Respected Sir,

1. I'm Stedsm, working as a Sales executive in a reputed education-based firm where I need to sell the customers a USB drive with the material these students look for. I can spread awareness simply by putting a great grand banner on the top of my home, can wear a t-shirt with something interesting written about this DApp thing and can also spread small paper templates near technical schools where such students are eager to know new things better.

2. This forum itself is one of the best platforms to market this DApp, and I have got a few more forums and traffic exchanges where I can market this as it'll be relatively new for people and as said before, there are a lot of techies who like to see and learn something new everyday, so DApps would really get a great response from such places. AdWords is good if we have strong budget and keywords.

3. English and Hindi.

4. Honestly speaking, I don't know much about this except that these are decentralized apps that the EOS team wants to market and make people use them.

5. Can't promise what I cannot afford to give, but I'll be able to give at least 36 hours of marketing for this $100 weekly pay.

6. @MrBitcoiner

I'm proudly saying this that we at Chipmixer are completely different people, we're all family here. Unlike other campaigns and campaign managers, we really like to involve in a matter we feel that needs some explanation - be it coming from the campaign manager or us (the participants). As well, as clearly as I (and everybody here) can see, bill didn't really argue with you but tried to help you in your case where you were arguing about non-segwit and vanity addresses. It's really your choice to decide with what attitude you take it, whether you take it as a suggestion or an argument - clearly a case of either misunderstanding or ego hurt. You're not literally enforced by someone to use SegWit here, but as everyone knows, SegWit is really helpful in saving fees and so it is being asked here - it's not for the self-interest of campaign manager but for the participants' convenience.

It's once again starting to appreciate higher from previous days and I even saw mempool clogged with too many transactions during last few days. I've had a test transaction that went wrong, I checked how much time does it take to confirm and didn't add more fee (intentionally kept priority at normal) and it turned grey for me. This is the transaction that confirmed after ~9 hours - https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/fb266692b2b43d511be23f6de16c9eeb63af331f9c444b65a07ccf076c89b695

I also have a thread regarding this - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5050686.0

P.S.: Posted my thread reference here for others to learn not to make such mistakes.

Thanks for the help, mate.


I've used the Replace By Fee method in order to try to increase the fee if such situation occurs, but accidentally sent the whole amount in urgency due to which I can't even add anything to it ATM. But I believe that it should get confirmed today itself and shouldn't take more than 3-4 hours at the most. This was just a test but sometimes, it proves to be very painful when you try to check something and the experiment goes wrong.

Hey miners, what have you been up to?
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/fb266692b2b43d511be23f6de16c9eeb63af331f9c444b65a07ccf076c89b695

Check this out, a SegWit transaction, fee that was recommended by the wallet itself (GreenBits wallet it is) and Voila! It's now stuck. I can't believe fees are once again playing games as even transactions with fee less than 1 sat/byte used to confirm in the next block but I guess it's not going to be the same anymore. It's almost more than an hour and I'm still waiting, I wanted to see what will happen with the least fee as I'm aware about GreenBits fee structure they use during sending a transaction. I guess the days of taking advantage of low fees will be going missing again, soon.

P.S.: If possible, someone please accelerate this transaction and help me get this confirmed asap as I don't want to wait being stuck in a mess I created myself.  

14a1d3c2d771139218d8dca4a641e5a2dad9c4e2024c6fcb16264c2069386bb5
Repaid, and thanks a lot for this as it helped a lot.
Please confirm this here.

I use localbitcoins but not by going through the website itself as I call (some really reputed) traders and directly trade with them offline, so as to save both of us a penny and on the other hand, do it at our own convenience so there's no need to wait for the trader to come online after trade is opened at localbitcoins, but as we're going out of the exchange, the timeline to complete the trade cuts down to nearly a few minutes.

