Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 07:13:01 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 »
401  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Conference on: July 31, 2011, 04:53:29 PM
I can't say I'm a fan of $1200 admission fees.

Yes tony robbins better be there to motivate me for that price.
402  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Conference 2011 NYC on: July 31, 2011, 06:35:50 AM
Looks like the prices doubled in the last day or 2?  Was 1 bitcoin admission now 2? 10 bitcoins for a table instead of 5?
403  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Does Bitcoin Street Faucet work? on: July 31, 2011, 05:54:22 AM
Have you tried to use http://faucet.bitcoin.st  it's a scam to get your phone number?

I've tried using it but only get errors.

It wouldn't have had 134 likes if it was a scam.

I gave them my number and never got anything.  Tried a few times.
404  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Open questions to Jered and Alan of Tradehill on: July 31, 2011, 05:03:25 AM
I'm going to look in to the other ACH method you had mentioned and see if we can make it work, thanks again for all the feedback and we'll stay in contact.

Jered

Jered - try calling Bank of America and seeing what it takes to get electronically setup as an online bill-pay vendor.  Those payments are cleared in 1 day, and ask about the reversals.  If that looks promising, you'll need to get setup with all the major banks that way.  it will take time, but it's better than processing checks!

Good luck!

Tony


It's been a pain dealing with them over the phone so I flew up to talk with them personally. I've got an appointment Monday morning and hope to have a solid answer on this by the end of the day. If it's not ready I'll have an ETA.

Jered

If you use bank of america cant I theoretically just go to any branch and deposit cash into your account? I thought my girlfriends mom used to do that for her all the time.
405  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Open questions to Jered and Alan of Tradehill on: July 31, 2011, 03:30:18 AM
Hi Folks,

We cannot keep any money with Dwolla for the reasons stated By Joel.

We wish there was a good way to quickly move funds in and out of exchanges. Dwolla looked like the solution but now it’s apparent that 25 cents per transaction is insufficient to buy merchants fraud protection. Noting also that fraud by reversible transactions was not the only data errors we found; i.e. transactions vanishing from statements and more without notice.

Regarding checks by mail - we could do this if the amount was large enough like 5 or 10k.

Email me at adam@tradehill.com and we can make arrangements.

Thanks,
Adam


Ouch! Wrong answer. Best of luck to you both. Cashing out now, sadly.

Smalleyster,

I've been traveling and out of the loop so I need to apologize for that. I handle most of the payment options and Adam was filling in while I was at 30,000ft.

There are two transactions here.

1) Checks out replacing Dwolla out. We can certainly send a check. We will send it for free as well. I will ask the bank if there is an easy way we can do this by submitting a CSV etc or another option. If there isn't an easy way to do this then I will sit down and write check after check personally until my fingers are blistered. Once again, free of charge.

2) Checks in. I've been looking in to options for receiving checks but it needs to be 100% free of chargebacks on our end and affordable. I beleive that I've found a solution and hopefully will have an announcement in a few days.


We will 100% write you a check to pull out funds you would have normally removed via Dwolla. Free.
If we can accept checks in we will, we'll evaluate it at first and then keep it if it's a viable option.

Smalleyster, sometimes you hate us, sometimes you love us but you're always honest, non biased and provide excellent feedback. We enjoy having you on these boards regardless if you stay a TradeHill customer or not. We would prefer that you do and are willing to work with everyone to find the best way to get funds in and out until everyone is using Bitcoin and we don't need an exchange.

Feel free to contact me if you need anything in the future.


Regards,
Jered





Nice.  I got a few hundred in there still and i'll keep it in, cause I wanna support you guys.
406  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I don't trust mybitcoin, but how come so many trust it? on: July 30, 2011, 11:00:47 PM
I got 600 BTC that I am on the hook for. So I should be way more angry.

600 BTC is ALOT, but I believe somebody had much much more (25000 BTC  Shocked) on mybitcoin. I hope it was moved someplace safer since first "mybitcoin scam" threads started popping up.

