Am replying here because this discussion is off-topic for the thread it was started in...  Do you think that you are owner of Known Alts thread so you can start shitting on other people and people are not allowed to reply? Don't you have some unanswered questions in that thread? Very well... I've highlighted the part of your post that shows where you specifically ask us to distrust you. I will bump this until I am excluded. distrust
Dictionary result for distrust
/dɪsˈtrʌst/
noun
noun: distrust; plural noun: distrusts
1.
the feeling that someone or something cannot be relied upon.
synonyms: mistrust, suspicion, wariness, chariness, lack of trust, lack of confidence, lack of faith; More
scepticism, doubt, doubtfulness, dubiety, cynicism;
misgivings, questioning, qualms;
disbelief, unbelief, incredulity, incredulousness, discredit;
informalleeriness
antonyms: trust
verb: distrust; 3rd person present: distrusts; past tense: distrusted; past participle: distrusted; gerund or present participle: distrusting
1.
doubt the honesty or reliability of; regard with suspicion.
synonyms: mistrust, be suspicious of, be wary/chary of, regard with suspicion, suspect, look askance at, have no confidence/faith in; More
be sceptical of, have doubts about, doubt, be unsure of/about, be unconvinced about, take with a pinch/grain of salt;
have misgivings about, wonder about, question;
disbelieve (in), not believe, discredit, discount, be incredulous of;
informalbe leery of, smell a rat
antonyms: trust exclude
Dictionary result for exclude
/ɪkˈskluːd,ɛkˈskluːd/
verb
verb: exclude; 3rd person present: excludes; past tense: excluded; past participle: excluded; gerund or present participle: excluding
1.
deny (someone) access to a place, group, or privilege.
synonyms: keep out, deny access to, shut out, debar, disbar, bar, ban, prohibit, put an embargo on, embargo; More
reject, blackball, ostracize, banish;
cut out, freeze out;
send to Coventry
antonyms: accept, admit
keep (something) out of a place.
2.
remove from consideration.
synonyms: eliminate, rule out, factor out; More
preclude, prevent the occurrence of;
formalexcept
antonyms: allow for
prevent the occurrence of.
synonyms: eliminate, rule out, factor out; More
preclude, prevent the occurrence of;
formalexcept
antonyms: allow for Positive trust means the "you trust someone"
Negative trust means that "you distrust someone" Are you talking about trust list or trust feedback now? What does this mean Timelord: The guy who wants us to distrust him (without explanation) is pondering if those around him are paranoid?
Explain me this post. Then explain everything posted in last few pages in known alts, and as you pick only one thing from my last post in known alts, feel free to discuss every single thing mentioned in that post, and as you went full troll after this post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg49916524#msg49916524 feel free to discuss links from that post too. |
|
|
|
marlboroza and mikeywith are trying to create FUD after the issue has already been resolved
Actually, it was you who said "DT TRUST ABUSE" so how are we creating FUD here? This is still part of your post: Miscellaneous:
DT Trust abuse
No comment on this.Not sure why the lapdog mikeywith
Insults. we all know he wants us to distrust him
You are making things up over and over again. Quote me exactly part of my post where I specifically said "I want people to distrust me". What part of " exclude me from DT2" you don't understand? and so far it seems I'm the closest to respecting his wishes by removing my positive DT trust in him without going that further step and placing negative/distrust on his DT trust.
What is positive and negative DT trust? What do you mean when you say "my DT trust"? So I guess marlboroza has just decided to lash out at the world around him and for the moment he's decided to lash out at me probably in the hope I will respect his wishes and give him what he craves - negative trust / distrust on the DT trust.
It was actually you who started pointing fingers to irrelevant inactive accounts, taking screenshots and archiving screenshots. I asked you simple question and I still can't see your answer. and for the moment he's decided to lash out at me probably in the hope I will respect his wishes and give him what he craves - negative trust / distrust on the DT trust.
Stop twisting things.My only comment in this thread after you said DT TRUST ABUSE was this one https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg49901881#msg49901881. And your replied with: @ marlborozaAs I replied in your FUD thread: The one who wants us to distrust him is wondering if those around him are paranoid? Witch hunt? That's the best you can come up with? You completely ignored everything I said in that post and replied with what exactly? And then what happened? What's with editing and removing links and this: Hmm angry kidding yelling "no you didn't!" syndrome... Those in a position of Trust should expect to be held more accountable and/or up to scrutiny.
So: Dark Star - very childish response to being caught out abusing the DT trust list with both yourself and your alt.
