Thank you for the information about RAK free trade zone, kinda helpful and giving me something to read, but what I wanted to know is the company details, like, perhaps, the registration number etc. I am not familiar with free trade zone topic, but I think even if you're under a free trade umbrella, you'll still need to have a company license to operate?
Perhaps this is the best option for the development of the project, because the free trade zone contributes to the active development of business, which is beneficial for every investor who will not worry about the interference of the regulatory authorities of other countries. In fact, the project is very interesting and has every chance of getting a high degree of demand in society. Which... is not what I'm asking. What I wanted to know was their company profile and registration number, or any government legal documentation that can be used to backup and prove their legitimacy. |
|
|
|
Does YPRO have any strategic partners? Products launch and marketing in Q2, time isn't too long but it is difficult to accurately assess the project now.
We are in contact with some companies (possible great partners), but we can't say too much now. We'll share information about it soon. Is it just me or was the answer didn't actually answer anything? It was a vague answer at best, not even telling us what sector does the company runs/ their background, or how they're related or beneficial --thus, strategic-- to the project. |
|
|
|
So, in other words, you're their representative and part of them, and that your answer is their official answer?
Talking about the company behind FRX, Ferox Advisors is a legal security and trading company that's registered in Turkey? With intention to be privy, pardon the necessity, can we look up for the company details to verify this?
I should hope so  As for the company, it's registered in the RAK free trade zone as far as I know. They hold offices in Istanbul through a partnership with a foundation because of Turkish rules and regulations about asset management, all the FRX related transactions will be done on chain, so there is no local law or restriction that would in any way influence the relationship between token holders and FRX organization. Thank you for the information about RAK free trade zone, kinda helpful and giving me something to read, but what I wanted to know is the company details, like, perhaps, the registration number etc. I am not familiar with free trade zone topic, but I think even if you're under a free trade umbrella, you'll still need to have a company license to operate? |
|
|
|
Before we move to a lot of technical and details about this project, I noticed you're wearing bitvest's signature. While there is no rule --not that I'm aware of-- against this, if still like to know your position and capacity here. Their community manager? A fan? posting on team's behalf? Voluntarily and unofficially?
Thanks for the great questions, I'm a fan, community manager and a local ambassador, I answer to the best of my ability, and anything highly technical or beyond my scope I check with the team and relay their answers as promptly as possible. So, in other words, you're their representative and part of them, and that your answer is their official answer? Talking about the company behind FRX, Ferox Advisors is a legal security and trading company that's registered in Turkey? With intention to be privy, pardon the necessity, can we look up for the company details to verify this? |
|
|
|
|
Before we move to a lot of technical and details about this project, I noticed you're wearing bitvest's signature. While there is no rule --not that I'm aware of-- against this, if still like to know your position and capacity here. Their community manager? A fan? posting on team's behalf? Voluntarily and unofficially?
|
|
|
|
"Created by a bored developer"  you really need another way to get rid of your boredom, instead of increasing the number of fun tokens created on the ethereum blockchain. If can't be taken so seriously, so for what? just for collection in someone wallet? in it's essence, it's a utility token, with the unique utility to piss people off - quite the opposite of a "collector's item" really plus it's fun to play around with a concept and see if/how one can implement it on the blockchain  I was thinking about how it could --or, well... couldn't at all, LOL-- be beneficial to track wallets for the case where someone moved wallets a lot, or perhaps tried to join multiple wallets into one, without losing his ownership record. The rought concept goes like, suppose I had one wallet fron 2015, that I signed, and I tried to join them all into one wallet; or I have six other wallet for some reason and I need to authenticate the other six, but I don't want to do signed message on each of them just to verify that those wallets were mine. So what I need to do is to get one cunt on my signed wallet, send them to the other six (since it's self replicating, I can even send them to hundreds or thousands of my wallet without costing me much). And from that point forward, the ownership of the new wallets with cunt inside can be tracked down to my original signed wallet via transaction history. Just giving words into the rought idea coming to my mind, I haven't really thought the real benefits of this. |
|
|
|
So umm... basically a trash token? I'm saying it in a neutral tone, not the negative and degrading ones. It'll never be listed in an exchange, as you said yourself that no sane exchange would do it, and it'll grow back in your wallet once depleted. A bit curios, tho, will it grow back or will it multiplies? Suppose I have 4 cunt on my wallet and it sits still for years, will it stays at that amount or will it grow to 8, 12, 16, etc.?
