|
I don't know either, I never used Bitstamp yet...
Bug fixed
|
|
|
|
Not sure it's a surprise as I asked here for your opinions
The problem is that it's not ready (not even started actually) server-side so it will stay commented for a bit
It even fucks up my script. "BT++ Settings"-tab doesn't appear, that kind of stuff. Don't make fun of my variables names!
I found it very amusing ;p Thanks, I appreciate that even more as I'm self-taught  Ah I know how that feels. I have learned everything I can myself. Don´t even try to implement Bitstamp´s API. I tried it with jQuery´s Ajax and Json and I failed horribly, because their API system is fucked up and strange. The page itself works for me, but it will reject every connection. The only excepting is, if you set your dataType to "jsonp", but that will fuck up the JSON.parse function, because it doesn't understand what you give to it. Yeah it's normal it crashes, I'll change that in case other adventurers read the code and want to uncomment this. Bitstamp ticker is working fine here, I don't get what is the problem you're describing. Do you mean the non-ticker API? Like putting orders and such? "Add your signature" does not work ;c
Again something that works here... Ctrl+Shift+J, do you see errors? |
|
|
|
var translators=[
// ['John','Chinese','1d4c5az42gr84fvre3qszd'],
]; I laughed and someone is missing at the btppcontributors page ;p -continues reading- I wanted to put an actual translator but didn't wanted to take the time to look for your address  Also, nobody's missing as there are no translations yet. I hope I'll have some time this week-end to add yours and French. Sure you didn't mean buttnames? Don't make fun of my variables names! if(myPseudo=='jackjack' && version[version.length-1]=='b'){
document.getElementById('needupdate').innerHTML='';
}I like to see those things ;p You just hide that pesky asterisk for yourself. Only if this is the development version, because I want my Chrome to show the asterisk! I also see new features! Which I won't tell, because that would mess up the surprise.
Not sure it's a surprise as I asked here for your opinions The problem is that it's not ready (not even started actually) server-side so it will stay commented for a bit Your code looks amazingly clean, well done!
Thanks, I appreciate that even more as I'm self-taught Bitstamp ticker doesn't seem to work for me, it keeps stuck at "Contacting ticker...."
Odd, it works here What do you see when you open this in your browser: https://www.bitstamp.net/api/ticker/ |
|
|
|
Mais je pense que mon pirate a simplement utilisé une attaque par dictionnaire.
Ton mot de passe était trouvable par dictionnaire...? Pas la peine que j'en rajoute j'imagine La prochaine fois que tu es flemmard rajoute un mot devant le mot de passe (pas dans le dictionnaire de préférence), genre 'petitlupassword' au lieu de 'password' Ca te coûte rien et ça réduit grandement le risque d'attaque dictionnaire fructueuse Ou choisis un vrai mot de passeQuand je parle de dictionnaire, je ne parle pas du petit Larousse. Mon mot de passe était du style "petitlupassword" mais la plupart des softs de cracking sont capables de casser ça en testant quelques combinaisons (plusieurs mots concaténés, un mot + un chiffre, un mot répété, etc.). Bref, j'ai pris un risque et j'ai perdu (le support MtGox me l'a confirmé)  Je pensais pas qu'ils croisaient autant lors d'attaques en ligne |
|
|
|
Breaks the system? No. If two people have the same private key, it's EXACTLY like if you put your private key in bitcoin-qt and in your smartphone for instance. The first to redeem the coins redeems the coins. But. 100+ years IS EXTREMELY FAR from being even a beginning of what time would be needed Hint: the Sun doesn't contain enough energy to count to 2^256 And your estimate of how long a brute force attack on SHA-256 would take is wrong, it isn't centuries, it is billions and billions of years, minimum. If you converted the entire mass of the sun into energy, and used all of that energy to increment a counter using the absolute limit of physics for minimum energy used to flip a bit, you'd get to around 2225. You'd need 231 suns of similar mass to finish just iterating through all of the possible inputs. So, billions of stars, or trillions or quadrillions if you want to actually perform the hashes too.
This is about the number of private keys, I'm sure calculations can be done for addresses too. But let's say this for now: - There are 3 times more bitcoin addresses (10^48) than water molecules on Earth (in the sea, in your dog's eye, in Putin's car) - A human being contains 10^27 water molecules By the way, there are: ~2^256 possible private keys 2^160 bitcoin addresses This means that there are ~2^94 private keys correspond to the same bitcoin address |
|
|
|
Mais je pense que mon pirate a simplement utilisé une attaque par dictionnaire.
Ton mot de passe était trouvable par dictionnaire...? Pas la peine que j'en rajoute j'imagine La prochaine fois que tu es flemmard rajoute un mot devant le mot de passe (pas dans le dictionnaire de préférence), genre 'petitlupassword' au lieu de 'password' Ca te coûte rien et ça réduit grandement le risque d'attaque dictionnaire fructueuse Ou choisis un vrai mot de passe |
|
|
|
Especially if you can merge mine 5 or more coins. It can really add up.
All my wat |
|
|
|
Sadly changing this will be easy for the powers that be. All it requires is to make sure the main developers change the protocol to their needs and use that as the offiicial Bitcoin client on bitcoin.org
All new people coming to Bitcoin wont realize these forums are screaming protocol changes and will believe whatever they are told to believe.
Gavin and crew will comply since they wont like a cell in Gitmo, and so dies Bitcoin.
As of this moment this wont happen, but if Bitcoin because what we all hope it becomes the fight will take new heights. Its messing with the most power people of this world, do you think they will stand by and see their printed trillions blow up? Hardly.....
Lol keep thinking that Bitcoin.org would be so ddos'd that even PRISM couldn't handle the load Someone anonymous and outside US+EU would take the lead |
|
|
|
Whiskey shot out of my nose when I read this. Who in their right mind would fall for this? Some idiot did it and rumbitla send it straight to SatoshiDICE. Damn! It's even true! |
|
|
|
|
Obamacoin already exists!
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, 0.1.24 is bitstamp addition
|
|
|
|
|
Obamacoin already started
Why don't you address that?
|
|
|
|
It will be interesting to see when it will reach $ 1 per coin
If we're lucky in 12months. If we're realistic in 12centuries. |
|
|
|
trusted
online service
Good one  |
|
|
|
Revealing scams deserves -1, gah
I'm not sure what you mean... Some suggestion for this script, add Bitstamp into the list for source of bitcoin price Sure, it's added (wonder if bitcoin talk can one day have a stream for all new posts, get everything in realtime, flows the new data out when new replies on subbed post comes in)
That would be nice and would allow interesting things |
|
|
|
This coin should live up to it's name, a complete failure and waste of resources.
Obama is the most popular President since Adolv HitIer. Dafuq? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