Miscellaneous:
DT Trust abuse
I am also curious about your opinion why this is DT trust abuse. If you wanted this to be between you and DarkStar_ you could have kept it private but you went public with it and now it is public and when people ask you why this is DT trust abuse you don't want to speak. ...unless of course you've got something to hide? Try with my password. Don't forget to archive screenshot. Also make archives of archived screenshots in case one archive goes down. Are we done here now? Now we are. |
|
|
|
Archived http://archive.is/GVHxb  As I replied in your thread
No, you didn't and you didn't: And again you didn't. And you didn't@DarkStar_
There's been a lot of posts these last few days, which one are you asking me to respond to? It was pointed few times 1 2 3 4 so it must be something before this @mikeywith
Interesting narrative you are trying to write there. Sham it's not true. (that's sham, not shame) Which part is not true? Hmm angry kidding yelling " no you didn't!" syndrome... Perhaps, you're right, what I actually said was: The guy who wants us to distrust him (without explanation) is pondering if those around him are paranoid? Perhaps from now on you should refrain from trimming down my reply to give the illusion it has a different context... May I remind you that you stated that DT member is abusing trust with alt account. As you ignored some facts posted on previous page, post which you are looking for is this one: Please explain how adding my alt to DT2 to allow a single neutral on my own account to show up by default is abuse.
|
|
|
|
Most spreadsheets are locked. Maybe to exclude 24 accounts and remaining one will be the one but this is long shot and too much work which probably won't give good result. 5 accounts are alts, not 4, as I previously posted in topic: Your BTC Address: 3QRy91zsHAb4QzpihYsTbC9kwakNj254uE
BTC Address: 3QRy91zsHAb4QzpihYsTbC9kwakNj254uE
BTC Address : 3QRy91zsHAb4QzpihYsTbC9kwakNj254uE
ETH Address : 0x4C69A39c1EA3b07e4a9902322e3F943F666223af
Bitcoin Address to send the payment: 3QRy91zsHAb4QzpihYsTbC9kwakNj254uE
Bitcoin address: 3QRy91zsHAb4QzpihYsTbC9kwakNj254uE
There was some strange merit distribution (quoted in topic) for example https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2006434.msg29441714#msg29441714 post #3927 Looking at account, except account jbautistangina which was active today ( http://archive.is/DTmsf), cryptopussies - http://archive.is/QxMoc - Last Active: February 21, 2019, 11:42:22 AM cryptopan - http://archive.is/sG2VS - Last Active: February 21, 2019, 11:48:02 AM mangkanor - http://archive.is/MOldp - Last Active: February 21, 2019, 11:54:41 AM jackolinyoko - http://archive.is/rlEQP - Last Active: February 21, 2019, 11:56:53 AM pedropendukot - http://archive.is/IkX6h - Last Active: February 21, 2019, 11:59:27 AM mariangpalad - http://archive.is/ZkhlJ - Last Active: February 21, 2019, 12:01:45 PM cryptocrocs - http://archive.is/TOfdU - Last Active: February 21, 2019, 12:03:45 PM That is for account loof99. Next account: s31joemhar. Merit distribution: johnyespapa 1 1
cryptomema 1 1
cryptotitan 1 1
joselitobayagbag 1 1
reypinioco 1 1
cryptamod 1 1
bratbu 1 1
cryptomarijuana 1 1 https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=s31joemharThe same as above. bratbu - http://archive.is/4vOV6 - Last Active: February 21, 2019, 11:58:46 AM joselitobayagbag - http://archive.is/GXOx8 - Last Active: February 21, 2019, 11:56:29 AM cryptomod - http://archive.is/H0tyP - Last Active: February 21, 2019, 12:01:11 PM reypinioco - http://archive.is/7DNYb - Last Active: February 21, 2019, 12:02:29 PM (other accounts from this group are tagged so I won't mention them) Remaining accounts: https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Jombrangscryptopusa 1 1
cryptospear 1 1
cryptonero 1 1
makuhpal 1 1
panghae 1 1
totnaksquad 1 1
maereglapo 1 1
cryptoatomic 1 1 Quick example: account totnaksquad - http://archive.is/pWJPA - Last Active: February 21, 2019, 12:02:41 PM https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=ace4549s31joemhar 2 30
Jombrangs 2 21
harbin55 2 18
loof99 2 18
mabell943 2 18
gunhell16 1 10
Genosx 1 5
BlasterS 1 5
Lannie25 1 5
Glorious04 1 5 Well fuck it. First account https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=harbin55 (not banned): boyjackyou 1 1
