Interesting! Good thing you've raised the rewards to 1000 satoshis , hope it will last more than expected. i think that is okay and good start for this
Rewards are the same from the beggining  This is correct. Rewards have not changed. You get 300 standard claim and then you play the bonus round where you get anywhere from 1 -10,000 satoshis. |
|
|
|
Self fulfilling prophecy? A nice jump on the same night as the super blood moon. Maybe some whale was bored and just decided to pump the price for fun. |
|
|
|
|
Wow this latest break in the story is crazy. I hope the post VJ made and messages he sent will lead to the cature of the crooked FBI agent that is extorting millions and is crazy enough to torture innocent women. What people will do for money... just insane!
|
|
|
|
a very good idea to boost the popularity of bitcoin. I
prefer dot BTC because of a short domain effect on a site
seo
I think .bitcoin would be better for SEO. Many search engines include the URL text as part of the search criteria which is why you see so many news sites that instead of making up an ID for each article like news.com/dfj34ifkdj.html it will be news.com/child-rescues-monkey-from-evil-panther Also as others have stated, not everyone knows that BTC means bitcoin. My vote is definitely for .bitcoin |
|
|
|
|
Agreed, you should absolutely do it yourself versus using an online service, even if they have been around for a while. It might take longer, but at least you can be sure in knowing that your funds are secure and you are the only one with the private key.
|
|
|
|
So do you think the average went up??? should i change on my list?
Nope, no changes were made, some people are just getting lucky!  |
|
|
|
Some big winners this morning! It's easier than you think to get 10,000 sats, 1 out of 100 chance!  |
|
|
|
|
I think there could very well be another round of FOMO similar to 2013. Now only 12.5 coins per 10 minutes instead of 25!! When we have huge sell offs people panic and over sell, when we have the big rises people go crazy and over buy in fear of missing out.
|
|
|
|
And at today's prices, accumulating between 10 and 50 BTC seems like it could be in the grasp of a lot more ordinary people.
On the other hand, if a person lives in a struggling situation, then maybe at most s/he would be able to reasonably accumulate 1 to 5 BTC... in these $200 price territories.
Your targets are very high IMO. 10 - 50 BTC, $11,000 is more money than I would be comfortable losing if everything went to zero. 10 BTC ~ $2,000 is also a little tough, I wouldn't be happy losing two grand but it wouldn't be catastrophic either. At least just about everyone can dig up $230 and buy at least one coin. So right now is a great time for new comers to join in, buy a coin and stash it away for a few years. The point I am making, is NOT only about you and your personal circumstances and your view about the future of Bitcoin. Surely, a person should keep in mind that s/he could lose the BTC whole investment based on his/her view of probabilities. Let's say for example, a person viewed probabilities like the below chart of probabilities for a 5 year time-frame: less than $200 < 5 % chance $200 to $300 about 5-10% chance $300 to $500 30-40% chance $500 to $1000 30-40% chance $1000 to $5000 12-18% chance $5000+ about 5% chance Someone like this better be putting a whole hell-of-a lot of money into BTC because s/he sees the 5 year time frame to be of about equal chance that BTC will be worth more than $5,000 as it will be below $200. therefore, the outlook suggests to invest quite a chunk of your investment assets in the direction of BTC. On the other hand, it appears to me, that you, coinableS, are giving a much greater probability that BTC is going to go to zero. maybe your 5 year outlook is something like this. less than $10 - 50-60 % chance $10 to $100 about 20-30% chance $100 to $200 5-10% chance $200 to $300 5-10% chance $300 to $500 <5% chance $500+ < 2% chance If your viewpoint is something like the above chart, then what you are saying makes sense; however, I believe that the second chart that I made is overly pessimistic about the future prospects of Bitcoin, even though each person is entitled to his/her own view point and outlook regarding BTC. I'm far from pessimistic in regards to bitcoins potential success. The main thing I was pointing out is you mentioned that 10-50BTC is obtainable for a lot more ordinary people and to me that seems very high. I don't believe there are that many people that have $11,000 laying around that they can invest into bitcoin. Your lower target of 10BTC, I can see that being obtainable by a lot of people... I buy a set amount of BTC every month, no matter the exchange rate and this investment approach works better for my finances. |
|
|
|
And at today's prices, accumulating between 10 and 50 BTC seems like it could be in the grasp of a lot more ordinary people.
