Si no tienes el capital ni el código del casino entonces por que alguien se asociaría contigo? El software de un casino no es algo simple, personalmente estuve trabajando en un proyecto de desarrollo de este tipo de software y la seguridad se algo complejo de cubrir.

Y una vez que tienes el software del casino mantenerlo representa costos elevados. Tanto en el servidor, como en la licencia, con en el servicio al cliente tienes que pagar grandes sumas para poder ejecutar un proyecto profesional.


Fuente: https://www.gaminglicensing.com/spa/gambling-licence-cost/

No es por destruir tus sueños, pero al menos que no consigas unos 100,000 Euros, no creo que puedas iniciar un casino.

This is a double edge sword... What happens if the tweet says:


That for sure will break the bitcoin prize, and I see the bot was coded to take the 0.5% loss, so, it will not hurt much, but that 0.5% will be gone, so, I'm not sure if I would run this bot.

That's the main problem if Musk tweets something bad about BTC is a risk for our money. But it would be nice if you can make a version for dogecoin too.

Dogecoin was always a shit coin, but in the software side it could look better than bitcoin, have you ever asked yourself what's the difference between doge and bitcoin, and why doge is better? Here are 2 main reasons:

1.- Transaction Fees: To send dogecoin has a cost of 1 doge. that's 0.00000099 btc for each transaction.
2.- Blocks each minute.

But there is a bad side for doge:

1.- There are 128,866,135,183 Doges in circulation.
2.- There is no halving, so, the coins will be unlimited.

If we understand this base, then we can think about how far can dogecoin go. And I say it would be really hard to see it at $1 each doge.

Why the starting bid is so high? At this price no one will buy it, you should try with a starting bid of 0.001btc, don't be Grady.  

And how the replies affect the value? if you got the first pages talking about the post and not about the service you want to promote i think it should lose value.

Is the first time I see someone selling a post as NFT. and the idea is really original, so good luck with it.

OP is asking for the big money, he only wants to be rich by the easy way.

If we only want to know how to become rich with bitcoin, then that's easy. Buy now and wait 5 years, that's the right formula and all those who have followed now are rich. The hard part is to hold, it's easy to say it, but not all of us can do it the way we should. So, hold like a boss and you will get the big money from bitcoin.

You are right bob, all the bitcoin services (exchanges or casinos) have a record of all the deposits, transactions, and withdrawals.

OP could verify directly in the blockchain that information only if he has made a withdraw to a bitcoin address anytime he made the purchase. If he only keeps the bitcoins in the exchange then it will be impossible to verify it from the blockchain.

The mining process isn't only to get the mining reward, is important to mention that mining is the only way to avoid the double-spend, and is a indispensable process of blockchain. This means the miners will never stop mining, even if the block reward it's zero they will keep mining to get the transaction fees.

This is how blockchain works, the blocks need to be validated to confirm the transactions. You can't cut off the miners, maybe you can change from PoW to PoS, but that only change the validation process but that validation is always necessary for the current blockchain structure.

I would say the assumption is wrong... The top reach bitcoin address is public information, and right now the address with more bitcoin is this one: 34xp4vRoCGJym3xR7yCVPFHoCNxv4Twseo with 143528.45848982 BTC

So, 1 million BTC wallet is what we call 'FakeNews' but what is real is the information about how many Bitcoins Shatoshi Nakamoto Has, and in theory, he has a little more than 1 Million.

Sources:
https://bitinfocharts.com/top-100-richest-bitcoin-addresses.html
https://btc.com/stats/rich-list
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/34xp4vRoCGJym3xR7yCVPFHoCNxv4Twseo

Hace unos días paso algo interesante con los drivers de video de las nuevas tarjetas gráficas de nvidia serie 3000, dichas tarjetas se configuran con un driver que solo permite minar con el 50% del poder de la tarjeta, sin embargo los de nvidia liberaron unos drivers para desarrolladores y sin darse cuenta dichos drivers ya no tenían la limitante y permiten minar con el 100% de la tarjeta.

Cuando Nvidia se dio cuenta de este error eliminaron los drivers de su página, pero ya era demasiado tarde, cualquiera puede acceder a estos drivers y sacarle el mayor jugo posible a su tarjeta de video en temas de minado.