cryptobobo 1 1
cryptocue 1 1
cryptodrei 1 1
cryptomngr 1 1
modtakels 1 1
matsusomoto 1 1
hiwainmoto 1 1 Second account https://bpip.org/smerit.aspx?to=ace4549&from=mabell943 (banned): abduljacklu 1 1
cryptodagger 1 1
nakamote 1 1
mautenisis 1 1
cryptotnak 1 1
junjunsalsalani 1 1
pooque 1 1
cryptoheroin 1 1
Randomly picked accounts from list above: poogue - Last Active: February 21, 2019, 11:58:34 AM mautenisis - Last Active: February 21, 2019, 11:56:10 AM And so on. |
|
|
|
As I replied in your thread
No, you didn't and you didn't: And again you didn't. And you didn't@DarkStar_
There's been a lot of posts these last few days, which one are you asking me to respond to? It was pointed few times 1 2 3 4 so it must be something before this @mikeywith
Interesting narrative you are trying to write there. Sham it's not true. (that's sham, not shame) Which part is not true? |
|
|
|
Part of post is taken and quoted from other thread: But the hierarchy loves these type of connections,merit,eth addresses, date of registration patter? wouldnt you get negged if you disagree with their beliefs?i like what marlboroza is doing ,tagging alts with the use of those said connections,merits,and date of registration  basically he isnt following what theymos have said,a total abuser here and the drama of leaving the DT position doesnt make sense because he is still tagging people while he has campaign of leaving his position .  Do you mean something like this, 2eugenio:    Wait, this is even better, ACEugenio:    This address 3QRy91zsHAb4QzpihYsTbC9kwakNj254uE connects last 2 banned accounts with other 2 banned accounts ...and...and following these accounts and merit trail https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=loof99 from one of banned accounts, I have found, among other things, this: jbautistangina 1 1
cryptopussies 1 1
cryptopan 1 1
mangkanor 1 1
jackolinyoko 1 1
mariangpalad 1 1
pedropendukot 1 1
cryptocrocs 1 1 cryptosomething...this crypto...:  ? That would explain why someone is ranting around whole day long And as I am stupid moron: @OP Sorry for hijacking  You stupid moron,i am mad because of my unrightful red tag,so you just need to fake it till you make it (this whole leaving drama) ? so these accounts now are connected to me? you cant connect it with the addresses,date of registration and now you are using last logged,very intelligent indeed you are one true abuser feel free to ban/paint those accounts if it pleases you.,send me regards to those who got banned Accumulating address 0x550364CC2e22Da44B5A31e369753552EeB7bc8C5 (if I am not wrong, this is wallet from KUCOIN exchange, assigned to user)  Underlined addresses from top to bottom: Proof of joined post
Bitcointalk username: ac2eugenio
Campaign in which you participate: (twitter)
ETH address: 0xb2b7c3529FFbfcD447035aBF99C5c17CEDf3861a
Bitcointalk username: makuhpal
Forum rank: member
Posts count: 270
ETH address: 0x7b8863DEEbfC311E57BbF8C8855085871B868C22
SIGNATURE
Bitcointalk username:pooque
Forum rank:MEMBER
Starting post count: 99 INCLUDING THIS POST
Ethereum address: 0x033a0d2804bd2DF9bF7FDbf3aA9FE940D89E0Fe4 And, well... 4. ethereum address has been found in traxia's bounty campaign https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rtHw9eKOQuVzHjunc8GmsmFLvR9QEbDzICnRX2hWYI0/edit#gid=1000933388 archived http://archive.is/Fsu0oAccording to that spreadsheet and etherscan, address has received tokens:  And someone participated in signature campaign with this account crytodevs, strangely enough, this account is tagged:  crypto something again... I didn't check 4 banned accounts from quoted post and connections and I didn't go further than these 4 addresses... |
|
|
|
Primedice's thread has turned into wall observer thread. Wherever I click I see Stake. This reminds me of "good old" yobit signature days and 20 posts/day
Can someone tell me what does this mean: If you are choosing between the waves and ethereum classic. You will better to choose waves remember ethereum is different to ethereum classic.so for me waves coin is the better to choose compared to ETC that is my opinion and I think it is right base to my research.
I'll give 2 merits to first member (without Stake's signature ) who deciphers this.
