This.

Yeah, like not to ever listen to his idiot Dad again.

Ah yes, you again.

So you're teaching your son to invest in schemes that are provably not mining the claimed 850GH/s which means that the only returns he'd be getting would be off the back of other chumps who send in their money so he can, if he's lucky, get out with a profit before the fraudulent scheme ultimately collapses?

Are you also teaching him about morality?

Let me get this right, you admit that you are operating an illegal business yet you want people to believe it is working to legitimate parameters, namely, you are actually mining and not simply just another criminal operation?

You've tripped at the first hurdle.

ORLY?

Any of them serve to objectively prove they are anything other than a scam?

Or are you talking in Josh Garza terms of special super-power-ups and double-dips, whatever the fuck they were supposed to be.

Minor cosmetic changes over time do not make up for the fact they have not delivered on any element of the 'news' they initially posted about what was coming which would serve to show they were a legitimate operation.

Because they are not.

Because they have been in 'beta' since they launched, it is a fraudulent way for them to claim that new features, particularly the ones which might be used to prove they are legitimate, such as public pool info etc., will be added 'soon'(tm JoshGarza).

It basically shows that they have spent the entire time since they launched doing one thing and one thing only, selling something they call 'KHS' and promising 'new features' will be coming soon. The kind of new features which a legitimate business can have, but a fraudulent operation, such as scrypt.cc is, cannot have because they do not actually have 850GH/s of mining taking place.

So the 'beta test' hasn't finished, but they've sold all 850GH/s of Scrypt mining power they claim to have?


So they post this 'news' last year when they launched their scam, I mean site, and since then they've achieved how much of this other than sell 850GH/s of Scrypt mining that mathematics proves they do not have?

When did the beta test finish?

Ah yes, the referral bonus scheme.

Which is needed for why, exactly?

ORLY?

Earlier in this thread I pointed out a payment going from scrypt.cc's wallet to http://3wponzi.net16.net/

If withdraws are handled by other addresses, why is scrypt.cc providing, what appears to be, the 'seed funding' for a different failed ponzi?

That's why it was posted, to reassure the kind of people who will send them money and take their pinky-promise that what they are saying is true.

The kind of people who ignore the math that proves scrypt.cc doesn't have 850GH/s of Scrypt mining power.

The answer to your question can be found in the fact that scrypt.cc claim to have 850GH/s of Scrypt hash power, but there is no room for 850GH/s in the entire Scrypt altcoin network. You can check yourself and see that all the public pools, which are actual miners mining with actual hardware from known suppliers (as opposed to scrypt.cc who claim they have super-secret super-cheep-ASIC from super-secret-ASIC-manufacturer) around the globe, pretty much total the stated Scrypt altcoin total hashrate.

FYI, merged-mining hashrates are, as the name suggests, merged hashrates, meaning you can't count Dogecoin and Syscoin hashrates as separate amounts as they are predominantly being mined off the back of the total Litecoin hashrate.

So, even though scrypt.cc has never proven to own 850GH/s worth of mining hardware, by way of simply posting the mining addresses to show the fresh blocks being generated, the site's 'Admin' apparently invites people down to Brazil to see for themselves, like that is ever going to happen, and the scrypt.cc faithful accept that as sufficient proof for them.

The math doesn't add up. That's why people get paid to refer more 'investors' to the site.

Which begs the question, why have a referral bonus scheme in place if you've already sold all of the hashrate?

Best is re-investment. Of course it is, that makes the ponzi scheme work for longer.

After all, the numbers on their screens don't actually relate to anything tangible, do they SpanishSoldier/GermanGiant/RussianRainbow?

Your multiple ponzis only have to cover for when somebody withdraws and, even then, they often will only withdraw to test they can and then immediately 're-invest' it back in for more 'profit'. That's why the scams get to run for so long. That you are clearly running more than one Ponzi scheme, given the fact you've already been caught out for that back in January, obviously gives you and your buddies more flexibility to adjust for if there is a little panic-run on the withdrawals you just move funds from one ponzi to another to cover any shortfall and count on the fact that, once people see they can withdraw, they'll mostly send it all back again to one of your scam ops at least, which is all you need.

