|
The FBI hacked the attacker's server and got access to the private keys... We all know the FBI has some tools and Zero days to do this kind of task but I'm not sure how ethical is a move like that. They are the good guys, but that gives them the privilege to hack a server and take the coins from them?
If they can do a move like that then why they don't take the funds from the narco too? That should fix a lot of problems too, there is a lot more money involved, not only 63BTC.
|
|
|
|
we don't want users to be tagged for wearing our signature, especially when we believe that this would be unfair in regard to them.
Thus, we have launched a review campaign to show that 1xBit pays, and the complaints received do not reflect the real situation.
This campaign already have quite a lot of positive reactions confirming that the payments were proceeded.
Also, since the beginning there were no straight proof of 1xBit scamming activities on this forum. Yet there were proofs of payouts - check out our signature post.
Sincerely,
1xBit team
I don't want to see those users burning their accounts, I feel the pain for each one posting in that thread, is like doing harakiri. But the problem is the quality of the people who write there, the smart guys and old members know that their reputation worth more than $140. The review thread is a self-moderated topic where you give money to those who talk nice, but that is not honest at all, you should let all the users say what they have to say about the site and not to delete the answers that you don't like. You are asking for straight proof, but the problem isn't the proof on the forum, just take a look to trust pilot and all the complaints from the users. https://www.trustpilot.com/review/1xbit.comThings like: Dear user<XXXXXXX Your funds were confiscated to cover the damage caused by your fraudulent act. Account №XXXXXXX has been suspended due to violations of our T&C, meaning that a fraudulent act was committed in relation to 1xBit, therefore 1xBit reserves the right to stop cooperating. If you keep freezing the user's balance and hold their money without giving them a withdraw option then more accusations will come day by day. If users are doing fraudulent things is because your casino allows them, you should fix those bugs to stop them and not wait for them to make a depo and then freeze their accounts. |
|
|
|
|
BSC is just a copy of the Ethereum smart contracts, but with their own chain they can earn more with the fees while people create more Tokens. But I don't think it will replace ETH, in the end people who make a token with ETH could make a copy in the smart chain. Is really cheap to make a token and the problem of that is what will happen if people start cloning the tokens from one ETH smart contract to BSC, which will be the new kind of identity fraud.
In the end, its a Grady decision by Binance, and it only brings confusion to the tokens world.
|
|
|
|
Están bastantes interesantes los puntos que trata la ley Bitcoin de El Salvador, comparto los 16 puntos. Interesante la 7° ley en la que establece que si alguien te quiere pagar con bitcoin tu debes de aceptarlo. Como comenta Ddmr, este proceso va mas rápido de lo que imaginamos. Justo ayer fue la asamblea en donde se expusieron estos puntos y fueron aprobados. |
|
|
|
|
Please be more creative with your posts mate, posting only a link is considered spam. If you want to discourse about an article that's fine but at least share your point of view of that article, so, please cpmṕleate your post buddy.
About bitcoins and Canada, we know they have some serious rules since a long time ago, we see how they force Just-Dice to stop using bitcoin, they had to migrate to Clamcoin after that, but the casino and his founds was at a big risk for a moment. So, Canada isn't the best place to move bitcoins nowadays, the best option will be El Salvador once they make from bitcoin a legal coin.
|
|
|
|
Just think about this?! Why should companies like McDonald and Sturbucks use DOGE? After all, the most stable cryptocurrency is Bitcoin. If ever someone chooses cryptocurrency as payment, it will definitely be Bitcoin. There is no doubt! The most stable and the most popular - it is enough.
If McDonald and Sturbucks start accepting dogecoin that doesn't mean all the users will pay now with doge, and the same for bitcoins. The only difference here would be the transaction fees. If we have to pay $10 in fees with bitcoin for a $1 burger then that will not work. But with 1doge as the fee is a viable option. Even if coca cola start accepting doge it will never take over bitcoin, that is just impossible because a big bump in dogecoin would come with a big bump on bitcoin, that's how markets works. |
|
|
|
Hello Hhampuz I would like to change my address to the next one: BEP20 Address: 0x17c99E005007fb26898Ad19da64A791C06A73976 I was using the address from Binance and I would like to get the payment direct to my trust wallet. Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
Thanks to Roobet and Hhampuz for this event.
I didn't think my song was even a valid entry to the contest and was a big surprise to see I get a place in the top 10. I have a lot of fun making that song and was awesome to share it with this nice community. Thanks again and I will think about what to do for the next contest.
|
|
|
|
...
Apple is still doing well as long as they will be able to provide better products and development it just happen that bitcoin popularity and adoption hits too high now especially that crypto includes plenty of projects in it that helps many businesses or individual in their job or investment. Many investors from stocks already shift in crypto for wide variety of choices to trade which are actively have volumes.
I don't think Apple is providing better products... The differences between the old iPhone and the new one aren't big at all and the fact that the new phones come without charger talks really bad about the company. And they still sell their products overpriced, if they have right now this market capitalization is because they steal to their customers. They don't want to fix a hardware problem they will tell you how to buy a new one is the right way to fix the problem. And that isn't ethical at all. |
|
|
|
|
Some altcoins have better features than bitcoin, some features like blocks each minute or smart contracts or low transaction fees are good for the cryptos environment. Is nice to have the option to change our bitcoin to dogecoins and only spend 1 doge as fees on transactions. And is cool to be able to change or Bitcoins to anonymous coins like zcash or monero and lose the track of our coins.