On the other hand, if a person lives in a struggling situation, then maybe at most s/he would be able to reasonably accumulate 1 to 5 BTC... in these $200 price territories.
Your targets are very high IMO. 10 - 50 BTC, $11,000 is more money than I would be comfortable losing if everything went to zero. 10 BTC ~ $2,000 is also a little tough, I wouldn't be happy losing two grand but it wouldn't be catastrophic either. At least just about everyone can dig up $230 and buy at least one coin. So right now is a great time for new comers to join in, buy a coin and stash it away for a few years. |
|
|
|
I am not particularly looking for anonymity, I am interested in just mixing the coins in my local wallet many times randomly so it make tracking them to the original wallet harder than normal.
If there is such a script, you will loose a fair bit of coins to transaction fee. Others have pointed out mixing your own coins do not make them much harder to track. Try sending them to an exchange, gambling site, shared wallets and withdraw them to a new address. Cheaper and faster. This. I have found this method to be easy and inexpensive. I've never understood why people put their coins in mixers instead of just doing this. |
|
|
|
|
For bitcoin to drop to zero there would have to be a break in protocol or design. For example, being able to extract the private key from a public address so you can spend others coins or the ability to create 'fake bitcoins' without mining them. As long as these two things don't happen, bitcoin will not die.
|
|
|
|
|
Just tried this site for the first time. I have visited probably 12 times before and never ended up playing, today I finally sent in 0.01 betting it would go down. I won! I like how easy it is to use, either bet up or down. Keep up the good work secondstrade!
|
|
|
|
Neither.
I assume the 21 machine is just a test article not really intended to produce much mining revenue, just prove that it's possible to do it in an integrated manner.
As for cloud mining, I'm sure there are some lovely ones out there but I'll be steering clear anyway.
+1 if I really had to pick between the 2, I'd probably take the 21 just for funIf it were cheaper I would get one for fun since I enjoy developing bitcoin websites. It would be fun to see what the firmware offered and what you could make using one. I'm sure it's just your basic bitcoind with RPC and then they built a library on top of it, but still would be neat to mess around with it. But at $400 no way, I'd rather spend that on BTC for the stash  |
|
|
|
still using faucet and I'm looking for an high pay faucet with long time period. Maybe I can claim only 1 time a day but I want to get 2500-3000 sat minimum guaranteedly.
That would be financial suicide for a faucet owner. If they allowed 2500-3000 every 24 hours, they would get hit by every IP address imaginable. The user would only visit their site once leaving less likely of a chance of click on ads and earning ad revenue. Faucet owners need to get the users to return or stay on the site. This is why my faucets have shorter wait times and games built-in, so my average visitor is spending over 5 minutes on the site. |
|
|
|
|
Thanks for taking the time to reply Chris. Looks like i have some learning to do, this is bit more complex than the leveraged trading I'm used to on finex and kraken.
|
|
|
|
|
Ummm, discrepancy.
Bitcoincentral.org shows it's registrar is Namecheap not Google.
Also expiration date is showing March 2016.
|
|
|
|
I don't know, but they're more transparent and their faucets seem to be more professionally designed in function - at least with regards to claims.
That all has to do with the faucet owner and has nothing to do with faucetBox the service. I really like faucetBox, their API is easy to use to build custom faucets. If people are going to use a premade one-size-fits-all template script their site will appear in poor quality. I make my faucets custom with faucetBox. It's a great service. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
