Bitcoin Forum
June 06, 2024, 12:48:39 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 [157] 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 ... 291 »
3121  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Seeking a team to develop Bitcointalk 2.0 forums (apply within) on: July 01, 2013, 07:45:57 PM
He was making a joke about the fact that you hate +1 .
Ha yeah, indeed!
I don't hate +1s that much Grin

Google Authenticator is probably a solid option for 2FA, though I haven't looked into how it works at all.
It's true I often read people considering it. I never studied this either though.
3122  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Seeking a team to develop Bitcointalk 2.0 forums (apply within) on: July 01, 2013, 07:05:56 PM
Optional

Optional... unless there's a service offered by the forum involving any type of trading/escrow/etc, required if you want to use those services.
It just requires forbidding users without 2FA to use those services.
It also depends on the 2nd FA used. I don't know many of them and I don't like the only ones I can think of (sms, yubikey) but maybe I'd like some other ones. Is there a list?


This isn't the thread to talk about why something hasn't been added to the bitcointalk.org forums.

+1   (sorry jackjack).
I think you quoted the wrong part of the post. If not, I don't get it.
3123  Other / Meta / Re: Forum is acting funny! on: July 01, 2013, 05:14:05 PM
I don't see anything weird
Might be your connection (bad connection -> CSS not loaded sometimes)
3124  Other / Meta / Re: Option: deleting colors/glow in signatures on: July 01, 2013, 05:11:33 PM
As it looks like I'm not the only one, I'd really like to know what theymos thinks about this
Even just a few words like bad idea/vaguely considered/will deliver soon would be enough
3125  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Seeking a team to develop Bitcointalk 2.0 forums (apply within) on: July 01, 2013, 04:55:22 PM
Optional
3126  Other / Meta / Re: Userbase cleanup on: July 01, 2013, 03:19:07 PM
Agreed
Look at this guy, he didn't login since December 2010, let's delete his account
3127  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CMC]CosmosCoin-PoW/PoS |Transaction Comment|0 Premine|Quick Confirm on: July 01, 2013, 01:17:18 PM
Quote for posterity

A P2Pool for CosmosCoin has been setup: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=246847

All CosmosCoin users,

A P2Pool for CosmosCoin is running now.

http://198.211.17.160:19996/



Features :

* P2Pool
* Stratum Support
* 0.5% Fee
* Still need CosmosCoin block explorer to show mining details

To Connect :

1. Connect your miners as follows :

url = http://198.211.17.160
port = 19996(Stratum)
username = Your CMC Address
password = any password

3. Start Mining !


Lol
3128  Bitcoin / Hardware wallets / Re: [PREORDER] Trezor: Bitcoin hardware wallet on: July 01, 2013, 12:51:30 PM
I just looked at the links, you need a deodexed ROM
Not sure the people aimed by Trezor know what is a deodexed ROM, how to install it, and want to do it...
3129  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: ★★★ [ANN][VLC] ValueCoin | The real valuable coin | Launched on: July 01, 2013, 12:20:11 PM
It's really the good moment to mine it, still easy to mine and very soon in the exchanges markets.


Yes exactly man. The diff is low and knowing that it is definitely going on the exchange very soon, valuecoin is THE most profitable coin to mine now.
I see this in every shitcoin thread I read
3130  Other / Off-topic / Re: mtgox free yubikeys on: July 01, 2013, 11:35:37 AM
Wasn't it only true for people who have been goxed?

3131  Other / Off-topic / Re: Preferred Browser? on: July 01, 2013, 11:03:08 AM
i excepted chrome in the list, instead there is explorer named as a first, bad pool is bad
3132  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Get 3 Free GoldCoins! on: July 01, 2013, 09:30:27 AM
3 Goldcoins?? WOW!  Shocked
That's like... 4 satoshis!!
3133  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Question about public key on: July 01, 2013, 09:22:24 AM
As DeathAndTaxes says, the address is not a public key, it is a hash of a hash of a public key with a 4 byte checksum tacked on and reformatted to base 58.

This question may not be related to practical usage, but just for curiosity, if I want to know what the public keys of my addresses are, how should I do that?

There really isn't an easy way to find it.  I haven't used pywallet, so I'm not sure what options it has, but it might be able to compute public keys for you.  You could extract the private key and enter it at bitaddress.org in the "wallet details" section, but one you've typed your private key into a website, I would immediately consider the associated address to be compromised and would never use it to receive bitcoins again (and would make sure to empty the address of any bitcoins before entering the private key).
Indeed, pywallet gives you the public keys that are inside your wallet

To my understanding, one address corresponds to one public key, right?
For general use, that's a safe assumption.

Technically, it may be possible for more than one public key to have the same address, but the odds of generating two different public keys that share an address are astronomically small.  It isn't a realistic event, so you can just assume that there won't be more than one public key for each address.
Number of valid addresses = 2^160
Number of valid public keys = n-1 ~ 2^256

So:
1 address represents ~2^94 public keys
Odds of generating two different public keys that share an address: ~2^94/2^256 = 1/2^162

PS: This assumes you use only compressed (or uncompressed) keys. The result considering both is very close to this one.
3134  Bitcoin / Hardware wallets / Re: [PREORDER] Trezor: Bitcoin hardware wallet on: July 01, 2013, 08:34:31 AM
IT works, you just need a second battery.

(which modern Android phones do support)
Nexus 4:
 - modern Android phone
 - no OTG support


Don't you need CM?
3135  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: What is ur height and weight? on: July 01, 2013, 08:25:43 AM
6"1 and 83kg.

Is there a purpose for this? haha
Having 5 posts
3136  Bitcoin / Hardware wallets / Re: [PREORDER] Trezor: Bitcoin hardware wallet on: July 01, 2013, 08:24:04 AM
(which modern Android phones do support)
Nexus 4:
 - modern Android phone
 - no OTG support
3137  Other / Off-topic / Re: Emojis on: July 01, 2013, 08:22:13 AM
No
3138  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [BETA] ThreadCoin Version 0 - testnet - BOUNTY: 250 BT3 for next block on: July 01, 2013, 08:14:38 AM
jackjack: 
Your bounty payout of 250 Bitcoin-Testnet3 coins is now sent.  Tx id: 4efcda5b755b465deeae2feb7d465ba2fbf8b90870ee3ac48c51cff1195a7016
And good idea about adding transaction Ids, that should be part of the protocol. 
Thanks
That will be much easier to track the coins this way. Otherwise you will have to sum all the inputs, then substract all the outputs and then check if there is enough money.
3139  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Jokes on: July 01, 2013, 07:59:32 AM
3140  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Any recent word from Bill Gates? on: July 01, 2013, 07:53:13 AM
How can someone think that the guy who brought Windows to the world coded Bitcoin?
Are you trolling?
Pages: « 1 ... 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 [157] 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 ... 291 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!