The big take-away, is (for the umteenth time) if you give someone the ability to take your money, there is every possibility that they will do so. In Bitcoin-land it is a near certainty.
We can see that you keep going with your endless, paranoid, calomnious ranting even though you have been paid back in full. Why do you linger in bitcoinland then ? Why don't you tvbcof travel off to your paracoinland (Note: paracoin, strangely an anagram for paranoic, is tvbcof brainfart )? |
|
|
|
|
UPDATE
The second payout batch was just sent. Tx ID is
'0624989adc022305527674afa44672e736fabf8e06910850a66f7de3a3381add'.
Next payout date is Thursday, August 1st at 4PM CEST.
We wish you all a great week end.
|
|
|
|
|
I cross post from the 0.8.3 release thread because I got not answer there: my question maybe not specific to this new release.
My understanding is that the "sendmany" command will only accept transactions of a certain minimal amount to mitigate the risk of spamming the network.
I had the "Too small amount" error on amounts like 0.00001 BTC.
What is the actual limit in this new version?
|
|
|
|
You can't be a Hero if you've not posted the past week.
My heroes go to places where there is no internet. |
|
|
|
|
The debate around this topic is often distorted by a fundamental misunderstanding of what is a natural commodity in statements like:
"Bitcoin is not linked to anything physical."
Bitcoin is linked to something physical, namely numbers.
Prime numbers are a commodity in unlimited supply (although the greater the prime number, the harder it is to find).
Bitcoins are a commodity in limited supply.
The fact that you cannot see a number (one can only see a representation of it when writing it down or looking at an enumerable set - if its an integer ) does not make a number any less physical.
Just like the force of gravitation is an invisible yet very real, physical force: one can describe it with formulas.
Note that a gold coin value is derived form its substance (gold) AND its weight..
In short, Bitcoin is a representative money system, backed by cryptographic formulas.
|
|
|
|
You need to go at your old INSTA address where you will have to press a button, without that no money you will see
If this answer is directed at me, then i have already done that... it is stated that i did that in my previous post "I confirmed my payout was correct, again on the same day that you started asking everyone to do so." The reason for the delay can only be multiple claims for the same wallet: we need to sort things out. People with wallets under 50 BTC and no multiple claims on their wallets have been paid out. I may made two claims by myself, with the same withdraw address. When will this be solved ? (less than 50BTC) "Multiple" claims mean multiple payout addresses for the same wallet. If what you state is correct, you should have been paid: if you havent, the likely reason is "multiple claims". You have no way of knowing if someone else filed a claim with a different payout address, we do. We are working to resolve "multiple claims" this week. |
|
|
|
You need to go at your old INSTA address where you will have to press a button, without that no money you will see
If this answer is directed at me, then i have already done that... it is stated that i did that in my previous post "I confirmed my payout was correct, again on the same day that you started asking everyone to do so." The reason for the delay can only be multiple claims for the same wallet: we need to sort things out. People with wallets under 50 BTC and no multiple claims on their wallets have been paid out. |
|
|
|
|
My understanding is that the "sendmany" command will only accept transactions of a certain minimal amount to mitigate the risk of spamming the network.
I had the "Too small amount" error on amounts like 0.00001 BTC.
What is the actual limit in this new version?
|
|
|
|
I have given you everything you asked for and verified all claims.
That is not true. You did not respond to the verification request contained in my PM. Please read my PM. |
|
|
|
I've got no communication on my wallet. Don't what I can do but wait, it's only a small amount but I really want to get it sorted
Did you confirm your payout on your wallet page ? If yes, when ? |
|
|
|
|
The transaction was sent just now: sorry for the delay, we ran into a few minor issues that needed attention.
Thanks again for your patience.
Bitcoin tx ID = 998d15b620272eb71f48cbfb9695d2a2d8a42738b62e7e348611e504acc4baa6
Next payout time is next Friday: processing of the next batch should be easier now that issues have been ironed out.
|
|
|
|
|
We are about to send the first batch of instawallet payouts today (Friday, July 19, 2013) at 4 PM CEST Time.
Please make sure to confirm your payout by then if you want your payout to be included in today's transaction.
Next payout time will be next Friday, July 26 at 4 PM CEST Time.
Thanks for your patience and cooperation.
|
|
|
|
I put in multiple claims dating back to April 11th and I still haven't heard anything from Instawallet besides the initial "Thank you for filing an Instawallet claim" emails.
I have many coins that should be returned to me and I really want them back. Mine has been flagged for review which I don't care about because the coins are mine. I'm the only one who made the claim. I have the reference numbers.
Any recommendations?
If you are still at the review stage then try and contact Davout regarding verifying your identity. This should move it to the next stage Please DO NOT contact us unless you have a claim over 50 BTC. |
|
|
|
Boussac, the mini key you obtain needs to be converted to the 51-char key (WIF) by either going to bitaddress.org and inputting your minikey into the details page/tab or inputting it into Casascius' key gen tool. Then import it using the importprivkey command from the debug window -> console tab.
Yep using bitaddress and the satoshi client is the simplest, most natural route. I stll think the satoshi client should support direct mini private key format import. |
|
|
|
|
I may be blunt, but the design sucks.
What bank is behind this card?
|
|
|
|
|
This is great news for bitcoin.
Fidor is indeed a very innovative bank.
By the way, bitcoin-central also is about to announce their new banking partner that will accept all EU residents..
|
|
|
|
|
Suggestion to Mike: in your best practices for private key redemption, your blog says that the satoshi client does not support importprivkey.
This should be corrected since the new version of the satoshi client does offer the feature via its "help>debug window>console" tab.
Then just type help at the command line if you need it.
Question: are there high res pix of the 0.5 BTC coin and silver coins available ?
I need them to update my shop (microbitcoin.fr).
|
|
|
|
From your Why? page, I found Firmcoins can proof to you they are holding a certain private key, without revealing it. Smartcards cannot.
Firmcoins have two capacitive confirmation buttons, where most smartcards do not offer an input interface. I am at a loss to figure out what makes Firmcoins special compared to smart cards (whether they are NFC enabled or not). If a private key is stored in a smart card, the card can read a message and return a signature, thus proving it holds the key to a given address. Also, smart card prototypes with input buttons have been displayed by smart card manufacturers, right ? |
|
|
|
Happens all the time. There is no requirement in the protocol for miners to include transactions in a block if they don't want to. It doesn't really matter since their block still adds to the consensus building of the blockchain.
It does build the consensus about past transactions but it slows down the confirmations of new transactions. It does not matter because miners will be incentivized more and more by bitcoin network transaction fees and by out of band value add fees. |
|
|
|
|
Most retirement schemes I know are turning into Ponzi schemes because of changes in demographics.
Worst, retirement plans are sometimes Ponzi schemes that you have to pay for whether you like them or not, because your government says so.
Your neighbour should not worry so much about bitcoin because no one is making any promise or forcing him to use it.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
