The latest shift for the FibreCoin Multipool paid out over 225 FIBRE. Still need more mining support on this pool. The slower speeds cause larger fluctuations in profitability. Cheers! |
|
|
|
We also got some HTML published in the DHT cloud index.html that included some javascript and a jpg file with: curl -k --data-binary '{"jsonrpc": "1.0", "id":"curltest", "method": "SuperNET", "params": ["{\"requestType\":\"publish\",\"files\":[[\"image.jpg\",\"image/png\"],[\"supernet.js\",\"application/javascript\"],[\"index.html\",\"text/html\"]]}"] }' -H 'content-type: text/plain;' https://127.0.0.1:7777/after that the web page is accessible via: http://127.0.0.1:7776/071337104547011275without needing any plugins James Very nice. Is it also possible to delete the pages? Will it find and remove all instances of it's files stored on other cloud systems? And... how would someone else access the pages... externally? Or will it simply be accessible if you are running a SuperNET client? |
|
|
|
Is the dev team behind this project publically known (with their real world ids)?
Is there a whitepaper or some other more specific documentation about the technology that is part of this?
Dan Metcalf and I have made our identities public. There's no whitepaper, but there is Dan's (and XC's) reputation of delivering the goods, on schedule, since its inception. How is the XC project related to this one? And what base technology / code you want to use? Do you fork some other project or will it be entirely new code? If it is new code what security algo do you use (pow, pos) how does it differ from others? The Blocknet will be largely new code, since it's for a rather different purpose to what XC is for. However at present the plan is to adapt XC's Xnode protocol (end-to-end encrypted P2P protocol) for the XBridge. It'll be used in conjunction with Telehash in a hybrid DHT-mesh architecture - and it will be completely serverless. The interim wallet is PoS. I'm currently unaware of how often the final tech will actually need its own blockchain, since the idea is to network nodes of different blockchains together. These chains are a resource and it makes no sense to either duplicate them in the Blocknet's own chain, or to use a new chain when the old ones may suffice. However if it needs its own chain for anything, it'll almost certainly be a PoS chain. Do you have the github link to xnode handy? no Xnode... |
|
|
|
The latest shift for the BitcoinDark multipool paid out over 108 BTCD. We need to have some more mining support over here at this pool It has been pretty good until the past few weeks. The lower prices are a perfect reason to point more hash at the pool. These low prices won't last for much longer as BTCD and SuperNET are nearing their v1 release. Cheers! |
|
|
|
The latest shift for the BitcoinDark multipool paid out over 108 BTCD. We need to have some more mining support over here at this pool It has been pretty good until the past few weeks. The lower prices are a perfect reason to point more hash at the pool. These low prices won't last for much longer as BTCD and SuperNET are nearing their v1 release. Cheers! |
|
|
|
Is the dev team behind this project publically known (with their real world ids)?
Is there a whitepaper or some other more specific documentation about the technology that is part of this?
Dan Metcalf and I have made our identities public. There's no whitepaper, but there is Dan's (and XC's) reputation of delivering the goods, on schedule, since its inception. How is the XC project related to this one? And what base technology / code you want to use? Do you fork some other project or will it be entirely new code? If it is new code what security algo do you use (pow, pos) how does it differ from others? The Blocknet will be largely new code, since it's for a rather different purpose to what XC is for. However at present the plan is to adapt XC's Xnode protocol (end-to-end encrypted P2P protocol) for the XBridge. It'll be used in conjunction with Telehash in a hybrid DHT-mesh architecture - and it will be completely serverless. The interim wallet is PoS. I'm currently unaware of how often the final tech will actually need its own blockchain, since the idea is to network nodes of different blockchains together. These chains are a resource and it makes no sense to either duplicate them in the Blocknet's own chain, or to use a new chain when the old ones may suffice. However if it needs its own chain for anything, it'll almost certainly be a PoS chain. Do you have the github link to xnode handy? |
|
|
|
The latest shift for the Darkcoin multipool paid out over 77 DRK. This pool could use some more mining support, especially on the SHA256 & Scrypt side. X11 has been seeing more support lately but with the increased average DRK diff and lower block rewards for miners we could use another 4-500+Mh/s to stabilize the profitability. Cheers! |
|
|
|
The latest shift for the Darkcoin multipool paid out over 77 DRK. This pool could use some more mining support, especially on the SHA256 & Scrypt side. X11 has been seeing more support lately but with the increased average DRK diff and lower block rewards for miners we could use another 4-500+Mh/s to stabilize the profitability. Cheers! |
|
|
|
2.2.0.7 released. Minor corrections and fixes to the Bittrex-Poloniex Arbitrage.
