Brings back the good old memories when both of them were competing together but IMHO, I don't think Man U will be there at the end of the season.

It could be less than that if Everton wins their game in hand ^{[what an unpredictable year]}.

---

As for today, if Martinelli plays for more than 60 minutes, I'm sure Arsenal would be able to win against Newcastle...
^{- If Auba, Pepe or Willian start, it's going to be another home draw.}

I went over the list quickly and it looks like apart from me, OgNasty's minimum fee isn't also accurate ^{[both of us have updated our fees recently]}...
<sup>- Kindly include our updated fee structures whenever you'll be adding back the temporarily suspended users to the list
- Btw, thank you for continuous updates.</sup>

Same to you and everyone else

Are you sure that 0.0002BTC was added and not 0.0001BTC only?

As mentioned "before", there's an added 0.0001BTC fee for funding ^{[or direct purchases]} your accounts with less than 0.004BTC.

IMHO, listing cryptocurrency websites while not accepting payments in those forms defeats its purpose ^{[you might want to reconsider that part]}.

I'm not a moderator but as long as you follow the "rules", you'll be fine...
^{- You should also lock the other thread you created back in 2019.}

There's not much to say apart from the part that, you've given some of the cryptocurrencies a spotlight that they don't deserve ^{[it's bitcointalk.org, not cryptotalk.org]} on the login page.

---

^{You should probably add this one to OP as well.}

Wait, what?!
- I'm not sure what you exactly meant when you said "unsecured", but it sounds like you're after a platform to get easy loans with the hope of easy routes for escaping ^{[potentially but hopefully I'm wrong]}.

Have you tried reporting it? If you did and nothing happened then my guess is, it has something to do with the "UTM tag" that's in it ^{[AFAIK, it's only for tracking purposes]}...
^{- Having said that, the part that I highlighted in red looks like a proper referral link to me.}

It covers more than just the fake exchanges
^{- You might want to consider labeling those that are still online.}

You can find more missing names from "BadBitcoin.org".
^{Note to newbies out there: If you don't see the name you're looking for on the above website, it doesn't mean it's safe [always DYOR].}

I would definitely use the darker version but tilting my phone to the side ^{[landscape mode]} would result in having a small middle section ^{[due to the header and footer heights]}...
^{- I would love to also see a responsive design in landscape mode.}

I'm the one that reported your topic/post ^{[personally, I have nothing against you]} and one of the moderators handled my report afterward...
^{* One of the links that you posted, redirected to a referral link.}

Although I see your point, I have to disagree with you...

• You shouldn't expect moderators to read every single post out there and unless someone reports such posts or those that they read naturally, some of the referral links will remain undetected for a longer period ^{[until someone reports them]}.
• If you spot some, take the time to report them ^{[personally, I rarely read threads with a lot of replies unless it has to do with a sport that I support; hence I haven't spotted those that you mentioned [yet]]}.

How about a little modification to show results within certain blocks or dates?

Stop flirting with my brain

Indeed, it is interesting and it makes perfect ^[ish] sense

I think we both know the moderator that clearly enjoys moderating that section in a strange way
^{- He/she is the reason why I haven't posted or even lurked on those boards in the past few years.}

Even though I do agree with LeGaulois's comment ^{[bestchange part]}, the following links ^{[that I've gathered over the years]} might come in handy ^{[not exactly a monitoring platform, but close enough]}:
^{Take note: I'm not vouching and you should never fully trust any of the listed exchanges [a lot could change in a short period] from such platforms [always DYOR].}

• CoinGecko
• CrypTwerk
• BlockSpot

If you meant it's not showing up, I just looked up on four block explorers and it came up just fine ^{[e.g. blockchain.com, blockchair.com, btc.com and explorer.btc.com]}.

I believe the only person that could potentially fix this issue is btc.com's support...

It's more noticeable when you progress more...
^{- I did some test and looks like in Firefox, even at the beginning there's a noticeable lag of some sort but in Chrome everything is smooth at the beginning.}

Yes, I was the only player for two straight rounds.

That makes sense now ^{[somehow I missed looking at it from that perspective, sorry]}.

Up until now, I had no idea about that platform and by its look, we have to be friends with someone or rather follow them before we could ask them a question. Would your platform also require those steps, before we could do the cryptocurrency exchange with someone from outside of our circle?
^{- The reason behind my question is the fact that this might open the door to a whole lot of issues down the road...}

---

What are the measurements to protect both sides of the deal?

Even though rewards by viewing ads are working, I found a bug that doesn't load the advertiser's ads but still rewarded me ^{[it's unfair to them]}:

• SS of the given reward for empty G2G ad ^{[same happened for adBTC]}

---

What is the limit for direct withdrawals?

I did enjoy using this faucet or rather playing the game a couple of times but I faced the following issues:

• At first. it only loaded the playground ^{[I had to refresh it, then it worked]}.
• Occasional stuttering.
• It doesn't count some of the rewards ^{[especially when you're bigger]}.
  ^{- Right now it doesn't matter due to not having a larger player base but you should probably take care of that issue sooner or later.}

You might want to lower it...

---

Seeing that rewards are recorded without an account and by its look, I can withdraw without one as well, is there any reason to create an account for?

Based on my observation from the past few years, they'll have a future but not a bright future. IMHO, I can't see them competing directly with the likes of those centralized marketplaces that you mentioned...
^{- With too much freedom, certain issues rises as well [like what Darker45 mentioned in his/her paragraph].}

Nope, it feels unnatural to hunt for a post in someone else's post history just for the sake of meriting back one of their posts, but if I come across their posts in the exact thread that I've received merits from, I wouldn't mind giving some if I found their post to be high-quality or useful ^{[I've done this in the past]}.

I don't care for the first part but despite my initial behavior ^{[I rarely gave merits back then]} upon its implementation ^[merit], it gives me a little joy to see I'm at zero sMerit from time to time ^{[I was hoarding them back then due to my own standards but since then, I've learned to lower my standards/expectations]}.

By doing that ^{[dodging our questions/concern while coming up with another ann thread]}, they clearly showed what kind of team is behind their so-called "blockchain Raffle Technology"...
^{- I didn't even get to ask my 2nd set of questions}

---

Btw, thank you for the update and support ^{[will add it to OP]}.