Have you tried using a different LAN cable ^{[it might be just a faulty one]}?

It looks like both BitXatm and PlutoBTM use the exact same "model & software" and since they're still around ^{[website - locations]}, you might want to try contacting them as well:

• BitXatm
• PlutoBTM

I don't know about that, but found an interesting article about one of their employees: Inside Job Theft Cripples Bitheus’ BitXatm Network

To those who have already seen/used this tab in the US, can you guys share a screenshot of it ^{[I'm interested in the educational part only]}? I'm curious to know if this is one of those tricks to redirect some of their customers, into using a platform that also happens to be their partner.

By the look of things, not everyone will get that feature in the UK!

The part I've highlighted in black, doesn't always count as an advantage ^{[especially in a platform that both parties should keep their end of the bargain]}.
^{- Security should always be your number one priority, or else it ends in a disaster [it always does].}

---

Any other advantages?

Due to your current rank, you're limited to a single promotional method ^[free] that would probably have little to no impact, unless someone hovers over the website icon on each one of your posts...

Steps:

• Go to your profile > Forum Profile Information ^{[it's located in the "Modify Profile" section]} > Type the appropriate name and link in the Website title & URL fields > Click the "Change profile" button.

AFAICR, you might be the first "brick and mortar" clothing store owner ^{[from this forum]} that accepts those cryptocurrencies in their store ^{[I salute you]}.
^{- Can we see some pictures [if privacy isn't a concern]?}

How about going a step further and introducing them to hardware wallets instead?

To a certain extent, yes, but not yet as a whole ^{[for now]}.

In addition to what NeuroticFish mentioned, a large portion of their population has already lost a lot in the last decade or so, and with little to no access to weapons, they can't fight back ^{[even if they want to, it'll never be a fair fight]}.

Despite having a volatile nature, in this case, it'd help them to preserve/retain their wealth's worth/value.

Based on the interviews I've watched recently, I have to respectfully disagree.

I do like it but if I were you, I'd get rid of the other body parts to utilize the space for making his face and the hat slightly bigger ^{[at the center]} while the wrench and other balls are coming at him from multiple directions, as opposed to a single direction.

_{- IMO, it might look a bit weird if those balls aren't evenly spaced out on the coin.}
^{- I do know you used the body parts to show he's dodging the wrench and the balls, but since this will be on a coin, it'll use a large portion of your limited space and you might need to save some for adding a text later.}

---

Best of luck

May alam ka bang link para mabasa din namin yung buong detalye ^{[wala kasi akong makita apart dun sa mga picture na pinost mo]}?

Di rin maganda yung naexperience ko sa UPS delivery recently... Binalik nila yung order ko ^{[not from Trezor]} sa mismong sender and most likely, ito din ang case dito and based dun sa announcement ng Trezor, wala silang issue sa pag bigay ng full refund.

Links:

• 1st picture
• 2nd picture

Personally, I would prefer to go with an already established alternative route instead ^{[there are a couple of well-known gift card platforms that cover pretty much everything]}.
^{- Having said that, you might get a different response if you move this thread to the "Digital goods" board instead [move button is in the bottom left corner of the page].}

You're right, but it forces their customers ^{[most of them]} to withdraw their funds a lot faster, as opposed to doing it with more time at their disposal.
^{- Having said that, I do agree with @Lucius's point and I wouldn't be surprised to see them extend it in the near future.}

Seeing that they've clearly ignored both "AOBTCT6" and "Slow death" concerns, despite being active and responding to other stuff ^{[either directly by responding through a post or indirectly by sending merits to others]}, makes me doubt the highlighted part ^{[I hope I'm wrong]}.

Just read the following threaded tweets ^{[8 parts]} and you'll see the whole picture:

• Quote from: libert19 on August 22, 2021, 02:42:06 AM
  Unfolding of events: https://twitter.com/MyCrypto/status/1427711396498731009
  

---

Always double-check and verify who you're talking with ^{[it's a simple step but unfortunately, a lot of people tend to forget or ignore it]}.

---

@libert19
Thank you for posting this ^[bookmarked].

That'll be a nice touch but depending on your browser, there is a workaround if you accidentally close the page prior to clicking the preview button...

• e.g. While using the Chrome browser, you can get the exact page back with everything that you typed:
  
  • Steps:
    Click the three dots at the top-right corner of the page > History > You should see it under the "Recently closed" icon > Click "Post reply" tab.
    ^{- Everything will be there [even after 10 minutes] if you're using the default settings.}

Isa sa mga dahilan kung bakit wala masyadyong recent reviews is dahil sabi sa isang video na nawala daw ito nun Aug, 8 at bumalik ulit nun Aug, 12 ^[link], pero unfortunately, may nakita parin akong dalawang recent reviews sa YouTube.
^{- Not sure kung paid review sya or hindi.}

---

Idagdag ko lang yung findings ko ^{[baka may mag basa from their current users]}:

• Quote from: SFR10 on July 22, 2021, 08:20:26 PM
  You can see their similarities from the following screenshots: Muyan66 and Usdtoption
  
  

  • In addition to that, there's also the following video ^{[Filipino/Tagalog]}: Usdtoption.com and Muyan66.com SCAM REVIEW / SAME SITE
    - Short version: They're claiming that "Muyan66 imitated their products...", but they forgot to change the top-up/deposit address ^{[4:23 until 6:56]} in their newly made fake platform ^{[proven by his transaction history back in June]}.

Have you tried searching the address that LocalBitcoins used for sending the amount in question, on a website like "WalletExplorer"?
^{- They're great at tagging the addresses that belong to most exchanges.}

• LocalBitcoins old addresses
• LocalBitcoins addresses
  - When you click on each one of those addresses, it has the following label attached to them:
  
  Quote
  part of wallet LocalBitcoins.com

---

Not sure if there's still such a thing as "non-KYC ATMs", but based on what I've seen, all of the BTMs have some sort of a KYC process when you exchange beyond a certain limit.

Does anybody know if there's a way to "clearly" view or monitor their current balance sheet?
^{- The best one that I could find for this year, was "this one", but even with that, I'm still not sure where such investments belong on the list [I'm looking for a way that clearly shows the amount for each of their crypto assets].}

You were right ^{[it's a nice touch]}... Found a podcast ^{[by their CEO - Zach Herbert]} that confirms what's actually the surprise gift:

• Link ^{[skip to 1:00:50]}

There might be more ^[link], but not sure how reliable it is.

You can find their logo at the bottom of the image ^{[investing authority]}.
- They have a page on Instagram:

Based on a couple of videos that I just watched ^{[two different apps on the Ledger live]}, you'll be sending it to them ^{[unfortunately, it's not the latter one]}.

---

Personally, I'd prefer to go with the safest route ^[saving], as opposed to putting everything in jeopardy ^{[no matter how high the rewards might be]}.

Perhaps you should consider using a single source for all of them and just convert everything instead.
^{- While you're at it, you might want to consider using a different source with more historical data [e.g. "this one" shows prices from Aug 23, 2010].}

It's not... Not every fall/decline is an indication that something bad is about to happen. On the contrary, I think it's a positive thing that fewer newbie investors ^{[most likely]} are buying/selling at the moment ^{[they just come and go (don't pay too much attention to those numbers)]}.
^{- The only thing that should matter, is if the amount of "true BTCitcoiners" goes down drastically [there's no way to accurately measure it (like what @pooya87 said)], as opposed to those that "only" see it as an investment asset!}

There's more: They might "relocate eligible sources".

Since they're dealing directly with the government, then I don't see the point in using one.

Looks like they would allow eligible sources to "choose" for themselves.