Yo creo que muchos corredores e inversionistas tienen como techo $60k es una cifra en la que todos obtienen ganancia, y es por eso que nada más se acerca o llega y luego se ve un desplome. Para superar esa cifra necesitamos ver una inyección grande en la capitalización de mercado.

Con esta locura de precios personalmente me gusta seguir mas la capitalización de mercado que el precio en si.

If they are big influencers then a lot of people will follow their moves and try to do the same. But as some users already say, they could use their followers to bump any shit coin. That's why I wouldn't recommend following them in their transactions.

For a good example of a Twitter influencer who can manipulate the crypto markets, we have Elon Musk, even a user on this forum made a bot to buy BTC each time that Mr. Musk post on Twitter.

That's right, there used to be a group of people called the cypherpunks, they have some ideas about mixing technology with security and money. And I'm almost sure bitcoin is the result of his ideas. They used to communicate on a mailing list, and satoshi was a member of that list.

That was in all the news, and was a shock for all the bitcoin users, a lot of them lose a big amount of money... But did you know the bitcoins have been already traced?


There are some nice articles talking about where does bitcoin goes after the theft, I will leave the source for those who want to learn more about the topic.

https://blog.wizsec.jp/2017/07/breaking-open-mtgox-1.html

Es una vil locura... Me he estado pensando en lo que realmente es un NTF... En teoría si un tweet puede ser un NTF por que no hacer de un código un NTF... Podríamos subastar paginas web, o scripts de bash. Siempre y cuando alguien esté buscando tirar su dinero en una pseudo-pieza-de-arte.

Tengo ganas de probar esos mercados ya que tengo una sensación que rosan con lo absurdo. Pero bueno, hasta no probar no se puede juzgar.

And this is the kind of news that bump bitcoin price... As they say, it was a visa transaction on the Ethereum blockchain, Feels like an enormous step for humanity and for economics.

The transaction was done with a stable coin called United States dollar coin, or USDC.  And this doesn't mean that all visa transactions will be this way from now, but at least some of them will come through crypto.

That's true, the limited number of coins is what gives a nice value to it. And this is because the market is unlimited. So, with all those zeros after the point is even possible to see 1 satoshi at $1 in the next 100 years.

And is really interesting how some coins decide to have no limit of coins, a good example of this is dogecoin. And that's one of the reasons why that coin is so cheap.

So, with and unlimited market with infinite money to inject the only limit is the moon.

The issue is really weird, you mention that you already verify the transaction in the blockchain and it's there but the coins aren't in the wallet. That could mean 2 things, the node where you are waiting to receive the coins isn't updated or you have wrong char on the addy, sometimes people write address by hand and confuse the l with the I, let me put them together to show you lI... one it's L and the other its I.

Transactions can't be blocked just like that, so, my advice is... If you want to experiment use known coins, because if you use weird coins like ESK maybe it could be a target of the 51% attack.

The problem with this idea is the smart contracts, without smart contracts you can't attach any digital source to a transaction. As the name says 'Non fungible token' it's based on a token, so if you can't make tokens with bitcoin then you can't take the NFTs to bitcoin.

Another problem with the idea is the cost. to register any NFT with a coin you need to make a transaction, and transactions with bitcoins aren't cheap at all.

Como consuelo nos queda que cada NFT tiene un costo de producción, y  digo como consuelo ya que si no el mercado estaría saturado de 'Piezas de arte' y demasiadas cosas sin sentido.

Como bien comentas Ddmr, el echo de adquirir un NFT no te da derecho sobre la obra. A mi me gusta verlo como un grabado, en esta técnica el artista tiene la placa original y hace X numero de copias registradas. Cuando los clientes compran la copia esto no les da los derechos sobre la obra de arte. Y algo así es como se venden los NFT, te muestran una imagen de la obra en baja calidad, si adquieres la obra entonces te entregan la origina. Pero hay varios NFT que se venden copias limitadas.

John McAfee has been involved in multiple crypto scams, he is a genius who loves to fuck the system. And maybe he has a problem with drugs or prostitutes but he knows how to enjoy life. I just read about his current situation, and right now he is in Cuba, playing his political cards, and is fun because looks like he loves to live in places where prostitution is common.

