knybe
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 25, 2014, 05:01:49 AM |
|
"ignore" is kind of pointless when so many users love to quote the trolls and I have to see their blather anyways. If anything, this thread has strengthened my critical analysis skills. I read, think, then disregard about 90% of everything in here. Just like watching the news on tv, you learn to read between the lines and spot outright manipulation and lies.
need a good one of these:
|
|
|
|
R_Lem
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 25, 2014, 05:20:23 AM |
|
"ignore" is kind of pointless when so many users love to quote the trolls and I have to see their blather anyways. If anything, this thread has strengthened my critical analysis skills. I read, think, then disregard about 90% of everything in here. Just like watching the news on tv, you learn to read between the lines and spot outright manipulation and lies.
True, and that's generally how I operate but I'd say reading and discerning the value of every post in this troll infested thread is way more pointless than making use of ignore. You could also use those mental skills to quickly skip the quoted crap too. You'll save yourself a lot of time.
|
|
|
|
BadBear
v2.0
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1128
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 25, 2014, 07:33:40 AM Last edit: January 25, 2014, 07:46:20 AM by BadBear |
|
"ignore" is kind of pointless when so many users love to quote the trolls and I have to see their blather anyways. If anything, this thread has strengthened my critical analysis skills. I read, think, then disregard about 90% of everything in here. Just like watching the news on tv, you learn to read between the lines and spot outright manipulation and lies.
Yeah I've tried to deal with it but so many people are intent on responding to it, giving them the attention they want, and making sure the conversation is going to center around that, it's kind of pointless. Kind of like trying to stop raccoons from coming in your yard while there's people throwing food out the windows, just ain't gonna happen. Oh well.
|
|
|
|
PurpleTentacle
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 25, 2014, 07:48:58 AM |
|
Actually, the trolls are the reason I still have faith in this company. They put so much time and effort into trolling ActM, there just has to be a big potential for the company.
Btw, crumbs using the pronoun "we" is misleading as he's neither a shareholder nor a customer.
|
|
|
|
VinceSamios
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 25, 2014, 08:28:54 AM |
|
... 1. manufacture their own full custom 28nm chips ... There are three i can think of, though Active Mining is not one of them. A few companies meet _one_ of four criteria.... only one....
|
|
|
|
tom.hashemi
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 25, 2014, 11:41:34 AM |
|
Actually, the trolls are the reason I still have faith in this company. They put so much time and effort into trolling ActM, there just has to be a big potential for the company.
Btw, crumbs using the pronoun "we" is misleading as he's neither a shareholder nor a customer.
+1
|
|
|
|
EduardoDeCastro
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 25, 2014, 01:04:36 PM |
|
... 1. manufacture their own full custom 28nm chips ... There are three i can think of, though Active Mining is not one of them. A few companies meet _one_ of four criteria.... only one.... The point is Active Mining does not meet this crucial criterion. Active mining does not manufacture 28nm chips. Other companies do, Active Mining does not. Active mining doesn't manufacture *anything*, unless you count broken promises as its products.
|
|
|
|
mainline
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 25, 2014, 01:15:32 PM |
|
Actually, the trolls are the reason I still have faith in this company. They put so much time and effort into trolling ActM, there just has to be a big potential for the company. ...
This kind of broken logic is exactly what attracts the trolls. To state the obvious, you have "invested" in a sideshow. The "investors" are also the stars, making this thread the most reliable source of mirth on this forum. Your problem is the failure to properly monetize your offering. You have mistakenly concluded that Active Mining makes chips, while its greatest (and only) product is comedy. Forget about selling ASICs. Sell tickets.
|
|
|
|
breadcrumbs
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 25, 2014, 02:36:09 PM |
|
The real issues are constantly being neglected.
The real issue is accountability. The company is registered in Belize, there is no SEC guidance.
Everything has been done to avoid legal oversight.
There is no board of directors which remove the CEO and make him CTO and install someone with better communications, management and negotiation skills.
Ken might finally succeed. Success means only one thing. Success means all Len Slaughter's promises have been fulfilled. Those promises are: The full .0025 per share has been paid out Active Mining is mining bitcoin on its own hardware Active Mining has completed shipping of product (and product means mining hardware and not anything else) to all those who have preordered mining hardware.
What will happen if Active Mining does not complete all of those promises? What will happen if Active Mining never transfers shares to an active trading exchange? What will happen if Active Mining does not pay out the full .0025? What will happen if no Bitcoin mining hardware is ever completed and set to fully function?
