Basically, yeah.

Agreed.  If government had any sense of its citizen's well being in mind (especially in light of financial crisis that's awful popular today), it will encourage the use of Bitcoin and/or PM, and fix their mistakes by picking up some form of standard for their own currency (or just ditch it for Bitcoin and stop worrying about it.)

However, most governments, if not all, are directly beneath the foot of the banks, which do not have the citizen's best interest in mind; they only want to make profits.  Because politicians accept bribes (a.k.a. corruption), anything could happen.  If any government knew what it was doing, it wouldn't attempt to limit growth; it would instead encourage it, and would stop censoring the Internet, and allow Bitcoin to grow where it will.

The only way it would work is if they helped fund exchanges, and made it considerably less of a bitch than it is now.  I think they'll try to cater to the Bitcoin crowd, but wouldn't necessarily adopt Bitcoin itself.

Sorry; I was typing one up, but noticed myrkul had took it.

My interpretation of freedom is to have as much agency as possible while allowing others an equal amount of agency.  In other words, the role of the state (dominant) and the citizen (submissive) do not coincide with this belief, as the state (and whoever is behind it) will always have more agency than any one individual.

I approve.

Well, the radioactivity could be given off from a nuclear engine, which rot the half-man half-robot-robot to the point of zombie...all in all, I still think it's a better source of energy than women's panties.

I'm beginning to see the connection here.

I'd rage against the machine.

That's a lot of movies!

MAYBE A FEW WEEKS AGO THEYMOS ADDED THE SELF-MODERATION FEATURE ALSO YOU SHOULD TURN OFF YOUR CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL

Do any of them accept Bitcoin? 

So if HoR keeps pushing this thing into congress, and it keeps getting swatted down...

At which point do we get to fire our representatives?  They're obviously not listening

That's pretty  much the only problem right now.

Precisely why I avoid driving anyway.  One false move and it's the hospital or the morgue.

In thousands of years, they've never changed and never evolved.  People change; governments still wage war and waste tax money.  We're still chained to serve those above us.  And I don't see how flood and famine have anything to do with NAP; flood and famine aren't living things, they don't have conscious, so NAP has nothing to do with that.

Are you seriously comparing AnCap to the likes of Christianity?  Have you taken a look at what you worship and give tribute?  Shit, at least the Church gives you the option to donate; the government just tells you to cough up or get out.  You're so deep into statism that you can't even see the connection between government and religion.  If anything AnCap is the exact opposite of any of that; it's like you're trying to imply Atheism is the most Theistic religion of them all--whoops, except it's not even a religion.  Funny how atheists turn up all around the world, despite coming from unique backgrounds, and the want for freedom just so happens to occur the same way.  Can you guess the prerequisites of being a statist?  I'll give you a hint; you're not a statist from birth.

Not trying to make fun of you  But I just don't agree that being is cause for aggression.

I've never attempted to listen to one before.  It might help me out tho, as I have to speak while reading anyway, or else my mind floats away into some random BS and five pages later I have no idea what's happening in the story.

...we lost?   Or does senate also have to approve of it?