Then again, Kokjo believes the action of existing is enough provocation to kill someone.  There are few scenarios where this is applicable:

1. Zombie T-Virus
2. Radioactive
3. Satan
4. Having your soul used in a weird Japanese gore film to power a supermassive zombie radioactive satan-bot.

But in most cases, I think we can all agree that merely existing shouldn't be cause to hurt someone.  Unless you're a statist, of course, and making the first move is fair game.

C'mon now, we're civilized* folk.  There's no need to hit someone because they said something you didn't like

* Debatable.

Not a whole lot's happened between $250 and now, so I presume it'll keep being volatile. 

The west coast is huge on Bitcoin.  The east coast...not so much.  I'm pretty sure San Francisco and all those other big western cities are where you're going to find the most Bitcoin presence.

Anyone who thought there, their, and they're was a good idea needs to be shot

And if you think that's bad, check this out: The definitions of "run".

Sounds like you're two clicks away from libertarian

Buttercoin seems neat but A.) confused me because I thought it was an altcoin and B.) will do no good if people are still using the Gox (like they are right now.  You know who you are.)

Lol that wasn't directed at you   I already know I can't get through to you.

An ISP owned by the public would be phenomenal against SOPA & CISPA rising from the dead over and over again.  As long as it worked at all, I'd be cool with it being a tad slow.  It may not be great for gaming, but at least no single person can be cut off from the rest.

If I can ensure my privacy then I'm all in on making this happen.

"Mike Christ"

"s/he"

Seriously? 

Anyway, thanks for answering my question.  Yes, I realize America's a load of horse shit, and it's probably better somewhere else.  But let's not forget, the only reason America rose to such extreme power was through government.  There is no anarchistic society which can band together and start world wars.  If America wasn't the power it was today, it would be Russia, or China, the other massive states.  The point is, I don't like war, and there is no, "But war is necessary because people are people!"  I can't explain that to a statist, as you don't seem to realize there's even an option B, that if government is simply people, why is large government always so disconnected with its people?  Certainly, Anarchism seems very out there, but it's not much different than Atheism.  If 99 out of 100 people believe God is real, doesn't that make that 1 guy a total nut-job?  Yes, because 99 people agree; they don't need logic, or reason, they just need numbers.  The state has nothing but numbers, and anyone who says, "Well, wait a second, what if--" is immediately shot down because how could there be anything different than what there's always been?

Is it too much to ask that you fit your thoughts into one concise paragraph?    MysteryMiner pulls this same shit, because he refuses to take arguments as complete packages; instead, he isolates every single sentence as if they had nothing to do with each other.  I'm not going to be roving over every small detail; you're still circling around my points, nit-picking what you want out of my argument to fit yours.  If you're not going to answer my question, this same exact question I've presented every single time, why should I answer yours?


Humor me, at least once.

Do you understand what the state is, and do you support what it does?

It's a very simple question, and begs a simple answer.  I'm going to assume, if your next response is more nit-picking, or anything that doesn't remotely resemble "yes" or no", that it's definite support.  In which case, nothing I could ever say will make sense to you; after all, you believe libertarians are basically cultists, and everything which comes out of their mouths is bullshit, right?  So why should I bother arguing if you've determined I'm automatically wrong, before I've ever had the chance to explain?  You already won, bub.  Celebrate.  Go wank.

C'mon, Australia.  Get it together!

How did it come to this? 

Only Texas can mess with Texas.

A flat tax rate would do wonders for America.  A progressive tax rate just means, the more successful you are, the more you'll be punished.

Banning pressure cookers would just mean legal cooks would be out of pressure cookers, but the real street chefs would still get their hands on them.

It is a little bit out there.  However, as a working artist, I can say Bitcoin is way better than PayPal as a means of accepting payment via the Internet.

I'm assuming I have to be religious and/or a rambler to understand the contents of this article. 

I predict the price will go up and then the price will go down.