Absolutely nothing. There is no board of directors which can fire the CEO for his failure. There will be many disgruntled shareholders who will either not have the organization, will or funds to seek civil lawsuits.
The real trolls are those chearleaders who post complex mathematical analysis whose fundamental givens are all speculative anyway.
The real questions important for the eventual success of Active Mining have not yet been answered.
|
|
|
|
breadcrumbs
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 25, 2014, 02:44:33 PM |
|
What has Ken Slaughter been doing for the last six months? Why are there no chips and working mining rigs already functioning? What has Ken Slaughter done with the money, both US dollars and Bitcoin which he has accumulated from the sale of stock shares.
Has Ken Slaughter and family been using Active Mining moneys for daily living expenses? What salary has Ken Slaughter and family been taking from Active Mining funds?
Because the CEO of Active Mining does not provide hard data, we, his many shareholders, have no idea what is actually happening with the company which we ostensibly own.
At some point, something will happen which will limit all this. That is either production of mining hardware, or running out of money or discovering that it is impossible given the remaining funds and resources to produce working hardware
If Active Mining runs out of money, its CEO will probably panic. He will need to pay his expenses and so he will try to find another Bitcoin or technology company. That will involve another attempt at getting money from others.
If Active Mining runs out of money, its CEO will probably panic, will have nightmares of shareholders coming after him, of the SEC coming after him, of his reputation being tarnished forever on the Internet, and of a host of angry individual who seek justice, both financial and emotional.
The CEO will suppose that having been incorporated in Belize will somehow protect him, but the bottom line will be that all the money will be lost.
Another possibility will be that hardware will be produced but with too little hashing power to be profitable. That would not be such a bad eventuality since at least it would show that Ken Slaughter had completed and accomplished something. In addition, someone would buy the hardware and there would be some mining. Some of the .0025 could be paid out, and at least it would show some serious effort of the part of the CEO. After all, in a hard engineering class, getting a grade of B is better than getting an F, even if it is not an A.
What does this all mean?
|
|
|
|
|
zefyr0s
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 25, 2014, 03:01:34 PM |
|
The goal here by certain parties is clearly either A) to prep weak hands or B) to disparage the company in favor of the one they work/shill for. That is it.
|
|
|
|
zumzero
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 25, 2014, 03:02:37 PM |
|
And so as the intensity of the trolling increases, so does their desperation as ActM ploughs on with relentless determination. The trolls have months left in them but they will be brushed aside as ActM picks up momentum and starts to deliver on the promise of making its shareholders successful.
Consider this; If ActM becomes an enormous success then those who hold shares will make fantastic profit. Those who hold many shares will become very wealthy, and those whales out there could become among the wealthiest people on the planet provided they hold their bitcoins long enough. It is an absolute certainty that people who sell their shares are denying themselves this opportunity with ActM. Make no mistake, if you are one of these people your shares and therefore your opportunity will be passed on to some of the trolls who seek to undermine your confidence and destroy your belief in ActM.
The greatest threat here is not from the trolls but from people's resolve.
|
|
|
|
|
minerpart
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
IIIIII====II====IIIIII
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 25, 2014, 03:11:21 PM |
|
Lol to Eduardo going into OVERDRIVE today. That is a great sign for everyone. You can almost smell his desperation. Right on cue, just as shares are about to be traded live again he pulls out all the stops. The timing is impeccable - could he possibly want cheap shares? mmmmmmm ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) OK about this point: sometimes the Trolls have a point. Well what that means is sometimes a Troll states the obvious. They don't really make good points atall, they make obvious points. Yes Ken's comms have been lacking - err we know No we have no hard evidence of a miner - except the eASIC press release that's right No we don't know what wages the staff are drawing - no we don't No we don't have very detailed accounts - no we don't etc etc Now personally I think the reason we are not hard on Ken on these areas is because of the ever present pressure from the Trolls. They actually prevent a healthy discussion and strong questioning of Ken on here because everyone is always working on battling the lies and disruption from the Trolls.Before the Trolls appeared on this thread we shareholders questioned Ken. We also battled with him over the original IPO - and it was changed significantly. We got a much better deal for the shareholders. MUCH much better. Ken redacted his original IPO to his own detriment. He put himself in the position where he now needs to make around 25-50Million dollars of profit for shareholders BEFORE he gets any money from the dividends. So the point is we are more than capable of taking Ken to task without the Trolls. And we would do a much better job without their input. But while they are so active on here posting multiple times per page we are distracted from doing so. Ken is also so fed up he has all but abandoned interacting on the thread. This means the Trolls are being very effective. You can't deny that. But they are effective at total disruption not at questioning Ken on the specifics that we all want to know.
|
|
|
|
antcastle
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 25, 2014, 03:22:11 PM |
|
Q: Please illustrate the learning process of an Active Miner. Be specific. A: Observe: ...