So, I think the effect is positive because altcoins give us the opportunity to do what we can't do with bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
... All what I have read about crypto taxes are: - only capital gain will be taxed
- capital gain will not be taxed if there is a capital loss until no losses again
Taxes on bitcoin are this way because bitcoin is like an investment tool and not money. If you spend $1000 in bitcoin and withdraw $1100, you have to pay taxes only for the $100 of profit. But as you mention that should change when Bitcoin becomes a legal coin just like it's happening in El Salvador. If bitcoin becomes a legal coin then you will have to pay the same taxes as you do with normal money. |
|
|
|
|
He estado pensando mucho en esta medida y he encontrado una vulnerabilidad.
Es por algo que todos los sitios actuales nos pide por lo menos 1 confirmación en nuestra transacción para hacerla valida, y esto se debe a que los bitcoins pueden sufrir un doble gasto. Supongamos que vamos al Supermercado, llenamos nuestro carrito, en la caja pagamos $100 con bitcoin y nos vamos, luego llegamos al estacionamiento y hacemos un 'double spend' y así es como el supermercado nos saldría gratis.
Veamos como abordan este tema y que hacen para evitarlo ya que quedarnos en el super hasta que se confirme la transacción no es una opción viable.
|
|
|
|
The event is over now, I hope you all enjoy the stream. I will try to post more live stream events soon. This thread is closed and thanks to all for the merits.  |
|
|
|
... Hashing "fffff" as a text is the same as hashing "6666666666" as a hex, because ASCII code for 'f' is 0x66.
So should I firstly convert my hex to text and then to bytes? If you first convert the hex to text and hash it with UTF8 encoding then the result will be the same as: And this when I hash it as a hex value: b4fabc7e6e75fa4b523cc55f51aa54ab1aa4309c92cc44fcf623ddef756f5391 We can verify with this tool the hash of fffff as hex: https://emn178.github.io/online-tools/sha256.html This is the string that you are looking for if the goal is to hash a Hex string. fffff as Hex = b4fabc7e6e75fa4b523cc55f51aa54ab1aa4309c92cc44fcf623ddef756f5391 fffff as Text = 99834619b3c160248b69c7f42ba868f945a0ea04cd31cf2f60dc4bc8f7d13b8a So, here the focus should be about what kind of input you have, since it's a Hex number the right hash is the one starting with b4fab.... This is important because if you want to repeat the process in another part of the code or in some dependencies like SQL, the process to follow was to sha256 a Hex input. And if you hash it as Text and as Hex in different parts of the code it will bring different results and that will break the main principle of the hash "Always you will get the same hash from the same string if they are in the same encoding". |
|
|
|
Muchos piensan que Bitcoin es una moneda, pero a los gobiernos no les conviene eso y es por esto que legalmente bitcoin es un 'Activo Digital'. Legalmente si alguien compra algo con bitcoin esto es considerado como un trueque (intercambio) y no un pago por un bien o servicio. Pero esto esta por cambiar ya que El Salvador será el primer país que adopte bitcoin como una moneda de curso legal, así que con esta medida una persona podrá hacer un pago con bitcoins y solicitar una factura para su declaración de impuesto, y como referencia dejo el siguiente video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l04Ohwg_QpwYa quiero ver como quedan las leyes referentes a las criptomonedas en ese país, eso va a ser muy interesante. |
|
|
|
But Polkadot is not a good coin, I found out after some research.
If you do some research you should realize that polka is not a coin is a token. And isn't the first one with unlimited inflation, a good example of coin with unlimited inflation is doge coin, and that's because that coin doesn't have halving, which means the blocks will always have the same amount of coins, and the total supply will grow to infinite. But that doesn't make from it a bad investment. It only means the coin will lose value in the future because there will be more coins. But if the people like the coin then the price will bump just like what happened with Doge. |
|
|
|
This address will be used as a green initiative for Bitcoin.
Why is burning coins a green initiative for you? You could use those bitcoins to buy seeds or trees... That's a true green initiative. And as other users already mentioned, you don't need to ask Elon for something that you can do yourself. Create an address and destroy the private keys, or use one of the burning addresses that already exist. You could even send your coins to a Satoshi Address and consider those coins as burned. If you take a look at block one: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/block/1 there was an address where the generated coins were ended (12c6DSiU4Rq3P4ZxziKxzrL5LmMBrzjrJX) you could burn your coins there just like the other people already burned 0.34btc on it. |
|
|
|
La gran subida a 60k+ fue por su compra desmedida, así que esto es como una auto-corrección.
Si fue intencional o no... Bueno sabrá él.
Entre mas rápida la subida, mas necesaria y saludable es que venga la corrección. A largo plazo es al alza, pero no TAN rápido.
Los que tengan alguna queja que vean el precio del año pasado. Bitcoin es largo plazo, no corto.
No soy economista pero por lo que yo entiendo del término 'Corrección' es que esto sucede cuando el precio baja después de haber subido pero el mercado de capitalización no cambia mucho. En este caso yo no lo llamaría una corrección ya que el mercado de capitalización creció de $1.5T a $2.3T y después bajó a $1.6T... Esto es mejor conocido como Bump & Dump. Y concuerdo contigo en que bitcoin es una inversión a largo plazo, aun que hay gente con suerte que se sube a la ola un par de semanas antes de que el precio se dispare a la luna. |
|
|
|
...
Do you have coins on Poloniex, only they can move your coins.
I knew Poloniex delisted CLAM 2 or 3 years ago but I don't remember how long the window time they allowed their customers to withdraw CLAM out of Poloniex.
Sounds like you have $CLAM stucked in Poloniex, and if it was stucked, can you share why?
Poliniex delisted CLAM as you say, but I think they keep some clams... And now after the transaction reported by BAC, that only means one thing, Polo is selling some of their clams... Now there is only one trusted place to sell clams and that's freebitcoins.com Today we can see some 50k clams sell orders, I wouldn't be surprised if some of them come from polo. And let's wait to see how Yobit does the same, lol. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
