We started with the Binance API, but eventually found the Coinbase Pro one more suitable, backtesting results of one of our algorithms can be found on rquanton.comYou use wix to build your official site? And it's the free version ones, judging from wix's banner that stick to your top page. How's this a profitable project, again? You seems going cheap for scamming. Ok, let's drop the domain for a while, let's talk about the content. Your graphic is very sad, your description is an epitome of laziness, and your team are basically un-tracable and in-verificable. |
|
|
|
Wow. Thanks for the heads up!! Too many scams out there.. We have nothing to do with this post and accusation. Snapshot as in hardforking? Kinda sure that's what you mean on the earlier part of the post, given you said people that holds ETH will be rewarded with the token once snapshot happens. Then... you offered a presale, at certian rate, promo. Weird. And oh, about scam accusations, you actually have something to do with it, namely defending your position and project, suppose they're real and legit. |
|
|
|
We wouldn't know it was an error! HOWEVER, the Consumer will be able to control what offers they receive. So let's assume that a click or search was either an error or a one-timer. Should an advertiser desire to send an offer to the Consumer, the Consumer has the right to "turn off" the system so as not to receive such offers.
But you bring up a great point: one click does not a motivation make! Multiple searches are more valid as an indication of intent as opposed to just one random visit. The advertiser has the opportunity to identify (anonymously, of course) Consumers who have expressed multiple indicators of intent.
Joe
Multiple searches would perhaps not an indicator itself, speaking out of experience. I had this online shopping app that I used to like, at one point in the distant past, I remembered they asked me to select some category of my interests, and I did, and everything went good up to one point they updated their app and all of my search history were now being suggested at me. They offered me sealant epoxy glue, metal glue, and other welding glues just because at one point I went to look at epoxy to compare its price with the ones offered on physical store. Being comparing prices means I went over the same products multiple times at different online stores to look for the lowest bid and their reviews. And just to emphasize how bad "suggestion based on search history" is, I clearly remember what that epoxy-hunting-night brought to my suggestions (or if you may, "offers"): plumbing pipe! And that's just because I landed on a store that offers home hardware goods (and also offers epoxy glue at a low price, with good reviews) got intrigued at that "oh, that's a funny shaped pipe, never thought that they have that shape! Oh, it's made of iron!" and voila, I now know there are a good variety of pipes and bolts. And yes, this is a serious and real example, not a hyperbole. |
|
|
|
Good afternoon, how can I exchange inf credit to inf tokens
As far as I know, the integration --or development of superwallet, if you may-- is not yet finished, scheduled to be within this Q2, and as soon after it finished, you can transfer INF to any ERC-20 wallet. I would assume that's when the credit exchangable to token. |
|
|
|
Great query...
1) Consumer behavior (what you do) > Consumer intent (what you say you intend to do). So the CYDigital approach is based on behavior, e.g., if you're looking at a $100 USD pair of sneakers, you may (if you permit it) receive offers for $100 USD pair of sneakers.
2) The ads that you see, called retargeting, are either blocked by consumers (via ad blockers) or are not pertinent, e.g., it's quite a stretch to receive an ad for a dishwasher when you've search "cooking lasagna" (although my lasagna pan needs massive washing after cooking). Relevancy is important for the brand to have a successful campaign!
3) Consider the real time offer. Going back to the $100 USD pair of sneakers...imagine receiving an offer at the same time you're looking at a competing item. It's this "moment of truth" offer that is so damn appealing to marketers...and consumers.
Joe
Umm... Sorry, my mood to hyperbole the case example perhaps a little bit taken wrongly as a serious one. The point to cover the whole example of dishwasher and... estate was how sometimes offers and "suggestions" are taking our search history for reference. Which is bad, because on that one or two searches, we were just wanted to look for something insignificant to out preference (thus, lasagna recipe as mundane thing and hyperboled dishwasher as an example of out-of-preference suggestions). Will your system omit such "error"? |
|
|
|
No, that's cool...
1) Proscribing a change in consumer behavior is very important as the opposite can be a barrier to large scale adoption. I think we've got that.
2) Locally: where you decide for it to be stored. If desired, we'll accommodate consumers who need assistance with storage. It does not reside with us.
