I just got 100 BTCD stolen (and I don't know how). This is the transaction: { "account" : "", "address" : "RTDvND5nHyP51q69XheFsyJt2JrpWT5ZD1", "category" : "immature", "amount" : 0.07638762, "confirmations" : 8, "generated" : true, "blockhash" : "38d7518ede3ba5fd63b15bfadd462ba127aa4335dc2b723629812c32b6311ad2", "blockindex" : 1, "blocktime" : 1413992038, "txid" : "4dbffc6a0621f9661dea136502ea9c324c3bdc3d79c38d9a476f0f0a2cfd3ecc", "time" : 1413992038, "timereceived" : 1413992065 }
And when I check the TX through the chain: https://bchain.info/BTCD/tx/4dbffc6a0621f9661dea136502ea9c324c3bdc3d79c38d9a476f0f0a2cfd3eccThere is 100.28 BTCD. What the actuall fuck?! Can someone please explain to me what happend here?.. have you scanned for Trojans? is does your account have a password? Yes, the wallet have password with 256 letters.. but I don't get it. The amount says "0.07638762" but the value is 100? I'm so confused atm.. The transaction are also "immature". scan for malware? This is nonsense. You're coins are staking not being stolen. Then what do you call this? bitcoindarkd getbalance 14.84232977 You can even check the TX i have provided in the transaction.. it doesn't add up.. Coins that are staking are not available to your balance. http://explorebtcd.info:3000/tx/4dbffc6a0621f9661dea136502ea9c324c3bdc3d79c38d9a476f0f0a2cfd3eccThe TX is a "reward"
|
|
|
I just got 100 BTCD stolen (and I don't know how). This is the transaction: { "account" : "", "address" : "RTDvND5nHyP51q69XheFsyJt2JrpWT5ZD1", "category" : "immature", "amount" : 0.07638762, "confirmations" : 8, "generated" : true, "blockhash" : "38d7518ede3ba5fd63b15bfadd462ba127aa4335dc2b723629812c32b6311ad2", "blockindex" : 1, "blocktime" : 1413992038, "txid" : "4dbffc6a0621f9661dea136502ea9c324c3bdc3d79c38d9a476f0f0a2cfd3ecc", "time" : 1413992038, "timereceived" : 1413992065 }
And when I check the TX through the chain: https://bchain.info/BTCD/tx/4dbffc6a0621f9661dea136502ea9c324c3bdc3d79c38d9a476f0f0a2cfd3eccThere is 100.28 BTCD. What the actuall fuck?! Can someone please explain to me what happend here?.. have you scanned for Trojans? is does your account have a password? Yes, the wallet have password with 256 letters.. but I don't get it. The amount says "0.07638762" but the value is 100? I'm so confused atm.. The transaction are also "immature". scan for malware? This is nonsense. You're coins are staking not being stolen.
|
|
|
^^ In how many days after ITO will the trading of Block/BTC begin?
The Block:BTC pairings will begin at the start of the ITO and will never stop. The ITO is just a sell wall on a pairing. So, once the ITO is sold out completely, you can start trading blocknet shares for BTC? Yup. This will continue at traditional exchanges until the Blocknet's tech is ready to pay fees to holders, at which point Blocknet tokens can be redeemed at the NHZ asset exchange. What is an NHZ asset exchange please? Link? It's the same as NXT, but a clone of sorts.
|
|
|
someone have a node list? Doen't seem to sync...
|
|
|
Hi guys, I just wanted to post something about blocknet. I don't want to troll their thread, so I thought I'd post it here. Here is their claim: There are at least three fundamental differences between the Blocknet and Supernet:
- XBridge is not an RPC call protocol, it's a true P2P protocol - There's no central or core currency, unlike SuperNET, which uses BTCD for this - Joining the Blocknet does not involve 10% of a coin's money supply being bought and centrally controlled
1. SuperNET calls are made via rpc to the coin daemon, yet the network uses a kademlia dht, like bittorrent. Plus, is he saying that bitcoin is not 'true p2p' because it uses rpc calls? Does he think SuperNET has a point of centralization somewhere? 2. BitcoinDark is not 'the' central currency to SuperNET. Does he not realize that SuperNET runs on top of the NXT blockchain? BitcoinDark is the first coin with SuperNET integrated and has teleport, yes. Is he saying that individual coins cannot be integral parts of the network by offering their respective unique techs? 3. SuperNET purchased these coins on the open market, necessarily raising the NAV of the SuperNET asset. Are the blocknet guys ignorant of the facts, or are they being intentionally misleading? They're both, ignorant and misleading and hoping the flashy graphics will pull in the like minded.
|
|
|
There are at least three fundamental differences between the Blocknet and Supernet:
- XBridge is not an RPC call protocol, it's a true P2P protocol - There's no central or core currency, unlike SuperNET, which uses BTCD for this - Joining the Blocknet does not involve 10% of a coin's money supply being bought and centrally controlled
Shame on you
Please explain how SuperNET is not p2p. He's just quoting the OP literature, but yeah, none of the points are really valid.
|
|
|
I added Berkeley DB to libjl777 so now telepods and cloud storage will be in standard database
you will have to do "make onetime" again to compile the latest version. It will make a storage directory and put public.db and private.db in there.
