Maybe they didn't see thread or maybe they start reading it and they saw red marked "hepta coin scam", come to conclusion that you are talking about some shitcoin plagiarist scammer and as scam is not moderated they didn't react, at least I jumped to conclusion that you are talking about some shitcoin plagiator scammer at first.
Anyway, ban evasion reported.
|
|
|
Is there any way to know this or not?
No. Lauda is controversial topic in this forum, and I don't know anything personal about this member.
When I came to this forum, almost everyone who talked about Lauda said "he", then at some point everyone start saying "she" and, lately, he/she and sometimes he/she/it. But if you really like to know, read Lauda's post in Croatian section. I really miss his/her/its posts.
|
|
|
Već sam postavio isto pitanje i nikad nisam dobio odgovor.
Ne pratim inače ove teme ali vidio sam bounty i reko što bounty tema radi kod nas. Gle ovo, smeće nije dozvoljeno: Projekt čini se isplaćuje u datotekama: I, što je najbolje : ...vjerovatno neće isplaćivati mrtve niti sa datotekama
Pitam se da member sunce33 nije moža neki novi super-bot... Čitaj ovo, "translate tool" 100%: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1526012.0
|
|
|
Reports for account Experia are 90% handled: Newest reports for account kSL are handled: Reports for account zupdawg are unhandled: Reports for account cozytrade are unhandled but handled: If a report is unhandled, it's either that a mod hadn't had the time to look into it (meaning someone will get to it sooner or later)
Looking forward to see reports handled and marked as good then.
Maybe this is the right way, proof of spam: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Qag0bfD8ASzewNVkX6phTpHTEGKypqqFDTBlLJ96hWU/edit#gid=155842840No zupdawg there..
|
|
|
Da li ima potrebe prevoditi i doslovno staviti sliku od bounty teme bez mogućnosti da se klikne i jedan link? Ako se ne varam imamo temu za bounty i signature kampanje točno ovdje https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2929934.0. Uostalom, što je tu toliko bitno da se otvori ova tema, nije "announcement" da se može nešto diskutirati o projektu
|
|
|
I have punch of unhandeld reports also! And there are some reports that got deleted but still have the Status unhandeld! Dont know why and it's not only one report that this happend! I mean its not an big Problem but how should we get rid of the unhandeld? Would it be ok to make a thread for unhandeld reports, and all reporters that want to get there reports done can post in there and when Moderators or global mods have time so they can look after it?
Its just an idea!
How will you know which report is unhandled if report page doesn't show older reports? I have 300 old unhandled reports, I am not sure what I reported.
Note to moderators to check this account: They spammed 16 bounty applications within 15 minutes. It is not that they didn't join bounties, it's just their facebook/twitter/llinkedin/medium accounts does not exist
|
|
|
Nevjerojatno. Ako sam dobro shvatio, projekt se sastoji od toga da korisnici pošalju ETH i onda kroz pet dana dobe 0.5-1% više natrag? Pa kako itko u to još vjeruje? Po čemu se to razlikuje od onog "Dear sir, send me 1 ETH, I give you 10 ETH back"?
Razlikuje se u tome što je prvo ponzi i neko će uspjeti izvući novce i/ili zaraditi/djelomično izvući dok će drugi izgubiti, dok je ovo "pošalji 1 dobiš 10" najobičniji pokušaj krađe. 1% u 5 dana NE MOŽE biti legit niti slučajno. Koji je to postotak tjedno? Koje je to postotak mjesečno? Koji je to postotak godišnje?
Smart contract ponzi, ništa novo osim što je postotak iznenađujuće malen. Bila ih je hrpa prije par mjeseci sa mnogo većim postotcima ali čini mi se da ih je sve manje i manje. Eto..primjer iz prve ruke zašto takve stvar prolaze: "Takav doprinos može biti legitiman".
Nešto što ja volim zvati "slow burning ponzi", upravo taj manji postotak prevari veći broj ljudi. Samo treba postaviti jedno pitanje: "od kuda dolazi moja zarada/postotak" i sve jasno.
|
|
|
IIRC I marked a lot of your reports as bad since they were duplicates.
I understand this, guilty as charged, I made mistake while reporting, I apologize If the the double reported posts haven't been deleted and there are still unhandled reports, that probably means the non-duplicate reports corresponding to the duplicate ones simply haven't been handled yet.
But non-duplicates are marked as bad and duplicates are partially handled. Isn't report handled when it is marked as bad? And last reported posts are handled: Prior to that lots unhandled: ...and some good/unhandled: ...then some good: ...then unhandled: When I see that last reported posts are marked as good, some previously reports are partially handled and lots of previously reports are not handled I usually come to conclusion that they will never be handled, maybe because it is not against rules to apply to as much bounties you can, I don't know, but there is proof of spam in topic.
|
|
|
[...]nekoj Telegram grupi razgovarao s nekim od admina ili moderatora ovdje[...]