|
|
|
|
It can happen but usually mostly it is "my brother's/sister's/friend's/cousin's account" excuse. There are some huge farming rings where people hire spammers and pay them in their local currency for tokens they receive(trust me on this one, I have received few PM's about this business, together with pictures of the "team of spammers")
But the hierarchy loves these type of connections,merit,eth addresses, date of registration patter? wouldnt you get negged if you disagree with their beliefs?i like what marlboroza is doing ,tagging alts with the use of those said connections,merits,and date of registration basically he isnt following what theymos have said,a total abuser here and the drama of leaving the DT position doesnt make sense because he is still tagging people while he has campaign of leaving his position . Do you mean something like this, 2eugenio: Wait, this is even better, ACEugenio: This address 3QRy91zsHAb4QzpihYsTbC9kwakNj254uE connects last 2 banned accounts with other 2 banned accounts ...and...and following these accounts and merit trail https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=loof99 from one of banned accounts, I have found, among other things, this: jbautistangina 1 1
cryptopussies 1 1
cryptopan 1 1
mangkanor 1 1
jackolinyoko 1 1
mariangpalad 1 1
pedropendukot 1 1
cryptocrocs 1 1 cryptosomething...this crypto...: ? That would explain why someone is ranting around whole day long
@OP Sorry for hijacking |
|
|
|
Looks like a movie thats why it wont work because the plot has been presumed by most of the people. "Im leaving DT position" seems to be idiotic title for a movie like this but its okay,lets see if most of the dumb people will bite the bait Keep going, I would like to hear ALL conspiracy theories you have. |
|
|
|
One way to make someones trust feedback visible without directly adding them to your trust network for whatever reason you have is to create alt account, add alt account to your trust network and then add accounts to trust network of your alt account (I posted this somewhere in some other thread). I don't see this as abuse.At the same time DarkStar_ excluded Lafu from their trust network http://loyce.club/trust/2019-01-25_Fri_22.33h/507936.html and included them using alt account which can't vote anyway. Lafu was actually excluded, not included.Theymos mention something about abusing trust system: Unlike the previous policy, I will not generally be trying to cultivate a good list; that will be left to the DT1 members themselves. However, I reserve the right to remove you and blacklist you from future selection if you engage in egregious and obvious abuse, or if multiple known alt accounts could be selected. And, as I can see, DarkStar_alt hasn't changed trust list http://loyce.club/trust/2019-02-23_Sat_05.10h/862062.html since then, can't be in DT1 because it doesn't match these rules https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.0 and can't vote because lack of merits, so having Lafu in trust network won't make any difference at all. So why this witch hunt @Timelord? |
|
|
|
Čuo sam se s Regulusom danas.
Da, kaže da već dugo nije bio na forumu.
Inače, ne voli moljakati i za sada ne misli više slati nikakve emailove adminima.
Da odem malo off topic, sad sam baš čitao i izgleda su se pravila promjenila u vezi ovih trajnih banova https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5113751.0Reče kazna ovisi od slučaja do slučaja pa možda smanji malo kaznu i makne ban, vrijedi opet pitati. |
|
|
|
You claim this: 1) Primedice is cheating 2) Owner is stalking players 3) Owner pretends to be advisor 4) Everything is written in article which is removed As it seems, you want someone to agree with you and say that Primedice is cheating even though you didn't provide single evidence of your claims, well that isn't going to happen. the "let it pass it will go away" and the "just sitting it out" approach doesn't work with me. I will get louder.
So show us some proofs, it is all we ask. How hard this can be? |
|
|
|
Kolko je to, negdje oko 24 milje kuna  Što drugo nego zamjeniti btc u lovicu, pokupovati nekretnine i živjeti od rente. Ni oro ni kopo svaki mjesec 100 hiljki u džep. Mislim da neki ljudi previše razmišljaju što sa lovom. |
|
|
|
It seams you either don't read properly, or you don't understand what I'm saying or you have chosen to just ignore what I'm saying.
I don't think anyone does. Primedice has its own verification process and you should stick to it. You don't want to show anything because of some strange unknown reason and I don't see any reason to continue this conversation. |
|
|
|
Exactly what I'm pointing at. You posting my bets here again where everyone can see them in my screenshoot anyways already doesn't make your defense of this any better.
You are not pointing anything, you are ranting in scam accusation without showing any kind of proofs. So either reveal server seed so we can check bets or move this to gambling discussion where you will be able to discuss how you were unlucky. I am pretty sure you will find lots users who will tell you "I am sorry for your lost, gamble only what you can afford to lose and you will be fine". |
|
|
|
Primedice has this system: Client seed + server seed + nonce. That is impossible to cheat unless they alter results. These are bet ID's: https://primedice.com/?iid=28824660593&modal=bethttps://primedice.com/?iid=28824676513&modal=betClient seed: BTC-AAT Nonce(first bet): 2409 Nonce(second bet): 2410 Server seed(hashed), 1. bet: 61c155e32717a217d484078aef5a437e009ede025219a027d9d719cbe34cc6d8 Server seed(hashed), 2. bet: 61c155e32717a217d484078aef5a437e009ede025219a027d9d719cbe34cc6d8 (Logically the same) Server seed is active. Change client seed to reveal server seed if you want someone to go trough this or lock thread. |
|
|
|
I quoted what you should read. You said this: There's also a positive as well: (you probably can't see it given how many positive trust posts you have on your trust wall) And you should focus on this: It is impossible for me not to see and to forget first positive feedback I received. And this one was a joke... I masturbated on it for few days IIRC. Excuse me, what am I trying to rewrite? |
|
|
|
This Bitcointalk sponsored ICO is completely SCAM: Accuse without proof. Take a look, lots investors join on this project. Investors know where to take money |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