Check this podcast (around 14:40):
http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2011/07/13/137795648/the-tuesday-podcast-bitcoin?sc=tw&cc=share

Ouch
407  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: TradeHill - Why we no longer accept Dwolla and an open letter to Ben Milne on: July 30, 2011, 09:58:30 PM
With the way I suggested, Tradehill would only use Dwolla to send money to its end users. This eliminates the risk of an end user doing what I described above since its not an option for funding your Tradehill account via Dwolla. It is impossible for an end user to fraud tradehill by getting money sent to them by Tradehill.
That can't happen until all the issues between TradeHill and Dwolla are resolved and Dwolla agrees to cover all losses from transactions before now.

Otherwise, TradeHill could send your $1,000 to Dwolla, go to send that money to you only to have Dwolla say, "Sorry, TradeHill, you can't send money to CubedRoot because you have a negative balance." Tradehill responses, "What? We had a zero balance and then sent in $1,000." Dwolla replies, "Yeah, you had a zero balance, but then two transactions from two months ago were reversed. You now have a negative $1,500 balance.".

Exactly my thoughts.
408  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: TradeHill - Why we no longer accept Dwolla and an open letter to Ben Milne on: July 30, 2011, 07:34:47 PM
Now, after your announcement that you will no longer use Dwolla for withdrawals, I am forced to stop using Tradehill as my exchange.  I will have to move back to Mt. Gox. I absolutely refuse to use Paxum as a service due to their intrusive background information requirements.
Is there a reason why you chose to stop using Dwolla for account withdrawals?  Its impossible for the end user (like me) to fraud Tradehill out of money when I am simply making a withdrawal. Plus, Dwolla is still ALOT cheaper to withdraw funds, its $.25 compared to Paxums $1.00.

I'm with CubedRoot on this one.  I have USD stuck on TradeHill that I'll have to to trade back to BTC just to get it out and resell on MtGox, paying commissions again to both.  I understand preventing inbound transfers, but by getting rid of outbound you screwed quite a few of us.
SteveFL,
Keep in mind also, that now, to get your USD from Tradehill all the way back to your bank it will now cost you $6.00!!!!!  Using Dwolla this same set of transfers would have only cost you $.50. 
I think its rather frustrating that Tradehill wont simply keep using Dwolla for Withdrawals since there is absolutley 0 risk in them getting frauded on withdrawals.

Wouldn't that mean tradehill would still need to keep an account with them with money in it?  What if Dwolla would decide to reverse more transactions and take more money from tradehill? I'm not sure how it works just asking a question.
Sure they would need to keep an account open, but if that account is only used to send money to end users there is no chance of fraud. The fraud they faced was were an end user would send money from Dwolla to Tradehill, buy BTC, then file a dispute with Dwolla.  Dwolla wouldn then refund the money to the end user, and debit it from Tradehill.
With the way I suggested, Tradehill would only use Dwolla to send money to its end users. This eliminates the risk of an end user doing what I described above since its not an option for funding your Tradehill account via Dwolla. It is impossible for an end user to fraud tradehill by getting money sent to them by Tradehill. 

Well if I was tradehill I wouldn't keep one cent in Dwolla. 
409  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The Bitcoin Show on OnlyOneTV.com on: July 30, 2011, 07:31:00 PM
Hope you got your money out of Mybitcoin bruce.
410  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Everything is Amazing and nobody's happy. on: July 30, 2011, 07:26:09 PM
http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3413928

This thread doesn't make me feel like we are winning. They have been on a relentless attack on our community for weeks. They misrepresent all of our ideas, and try to paint us all as crazy right wing libertarians. And on top of that some of the openly admitted trolls in that forum are still welcome here, and our mods don't seem to do anything about it... We are not bad people and I have no clue why these people at SA seem to portray us as so? I think we have a good idea that can balance some imbalances in our financial system today. Do I personally believe that Bitcoins are destined to take over every major currency? No. However, I do believe that Bitcoins and other cryptographic currency's have a crucial role to play in the 21st century.