Nisam to znao, ako je tako onda i nije baš u redu. Ali ako netko uporno mjesecima pokušava nešto objasniti i dokazati (govorim o topicu za Regulusa), zar nije onda taj netko zaslužio barem odgovor? Ne kažem da odgovor mora biti pozitivan, ali zar nije netko od admina mogao napisati nešto tipa - sjašite više, Regulus je sjebao time i time. Samo tim jednim postom (za koji treba 2 minute da se napiše) bi cijela priča oko Regulusa bila završena i ne bi ostao dojam da je na forumu isto kao u ostatku svijeta - bez poznanstva nema ništa.
Tu se apsolutno slažem, topic je dizan na vrh toliko puta da bih recimo ja da sam uprava osobno odgovorio samo da skinem sve s one stvari, još više što su i stranim članovima nije jasno zašto nema odgovora. Btw, nabio sam si jučer greškom 20 loših prijava , ako koga zanima https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5188282.0 - niđe logike. Marlboroza, rado ali ne mogu doći do podataka o tuđim izbrisanim postovima.
Primjetio sam da ti je obrisan post u altcoin temi o signature/bounty kampanjama, sad ne znam da li si ga sam obrisao ili netko prijavio, u svakom slučaju je spadao u kategoriju "multiposting" što bi moderator da ga imamo ovako i onako "moderirao". Hipotetski, da sam ja moderator vjerovatno bih spojio ta dva posta u jedan, ali ako bi se to ponavljalo češće onda bih obrisao.
Btw, glasao sam "ne znam", nema puno "kršenja pravila" za moderatora a s druge strane global mod odradi svoj posao.
|
|
|
Ne znam koliko se uklapa u temu, vidio sam neku novu signature campanju za nekakav novi forum, manager je yahoo i primaju sve po redu. Sad sam malo škicnuo forum i ne vidim ništa drugo osim nekakvog spamanja i nečega što sam već stotine puta pročitao na ovom forumu, ali, što me je zaintrigiralo je ovaj "contest" https://cryptotalk.org/topic/16-contest-make-max-posts-and-win-1-btc/Ne znam koliko treba vjerovati ovome, navodno daju 1 btc za prvo mjesto i 0.1btc za deseto i još plaćaju 1000 sat za svaki post. Ako netko dobije nagradu ne zaboravite tko vam je rekao za to
|
|
|
~
I start reporting first 3 accounts and found this: #Proof of Authentication Bitcointalk username: Cozytrade Your telegram username: @Tradecozy Which Campaign Joined: Telegram Campaign
#Proof of Authentication Bitcointalk username: Cozytrade Your telegram username: @Tradecozy Which Campaign Joined: Telegram Campaign
Both posts are posted in the same bounty campaign, it looks like this: I noticed the same thing here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5183095.msg52569342#msg52569342 ( http://archive.is/BQ5jy).
|
|
|
Cryptotalk is paying people to spam bitcointalk? Sounds like forum wars.
I spotted few "one line" spammers but it seems some users have found a way to bypass "anti-spam" rules: ExperiaBitkoynscozytradecca 20 posts ("bounty authentication") posted by each account in an hour and a half.
|
|
|
Slučaj Regulusa mi je pokazao da je svaki pokušaj ''traženja odgovora'' i pravde na ovom forumu jako naivno za očekivati.
Meni je opet slučaj Tvplus-a, Branka a i nekih drugih korisnika pokazao da ipak ima pravde. Sve ovisi kako na sve to gledaš. s obzirom kako je krenulo i na ovaj ''križarski pohod'' tzv. inspektora po forumu.
Nije to baš od jučer. Postovi se na veliko prijavljuju već duže vrijeme, pa ima i onaj klub "spam buster", preko godinu dana roštaju po altcoinu, sad se neki ljudi prebacili na ostale dijelove foruma. U krajnjoj liniji, ovo je forum, pa sad zamisli trebaš mišljenje o yokohoma zimskim gumama i odeš na forum o gumama - i ono, čitaš postove tipa: " meni su yokohama gume najbolje zato što su yokohama gume odlične i stvarno mislim da su yokohama gume najbolje pa ih zato imam", onda netko odgovara " da, slažem se, yokohama gume su stvarno najbolje i ja ih isto imam jer su najbolje" pa onda netko quota oba posta i odgovara sa " obojica ste u pravu, slažem se s vama o yokohama gumama, ja ih isto imam jer su stvarno dobre". E onda neki padobranac uletava sa " i ja se slažem s vama, stvarno su super, eto meni su dobro zakočile i uspio sam stati na crveno", onda se netko nadovezuje sa " blago tebi, mene policajac jučer kaznio, prošao sam kroz žuto a on tvrdi da sam kroz crveno", pa ide dalje razgovor " ma da, ti policajci, samo gledaju kako će nekom lovu uzet", pa onda " ma joj, dobro da se može platiti u nekom roku pa ti smanje kaznu" - a ti došao čitati o yokohoma gumama. ništa nas se ne pita a moderatori vršljaju po našem dijelu foruma, i iako ne znaju jezik, prave reda po svom nahođenju.
