From everything I've seen so far, Kruw seems to be a cold and heartless bastard. How he behaved in this situation is probably the most disgusting thing I've seen on this forum so far. Similar to that jerk who controls the Bitcon SV account.  If the people at Wasabi Wallet actually act like this, I gotta say I wouldn't feel too sure about using their stuff.  No clue if this dude's honestly with them or just some random hype guy, but either way he basically made it look like they got some real problems in their heads.

@KingsDen, with all due respect, I also think this thread is unnecessary. 

o_e_l_e_o already put out there what he was comfortable sharing. Sure he ain't just another dude on this forum, but still, we should respect his privacy and  if he wanted to share more about his health or situation, I trust he would. 

We can just hope he's taking care of himself and offer good vibes.  No need to push him.  I know you mean well, but maybe you should say my bad and put this thing to bed? Just a thought.

Sharing information is one thing, right to privacy another.  Don't mix them up.  If Satoshi wanted their identity known, they wouldn't have gone to such great lengths to hide it and  even with everything available, no one's turned up a solid lead yet.  

Sure Bitcoins open-source.  Had to be for people to trust it.  Without this transparency, it's unlikely that people would have accepted it.

It depends on whether you want the transaction to be "picked up" (broadcast) again or if you want it to be dropped by the network.  If it's already marked as "local" in your Electrum wallet, I wouldd suggest simply deleting old tx and creating a new one (using the same inputs) with a higher fee.  This way, you can be sure that your transaction gets picked up by the network and processed.  The current recommended transaction fee (medium priority) is around 42 sats/vbyte.

You know, seeing a couple of idiots reveling in others' misfortune really showed their true colors.  Should count for something.  Honestly hadn't crossed paths with or caught wind of that Kruw fella in relation to Wasabi prior.  But this really shone a light on his pettiness. Good to know.

o_e_l_e_o can definitely rest easy knowing that he's got a lot of people here who support him during this tough time. I mean, it's not like it matters in the grand scheme of things, but I think his legacy here is pretty solid.

---

So it looks like the "Bitcoin SV" troll has been dealt with and Kruw's posts have been moved to another thread. I guess it's best not to bring them up again here. But I just wanted to drop a quick note to thank you for taking action. And I'm also grateful to the moderator who responded so promptly and appropriately.

What a miserable person.  Unbelievably!  If this is how the folks behind Wasabi Wallet act, I don't think I'd feel real confident using their product.  Whether this guy actually works for em or is just some shill it don't really matter - he basically showed that they got some issues with how they treat people.  I ain't tryin' to be mean, but his behavior here was definitely outta line and  the guys gotta get it together.

I think after 13 years of speculation about Nakamoto, it's time for all of us to just appreciate Bitcoin for what it is today. 

I used to really wonder who was hiding behind that pseudonym, but at this point does it really matter?  Bitcoin has taken on a life of its own and impacted so many people regardless of who invented it. The creator was brilliant, no doubt, but Bitcoin has become bigger than any one person now.

I've seen those ads on YouTube too claiming they'll pay like 10% over market rate or whatever.  Definitely makes you go hmmm. 

I mean if it sounds too good to be true, it always is right? My guess would be either straight up scam trying to lure folks in or just super low liquidity so good luck trying to actually sell at that inflated rate they claim.  Either way, probably best to just steer clear and 

stick with the reputable mainstream exchanges that have been around a while.  May not be quite as flashy but least you know they're legit and you can cash out your coins if you need to.  Gets too dicey playing around with these fly-by-night operations just trying to make a quick buck.  Better safe than sorry when your hard-earned moneys on the line.

Yeah! If you ask me, it can swing either way - be a real gamechanger that lifts you up, or drag you down into the pits if you don't watch yourself and

See, if luck's on your side that day gambling can make you a ton of cash, just like that.  Were talking big time life upgrade type money potentially.  But that blade's other edge is that it can just as easily hook you in deep to the thrill of risking it all.  When the chips are down, things can go south real fast if you bet more than you can lose.  That road leads to going broke, life in shambles all kinds of ugly.