James
Thanks, worked just fine. performance and stability seems to have improved a lot with the latest update.
|
|
|
I added Berkeley DB to libjl777 so now telepods and cloud storage will be in standard database
you will have to do "make onetime" again to compile the latest version. It will make a storage directory and put public.db and private.db in there.
James
Thanks, worked just fine.
|
|
|
You can 'hear hear' all you want but also "- BlockNET real value SHOULD equate the total combined value of every coin, mathematically, practically is another story, but still there is not promise out there" is idiotic. It's not like you take-over each of the participating coins and their intrinsic value becomes Blocknets value. This is just plain retarded. You're just trying to copy Supernet's idea and try to make some money in between. At least Supernet's assets are backed by a 10% buy in, which DOES give it an intrinsic value. You are just talking crap about that Blocknet's value is derived by it's so called 'incredible utility'. This is fine and all but you need to prove that first. Stating that mathematically (or practically) the value should be equal to the combined value of the participating coins is just a complete SCAM where you try to screw people over by luring them with a fictional ROI. And I'm not stating anything about the concept or the technology, I support that, but the way you try to make money is just, well... Shame on you... There are at least three fundamental differences between the Blocknet and Supernet: - XBridge is not an RPC call protocol, it's a true P2P protocol - There's no central or core currency, unlike SuperNET, which uses BTCD for this - Joining the Blocknet does not involve 10% of a coin's money supply being bought and centrally controlled Shame on you I want to clarify, that although without some sort of tangible proof-of-concept I believe this is purely a vehicle for market manipulation, I also fully support this project and will be following it closely. Personally I'd love some proof-of-concept code to be released prior to the ITO. Part of the XBridge code is actually completed so this might be possible. Regardless of that, the XBridge protocol is based on the Xnode protocol that XC uses. If anyone is worried about development talent or the ability to deliver, take a look at XC's timeline. Now pool all the developer talent from all the participating coins. This code will get nailed down good and proper. I have to agree with mxxxxxx overall, However, I believe having one currency as the central core or group of currencies that compose the core would be better than, "There's no central or core currency, unlike SuperNET, which uses BTCD for this"Keep in mind this statement isn't true. SuperNET doesn't rely on BTCD. BTCD is simply the flagship coin that offers the Teleport technology. SuperNET can be run standalone and will do that along with being embedded into the core coins wallets. SuperNET actually runs on the NXT blockchain Hmm... thanks for that. Brevity demanded a fairly inaccurate summary of SuperNET's centralisation. Perhaps I should try expand on it to refer to NXT too... Brevity is not excuse when you're asking for $1,000,000.
|
|
|
You can 'hear hear' all you want but also "- BlockNET real value SHOULD equate the total combined value of every coin, mathematically, practically is another story, but still there is not promise out there" is idiotic. It's not like you take-over each of the participating coins and their intrinsic value becomes Blocknets value. This is just plain retarded. You're just trying to copy Supernet's idea and try to make some money in between. At least Supernet's assets are backed by a 10% buy in, which DOES give it an intrinsic value. You are just talking crap about that Blocknet's value is derived by it's so called 'incredible utility'. This is fine and all but you need to prove that first. Stating that mathematically (or practically) the value should be equal to the combined value of the participating coins is just a complete SCAM where you try to screw people over by luring them with a fictional ROI. And I'm not stating anything about the concept or the technology, I support that, but the way you try to make money is just, well... Shame on you... There are at least three fundamental differences between the Blocknet and Supernet: - XBridge is not an RPC call protocol, it's a true P2P protocol - There's no central or core currency, unlike SuperNET, which uses BTCD for this - Joining the Blocknet does not involve 10% of a coin's money supply being bought and centrally controlled Shame on you I want to clarify, that although without some sort of tangible proof-of-concept I believe this is purely a vehicle for market manipulation, I also fully support this project and will be following it closely. Personally I'd love some proof-of-concept code to be released prior to the ITO. Part of the XBridge code is actually completed so this might be possible. Regardless of that, the XBridge protocol is based on the Xnode protocol that XC uses. If anyone is worried about development talent or the ability to deliver, take a look at XC's timeline. Now pool all the developer talent from all the participating coins. This code will get nailed down good and proper. I have to agree with mxxxxxx overall, However, I believe having one currency as the central core or group of currencies that compose the core would be better than, "There's no central or core currency, unlike SuperNET, which uses BTCD for this"Keep in mind this statement isn't true. SuperNET doesn't rely on BTCD. BTCD is simply the flagship coin that offers the Teleport technology. SuperNET can be run standalone and will do that along with being embedded into the core coins wallets. SuperNET actually runs on the NXT blockchain
|
|
|
dogebc.minerpools.com stop payout feel free to try my pool: www.hasher.caCheers
|
|
|
The Antminer S3 is sold by bitmaintech. As far as I know GAW doesn't sell any S3's. If you have any other hardware with GAW that they host when you used to be able to convert them into hashlets it was a 1:1 MH/s ratio for scrypt hardware.
