I wonder, did ASICMiner bid for your shill services after Avalon snubbed your demand for a free unit?
Or was BFL your only offer of free mining equipment?
I am sure your rabid support of BFL on these forums is purely coincidence of course. 

From BFL_Jody

The only product that has shipped more than 1 day's worth of orders is the Jalapeno and those still have a 10 month backlog.
BFL equipment will qualify as antiques when their investor's finally get them.

Not much of a race. The singles and mini-rigs haven't moved yet.
They have managed to ship 2 days worth of little singles in 2 months.
Good thing they "let the other lines catch up". 

Very interesting.

Uniquify looks like it has the guns to undertake this.

It is clear that the right hand at BFL does not know what the left hand is doing. They issue conflicting statements as to what is occurring while trying to placate irate customers on their own forums. I would imagine that customers with large orders don't get censored or banned on BFL forums, lest those same customers ask for a refund and precipitate a run on refunds. So since they can't delete all the angry posts, BFL has to come up with "explanations".

I like how you quote my statements in this very post, which you then ignore in order to draw your conclusion. Fortunately, I have the patience of a saint when dealing with folks who have trouble following logic.

You should not ignore the maths, it is the whole point of this series of posts.
You should also not ignore the bolded statement where BFL_Jody declared that the Jalapeno line was stopped while the other lines catch up.
Where I said "for the sake of argument, lets say those units are little singles", that was to establish the lower bound. Those units could not be Jalapeno's per BFL_Jody's statement that none of those were shipping. Those 300 units could have been Little Singles, Singles, or Mini-rigs. I said for the sake of argument that they were all little singles because if any of them were larger than little singles, then the math is even farther than adding up. Little singles have the least hash rate of the possible shipping units from BFL.

My statement is not a "claim" as you put it. It was an assumption, and then under that assumption I illustrated that the maths did not add up. Therefore the assumption could not be true. BFL could not be shipping 300 of little singles, or 300 of anything larger than little singles. BFL_Jody said that the Jalapeno line was halted during this period. So the point of my posts are:

If at the time of the visit BFL could not have been shipping 300 Jalapenos (according to BFL_Jody).
and if BFL could not have been shipping 300 little singles (the maths don't add up),
and if BFL could not have been shipping 300 of anything larger than little singles (the maths are even farther from adding up),
then BFL was not shipping 300 of anything while Josh was giving that tour.

People shouldn't care what accounts created a week ago think of BFL. I know I don't.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/bitcoin-ponzi-scheme-alleged-by-sec-in-lawsuit-against-texas-man/2013/07/24/232a764e-f3c0-11e2-81fa-8e83b3864c36_story.html
The SEC got Pirateat40, is BFL next?

Name:   fractal02
Posts:   23
Activity:   22
Position:   Member
Date Registered:   July 18, 2013, 07:59:06 AM

Accounts older than April 1st 2013 that unambiguously support BFL:
Kano (paid for with hashing equipment)
Slok (paid moderator for BFL forums)
Inaba (COO of BFL)

Anyone have any others?

The love how the OP dismisses 165TH/s in hashing power shipped by Avalon as "cute" or "worthless to joe six pack".
The chips were shipped to projects assembling products with them, not to "joe six pack".

At this point, I suppose only willful ignorance (or a paycheck) could inspire a person to be pro-BFL.

I think the SEC charging Pirateat40 has made Josh a little nervous and testy. It seams the Feds are taking fraud in the Bitcoin space more seriously than some had thought. 

This is the fourth time I have tried to explain why you are on my side. Please pay attention, it is making you look bad.
A) BFL_josh made the claim in the article in the OP that they are shipping 300 units a day.
B) BFL_jody said they stopped the Jalapeno production line to let the "singles and mini-rig lines catch up".

Those two statements in combination (if true) would result in at least 9TH/s per day (over 10 days time the lower bound would be 90TH/s) since by BFL's own admission they had temporarily stopped shipping Jalapeno's. Since 90TH/s is not visible in the hash rate, it does not exist. Therefore, one of those two statements is false.

