So what Local HTTP Server exackly means for the coin? What does this do? Thanks.


Also people are asking for a MAC wallet

I really like DTC, and Im sure it has muuuuuuuuuch more value than other coins. I have 12 servers mining currently The idea of reducing transaction fee should be implemented IMO, would givethe coin much more liquidity and increase the traffic for sure.

you seriously gave that guy free DTC?! I dont like you anymore :P:P

Set up a Datacoin faucet. While faucets do not add much to the ecosystem, they are good at attracting new users. The faucet could be ran by donations from people who want to support Datacoin and its concept. I hope this coin will succeed, as it actually has a purpose (and so does its proof-of-work system, too!).

Thought about recent giveaways and the way Datacoin is going...

Cryptocoins generally lack any inner value, today their main purpose is speculation. Easy to see especially with many altcoins experiencing pump and dump schemes. Lots of people buy them hoping for bitcoin-like exponential growth. Datacoin is one of very few different. From initial thread:

Datacoin is intended to be reliable censorship-free data storage and a currency to pay for this storage. Money transfer isn't the first purpose of Datacoin.

Data storage is the inner purpose of DTC, giving Datacoin its inner value. BUT its inner value does not have to be equal to its price. While I appreciate giveaway and cryptsy “fight”, I think I see you are going every-other-coin-way here. I think you should not promote Datacoin in first place. You should focus all your efforts at Datacoin uses, services, etc. Build a user base around them. Make Datacoin not a target, but *just* a tool for people. That would reinforce its inertial value by making the coin itself simply useful. You should really make this coin a tool first and a coin second.

And – sorry to say that – I think that going the “Dogecoin-way” ), with giveaways, twitter, cryptsy and buzz, while may seem desirable on a short time frame, on a long way run may destroy the uniqueness if DTC would became too successful this way. With tool-first approach DTC price would depend on its usefulness and usefulness of all DTC-related ecosystem. DTC price cannot be too high. Don't get me wrong, theres still space to grow here, but it would be quite bound to a data storage function, and here price cannot rise above sanity levels. Additionally, function-bound price could be quite stable. Just these orders of magnitude jumps that would make all this speculation crowd happy would render Datacoin unusable, practically depleting it of its inner value.

Unless we imagine a dystopian future, where people are willing to pay many thousands of  dollars for every byte of decentralized redundant censorship-free storage...

it is preferable to change the logo, which represent a currency, and also email contact address , it's not professional , gmail !

hey gentleman give some coin to the lady  

force everyone to use datacoin instead of the dollar, then knock everyone out who supports litecoin and bitcoin. worth a try  

I made small Linux utility for primeminer&pooled mining, check my github: https://github.com/arkhebuz/datawatch
Useful when you experience crashes or long lasting connection problems on a box operating autonomously (i. e. PC during the night or a VPS). Readme file on a github tells the rest.
Don't know if it fits any bounty but check this out.

does anyone have instructions to build on CentOS,
i have an 64 cores using centos 5.x, but not familiar with with, cannot event install git on it 

getting this error when compile on ubuntu 12.04, can anyone help? 

appriciate!

I send now 1 DTC to someone and the fee was more than 0.05. Actually 0.06695476 . Why is that happening? Not that i care about the difference but i would like to learn how it works.

if i have the file on my pc, i dont need datacoin to store it.

i mean about permanent storage without any responsibility from me, thats why i would pay in the first place.

Meanwhile DTC/BTC is rapidly going down, hit 0.00066, from 0.001 a few weeks ago.
More miners -> less price, while stupid useless DOGE are on tons of exhanges and grows like crazy...
lol

The example they gave me was that it has no recovery process whereby if you lost power (a fuse blows, your host decides to reboot your machine, or whatever) it would on reboot know exactly what parts of which operations had completed and what parts still needed doing.

So I guess maybe, no "transactions with rollback" type functionality akin to what the kinds of databases demanded for financial applications have?

As just one example. The general idea was that the code is merely a sketchy sketch of the very basic purely ripple-related aspects of what a real gateway would need to do, but lacking all the real stuff a real gateway would, regardless of ripple, need to do in order to be a secure and robust financial application able to recover from unexpected failures in the midst of uncompleted database operations, resist all the various CSS and cross-site and injection type attacks financial sites attract and so on and so on and so on.

Basically "if you had a real secure stable robust gateway platform, here is a quick sketch of the kind of code you'd need to add to it to make it able to work with ripple" or something like that. A far cry from being an actual real-use gateway.

-MarkM-