trash's a bit harsh, though objectively speaking it is i'd prefer to call it a fun- or meme-token though the idea is that you can't fully get rid of it, tokens are minted when your balance drops to zero - let's say someone sent you 3 CUNT. - you send 1 to an address - you end up with 2, the other wallet with 1 token
- you send 1 to another address - you have 1, the other also 1 token
- you send 1 to yet another address - the wallet receives 1, but your balance is still 1. 1 token has been minted.
To sum it up, it is a grow-back and not a multiplication, and as long as someone has 1 cunt on his wallet, it won't trigger the... endless event? Another curiosity, is the token "replicate" itself from the person's wallet or is it sent over and over from the contract address? |
|
|
|
|
Whoops, I almost missed a fun party here.
Yo, OP, let's see if I get this straight: you think bestchange made a mistake by employing Nutildah because he is a, quote unquote, scam facilitator, with your sole evidence and/or base argument is that he tried to sell his account... back in 2016?
Umm... two things: one, you asked people to read evidences before commenting here, but have you read the post right below that very "evidence"? And two, have you tried to, perhaps at your free time, look at his trust page? You know it's clickable and give you an access of his trust history, right? (mind blown much?) And I'm not talking about the one he received, I'm talking about the one he send. You know, the one where he tag scammers and effectively hunt and decimate them instead of facilitate them? Pretty much sure if he's a, quote unquote, scam facilitator, he should do the exact opposite.
Next evidence to be studied, please.
|
|
|
|
|
So umm... basically a trash token? I'm saying it in a neutral tone, not the negative and degrading ones. It'll never be listed in an exchange, as you said yourself that no sane exchange would do it, and it'll grow back in your wallet once depleted. A bit curios, tho, will it grow back or will it multiplies? Suppose I have 4 cunt on my wallet and it sits still for years, will it stays at that amount or will it grow to 8, 12, 16, etc.?
|
|
|
|
And besides, they themselves do not deny that they copied from this document.
Was it mentioned from the beginning? I can't open the archived link since it's redirecting to downloading, but I don't want to download it. If they mentioned it at the beginning when you made the accusation, then I think it should call copy paste instead of plagiarism. Because they use reference links from where they copy-pasted. But of course, this is a red signal for investors. I am wondering how they will succeed even if they can't write a full whitepaper by themselves. It's better to avoid such a project. No, it wasn't there before. I have the original file as I also noticed the similarity and was about to raise a thread myself before seeing this one. Screenshot below, as well as team admitting and acknowledging their mistake. 
Yes you are right. We have not included the source of materials that we used on the last page of white paper. Very sorry about it. We only used paragraphs describing what farming is and risk disclaimer note from Rigel.
|
|
|
|
I was about to point out the plagiarized content on your whitepaper and raised a thread about it, but lovesmayfamilis already created a nice one, so all we need to do now is you telling us, on that thread, to be more convenient, about why you completely copied paragraphs from other project. |
|
|
|
[...]
I told you the plan and why we can't give you exact numbers right now. Again, just because you don't like it doesn't make it wrong. I disagree with your opinion. That's the plan, if you don't like it then don't invest. And that's OK, that's why you do your DD. Good luck.