About the scams, more than 90% of ICOs were scams, so, what's the surprise here? John see how the bad guys was making millions and he decides to join to the party.

There are two answers to your question:

1.- If you want to fork a blockchain you only need to Github and fork the bitcoin code, just a simple copy-paste, then you need to create your genesis block and after that you can run your own bitcoin, if you want to make modifications to the code then you will have to edit some C++.

here is the code for you: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/tree/master/src

2.- If you want to build applications with the current blockchain, then you need to use sockets, which means you can build your code on ruby or JS or python and it will work with sockets calls to perform tasks with your node.

The mathematical limit is in the code. And that limit is the result of the halving. Maybe a consensus could bring more coins, but the block reward should change and the having times should do it too. Is a complex task.

I think it would be easier to add more zeros after the point than adding more coins to the blockchain, and both would have the same effect.

Esta noticia está siendo un bum en las redes ya que una casa digital por ese precio para la mayoría es una locura. Pero esto fue posible gracias a la tecnología NFT la cual permite a los artistas digitales subastar o vender su contenido de una forma muy innovadora.

Hay mucho que aprender de los 'no fungible token' ya que como podemos ver hay mucho dinero envuelto en esta nueva tecnología, no le quiten el ojo de encima ya que es una buena oportunidad de negocio para todos.

También es importante mencionar que el CEO de twitter ha vendido su primer tweet por $2.9 Millones de dolares a través de NFT. Con esto nos podemos hacer una idea de que tan grande será este fenómeno.

The high power required for the networks goes by hand with time... The first coins were mined only with one CPU, but now the mining business has grown too much, there are big pools with a lot of hashing power, and this makes solo mining almost impossible.

Miners have a high energy cost and there are some solutions for this, like the one that ETH will adopt this year, and that solution is to move from PoW to PoS

Elon es una persona que tiene tanto dinero que ya pasó el punto en el que el dinero pierde sentido. si pierde o gana $10 millones de dólares no es algo que le quite el sueño. El único problema de Elon es que no es inmortal y no vivirá para ver el fruto de el gran legado que está forjando.

Sin embargo personalmente pienso que abordó a bitcoin en un mal momento, llego tarde a la fiesta y ahora no le queda mas que usar sus propios recursos para evitar que la moneda baje a $10k o $20k.

Es como si no tuviera contemplado que existen 'early adopters' los cuales compraron bitcoin en menos de $10 dolares y que tienen tantos que fácilmente podrían tronar los mercados.

Those who think bitcoin does not have strong backing is because they don't understand how the blockchain works, all the machines that are involved and all the people who is ready to pay for it. The main backing from bitcoin is the beauty of maths who empowers the technology. We don't need to backup bitcoin with gold or with money, the code by itself is the strongest way to backup bitcoin. So, in other words, if you understand all the backend you will realize to things: 1.-bitcoin comes to stay with us, 2.-There is not enough money to evaluate the most expensive idea of all times.

And when they say 'Bitcoin is like something that doesn't exist' should try to say the same about the Internet or Operative Systems.

I just take a look at the white paper and I like the project. It has a nice potential because it was made to be able to handle an enormous amount of transactions in a short period of time.

For sure is a white move to invest in it now because it's really cheap and it has the smart contracts feature. So, I would say the market will grow a lot for 2025.

Is important to mention that 25% of the total supply has been mined, there are 14,375,208,612 coins in circulation, and the total will be 21,000,000,000.

Source: https://docs.zilliqa.com/whitepaper.pdf

I don't think it will affect the competitors, i think it will affect the coins by itself. Is hard to say but we haven't seen a PoS coin that is a success, and this could bring some problems to ETH. And I think that's why we haven't see ETH 2.0 yet.

ADA is a good option for staking as you mention, but ETH will be the number 1 coin for staking in the future, at least it gives more than what the bank offers if you decide to save your money there.

Big changes always come with a big impact on the markets, and only time can tell us if this change was a good or a bad thing.

It looks like you want to start a local exchange and not an online one... that's why I don't understand why you need a team for this.

For a local exchange you only need a wallet who allows you to hold different coins, a good option would be Atomic wallet, and you need a high limit account on an exchange to buy the coins you already sold and never get out of stock.

The business model is simple if you charge 5% of each buy and each sale you will end with profit.