Das ist nicht möglich, weder bei Bitcoin, noch bei irgendeiner Shitcoin.
Es ist mathematisch unmöglich, das mit berechenbarer Sicherheit zu tun. Es ist physikalisch unmöglich, dass in einem globalen peer-to-peer-Netzwerk zu tun. Es ist spieltheoretisch unmöglich, dass dezentral zu tun. Es ist volkswirtschaftlich unmöglich, das mit werthaltigen Tokens zu tun.
Kein Shitcoin dieser Welt wird an diesen mathematischen, physikalischen, spieltheoretischen und volkswirtschaftlichen "Naturgesetzen" jemals etwas ändern können.
das sollte jeder bitcointalk-forist auswendig lernen und bei jedem merit 3 x aufsagen. qwk, bitte mach doch daraus einen ordentlichen mehrseitigen referenztext, damit wir was zum verlinken haben, wenn die scamcoin fraktion wieder aufmuckt. oder noch besser: ein buch. ich arbeite auch schon an einem: blockchain- my ass. warum crypto ein einziger betrug ist aber bitcoin trotzdem die welt verändert.Warum sollte jemand so einen Blödsinn auswendig lernen? Ohne Belege sind das einfach nur Behauptungen. Das etwas unmöglich ist, ist eine sehr gewagte These. Ich freue mich auf mathematische Beweise für jede der Behauptungen....die wird er aber leider nicht liefern können! wenn ich mir das seit 10 jahren einzig funktionierende blockchain projekt ansehe und in relation setze zu den vielen 1000 shitcoins, die keiner* benutzt und die nichts können, dann ist mir das persönlich beweis genug. *ausser die shitcoiner, die darauf spekulieren durch shitcoin trading mehr btc zu generieren. wenn IOTA ein seriöses projekt wäre, dann hätten sie keinen token an den markt gebracht, der die erfinder alle reich gemacht hat. hätte man sauber in einem testnet entwickeln können. dann würden uns die nervigen iota-jünger erspart bleiben, die uns andauernd ihren shitcoin verkaufen wollen. Da stimmt so ziemlich vieles! Die Ursachenforschung ist jedoch relevant. Wie konnte es denn zu der Masse an Shitcoins kommen? Oder wie wird man die wieder los?
|
|
|
This fight between bitcoin and others damages highly both trust to crypto world and trust to developers. Nobody wants to see a few fight between people could collapse market. People need more trust no need to fight.
Absolutely. Wouldn t it be better if only the original white paper defines what Bitcoin does? There would be no need of super devs and political feature discussions to fight for.... Hm. Better remove those middle men from a protocol. Get bitcoin to a tcp ip standard and use it as such. The issue is also with all that speculation flaws. So much bag holder fighting is toxic for global adoption ( incl. institutions, banks govs ...)
|
|
|
a small block is not bitcoin, it's just BTC
And segwitcoin is a flawed air drop.
|
|
|
Warum steigt der Bitcoinpreis heute wieder so an? Wurden heute nicht einige Betreiber von Wallstreet Market hops genommen und waren die nicht schon dabei einen Exit-Scam zu machen... Tethershorter
|
|
|
^ says the troll and disinforms the herd
|
|
|
Ist es denn so, dass die Börsen die Coins vorfinanzieren? Bisher habe ich es eigentlich immer so mitbekommen, dass sich entweder die Devs sich bei einer Börse bewerben bzw. die Community über ein Listing diverser Coins abstimmt und der Gewinner dann gelistet wird und im Enfeffekt die User dann einzahlen und traden können.
Ich würde das auch als eher die Ausnahme ansehen. Jedenfalls habe ich es noch nie aktiv mitbekommen. Wissen kann man es aber nicht, was die Börsen so treiben. Im Prinzip ist ja ein Bitcoin-Basismarkt genau gleich wie ein Tether-Basismarkt zu bewerten, und wenn die Börsen dort Liquidität "vorfinanzieren" würden, setzen sie sich genauso dem Kursrisiko aus. Wir haben fast nur https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bucket_Shop- WinkelBörsen Bis evtl BAKKT - SIX/SDX oder Börse Stuttgart / Dt Börse mit Sygnum + die Banken ( Goldman mit Circle ?) das machen werden Edit: Guggst du hier: https://www.nzz.ch/finanzen/die-flash-boys-frisieren-heute-die-kryptomaerkte-ld.1475841
|
|
|
This is correct. Anything u want to say against ?
|
|
|
and if this "pushes" people into using Lightning, then good.