My apologies for missing this reply, I must have not noticed there is a reply and the thread were drowned by other new posts on my list. Glad that you bumped it and took my attention. To continue and simplify the... curiosity, this is what you have in mind while you planned your tokenomics: Total supply is 2,000,000, hard cap is at 1,500,000. This means you planned to have 500,000 wPGO for team and development allocation, which goes as follows: 25% Development & Operations 25% Dex liquidity 20% Marketing & Promotions 15% Partnerships and Exchanges 15% Team Development I'll make it easy with the rounded rate of ETH highest from past days, namely at 1,400 USD/ETH, while factually the rate and amount in mind while budgeting this tokenomics were much lower, as it follows early Jan's ETH price. And I'll assume your token price raises 100% from the presale price, namely at 0.000004. So, based on above points, you planned to have 500,000wPGO x 0.000004 ETH/wPGO x 1,400 USD/ETH
2 ETH x 1,400 USD/ETH
2,800 USD Were you saying you planned exchanges, team development, projecr development, liquidity, and marketing with less than 3,000 USD at best? And please don't use the excuse "nothing is set in stone" as it is rather unprofessional, because if you're really serious with a project, you won't stray far --or at all-- from the goal you set yourself. This is what you have in mind when you initially budgeting the project, this is the basic mainframe of wPGO. 3,000 USD? |
|
|
|
MVP is live soon, right now you can stake Royale in different liquidiy pools, join our telegram to learn more.
If you are a casino or are opening a casino and need liquidity then get in touch via pm.
does the IDO still running or not ? because this project already tradeable on cex, i hope you will explain us about this situations i saw a lot of people confuse, and need a clear explanations from the team or you as the thread creater my friend Uhh... actually... CM has answered that, two posts above yours, right below my previous post. But, I have to say that it'll be nice if some updates were made to reflect this milestone. I think it is rather difficult to learn about this from the currently available media, and it is rather easy to mistook the current phase, especially as polkastarter didn't show much info about the progress of the sale. It'll be nice if the info about concluded IDO were updated from website, just like what happened to the first and second sale phase. |
|
|
|
MVP is live soon, right now you can stake Royale in different liquidiy pools, join our telegram to learn more.
If you are a casino or are opening a casino and need liquidity then get in touch via pm.
Can you help clear the confusion with token sale phases? Namely, if your IDO were yet to be launched and your private sale is not concluded yet, then why does it already available on a cex? |
|
|
|
|
This is a serious question: do you have a dumb version of your explanation? Because I find it extremely hard to understand your concept, even after going back and forth between your site's pages. The "the protocol consists of pBTC35A tokens and MARS tokens" seems rather non-descriptive, and I'm saying this from the perspective of non-technical human. Perhaps we can start from the simple version of the use case and the benefits of your token
|
|
|
|
seems early investors already made a good profit from this project
because when i see the token price in crowdfunding stage in the site,
early price is less than $0.1 and now the price on bithumb is more than $0.2
A bit curious about this, their site shows that seed and 1st private stage of token sale were closed, and probably they're currently on 2nd private stage --marked as "oversubscribed"-- and will do an IDO (initial dex offering) on polkastarter, but token is already on uniswap and bithumb? |
|
|
|
Whats up with the website? Its been down for a while.
Really? You asked that? Doesn't the quality of this thread and the long inactivity of the devma clue enough? Just curious, I noticed that you're actively promoting bongger, and although I never followed this project, I concur you're the dev of bongger? Does the question if their inactivity strictly personal or do you have your token listed in their exchange? |
|
|
|
Guys, to cut the long loop of predictions:
Listing on UniSwap isn't hard as one member said, the thing is we are waiting for the right time to list over there so as to have supply and demand (demand will be from VPN premium users in the short term and eventually other JACS services)
The current pool over UniSwap was created by one of our developers for testing purposes, the price over there isn't the intended price for launch, so we will have to create another LP once we're about to launch
And also, we're looking to add more CEX and DEX exchanges as we progress
good public demand to open jacs tokens on cex or dex is very much, unfortunately jacs products are not ready so far so a little more patience to wait, it would be great if the team will dare to give that time it will make the community calm ... but they did. By the end of January or early February at max. Which... given it is the later half of January, I think it's safe to say the long await would end within two weeks at the latest. |
|
|
|
But uniswap can really give a bad starting price to the token because its the best place for bounty hunters to sell theire tokens imidiatly and the problem of liquidity can make things worse...i think cex exchange as a starting exchange is a very good choise
You do aware that --if you really read previous page, or really followed the beginning of this topic instead of just cluelessly jumping into a topic-- JACS already on uniswap, right? Disregarding who launch the initial pair, if we apply your opinion, then the token should already be in a bad place and price, as bounty hunters should already be selling their token immediately. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