Hey Ddmr, couldn't stop myself from bumping this.
Thanks for the most interesting data I've been trying to find all over the forum. Everything is now clear and easy to find that which section/subsection is really worth working on to get better number of merits, especially for newbies (not saying that sections other than those are not useful but they probably need proper knowledge and skills as you said, because as an example here, it is mostly tough for a native French speaker to earn a merit in an Indonesian local board if they ever try to do so.) While people roam here and there trying to post shit and increase their post count thereby trying to increase their merits with it, they should put in some effort to be really eligible for those merits. Some user here said that you really work hard for your merits and earn them, everyone should take a morale from this post and put in a lot of efforts and make us give that damn merit to them. I have a question here that I'm all confused about, where did you get all the data that you used in order to create these tabs with such a well-determined explanation? I mean from where did you get those numbers of users and their merits based on which you made all your calculations?

It's independent in the case that it's a whole new concept, but it doesn't mean that it is not independent due to its valuation in fiat and esp. $ as you said, because if not fiat something is needed to evaluate it else how will you decide that what's the value of something for which miners are burning both their electricity and computing power. And about keeping us independent from Government, it's us who are supporting them by showing them every single transaction as needed in a regulated economy - this is not Bitcoin was derived for - the main property of it is to keep our finances and especially us - anonymous, but I can't really find any place where we may be said as anonymous except decentralized exchanges only, even in P2P, a person poses risks of either getting scammed or their data leaked in case the other party is fraud or suspects you for something.

The only rule to be followed here is: Posting in the correct thread at correct time. According to my knowledge, the best threads where best discussions are conducted and where chances of getting merits are more is Meta section. Still, it's like for someone, it's a piece of cake and for others, it's like conquering a war whilst trying to make a lot of competitors lose on the basis of their knowledge and posting skills. There are a lot of interesting topics I've seen on the forum which were started by newbies and got merited. As well, for those who think that we don't see your posts, then there are still merit sources and a few people are also helping by asking for your best posts on their thread and a few do it the other way by asking you to PM the same. And yeah, merit is one of the hottest topics here on the forum because if not discussed properly, shitposts will continue to happen and the intention to make this forum a spam-free place for which this system was introduced - will never be met.

If you think that scam ICOs are limited to just run away with your money, think again. Visit this thread: ICO scammers, Sell your uploaded KYC ID documents, adress for a lot of money. and see - for how much is your KYC data being sold by them in the dark markets. Trust an ICO and give your data ONLY if you are aware of the risks that your data maybe compromised at a point where ICO turns into a scam as when it's about scamming, scammers have shitheads to make it worst for everybody and they don't think of anyone except money. The image in that thread clearly shows how cheap is the worth of our KYC and these scammers' brains are ridiculously ill to sell such user data breaking everyone's trust and still making money over it.

The reason why I don't participate in most of these ICOs and their Airdrops is this only, the biggest fear I had in my heart everytime I thought to get in an ICO and the next minute I stopped myself from getting in. It's better to buy those coins directly over the exchange if the project works out well in the market of such shitty ICOs where our data is sold for pennies. Shocked to see my fear turned real, and surprised that the value of our data is just BTC0.003. Really unexpected, but I think there should be an authority to authenticate the trustworthiness of an ICO and give a certificate of authentication before anyone even gives their KYC docs to them, so no need to invest before any true rating is given.

First things first, an addiction is when we're stuck into something due to our mind constantly thinking about the same and it depends totally upon us whether to get out of it or not, whereas a disease is when we're diagnosed with something that's in our body due to various factors such as unhygienic environment, unhealthy foods, etc. and our mind has nothing to do with it and a disease can be healed with medicines, so comparing both of them is useless.
Drug is a part of gambling (if casinos allow drugs at their premises) and I somewhere agree that both type of addictions are almost same as both are not good, one for health and other for finance.


Gambling is one type of a group of games only but in a different genre, so no need to forbid any gambling activities, and about treating those who're addicted, no one can stop you from doing it unless you're not going to choose the right path. Still, ask them to go to different gambling awareness websites to learn more on how to stop themselves from going on those casinos/websites.

