At least there's some decency left on this thread.

I would pay to find out how old crumbs & co are and what they do with their day-to-day lives. Simply cannot believe the amount of time they spend on here typing inanities.

Network latency or your cgminer.conf needs adjusting.

Do a speedtest and post your cgminer.conf...

Of all the mining companies who have failed to hit deadlines or worse you throw stones at KnC - the ONE company that has delivered on time and with relatively little issue. How do you think they raised $28M? They run a tight ship and get things done. KnC is THE competition in this space. If any mining company can put an engineering team together that can achieve a highly competitive 20nm device it's KnC.

I would not be playing them down or lead anyone else invested in the mining industry to do so. They are the top dog and are aiming to stay there. Let's be reasonable with our competitive analysis here.

That said, I agree that this year will still see a high demand for miners, even if KnC enters the first 20nm miner successfully.

"ignore" is kind of pointless when so many users love to quote the trolls and I have to see their blather anyways. If anything, this thread has strengthened my critical analysis skills. I read, think, then disregard about 90% of everything in here. Just like watching the news on tv, you learn to read between the lines and spot outright manipulation and lies. 

I think youre correct here ukyo. Regardless if the 106BTC owned are ActM-Funds or Ken's private funds. He cant simply sell them because the shares belong to a private person not weexchange. As long as ken cant proof that ukyo is personally liable he cant sell them because weexchange is in debt. Its a legal risk he takes. It would b different if ukyo personally is in debt because then it would be legal i believe.

On top this sell means lowering the shareprice for all shareholders.

If the shares are owned by weexchange it would be legal too. It would be luck for the person that has something that belongs to weexchange. Though it would be unfortunate for all other weexchange victims. The shares would belong to the company and not to a specific person then.

If wishes were horses, beggars would ride.  Start with an absurd premise, get an absurd conclusion

Does anyone know the value of Bitcoins ACTM lost out of BitFunder?

Bitfunder/WeExchange Problems:

We have ~106 BTC in the Bitfunder/WeExchange system which we can not obtain.  We have sent Bitfunder's/WeExchange's Ukyo a Legal Demand For Payment within 72 hours.  We expect this problem to result in the loss of the 106 BTC.  We are meeting with our Lawyers to determine what our next steps will be.  This 106 BTC has been deducted from our liquid cash position above.

I also got a payout, my graph has been stuck all day though.

Yes. The 28nm goes full custom with eASIC so we get a market leading chip when that arrives. While we wait for that (and we were always going to be waiting) Ken has struck up a partnership to mass produce cheap 55nm chips that will provide us with Millions in revenue to throw at our 28nm. This move shows us Ken is working far more than anyone suspected at making us a success.

Our chances of knocking out huge numbers of leading performance 28nm ASIC's just went up about 1000%.