I was wondering if you're also the CM for their telegram channel or they're a different people from you, because if I can be direct, how the telegram CM responding to their community is certainly not encouraging a growth. They're practically alienating their own community there, whoever opposes and criticize them will get a rude response, and at the very least they probably wamt to sound confident of themselves and their roadmap, but the outcome was very far from it because they sound very arrogant instead of confident. As far as I know, lots of projects who apply such strategy --or perhaps just hired a very wrong person for their community representative-- ends up... not right.

Just my 2 cent, but if you're the CM on that channel and it was you who replied them, you know what you should do to improve community growth. If you're not --that it was someone else from their team-- then they need to hire someone else.

I jumped the cliff and plunge myself into their telegram channel, it's flooded with spammy bot chat, but here's their chart according to poocoin --I've never heard of this service before-- and dexguru. Current price at pancakeswap is on 5,576,740,000 BNBD per BNB. Providing a screenshot below for a better visualization of their... series of number.

You have my question right above your post still unanswered. While for the article, although it might add a bit credential and confidence for your project, it actually brings more questions for me. Allow me to give direct snippets from the article:


Your goal is to cover investors from a failed ico, but you require the said ico to be at least on one exchange and has a no less than 1 million euro in capital. If a project managed to be on one exchange --I believe the requirement imply that the exchange is a CEX and not a DEX-- and has 1M euro in capital, it doesn't sounds like a rugpull or an exit-scam.

I really hope badmanthought was just a hired CM and not a part of any team whom thread he posted, because if he's part of the team, we really need to start questioning his legitimacy. Three out of four of his recent thread faced similar silence, although he's online,

Dino Exchange

Anti Lockdown

and this thread.

But will your customer be able to take only what they wanted to join --for example like only insurance, or only brokage-- or will it be one for all service?


Then move your thread to service section

Is it really that hard to notice my post? It's literally the only post on this thread aside from yours. Or were you just suddenly turn blind because you don't have logical and satisfying answer to my question?

I know it's a common knowledge and it should already be on any investor's awareness, but in case someone failed to realize this poece of important disclaimer they put on their website but conveniently forgot to write here.

Reading your title and a brief description, I thought you.offered an insurance against failed ICO --and if this is true, you're not the first to propose this idea, and I don't think any of your predecessor actually managed to seriously run this sector-- but reading your terms and condition, as I screenshotted below, i am rather dubious. Are you actually offering a brokerage service?

Theyn state it themselves on their whitepaper, although I don't think we can call them a whitepaper as they're lacking an in-depth info. For point number 2, if you shift your perspective into the percentage instead of focusing on their gigantic suppy, it is not impossible at all for handful of people to own 0.1% of total supply, especially if team can't maintain price and their rate dropped to a very low rate. What'll be of these holders? Do they have to pay some penalty if they wanted to leave and sell all of their token?

You have two allocation of token burn, 80% of token burn and 10% of liquidity that'll also be... burned? So the final total supply is 10%, like... 100 trillion?

For anyone who wondered, this is their website as I managed to fish from their tg.

Now, for the question. You asked for 12% transaction fee? Am I missing something? Is it the current trend? I was just from another thread asking 10% fee. How exactly does this appealing to anyone? I also can't fins details about team. Don't tell me they're anonymous and prefer to keep their anonymity to maintain focus of the project, blablabla.

Do I get this correctly:

1. Each transaction will cost us 10% of the total amount sent
2. Each transaction may not exceeeding 0.05% of the total supply, or there will be a consequences.

How will this be appealing to anyone?

Here's the thing, what you sell intially was BelaToken with these details:
Token sale platform: https://unicrypt.network/amm/pancake/ilo/0x15D0D31c7Bb998e8fc8FE1531082EFa0E5014D04
Contract address: 0xF413B065A6a18C8cac7163f57eCd28D4f8d638e3
Coin tracker: belatoken

What you announce as per your last post:
Contract address: 0x1cb3fefd70d5a047a956ad9521928fbb12eb853d
Coin tracker: BelaXi

Can you explain why do you have two different token? How? When did you announce about this?
What's the correlation between both?

Reference: Archived post by Loyce

What? The POA posts literally stopped since six days ago and no longer cluttering this thread. But I'm agree that we need to know more, and CM and the thread itself is quite silent. I wondered if that's part if their "stealth mode" and if so, why bother creating an ann only to leave it alone?

You missed my question, or perhaps it is better if I say you missed the point of my question. What I asked was, given we can roughly say your service is an ICO platform, there are a lot of similar platforms already circling around, and most didn't safeguard the buyers against projects that do rugpull. Unfortunately, neither did i find any of your feature that attempting to fight against this known issue. So what's improvement that you purpose that differentiate you from others?

You failed to mention how much token reserved for team and "development purpose where team can use them as they see fit", and I think this sentence answers that,

"40% of the coins have been placed with PancakeSwap. Over time, 20% of the coins will be burnt to the ground, 15% will be airdropped to turn DOGE people into CATZ people (meow) and 5% will be used to sponsor needy cats. The remainder will be used for promotion and given to people helping to facilitate."

20%? For something that claimed to be "by the cat for the cat" whose goal is to help stray cats, how could those cat only get 5% allocation while "people helping to facilitate" got 20%?

Can't find that either, and I've peeked at their WP, website, and even googling their token name for this. Dev, I'd also like to know your official ann thread on this forum. It seems you just... appeared out of thin air in one day

But the sale that's concluded within 10 mins was a private sale, wasn't a private sale works according to an agreement where the invitee purchase token as they said they would? So, wasn't basically what happened within that 10 mins span was the team notified invitee that the token sale has begun, they close the deal as per agreement, and that's it? I don't think we can say that as impressive, especially if the team gives the invitee time limit to close the deal or the token sale is automatically cancelled, 10 mins is very achievable.

Although... judging from their confidence to sell 3,000,000 token as a hardcap within 8 days, I have to say they're very sure with their next sale.

Anothe inconsistency is on their total supply, they said they have 1Q tokens --that's 1,000T-- but bsc explorer indicated they only have 944.5T tokens. And what's even worrisome is how this address owned 813trillion out of 1Q total supply --or 944.5 trillion, if we use bsc's data-- that means they hold 86% of the total token. Since presale is not open yet, I believe they're part of the team.

I visited their bounty and gave them a thorough look, apparently Royse777 was just posting on their behalf, he did not hired to manage the campaign. I also took a deeper look on their telegram channel, they have three members labeled as CM, community manager, I am sure three should be more than enough to handle their only two media --telegram and this thread-- so I can't help but thinking that their silence is perhaps intentional.