So yeah, gambling's got the potential to completely flip your world one way or another - but only if you gamble more than you should.  Everything in moderation, I say.

Over the past few years, crypto casinos have totally blown up.  It seems like there's a new one popping up every day trying to get a piece of the action and  these online gambling sites using cryptocurrency aim to bring in all sorts of people - those interested in crypto, gambling fanatics, tech nerds you name it.  They target a wide range of ages too, from young 20-somethings to middle-aged folks looking for a rush.  But it's clear their sweet spot is millennials and Gen Zers who actually understand and use crypto. 

No, dude. Haram is specific to Islam. But there's other religions out there with differing perspectives on gambling.  For example, gambling is not strictly prohibited in Christianity or Judaism. And, as far as I know, in Buddhism as well.


We can't assume all people buy into a faith.  Plenty of folks don't belong to some formal religion or feel beholden to religious rules.  For them, sin might not carry the same meaning as it does for people who strictly follow a certain religion.

That's a good point!  When folks criticize DT system for being misused, it can be valuable to consider the context behind the critique.  As in this case.

The negative trust rating clearly sparked this debate.  But we could also argue it pushed the rabble-rouser shitposter to reform. So was applying that rating improper? I don't think so.  


I agree. Managers need to bear some of the responsibility for shitposting in their campaigns.


I have no comment on this...

Thank you! Finally someone who understands.

I've been trying to explain this to my wife for months now. 

Oh, come on! What kind of fun is that?  Gambling is supposed to be thrilling, not penny-pinching and  you might as well stay home instead of hitting the casino if you're just going to play it safe. 

But hey, going wild isn't for everyone.  And there's nothing wrong with playing the odds if thats your thing.  Either way know your limits.  Because at the end of the day, it's your money on the line.  Still, it couldn't hurt to let your hair down once in awhile.  Grab life by the horns, right?  Just don't bet the farm.

I think this is just bullshit.  It's just a statistical model - doesn't actually impact individual outcomes.  Easy to fall into the trap of thinking your luck will turn around if you keep playing after big wins or losses.  but randomness doesn't work that way. and  Each spin is its own thing.  

Overall the house usually wins.  Thats how they stay afloat.  But no guarantees for any one player or session.  Whether you walk away on top or not comes down to making your own wise choices... easier said than done in the heat of the moment! But keeping the big picture in mind helps.  Maybe take breaks, set limits, only risk what you're OK losing.  Easier to make rational moves that way.  Not saying it's easy to walk away when you're down! But chasing losses rarely ends well even though it feels like it should.

Anyway, just one guys thoughts.

What are you trying to prove?  From what I've seen, almost everyone who has commented in those threads agrees that you're a shitposter.  Are you denying that?

I'm just not getting why people wanna play some game like this.  It's a Crash game where we gotta make choices fast before stuff shifts. Makes way more sense to me to settle on your multiplier or whatever before you even start the game.  That way, no need to worry about your device messing up or your connection crapping out at the wrong moment. 

I dunno, maybe there's something Im missing here that makes it fun to play games where you're rushing against the clock.  But me personally? Hard pass and  just feels too stressful.

Because they are nothing but bullies!  They're trying to intimidate and bully others by making their writing stand out and look aggressive. It's a childish and pathetic way to try to get attention.  Could be they weren't taught better communication growing up.  But it feels like bullying, trying to shout down others in the conversation.

We've all heard that to succeed, we need to step outside our comfort zones.  But that's easier said than done when fear holds us back.  Still, facing those fears is one of the best ways to better ourselves and move forward and 

If we let anxiety rule, it's tempting to stay put rather than risk failure or embarrassment.  However playing it safe often means playing it poor, both financially and in terms of personal growth.  While failure stings, nothing ventured means nothing gained. 

By embracing discomfort, we open doors to opportunities that can enrich our lives immeasurably.  With persistence we can break free of old patterns that limit our potential.


No sarcasm here.

Yeah. I see that this immature baboon already got his money from the casino, and his accusations and insults were completely unfounded, so we probably won't see him in this thread anymore because he will probably find a new casino to bully.