I actually posted this just to remind people how amazing this technology is.  Sometimes we get so caught up in in the drama that we forget how new and fragile some of these technologies are.  I am also guilty of bitching and moaning.  Wasn't meant as an attack by any means.
411  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: TradeHill - Why we no longer accept Dwolla and an open letter to Ben Milne on: July 30, 2011, 07:13:25 PM
Now, after your announcement that you will no longer use Dwolla for withdrawals, I am forced to stop using Tradehill as my exchange.  I will have to move back to Mt. Gox. I absolutely refuse to use Paxum as a service due to their intrusive background information requirements.
Is there a reason why you chose to stop using Dwolla for account withdrawals?  Its impossible for the end user (like me) to fraud Tradehill out of money when I am simply making a withdrawal. Plus, Dwolla is still ALOT cheaper to withdraw funds, its $.25 compared to Paxums $1.00.

I'm with CubedRoot on this one.  I have USD stuck on TradeHill that I'll have to to trade back to BTC just to get it out and resell on MtGox, paying commissions again to both.  I understand preventing inbound transfers, but by getting rid of outbound you screwed quite a few of us.
SteveFL,
Keep in mind also, that now, to get your USD from Tradehill all the way back to your bank it will now cost you $6.00!!!!!  Using Dwolla this same set of transfers would have only cost you $.50. 
I think its rather frustrating that Tradehill wont simply keep using Dwolla for Withdrawals since there is absolutley 0 risk in them getting frauded on withdrawals.

Wouldn't that mean tradehill would still need to keep an account with them with money in it?  What if Dwolla would decide to reverse more transactions and take more money from tradehill? I'm not sure how it works just asking a question.
412  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Everything is Amazing and nobody's happy. on: July 30, 2011, 07:01:07 PM
Seems like this forum is 90% wining so I am constantly reminded of this Louis CK skit on Conan.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8r1CZTLk-Gk

Wow. and this post is somehow a positive contribution?

Yes, I believe it is.
413  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: TradeHill - Why we no longer accept Dwolla and an open letter to Ben Milne on: July 30, 2011, 06:54:28 PM
I am glad Tradehill is using Paxum.  I have used them for a while (less than a year, but steady) for other sites and work, I am glad to have them on board with Tradehill.    I worry about the fees more than trust Wink

The fees are just to high for me. With difficulty increasing, and edging profits down, an increase in the fees I pay lowers my return. Most of my transaction were withdrawals, which is impossible for the end-user to fraud, so Paxum is just to expensive for me.

Promote locally, sell locally.  What do you suggest tradehill do? They are trying their best.
414  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: TradeHill - Why we no longer accept Dwolla and an open letter to Ben Milne on: July 30, 2011, 06:50:18 PM
I am glad Tradehill is using Paxum.  I have used them for a while (less than a year, but steady) for other sites and work, I am glad to have them on board with Tradehill.    I worry about the trust more than fees Wink

Fixed
415  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Everything is Amazing and nobody's happy. on: July 30, 2011, 06:49:20 PM
Seems like this forum is 90% (ok 30%) wining so I am constantly reminded of this Louis CK skit on Conan.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8r1CZTLk-Gk
416  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: TradeHill - Why we no longer accept Dwolla and an open letter to Ben Milne on: July 30, 2011, 06:36:34 PM
why couldn't a bitcoin business buy Dwolla?
What for? Bitcoin businesses were interested in Dwolla only because of their "no chargeback" policy! Now it is quite clear they do not have such a technology or know-how in place. So, they are not attractive anymore.

We're now using Paxum at TradeHill which has more fraud protection in place. It doesn't have all the same peer to peer features that Dwolla does but allows payments similar to Paypal. It can be funded in a similar way with a few additional options like checks and wires.   It will also allow you to withdraw funds from an ATM or with a debit card.

For more information go to www.tradehillblog.com or www.paxum.com

The opportunity is to *replace* dwolla with a service that keeps its word. All they are is a webite using the ACH system. Pretty simple stuff really.