...
...
...
![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif) Active Mining: Strength Through Ignorance!
|
|
|
|
Minor Miner
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1019
Be A Digital Miner
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 25, 2014, 03:32:31 PM |
|
Why is this thread a constant cesspool? It always, ALWAYS, devolves into the major players going at each other, while the rest of us are sitting here just waiting for news or new information. We would love some actual discussion, but instead we get such crap with people coming in and spouting their attacks on each other. Why can't they be done via PM? Or on twitter if you demand an audience? Hell, why are they even still allowed to post here!? And it seems that for some reason this only happens in Active Mining threads, and much more rarely in Asic Mining threads.
The trolls are scared of what Active Mining will be able to achieve. I do not think anyone is that scared of how poorly you have shepherded over $10M in other people's money and produced absolutely nothing other than some great tax losses (if you ever have income to offset them).
|
|
|
|
minerpart
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
IIIIII====II====IIIIII
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 25, 2014, 03:44:17 PM |
|
The day eASIC come on here and say sorry Ken is lieing there is no 28nm custom chip.
or
The day UMC come on here and say sorry Ken is lieing there is no 55nm custom chip
then I will wake up.
Till then, you are the one who needs a reality check.
|
|
|
|
breadcrumbs
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 25, 2014, 03:52:24 PM |
|
Where are the products? Where is the hashing power?
Where is the money? How has the money been used?
Why do some of you act like white-hate trolls and feel the intense need to defend a company which has been so inconsistent.
It is true that IF Active Mining succeeds, some people will make a great deal of money.
You all should know that even if all the outstanding shares are added up, it is still less than the number of shares which Ken Slaughter and family are holding.
If Active Mining pays out the complete .0025 Bitcoin per share, he will personally benefit. That is not a complaint. It is the way Ken Slaughter SHOULD be running that part of his company.
Some of the so called cheerleaders, whom I prefer to call white-hat trolls, have some weird logic. None of them are big shareholders. None of them own over 100,000 shares. Nothing any of them say will influence the CEO or will change the timetable for production or will improve or even lessen the stock price.
The facts remain, only Ken Slaughter's opinions and decisions matter. We here may be able to put some little pressure on him, but, as we have seen, what is said here really affects nothing. It should be the side show, but because of the lack of results on the part of Active Mining, it has become the Center Ring show.
There is more evidence to indicate that Active Mining will fail than there is that it will succeed. That is just based upon facts.
Some of you white-hat trolls are trying to dismiss comments made here by those who are more realistic by trying to say that the motivation is to lower the price or destroy the company. I would like nothing more than for Active Mining to transfer all accounts and share to an active exchange, and for Active Mining to ramp up assembly of real miners and start mining on an industrial level.
But, for that to happen, Ken will have to do a better job of managing human resources. Why did it take him so long to hire a couple of competent engineers who were introduced to him by someone from this thread?
What has Ken been doing for the last 6 months?
Will the next 6 months like the previous 6 months?
We have been talking about this long enough. How about some accountability. How about a real deadline. How about, September 1. If by September 1, 2014, if shares are NOT being traded on an exchange and if there is less than 10,000 gigahash mining for Active Mining, we finally hold Ken Slaughter accountable with both Belize and Missouri, USA, and US Federal authorities. It is January 25th today. Is 8 months enough time for Ken and Active Mining to be on a profit making track?
|
|
|
|
minerpart
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
IIIIII====II====IIIIII
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 25, 2014, 03:59:33 PM |
|
Where is the money? How has the money been used?
That is the only question that needs an answer really, and always conveniently ignored. There is 54,000 USD in the dividend wallet - accounted for. There was 106,000 USD stolen by Ukyo and now in theory tied up in his shares. There are several Million dollars in company liquid assets - as stated in company financial release. Now please FO. We are grown ups and we can look after ourselves.
|
|
|
|
|