Lightning incentivizes everyone to only have one channel open with a bank which then routes all of their transactions. HOW THE FUCK IS THAT GOOD? WHY would anyone advocate for that garbage over physical metals? Oh yea, I forgot, you're all con artist scammers who only care about trying to profit off pump and dumps even though you could just as easily make as much or more money in metals while not promoting (((digital currency))) slavery and surveillance systems. Hey - very good spotting. But seems for BTC it's too late to fix that now. There is only one from many 'busines case' left over: Speculation
|
|
|
growing unknown hashrate, already 44%, probably will be another hardfork may 15
Due to the entry it's from Satoshi Nakamoto So grab ur popcorns
|
|
|
They will not calm down! How do you like the news on BitcoinSV? CoinGeek Sponsors Ayr United Football ClubAs per the Reuters report on Thursday, Bitcoin SV will sponsor Ayr United for the rest of the current season, as well as the whole of the next season. Founder of CoinGeek, and well known Bitcoin SV advocate Calvin Ayre said this was part of a move to educate people about the ‘original Bitcoin’: “There is an education underway explaining to both the media and everyday folk that BSV is, in fact, the original Bitcoin. People have heard of Bitcoin but don’t yet understand that BSV is the only blockchain following Bitcoin’s original design.” Bitcoin SV the emperors new clothes? Seems that scaling is really sexy Reorgs here btw https://bitsonline.com/blockchain-re-orgs-bitcoin-security/That seems to be a decent article, hv_ - except to the extent that there are implications that bcash sv is some variation of bitcoin, merely because that bcash variant strives to confuse people into some kind of belief that it is a bitcoin variant... Otherwise, the discussion of reorgs does touch upon some decent points. This is the thing btc ticker follower cannot learn, since btc is not open for on chain scaling, the initial Bitcoin rather was build for. BSV shows that path now. And in a very sexy way
|
|
|
Your example is ... , and assumes that
and you too make many assumptions From your history of misinformation? Yes, easy assumption. IF it's succesfully out of beta,
you think LN will be out of beta?.. well bitcoin(the separate network that uses a good blockchain security model) is 10 years old and devs are too afraid to say its out of beta. so dont expect anything different with ln, especially when LN is more flawed, buggy and impractical. Is Bitcoin out of beta in your opinion? Do developers of Bitcoin Cash share this opinion? Because they should promote it as the "Bitcoin that's out of Beta". They fixed Bitcoin's limitations, right? and accepted by the mainstream.
compared to a well advertised, talked about network called bitcoin thats 10 years old and still not main stream.. im starting to wonder how long you expect it to take to have LN 'mainstream' But IF it stays as a niche for Bitcoiners, then yes.
stays as a niche for bitcoin.. ha.. never was. remember bitcoin and other coins were edited to become LN compatible. LN was node made to be bitcoin compatible Never was? No one is using it? I'm confused. So only a protocol that is set in stone and only changes for scaling / capacy demand adjustments and bug fixes is out of beta. Second, full nodes are defined to mine, so they are properly incentified. Problem solved. Nodes that dont mine are just slave nodes at some front end / fat client style - just listening what servers / back end nodes = miners have agreed on.
|
|
|
They will not calm down! How do you like the news on BitcoinSV? CoinGeek Sponsors Ayr United Football ClubAs per the Reuters report on Thursday, Bitcoin SV will sponsor Ayr United for the rest of the current season, as well as the whole of the next season. Founder of CoinGeek, and well known Bitcoin SV advocate Calvin Ayre said this was part of a move to educate people about the ‘original Bitcoin’: “There is an education underway explaining to both the media and everyday folk that BSV is, in fact, the original Bitcoin. People have heard of Bitcoin but don’t yet understand that BSV is the only blockchain following Bitcoin’s original design.” Bitcoin SV the emperors new clothes? Seems that scaling is really sexy Reorgs here btw https://bitsonline.com/blockchain-re-orgs-bitcoin-security/
|
|
|
There's no way I'm reading all that but on what basis are you proclaiming Craig is Satoshi? I think on the basis that he's delusional...... Nah! wether craig is satoshi or not the question is "does it help contribute to the market? There ain't no way that it can help after all it is the community will decide to invest in a good project or leave it behind and regret in the near future. This project is good and I am closely monitr it on the updates of this project. Its entire value rests on Wright being Satoshi. Outside of that it's simply another altcoin with bitcoin in its name. If u really believe ur written crap, why u posting it here? What is u want to achieve or just being destructive and trolling? No BSV is the only clean chain that has no crap code seen like segshit or dsv / ctor - altcoin genes ... And it scales like hell, that's what u fear, since only ur dumb fear drives u to troll here. Try to spend ur time more constructive or ur live is just usless - ur choice
|
|
|
|