We feel confident that Paxum will. They've been in business a lot longer.

Jered

Jered,
I was a big Tradehill fan. With your current switch to Paxum I figured I would sign up and give Paxum a shot.  Well, i was very surprised to see that Paxum REQUIRES its customers to send a photocopy of their identification (such as your passport, or drivers license) to them as proof of your ID.  They also require you to send in a photocopy of a utility bill to prove your address.
I find this a little intrusive.
At first, since I am miner, I rarely had to fund my exchange account with USD, since I mostly sold all the BTC I mined. So, I still relied on Dwolla to receive my funds from Tradehill.
Now, after your announcement that you will no longer use Dwolla for withdrawals, I am forced to stop using Tradehill as my exchange.  I will have to move back to Mt. Gox. I absolutely refuse to use Paxum as a service due to their intrusive background information requirements.
Is there a reason why you chose to stop using Dwolla for account withdrawals?  Its impossible for the end user (like me) to fraud Tradehill out of money when I am simply making a withdrawal. Plus, Dwolla is still ALOT cheaper to withdraw funds, its $.25 compared to Paxums $1.00.

Plus there is the HUGE difference in fees!!!! It costs me $5 to withdraw money from my paxum account to my bank account!! Holy crap! It also costs $5 to send funds to my Paxum account from my bank.  These fees are just ridiculous.  Dwolla, was just .25 to withdraw. So, for me as a miner, when I sold my BTC on Tradehill, it only costs me $.50 TOTAL to send the USD to my Dwolla account from Tradehill, then from Dwolla to my bank. This same transaction will costs me freaking $10!!!!!! Thats a huge increase!

Also, I posted several comments on your Blog, tradehillblog.com stating how Paxum requires such intrusive background information, and it never got "approved" by the moderators. I had thought Tradehill was a respectable company, and was open with its end users, but when you do sneaky things like not approving comments that expose Paxum's invasive TOS, it makes we question your Tradehill's openness.

This just in, Dwolla was a scam.   This also just in, tradehill is probably very busy and moderating their blog entries is probably the last thing on their mind.  Jeez people are such winey babies.
417  Economy / Services / Re: realitykings.com account sign up with BTC [NSFW!] on: July 30, 2011, 05:49:23 PM
Love to see the big players in the Adult Industry trying out bitcoin.  Now you can tell those people on GFY that people will pay for porn with bitcoins.

My dreams are coming true.
418  Other / Politics & Society / Re: The $1 Billion Armageddon Trade on: July 30, 2011, 05:44:33 PM
The rating agencies are regulated by the USA government. The USA government will never loose the AAA rating by these agencies.

Yes it seems these agencies were the same ones giving AAA ratings to home loans when they were crap.
419  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: How long till BitCoins become outlawed? on: July 30, 2011, 05:06:02 AM
...Okay, and? That doesn't have anything to do with the US's innocent until proven guilty policy. If you say something incriminating, of course it will be used against you, as they are informing you when you are read your rights. Until proven guilty, regardless of how you may prove yourself guilty, you are considered innocent under US law.

Kinda off topic, but this Special where the guy goes into A miami prison for a few weeks was pretty insane.  Some of these people haven't even been to trial yet and they've been in for years.  Technically most of these people are innocent.  But you sill have to be in a shithole. Watch if you have time.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Px2kTQKZaSU
420  Economy / Speculation / Re: I'm either deaf or the volume isn't high enough on: July 30, 2011, 03:51:12 AM
Less free trades? + uncertainty?

I have my btc's and a couple hundred bucks on tradehill.  I'm thinking about buying some btc's with my remaining cash, just so I dont have to deal with the cash problem.  I actually feel safer being in BTC's at the moment for some reason.  Dealing with cash is such a pain.

EDIT: dam i just looked at the charts and something is wierd. 

Mt gox just 29 btc's in 4 hours? Tradehill with 400? hmm

http://bitcoincharts.com/markets/

(bitcoin charts resets at 8pm eastern time US)
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!