It is the brain of human that found blockchain, and so, it'll be human himself who'll find a solution for those fiat casinos to implement this "provably fair" thing if they really want their players to know everything about their bets and to prove that they've not cheated over them (users).

---

That's true, no casino is stupid enough to strike a hammer on their foot by adding such algorithm as "provably fair" because it'll help a lot of users to validate if their loss was actually real or they were cheated. I tried to find a casino where a player could get a verifier to check if their bet was provably fair, but none was found. Bet365 is one of the biggest names in the gambling industry and has a lot of users playing there all day long and they have a dice game too, but there were many users complaining about their losses as it's really easy for a fiat casino to cheat on its users by not letting the users verify their rolls through any means.

Is it just due to Grammatical issues or that you yourself aren't aware of this HASH thing and posted just to add one more post to your portfolio? You tried to play wise, but did you do it right? No. And yes, nobody in this busy world is too lazy to visit https://www.google.com or even open Google's search app and ask for the same if they aren't aware of what is HASH. It takes not even a whole second in order for Google to show the exact results, one of which you've demonstrated here.



Not trying to be rude here dude, I've tried to put the facts in front of you and there's nothing wrong in sharing anything here, it's just that you should actually know what you're posting about. For example, if I ask you anything out of the box related to this SHA-256, will you be able to answer?

You may have used the Code function itself to post those links because the links which seem to be suspicious to the forum are hereby deleted without any notice.

I appreciate that you tried to say something here, but on another note, what's the meaning of posting the content that's already available over the internet and can be easily found once Googled? This may/may not be considered plagiarism based on many factors but it's not really needed as you didn't add anything extra to it in your own words and didn't try to describe it in your way.


Everyone here is, else what's the reason for you to post it?
Didn't you post this to earn some merits?  

Based on the BPIP project, is it possible to track that on which "deleted" post, the merit was given so as to stop merit abuse by those who try to do it to achieve higher ranks without any specific qualifications? I'd really recommend such a system where when a thread is deleted (in which a post is made gets deleted)/user's post is deleted for any reasons by mods, the Merits should automatically either be reverted back (least recommended) or the Merits should be burnt (out of the system to take that amount of merits from those abusers to make them think twice before sending it back to their alts/merit buyers). I really think that even if the merits were given on a good quality post and the thread itself gets deleted in which it was made, then those merits should be of no use as the thread on which they were made - doesn't exist anymore.

When we make a valuable post, we get rewarded in the form of "merits" here - a system injected to stop spam and encourage high quality comments. But, a question immediately struck to my mind and I thought I should definitely ask this as it's something really interesting.

When a user deletes their post/thread or when a mod deletes a user's posts/threads (least possiblity) due to low quality which has 1 or more merits given to it, what will happen to those merits? As we're aware that merits once given cannot be reverted back, will it still show in addition to the total merits in that user's profile?

I've already told about this that I'm not really saying that all those same subject threads aren't worth making comments into, as few or many of them add up value and spice to the same subject by adding a whole new twist to the topic with a somewhat/completely different content in the OP, sometimes people who post in those threads don't watch OP or even first few posts, and they just try to add up more spice to the conversation by saying the same thing again and again (spam) which turns that complimentary debate into an unnecessary box of matchsticks which is left empty (even if full as it contains nothing but shit).

But till date, I haven't heard a single complaint about them like they've cheated any of their users (or else I've not yet encountered any).


That's why I think that as Deribit is relatively new, it looks like a shooting star in the sky from which I can wish anything and it might come true, it's an early-bird opportunity for those who want to get rid of the dirty games that are being played at Bitmex through their market-maker.


True, someone needs to lose money for another one to win, but at what cost? Stopping those whales by locking their accounts for any/no reason is good?


  Never knew this. But I don't have anything to do with it, I'm interested in getting in if there's really nothing (like cheating or account closure without any valid reason) going on there as I don't really want to experience the same thing I did at Bitmex.