No you don't necessarily get the same result every time. Schrodinger's cat can testify to this. Also, it is true that many science theories haven't been proven one way or the other. Although most theories have substantial evidence to back them up. (For instance, the predictions given by the Theory of General Relativity keep testing out as true.)  That is why they are called "theories."

We have enough resources for everyone its just that greedy people at the top like to hoard.  UBI is a natural progression towards an advanced society.  Remember if wealth inequality gets too far out of hand the wealthy will be exposed to the very real threat of revolution.  Poor people would rather flip the game board over and start again making all those dollars worthless.

The earth is an advanced engineered structure covered by a steel dome and the temperature is controlled by not man. The level of clown world insanity here is really over the top.

People ask why would clowns lie about the shape of the earth, well carbon taxes are one of million fucking reasons.

It's not surprising that someone who loves criminality wants to go easy on criminals so they are encouraged to continue to be criminals.

What? You want to stick them in a room underground and set off a baby nuke down there? It would be a little faster than the guillotine.

So if I have a 1L beaker that contains 1L of air at standard temperature and pressure, and I place it in a vacuum chamber with a hard vacuum, the force of gravity will keep the air from rising up and escaping the beaker?

I think that his many war-hawk neocon advisors basically ordered the airstrike for him, but he realized that it was insane and called it back. From reporting about the inside of the Administration, I get the sense that everyone is just doing whatever they want, often ignoring what Trump says, and Trump himself is a pretty weak force on most issues. I'm glad that he pushed back on this one, but I still see the machine of war moving constantly in the direction of Iran.

If you're gonna execute them, get it over with. Or is there some kind of retribution that is gained from prolonging it?

Make sure they are guilty... really deserving of the death penalty. Then get it over with. Guillotine is the fastest, sure way.

Science is very limited. It is divided into two basic parts:
1. The parts that are factual, like electrolysis of H2O;
2. The parts that are unknown (science theory), like Big Bang or evolution.

Religion covers the parts that science hasn't gotten to, yet.

If science fact didn't work, it would have been gone long ago.

If religion didn't work, it would have been gone long ago.

Believing in science that isn't known to be fact is like making it into a religion. After all, people feel that religion is true, but they can't easily put their fingers on the facts that might make it true. Same with science theory. No facts that make science theory true, or it would be science fact. So, belief in science theory is religion or like religion.

The reason science theory works is that it is a religion to its believers.

I guess you would get more than 20 years for that crime. Anyway, I partly agree with your point about the cost of living for one prisoner which certainly adds up to a big amount in 20 years. But I have a solution for this. The cost of security, food etc. should be deducted from prisoner's life savings, his property should be sold. If/when this would not be enough, the prisoner should work at the prison. This is already functioning in many prisons - prisoners work in factories or as farmers. But they get very small salary, more like pocket money. Instead, they should work to pay for their costs and if they earned more, this would be their money. If they refused to work, they would get significantly lower comfort level (very small room, no outdoor time...) and cheaper food.

Show me one place in the Bible that says that they didn't exist.     

Of course, anything could still happen, but its encouraging for the Dems that all of their top candidates are shown as beating Trump in a Fox News poll.  



IIRC Fox News also showed Hillary beating Trump through much of the election, so make of it what you will. The only poll that was consistently correct in forecasting the election results was one done by USC and the L.A. Times, interestingly.

No death penalty.

Some prisons maybe hell and some maybe better, by giving a chance to get an education, develop a skill, and even explore the arts.

And, yes! What what about innocent people that were convicted?

There is always a chance for a human being to grow and get better as long as they are alive.

All the scientific methods that show the age of the earth are based on things that we do not know. Of course, this makes them to be religious methods rather than science methods. Certainly there is some knowledge, but much of the understanding is based on things we don't know for sure... or really, even close.

All that this proves is that scientific people who believe science things that are not known is, these people have made science their religion.

So we see that people are religious beings at heart, and anything can be their religion... even science.

USA has death penalty and has high % of crimes there. I dont think Death Penalty is a good action to reduce crime but I agree with Death Penalty in some crimes, like multi murderer, etc

The famous aviator Wiley Post, 1920ish, had lost one eye when young. He trained to estimate distances very accurately with one eye. Hence, with no triangulation. He would often win wagers in bars this way. It enabled him to pass the Airman's exam, which required good vision.

So I'll let that issue pass.

However, you are correct in that NotBat has not shown the total of the triangulation issue. There are several issues.

(A) How much does the Moon change in diameter, from the Supermoon to the minima, and why?

What does it mean, if an object in the sky periodically, and predictably, changes in diameter?

(B) From where might we stand, say in a couple of places, to measure the Sun and Moon over the course of a year?

This would be to find their distance from the Earth.

(C) We commonly measure the height of mountains on the Moon, and the depth of craters, using a form of simple triangulation. Measuring the spreading of the shadows as the Moon moves to a crescent.

Notbat, care to comment?

(D) Given that the terminator line moves precisely across the lunar surface over the course of a lunar day (27+ Earth days) and we measure heights on the Moon of objects as they approach that terminator, geometrically this is only possible if the Moon is a sphere like object.

NotBat claims the Moon is just a bright light?

(E) A lunar eclipse is when the Earth occludes the Sun, as viewed from the Moon. We will consider the trig involved in this, along with a quite interesting topic, after NotBat answers the above questions and issues. This topic is how we can predict lunar eclipses.

Any scientific theory is affirmed if it predicts correctly. We have a model of elliptical orbiting masses in space, which we can use to accurately predict many things. All on the basis of a synergistic development of math, and orbital mechanics, over three thousand years. But you reject all of that.

No problem. We can step through the fundamentals.

The title needs correction.
It's not YOUR country which sucks, they ALL do.

The only solution is to stop acting like a citizen, to stop paying taxes, and to travel all the time, being a tourist wherever you are. Enjoy life!