3) By offers: a specific product/service at a specific price available now. Advertisements are far broader, e.g., brand building. So consider a consumer who is looking at a specific set of pots and pans on Company X. Via CYDigital, the consumer can receive a notification that a competing set of pots and pans is available at Company Z, while the consumer is looking at Company X's offering! Very powerful for the company looking to sell pots and pans: to make an offer while the consumer is looking at a competing brand!
Our team includes marketing veterans who have experience across a wide variety of products and services, so we know what works (and what doesn't).
Keep the questions coming...
Joe
Clear on point number 2, so let's drop that. If I may ask further for point 1 that somehow got related and intertwined with 3, will there be a specific way to ensure the offers are based on customer's preference and history? I mean, based on my own experience on physical world with online shopping app (google is the main suspect here), they asked me to select categories of interests, buying preferences, etc. Like, for example a sneakers under brand, never used before, at 100 USD, etc. Also select my interest on gardening (just an example, I'm very good at killing plants) would love offers about fertilizers and potting and seeds. Then I searched lamp for once in the app, because I need to replace the old one on my room, and suddenly the offers are about lamp, bulbs, flashlights, and LED. Then googled "how to cook lasagna" and the offers change once again to frying pan, oven mitts, dishwasher, kitchen... house... estate. |
|
|
|
Thanks for asking...
1) A change in Consumer behavior is not required: you don't need to change browsers, you don't need to load all your separate accounts into a system, you really don't need to do anything other than sign-up.
2) All Consumer behavior is captured and stored locally: what was visited, what action was taken during that visit, etc.
3) Real offers (not ads) from brands are presented to the Consumer based on their online behavior (assuming the Consumer has given permission).
These are our 3 greatest differentiators.
Thanks,
Joe
I'm sorry, I didn't mean to be rude by saying the followings: 1. I can't recall correctly their name, but I am sure one or two projects propose this idea of this "simplicity", IIRC, one even propose a method as simple as chrome plug-ins or mozilla addons. So... not new. 2. Does this means the data collected will be stored locally on your site or on our PC? 3. I failed to understand the difference between "real offer" and "ads". Sellers offer something through advertisings. Wouldn't it, in a way, put them in a same meaning? |
|
|
|
|
What will be the step after exchange listing? I got an impression that you focused om getting listed, but not really has a foresight on what do do after that, what to do to ensure price stability. And yes, I have read the speech about value and group consensus.
|
|
|
|
|
The idea of selling one's own data to gain profit in crypto is not exactly new, over the years I've stumbled upon few that propose the idea, gave good explanation, interesting promises, etc, but I have yet to hear any of them. So uhh... how will you be different and stand out?
|
|
|
|
|
Care to explain why you delete your other-newly-created-and-discussed-thread? The one where you rant about me being crazy, that I replied and explained rather nicely about what crazy is, the exact same one with the one where you rant about how unfair it is that one (where there's actually two) member gave you a red trust because of "baseless" reason (that I also explain nicely and lengthly) that somewhat is the proof of (your words) how poor the system of this forum is.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm still waiting for your response on why do we have to go crypto for green energy while the conventional ones are still working enough.
Will it be for the sake of easier distribution? How? Or will it be for the sake of simple payment? Hmm... no, it can't be, I'm pretty sure the "old" system still works just fine
|
|
|
|
People get this token for free, so they'll mostly feel no burden on parting with them, which means, dumping once exchange arrived is a very possible scenario. So what'll ensure dev can maintain the price at 1$ or what good reason/benefit that this token have that will persuade people to keep holding and accumulating?
It may fluctuate but we assume it would have value around $1. You may check the currently available stable coins sometimes value $0.99 and sometimes value $1.01 If you dump your stablecoins up to 90 cents (for example) and other people may buy your coins cheaper for instant profits of 10 cents. It is a free market and you may go for dumping your "free" coins but that may help another person getting easy quick profits. it (as per this post, no explanation yet) has no feature to encourage people to hold
cBux is a POS coin with annual inflation of 6% to 3%. It is mentioned within open-post. All format of cbux are swap-able from one format to another format (as value of all format coins/token is always $1) hence you may choose POS based one if you want to stake and profit. Ohh... that. Ok, POS being integrated to bitcoin will provide enough selling point to dissuade people from dumping. Just to clarify, will the token be at 1 USD, pegged by the script, or the number is still a matter of speculation? Because on this post you said that the price is said to be at 1 USD for the sake of simplicity. |
|
|
|
So what'll ensure dev can maintain the price at 1$... theymos explained it in Meta here. This is totally unrelated to this particular token, which I don't know anything about and only spent 30 seconds skimming, but you could do a stablecoin in a mostly-decentralized way like this:
- Call the stablecoin "SSCN". There's also another token which is part of the same system called "SBND".