As far as converting from a hosted GAW sha-256 to scrypt hardware goes IDK what the conversion was.
yeah it was an S3 I bought from them a while ago, with the cloud option. I'll ask them I guess. I've ROI'd on all my other hashlets as well though, so can't complain at all, compared to some group buys I went in on...
|
|
|
10/18/14: I am now 126% ROI for my bitcoin invested in gaw's bitcoin miners (actually scrypt hashlets)!!! My plan at this point is to now build my mining power with future profits That's great to hear! I'm not sure whether I'm going to re-invest more into these hashlets. Currently, I'm at 95% of my ROI. I haven't reached this percentage with any of my investments (which all obviously turned out to be bad investments), so I'm already really happy. I can take the profit now if I want and leave the market by selling the hashlets I own. This would make me some nice money when you look at how less I invested in Gaw Miners. However, I'm not sure about my plan yet. Does anyone know how much your hashrate would be converted into if you switch an Antminer S3 into a hashlet? It really depends on how much you can sell your antminer s3 for. oh really? Mine has an option to "upgrade to hashlet" but doesn't give me any #'s before I have to complete it...
|
|
|
10/18/14: I am now 126% ROI for my bitcoin invested in gaw's bitcoin miners (actually scrypt hashlets)!!! My plan at this point is to now build my mining power with future profits That's great to hear! I'm not sure whether I'm going to re-invest more into these hashlets. Currently, I'm at 95% of my ROI. I haven't reached this percentage with any of my investments (which all obviously turned out to be bad investments), so I'm already really happy. I can take the profit now if I want and leave the market by selling the hashlets I own. This would make me some nice money when you look at how less I invested in Gaw Miners. However, I'm not sure about my plan yet. Does anyone know how much your hashrate would be converted into if you switch an Antminer S3 into a hashlet?
|
|
|
With XC's Blocknet release looming what are everyone's thoughts on asking to be added to the list of supported coins. A link to Blocknet info: http://downloads.xc-official.com/images/14-10-15%20Blocknet%20presentation.pdfAmong being able to add flexibility to QTL by being able to use the features of all coins on the Blocknet here is a huge one. QTL will be convertible to fiat currencies through use of any ATM supporting withdrawals in XC(NEOS sent through the XBridge will be auto converted to XC and cashed out at the ATM). As well with the upcoming release of their ITO(shares) there is a 10% discount for anyone who wishes to get in on that. There is no downside here. It takes absolutely nothing away from QTL but adds a vast network of useability, and a lot of exposure for us as a member. Thoughts? This is what SuperNET has been doing for quite some time already. I'd stick with the originators of this innovation rather than the clone.
|
|
|
BitcoinDark Rich List (Top 500)Now available on http://explorebtcd.info/bitcoindark-btcd-rich-list-top-500/This will be updated every hour except I'm sleeping. So, Plese be patient until I can get something to update it automatically every 10 minutes. Hope you guys will like it. There is still more to do. If you would like to help or any feedback please let me know. Donations are welcome. Cool! I'm on the list a few times ^_^
|
|
|
Hey James, I'm currently helping with some VRC projects, but I could set up some VMs to test with next week. Maybe this weekend if I'm lucky.
that would be great! Do you have a build that is running under Windows Server 2008? Then I could rund some nodes, too... Not yet, but you can certainly install VirtualBox and run a linux instance.
|
|
|
Is there any chance to support the KnC Titan and improving the performance/efficiency? http://www.xpool.caShift history for scrypt Wed Oct 15 2014 07:00:00 11920736 41659004 28.6150 % 9.09 MH P.S. I'm currently mining with about 200-300 MH/s at your pool, again. When did you start? If you started Mid ---> End of shift, your rate will be off because it's calculated against the whole shift, not just when you started to the end of the shift. Then you also need to account for mining done on blocks near the end of the shift that didn't not mature, so more hashrate will be carried over to the next shift... Thank you for your quick reply! The Titan was mining on October 14th from 17:50 CET till 18:50 CET. Do you think I could keep on mining at your pool because all multi pools have lots of problems with Titan? 28.6150 % is not the reject rate, right? 28 is your share of them payout. I have had no reports of issues using any particular miners so please mine and let me know if you see issues. So you only mines for an hour, so that looks about right. As I mentioned earlier today in another post. Hash rates are calculated against everyone else for the whole shift. So your one hour of mining @2-300 mh = the same as mining the whole shift @ 9mh (48 hours)
|
|
|
It says: 9361360
What about now, after today's shift? It says: 5154210 unconfirmed BTW, today's shift looks very accurate: SHIFT END YOUR SHARES TOTAL SHARES PERCENT AVG. HASH RATE BTCMH/DAY PAYMENT STATUS Fri Oct 17 2014 07:00:00 18006620 253171760 7.1124 % 44.76 MH 0.00028719 4.17735317 DRK Complete But Wednesday looks like this: Wed Oct 15 2014 07:00:00 1090 99329580 0.0011 % 0 KH 0.00045798 0.00047513 DRK Complete You should be ok now. You started mining mid shift + had shares that rolled over to the next shift.
|
|
|
|