I will say it again, for all you people attempting to claim the 'hashing' looks correct, there is NOWHERE for 850GH/s of hash power to exist within the Scrypt mineable altcoins because the public pools of actual real miners hashing already show sufficient power to cover for the total combined hashrate.

This is not bitcoin mining, 850GH/s is a massive amount of hashpower for Scrypt and only if there was a 850GH/s shortfall between the public Scrypt mining pool rates and the total Scrypt network rate for all coins then maybe you could claim that this was where scrypt.cc's claimed hashrate could be.

But there isn't an 850Gh/s gap between the total public hashrate and the total Scrypt network hashrate.

So what do you think you are actually doing 're-investing' other than allowing scrypt.cc to move the numbers around on the screen to make you feel like you actually are doing something tangible?

Do you understand basic math? In order for 'a lot' of people to profit from this scam, in that they are early enough 'investors' they can make over ROI and withdraw it, a considerably larger number of people have to be defrauded of their funds when the scheme ultimately collapses.

You are essentially declaring that you are willing to play the equivalent role of helping a mugger steal from thousands of victims as long as you get to walk away with some profit. This does not make you an 'investor' or even a 'gambler' it just means you're a scumbag who'll crap on everyone for a few satoshis. 'Admin' and his other ponzi chums rely on people like you, otherwise their multiple ponzi schemes would never function for as long as they evidently do.


Yeah, I'll just go with saying I don't care if it bothers you that I frequently post Facts U Dislike in this thread.

It doesn't change a thing, Mohammed, you'll be seeing my solicitor in Manchester court shortly.

Yeah the previous 'miracles of the Quran' thread was closed by the OP because he claimed people were 'trolling, when the truth was people were objectively shredding the claims about that book being 'miraculous' and they didn't like facts getting in the way of their version of the 'truth'.

I have had plenty constructive to say, including pointing out how there is no possible way for this 'cloud mining' op to hide their claimed 850GH/s of Scrypt hash power in the Scrypt altcoin networks when you account for the known manufacturers and pools.

To attempt to claim they have hardware from some super-secret Scrypt ASIC firm as well as mining their own super-secret pools, all the while the public pools numbers are sufficient to cover the known coin network rates, is either delusional or just outright lies from shills who know damn well what the ponzi reality is.

So, no, you don't get to demand people stop posting Facts U Dislike.

Absolutely, therein lies the problem, Muslims refuse to condemn the actions of their prophet and, what is more, I assert that if Muslims agree that it is wholly appalling for a middle-aged man to rape a nine year-old little girl, then they probably need to clarify where they believe their 'god' stands on the subject in that he either was fine with it then and wouldn't be now, which is kinda weird to think that a 'god' would be so fickle on the grounds of human cultural values, or they believe their god was fine with it then and would still be fine with it now.

Which would demonstrate them to be monsters.

Understood but, given what is asserted about the omnipotent, omniscience of their god, 'cultural values' would not have been a factor in 'His' 'communications' with their prophet on the subject of raping a small child.

So my assertion still stands, either they claim that their god approved of child-rape then but does not now, or they are claiming their god approved of child-rape then and still does now.

Would a "God" today advise a person he was communicating with not to rape a child?

In asking this question we do not establish anything about their 'god' ourselves as atheists, but given that theists claim to have knowledge of WhatGodWants(tm), the question can be directed at them to answer because our questions do not concerns the gods we do not believe in but the dysfunctional delusions they do. Understanding what values they ascribe to their world-view by way of having them explain what their god values and does not is critically important to better understand just how toxic their psychology and their religions are.

Muslims citing, "that's how things were back then", is not only tacit approval of their prophet being a child rapist, it also puts them into the awkward position of knowing that it is *not* appropriate and it is not 'right' for an adult to rape a child and that it both risks children's lives physically as well as causes them numerous neuropsychiatric disorders in adulthood, having to consider the fact that if their prophet was genuinely talking to their god and their god was genuinely communicating regularly with their prophet, wouldn't god have known the harm that child rape does and have advised him not to rape Aisha?

So citing "that's how things were" is to say that either their prophet wasn't actually communicating with god and he was simply making sure he got what he wanted by lying to his deluded followers, or god also approved of child rape back then but doesn't now.

Either that or they have to claim that their god did and still does approve of child rape.