As to which statement:
People who were expecting their Jalapenos to be built and shipped (since BFL was close to their pay date) had an unexplained week long wait that generated several forum posts. Therefore, it was more likely that BFL redirected their efforts towards the other lines as Jody claimed.
That leaves Josh's statement to a reporter touring the BFL facilities as unlikely to be true.

Since this thread is about that statement, I provided the math behind why the title of this thread is somewhat misleading.

Actually, it shows the opposite of what you are claiming.
If they were shipping 300 units a day, after 10 days they would have shipped 90TH/s.  I am not saying BFL shipped 90TH/s in 10 days. I am saying they did not, because that 90TH/s is not visible in the network hashrate. Thus, BFL have not been shipping 300 units a day while they stopped their Jalapeno production to focus on Singles and Mini-rig orders. No Jalapeno's produced + claim of 300 units per day shipping = false claim by BFL. The two claims together are incompatible.

We are not talking about BFL claiming 400+ or any other claims you have raised. We are talking about Josh's claim of 300 a day, in the article, in the present tense, in the OP of this thread.

BFL never corrects the math. That is the point. Inaba only shows up, throws some LiarDouche Powder (TM) on the thread, says "Two more weeks" and then rides off without having shed any light at all on BFL's failure to meet their obligations to their investors.

That author visited BFL during the time when BFL "stopped the Jalapeno line to let the Singles and Mini-rigs catch up".
So yeah, BFL is claiming to have shipped 90TH/s by virtue of claiming to be shipping 300 little singles (or better) a day.

Let me provide the entire quote from the article from the OP:
"The Butterfly Labs HQ is bustling with employees, over 35 of them I’m told. Customer service, assembly and logistics are all run from the facility.
“We’re shipping about 300 units a day, but we’d like to be doing more”, Butterfly Labs Chief Operating Officer Josh Zerlan tells me. We’re standing in the back of their facility in a suburb south of Kansas City. This is the warehouse portion of their headquarters, and it is chock full of boxes from floor to ceiling. A forklift is parked off to the side."

Let me revisit the math with better labels.

Say BFL can ship 300 units per day. For the sake of argument, lets say those units are little singles.
Assume that each little single can do 30GH/s.
300 singles x 30GH/s per single = 9000 GH/s per day shipped. That is 9 TH/s per day claimed to be shipped by BFL.
That means in the last 10 working days, BFL claims to have shipped 90 TH/s.
20 working days per month would yield 180TH/s.

Avalon's batch 2 arriving and being switched on is visible.
The ASICMiner increase in hash rate from their website is visible.
I don't see the extra 90TH/s BFL claims to have shipped in the network hash rate.
An extra 90 TH/s every 10 days should be very visible considering the overall network hash rate is ~220 TH/s.

Edit: notice how Inaba shows up in the thread but never actually defends their claim that they could ship 300 units a day.

I like to have more than just my tinfoil hat as evidence 

Lets say BFL can ship 300 units per day. For the sake of argument, lets say those units are little singles.
300 x 30GH/s = 9000 GH/s per day shipped.
That means in the last 10 working days, BFL claims to have shipped 90 TH/s.
I see Avalon's batch 2 arriving and the ASICMiner increase in hash rate. I don't see the extra 90TH/s BFL claims to have shipped.

Of course, if any of those units were full sized singles or mini-rigs, there would be even more hash rate.
Clearly, they are not assembling 300 singles per day.

Everyone has followed the link. You are measuring the package area not the die area. There are no measurements associated with the ASIC section of that series of pictures. It is bizarre accounting to use the package size for one chip but the die sizes for all the others.

Their first model they shipped was a little single to Luke-Jr.
After 3 months and 22 days they haven't gotten past the first day's worth of single orders...
It ain't complexity of assembly, the single is basically a box with 2 jalapeno's in it. After seeing the teardowns, a person can assemble one in 10 minutes.

I have made this point several times, but it seems to just fall on deaf ears. Plus, the schematic that people are pointing at and saying "die size" is the package schematic not the die schematic. The package is usually several times larger than the die.

For instance:


The outer dimension is the package size, the inner brownish square is the die size.