Ajmo ovako. Koji postovi su obrisani koji po tvome nisu "smjeli" ili trebali biti obrisani jer nisu kršili nikakva pravila zbog kojih se inače postovi brišu? Navedi ih nekoliko i otvaram temu u meti.
|
|
|
~
Smije li se znati gdje su postovi obrisani i zbog čega? Koliko je star najstariji obrisan post?
|
|
|
This image definitely is faked. There is no other reason why the email address should be hidden.
There could be one good reason to hide email - to hide email No no.. i think you misunderstood me. If you have your own email set as hidden, you still see it when visiting your own profile. In the screenshot, the 'owner' is on his own profile. But the email is not shown. That's a clear sign for a fake. I wasn't talking about hiding the email itself, just that it is not possible to see " hidden" when watching your own profile. I didn't misunderstood you, actually, I was thinking about something else. While I believe it is fake I only tried to say that you can "hide" email/avatar/whatever if you want to: This doesn't make my profile picture "fake", it is still my profile picture, just little modified for public. (note: image in topic doesn't have "profile info" on the left side). So, if someone do this: ...you will have hard time to prove it is not you who is selling account ( of course, account seller not able to sign message should be good proof) There is another option. So, I am selling account bob123 and I took screenshot while logged in my account: So I modified my nick to bob123 and I forget to modify avatar. Hah! ( just saying, picture is usually not a good reason to tag account)
|
|
|
This image definitely is faked. There is no other reason why the email address should be hidden.
There could be one good reason to hide email - to hide email Any idea why seller doesn't want to show "total time logged in"?
@The Pharmacist there is not enough evidence for negative.
|
|
|
@Danijel gledaj to s vedrije strane. Par obrisanih postova te navelo da otvoriš temu i natipkaš 25-30 i zaradiš "koji dinar". Sad zamisli da nijedan post nije obrisan, zarada bi ti bila manja a u krajnjoj liniji država bi uzela manje poreza, ne bi se neke ceste popravile, auti bi se više oštećivali na tim dionicama što bi direktno utjecalo na džep mnogih vozača. Sad gle koliko signatura tu ima, čak se može reći da je taj zli moderator napravio dobro djelo za šire građanstvo Izgleda da je ipak bolje da nemamo moderatora.
Ja se slažem s quotanim tekstom. Mislim da nam je bolje ovako... Velika je greška misliti da moderator neće raditi posao za koji je plaćen, tko god bio postavljen. Sad vidi, dobijemo moderatora koji može biti jako blag i ne biti "policajac", "rambo" ili tko već, ali kad netko prijavi post moderator će morati odratiti svoj dio posla - onda ne bude "incident" jer se nekome "učinilo" da je vidio referral link, što je mudro sakriveno u samoj temi.
|
|
|
They had yellow "be careful" flags up until now.
Oh..yes. Yellow box was visible, not "old red box". I am failing to understand how OP missed all tags Poster said in post #3: found him here. said warning but figured no scam for 10$. only for 10$ took a chance. Yes, but that doesn't make much sense. This was in warning: "Login to see the detailed trust ratings"Scam accusation: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1663453.0 ~30$. Scam accusation: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2099774.0 for 15$ Also, there are several negative ratings for amounts between 10-20$, and still, OP figured they won't scam them for 10$?
|
|
|
Ovo sam i ja počeo razmišljati... S ovim offtopičarenjem smo ipak možda pokazali da nam je potreban moderator da nam ipak malo organizira i prebaci razgovore u prikladne teme. Recimo ovdje smo s offtopicom došli ponovo do ontopic teme da nam treba moderator Jedina tema za koju znam da je otišla u off topic i (vjerovatno) admin je prebacio razgovor u drugu temu je ova https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5108756.0;all, a ipak u velikoj većini slučaja moderator će se ili odlučiti na brisanje off topic postova ili ih neće ni dirati. Zaista šteta da smo originalnog moderatora izgubili a i kad je theymos otvorio topic s pitanjem da predlozimo novog moderatora ništa se nije dogodilo.
Gdje možemo naći tu temu? Ima ona stara nakon koje je lauda postao moderator ako se ne varam. Do not post off-topic repliesOff-topic replies have become a big problem. From now on, I will be deleting such replies without notice, forum-wide. If your replies disappear, this is probably why.
All replies must respond to the topic's original post in some way, even if they are replying to an on-topic reply. If your reply has nothing to do with the topic post, either add some content that is relevant or create a new topic.
Please report off-topic posts as soon as you see them.
Izgleda da je ipak bolje da nemamo moderatora.
|
|
|
|