- When the price is below $1, the system automatically creates x SBND tokens and sells them for SSCN tokens in an automatic auction process. This destroys SSCN coins, reducing the supply and therefore increasing the price.
- When the price is above $1, the system automatically buys y SBND tokens in return for SSCN tokens in an automatic auction process. This creates SSCN coins, increasing the supply and therefore reducing the price.
(Speculators would buy SBND tokens if they think that SSCN is going to become more popular, and sell them if they think that SSCN is going to become less popular.)
A decentralized system cannot know anything about prices, so some centralized entity needs to provide SSCN's price to the system as an input. This is an unavoidable point of centralization. But everything else, such as determining x and y above and conducting the auctions, could be done automatically.
Interesting, always bumping into the term of "stable coin" but I never really could grasp the clear concept, never have guessed that theymos had a very explanation. Going back to the thread topic, will this system be able to support, like, a massive dump? Given the token is free, and it (as per this post, no explanation yet) has no feature to encourage people to hold, wouldn't it be very possible and logical that massive dump will occur? Then, would the system be able to overcome it? |
|
|
|
sorry, but to tell you frankly how can you equate the value of your cBux token to $1? who will buy your token at that price? lets say for example, i have 1023 merits right now, so i will get about 1023 cBux which is equivalent to $1023. but where in the world can i sell this token to get my $1023?
what i'm trying to say here = who are those people that will naively buy this token at a fixed rate of $1 for nothing? remember that once a token or altcoin hits in the exchanges, there's no stopping for the dumpers to sell their freebies for peanuts. how can you maintain your token's value just like any other stable coin in the market today?
Have you ever used any stablecoin to lock your profits ? You do not need to buy my token, you already own that. You may start using it. We may value this coin/token 1 cent or 50 cent or $25 or even $100 too. Because, there will be no pre-mine and it is like pre-owned distribution. But, for simplicity, we assume this token to have $1 value out of thin air or based on your BTC savings. This is a static value coin hence there will be no point of dumping it. If you people want to quick cash out your cbux then that will be an opportunity for all other traders (who are all the real adopters of stable coins) to get them cheaper. A stable coin may get dumped for less than $1 too but it may get recovered to $1 as early as possible as everyone is aware of it is actual worth (which is $1). I come for this too, and I still can't grasp your meaning. How could you ensure the price will always stuck at 1$, again? People get this token for free, so they'll mostly feel no burden on parting with them, which means, dumping once exchange arrived is a very possible scenario. So what'll ensure dev can maintain the price at 1$ or what good reason/benefit that this token have that will persuade people to keep holding and accumulating? |
|
|
|
DCN teams exist, but token prices for projects are hopeless. The reasons are as follows: First, the token has too much supply. Second, they tricked many investors by posting logos of certain large exchanges on blogs throughout the year. They don't have the money to run the project now. Project planning was good, but investors are now in danger. Token prices will soon drop to 0.00000001 ETH. Good bye, money  I hope that many people who invest in this don't have wasted chance. There are many better projects in the Krypto market besides the DCN project. This is a dead coin. Has anyone actually used this token for payment? The reviews of people who say they're using are kind of advertising. Everybody wake up! Don't dream in vain. I'm not a fan of this project either due to their enormous max supply that, although gradually released, will still scares investors as well as probably creating annual depreciation when released, but I am more curious on why you replied yourself in 4 mins gap, in a tone that seems like you commented your previous post as someone else. Was this a FUD attempt? |
|
|
|
|
I would like to know more details about the scam accusations and what'll be the defense, but it seems dev and the original accusers didn't want to get into this further. Too bad, I've made my popcorn.
Anyway, with the benefit of the doubt, why would green energy resource(s) need to be crypto-ed? It still works completely fine with conventional paper money, isn't it?
|
|
|
|
One of the privilege earned by holding your native token is the ability of early bidding for new tokens, how many token does one need to be able to enjoy this privilege? And how does the other community or the projects' team will think about this? Most exchange will not disclose the date and list of new token listing, and this feature propose a "violation" to the unwritten rule.