La cuestión aquí es que lo hacen parecer como si fuera una coincidencia, sin embargo yo creo que fue algo planeado ya que ellos saben que una parte enorme de su mercado son los mineros. Ustedes creen que fue simple casualidad?

Fuente: https://www.xataka.com/componentes/visto-no-visto-nvidia-desbloquea-mineria-ethereum-sus-rtx-3060-luego-retira-controlador-que-desbloqueaba

You can get merits on any post because merits are sent from users, if they like what are you posting then you will get merits.

Some users like to only post in giveaways and bounties, that kind of post doesn't give merits at all... so, the best way to get them is by sharing high-quality info. And merits are required to grow your account, if you want to be legendary someday then you need to get 1000 merits.

Solo-mining will give fresh and untraceable coins, I'm with you about this as the most anonymous way, but if the coins are old with a big history you can always use a mixer service to put them on an untraceable wallet.

If OP uses Monero and a exchange, the coins still traceable because the exchange register the operation even if the Monero Blockchain hides all the information, the exchange will have a user, mail, and IP for that transaction, so, that way isn't anonymous at all.

Isn't about a user cracking the code, to apply a change on the network then more than 50% of the nodes should run with that change. In theory, this could be possible, but more than 50% of the people should be agreed with this idea and that's the complex part.

When governments print more money the coins lose their value, that could happen to bitcoin if a fork like that comes.

So, my answer is, yes, it can be manipulated but it will never happen.

Concuerdo con Ddmr, la presentación del proyecto debe de ser muy profesional y de preferencia en ingles, y mas que presentarlo debes de sentir como si lo estuvieras vendiendo. Incluso puedes iniciar un hilo en esta sección en español platicando un poco sobre el proyecto y así tratar de juntar un equipo.

Podrías también intentar conseguir un préstamo a través del banco para comprar BTC y financiar tu proyecto.

Glaciers are melting, until we understand that problem as part of global warming we will be able to find a solution, and I'm sorry to say this but the solution isn't in any crypto coin or any other software. We are talking about a physical process, more temperature, more CO2 in the air, and less ice in the poles. So, physical problems need physical solutions, and not a piece of software and a chess player like Karpov.

Any piece of software we create will increment the CO2 in the ambient, that's the cost to pay for running a computer and its programs.

Hey Hhampuz, Signature and Avatar updated, thanks for the opportunity, I will do my best. 

Y en este tipo de ataques lo que mas sorprende es ver cuentas falsas verificadas... Aun recuerdo ese scam de la pagina oficial de Binance en youtube, en la que tenían una vieja entrevista corriendo y daban unos códigos QR para que envíes dinero y que ellos te lo multipliquen. Y como comentaba lo irónico de este ataque es que según youtube la cuenta desde donde se hacia el stream era la cuenta verificada de Binance. Mucha gente cayó víctima de este engaño.

I see you have an open spot, so, here is my application.

#Proof Of Authentication
Bitcointalk Name:seoincorporation
Bitcointalk Profile:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=334783
Current amount of Posts (Including this one):5428
Amount of merits for the last 120 days:16
BTC Address: 1BtcBoSSnqe8mFJCUEyCNmo3EcF8Yzhpnc
BTC Address: bc1qa80splpy5eylt8v7apw67r6lak9a9624kr5xhs

Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=334783
Current amount of posts (including this one): 5426
bech32 BTC Address: bc1qa80splpy5eylt8v7apw67r6lak9a9624kr5xhs
Earned merit in the last 120 days: 16

Is a hard decision where to invest with those 2 options, I would say the best to do is to invest half and half. BTC has some crazy jumps this year, and maybe that can give you more profit. But at some point, ETH will have some crazy jumps too. But I don't think those jumps will be that big.

If you invest in ETH you can use your coins for mining with staking, and that is a big point for ETH. So, play it wisely.

Sell and take the loss is a terrible move, and the only reason to do this is if we need the money in that time, but is something that no one should ever do. In the end is how the markets work, remember every time someone is winning another person is losing.

Just like the ones who buy at $20k 2 years ago, they had to wait for a long period but today they have tripled up their investment.

I really enjoy reading this thread from 2011 and see how people react to the price of $10.