thanks. is there a changelog of each fix/change for each release? |
|
|
|
Does BlockNet team plan any pump to get price to some reasonable levels, before whole project collapse badly?
We plan on releasing a continual stream of progress-related news. While this may lead to a pump, it's up to the market to decide how our work affects the value of BLOCK. P.S. The project is independent of the price of BLOCK; it won't collapse at all. We'll just keep on working, because we have the resources to do so. This should be a major support for the price IMO: that the project is viable, healthy, and able to proceed. Well You have to work faster, otherwise BLOCK will be dead in 2 months. On what basis? I think BLOCK will be very much alive in 2 months. At any point people can buy into the Blocknet project (not just during the ITO), and it's a very exciting project. Buying, therefore, makes a fair bit of sense in my personal opinion. Based on how many work was done so far - from github ( https://github.com/atcsecure/blocknet) it seems that devs lack motivation. I am no pro coder, but when I work on some project (arduino / raspberry custom stuff on demand mostly) to which I am thrilled, I work 16/7 on it. But maybe its because nobody pays before in real world.. I agree. They said they have knowledge to develope such game changing innovation to crypto (ie what SuperNET HAS done), yet if they could, they should have just made it instead of con'ing everyone in to "pay" for it. If it was to be true, they'd make $ hand over fist. There really is no motivation for them now, simply just have diddle forward long enough to get "paid" all the funds, instead of the funds being invested and holding value. |
|
|
|
Why has price dropped so much from ITO price?  you missed the first 200 pages eh? |
|
|
|
The latest shift for the BitcoinDark multipool paid out over 35 BTCD. We need to have some more mining support over here at this pool It has been pretty good until the past few weeks. The lower prices are a perfect reason to point more hash at the pool. These low prices won't last for much longer as BTCD and SuperNET are nearing their v1 release. Cheers! |
|
|
|
The latest shift for the BitcoinDark multipool paid out over 35 BTCD. We need to have some more mining support over here at this pool It has been pretty good until the past few weeks. The lower prices are a perfect reason to point more hash at the pool. These low prices won't last for much longer as BTCD and SuperNET are nearing their v1 release. Cheers! |
|
|
|
The latest shift for the Darkcoin multipool paid out over 62 DRK. This pool could use some more mining support, especially on the SHA256 & Scrypt side. X11 has been seeing more support lately but with the increased average DRK diff and lower block rewards for miners we could use another 4-500Mh/s to stabilize the profitability. Cheers! |
|
|
|
The latest shift for the Darkcoin multipool paid out over 62 DRK. This pool could use some more mining support, especially on the SHA256 & Scrypt side. X11 has been seeing more support lately but with the increased average DRK diff and lower block rewards for miners we could use another 4-500Mh/s to stabilize the profitability. Cheers! |
|
|
|
The latest shift for the FibreCoin Multipool paid out over 164 FIBRE. Still need more mining support on this pool. The slower speeds cause larger fluctuations in profitability. Cheers! |
|
|
|
The latest shift for the FibreCoin Multipool paid out over 164 FIBRE. Still need more mining support on this pool. The slower speeds cause larger fluctuations in profitability. Cheers! |
|
|
|
|
When using the auto tools ping/pong... can it be possible to leave the order if yours is the one still at the top of the book? Seems unnecessary to cancel and put another order in...
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