It will be listed and then locked for trading unless you have the required amount of tokens, 100, but subject to change in favor of users based on market conditions. Just to make it straight, the owner of 100 NEXT (subjected to change) will earn a privilege to buy and sell newly listed tokens up to 14 days prior to public listing? Or will it be listed and then locked from public? Let's say, an ABC token is to be listed on January 15th, will the owner of 100 NEXT be able to start trade them from January 1st or will they still only be able to trade from 15th (whereas the other will be able to trade on 29th)? You have it correct in the last part. Once it is listed on the 15th, holders will have access on the 15th while everyone else will gain it on the 29th. I honestly wonder if the feature will be beneficial, without being sceptic. Let's assume there are 100 people holding the privilege of this early trade, while the rest 500 were content with waiting for the public trade, the initial pump that usually follows a listing, or the excitement that bring volume, will not happen because most of the token owners (or, to stick with the example we use earlier, the ABC owners) still can't trade them. So, the main excitement, pumps, and volumes, will still happen on 29th. I think it'll be not too different from a case where projects releasing their tokens 14 days before exchange listing, people can trade on DEX, but only small numbers of holders interested to do so, resulting a small to no volume, whereas the main trading activities happen 14 days after. It's an assumption. We can assume that there will be more than 100 people holding privileges to trade early. It would also show true demand to get on board a project and hold its token/coin. Also, 100 NEXT for early access is not hardcoded, it can be adjusted based on market conditions in order to benefit users and the project. Regardless, we will see how it goes with this feature. Regarding it not being a benefit if many people try to utilize it... Why? It creates buying pressure. Sure, we have utility to provide through the use of NEXT. Greater demand to trade a project early bird promotes greater demand for NEXT. "So the benefit is no longer a benefit as everyone entitled to it" it sure is a benefit for existing holders who will see their NEXT holdings appreciate in value. Hope this makes sense. (replying to paragraph 2) Price-wise, yes I can understand that it'll make very much sense, that the more people trying to get hold of the token to be entitled to early bird feature, the more it will be beneficial to the existing holders as their token value increases, thus benefit (or rather, profit). But feature-wise, will it be beneficial? Let's assume that the entire members of your exchange are 100 users. Due to the interests on the feature, 80 of the 100 users are possessing the NEXT token, this means majority of your community are entitled to this early trade, which lead us to a situation where the early trade is almost equal to an ordinary trade, there were no early bird anymore, only the night-owl... or late-worm. Thus, your feature is no longer a feature, isn't it? |
|
|
|
The title 150% ROI picked my interest on looking what kind of yet another "brilliant" idea of investment is this, but then I read the rest of the thread and really got amused. Two questions: am I correct to take that you will airdrop the entire supply? And, why do you think the price mimic those of trash coin?
The ZERO Buy support is a proof that no investors is taking this project seriously so all airdrop dumpers are out of luck with their coins and they cannot sell for peanuts immediately. I will not assert this unambiguously. of course this option is possible. However, the team is trying to improve its activities. some results are already seen. and they are pretty good. Like... what? I can see that they had minuscle volume on crex24, and although it's arguably better than 0 volume --which indicate dead coin-- it's still very low that perhaps it was fake volume. The point of topic I raised is that it has extremely minimum rate --which is a polite way to say near trash-- of 1 sat. What's the improvement, again? |
|
|
|
Yeah nice, umm... didn't mean to be rude, but if you could share your thoughts and views about the previous topic I asked, I'll be grateful as I am really interested to discuss about it. I'm currently on mobile and it's rather troublesome for me to requote, but it's on previous page, post number #21. If I may give a brief highlight, I thought your feature might not be a beneficial feature at all, because there's a slight chance that only few people will use this "early trade" feature, thus very low volume, or the exact opposite, everyone hold the requirements so the benefits is no longer a benefit as everyone entitled to it |
|
|
|
|
The title 150% ROI picked my interest on looking what kind of yet another "brilliant" idea of investment is this, but then I read the rest of the thread and really got amused. Two questions: am I correct to take that you will airdrop the entire supply? And, why do you think the price mimic those of trash coin?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
