ganitong products ^{[this may sound weird, but I'm leaning more towards Tonik (soon to offer crypto products) to be the first of it's kind to offer such a thing]}.

Nasubukan mo na bang kumuha ng loan from "GCash" at "Tonik"?
^{- I prefer to not vouch, pero mukhang nagbibigay sila ng non collateralized loans!}

As long as they're not about to retire and only include a "small portion" of the 20% max cap that Fidelity is offering for their 401(k) plans, it should be more than enough to counter most of the volatility issues that BTCitcoin has.

Even if you manage to persuade one of the reputable escrow providers to handle this deal ^{[highly unlikely]}, it still doesn't change the fact that nothing can stop you from recovering it in the future!
^{- The bolded part in the first quote "only" gives a false sense of security to potential buyers!}

Amen to that!

Just because it takes some time to accumulate through faucets, it doesn't make them useless... For normal people, they're more than enough and when it comes to developers who might need larger amounts, they can go with the "Regtest" route instead!

@Canaan Online Shop
Any plans to expand or rather open a warehouse in the MENA region?

---

You might want to provide more information about your upcoming wallet ^{[e.g. SW or HW, custodial or not and etc...]}... Personally, I don't think anything with the word "pay" would be appropriate for a wallet ^{[IMO it's better suited for a payment processor of some sort]}, so I'm going to suggest the following names instead: CanaanBits, CanaanPurse, PurseyBits, CanaanSuite, Canaandle ^{[brand + handle]} and CanaBits.

It's worth noting that Ledger has also prepared a "bunch of playlists" on their Youtube channel:

e.g.

• Ledger Live
• Ledger Tutorials

You might want to visit their "360 library ^{[it has various filters to narrow down the results]}".

Even if the bill passes, a big portion of the unbanked population will remain the same, since the internet penetration rate in Mexico stands at roughly 74% only and I have a strong feeling that most Mexicans with incomes below the poverty line, probably wouldn't use something as volatile as BTCitcoin either.

I highly doubt they'll do something similar to what President Bukele did in the past.