Vous êtes déconnant, des cryptos pour backer les tether, wtf ?
Si vous preniez le temps de vous intéresser vraiment au dossier, au lieu de gratter la chose superficiellement et ironiquement perdre votre temps et des neurones, vous aurez pu lire qu'une grosse partie des fonds est en obligations US. C'est une pratique tout à fait standard quand on détient du cash, c'est même un risque inconsidéré de garder du cash car il n'est pas nominatif et appartient à la banque. Un problème de faillite et il peut disparaître. Tandis qu'une obligation est nominative dans un custodian et ne disparaît pas si la banque a un risque systémique.
De plus ça génère des intérêts, ils ont généré 30M l'an passé sur le ~milliard sous gestion. Autant dire que cette manne aide à cadenasser le business.
De rien pour les infos, bye les conspiracies.
C'est bien de répéter ce que je dis. En revanche je ne serais pas étonné si un faible pourcentage est effectivement en crypto. Mais c'est un investissement risqué comme un autre.
|
|
|
J'en suis sûr que c'est comme ce que j'avais dit, en gros les Tether sont backed par des crypto' lol...
Impossible de savoir si il y a des cryptos dans le lot. Pour moi leur annonce signifie surtout qu'ils veulent générer du profit via leur capital, comme une banque le ferait. La couverture n'est donc pas seulement réalisée par des liquidités mais aussi de la dette, et d'autres produits d'investissement. Ce genre de stratégie est tout à fait commun dans le monde financier, je ne suis donc pas surpris qu'ils fassent de même. Est-ce que cela veut dire qu'ils ne sont pas solvables ? Non. Cela peut uniquement indiquer qu'en cas de claim massif de USDT ils soient à court de liquidités et puissent êtres forcés de clore des positions avec de grosses pertes afin de récupérer les liquidités en question. Après on part sur des stratégies de hedging classiques. Soit ils la jouent conservatif et ça n'arrivera pas, soient ils sont très agressif et les chances de se planter sont plus élevées. A suivre donc.
|
|
|
rewrite it completely is not quite the same as translate it completely. I would think a rewrite makes it not plagiarism while an accurate translation makes it plagiarism. A rewrite means more change then a translation does. But I suppose it is a matter of semantics.
A proper translation IS rewriting. Did you ever read a book that wasn't written in the authors language? Which name was on the cover? The translators? Yes it is a matter of semantics, and you are wrong.
|
|
|
What do you meen with „Must be SegWit“?
I guess this means you are still hibernating someway. How can you not know what segwit is while offering an escrow service?! Segwit is like the most important bitcoin soft fork and it is implemented since July 2017... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SegWitPractical answer is your BTC adress has to start with 3 or bc1 to be accepted in the campaign. But then again registration are closed, again.
|
|
|
Unfortunately, your reality is from a parallel universe.
You can't fight bad faith with rationality unfortunately.
|
|
|
if the community of bitcoin talk keeps drying down, it wont be good for Bitcoin Either.
I knew you were a troll, I didn't know you had issues of understanding english. It says nowhere that the community is dying down. It merely says there are less links posted on other sites. It has little to do with actual audience of the forum.
|
|
|
Because if he only translate it and post the translated text its not a plagiarism in my eyes !
That's correct if he uses his own words to redact the post. But if he use an automatic translator and post it as it is word by word then it is plagiarism. It is just another trick to avoid getting caught. You are misunderstanding what plagiarism is. Even if the user was to rewrite it completely it would still be plagiarism. It is just harder to detect. Also even google translate does better than translating word by word now. It doesn't make it any less plagiarism. These people can be tagged/banned for plagiarism and/or using automated translation tools to gain visibility/activity/whatever.
|
|
|
I said that i will remove the neutral trust and did accordingly.. But after having seen your post in a way to defend yourself, instead of accepting the truth of your acts and learn from the mistake, you made me angry again.. don't make me regret having cleaned your trust score please.
He annoyed me too. Now I added a neutral. And I won't remove it anytime soon. PS: Quoting large posts is really hurting readability.
|
|
|
If the team is so sure about their success they should be able to send some eth in proof of good faith, and deduct it from future payouts. How did you conduct your due diligence without their identity? What makes you say they are legit and not some scamster that just bought some fancy website from someone? 1- Easy 2- Easy 3- I can give you a pdf if you give me a PDF as a source (or a word file). If I just copy the text over it won't be really usable. Also the WP is pretty unreadable. Looks unprofessional to me. 4- See 3-. What is the duration of the TGE. When will the payment be made? I don't mind about waiting for tokens, but the ETH should be paid either at the end of the TGE (immediately), or if the TGE is very long, every week/month. How will you handle a drop out? Let's say someone translated 1-4 but not the ann for instance. What happens? Will the 1% eth be paid even if the projects fails to reach it softcap? Is there even a softcap?
|
|
|
Hello,
I am fluent in 3 languages (english, french, german) and would be able to:
1- All of it 2- Not much experience regarding community building, but for the monitoring & replying no problem. Moderating as well. 3- Does this include redacting news? Or just publishing them/answering DM etc? 4- What tools would be provided to do that? I guess this would need more a team than a single person. However I feel confident I could help with that 5- why not.
I'm available to speak more about this on telegram or here
@asche24
|
|
|
The Firefox extension would be great.
Read carefully. There is already a firefox extension.
|
|
|
Is it entirely obvious that a trust of n * 10 is (at least) n different pieces of positive feedback, which have aged for 10 months?
Since you ask the question, you know very well that it is not obvious for newcomers. I myself didn't care for trust for a long time when I joined, and it took me quite some time to find this information. Maybe having a reminder of that on the trust page would be beneficial.
|
|
|
I currently have 266 merits, 166 merits earned and 100 merits airdropped since the start of the merit system. Hoping to be accepted!
Funnily enough you have only 263 merit.
|
|
|
Can you please be more specific regarding what you are expecting and how you built your list?
The predetermined list of people in OP I am in. - - - Above referenced bounty manager %ETH payment in full. Set at 1% of total ETH held in Multi-Sig wallet at event conclusion. Note: Bounty manager will receive 1% of total ETH Ref: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5118533.msg50079851#msg50079851For calculation let's say the ICO will raise 230,000 ETH. So my employer's % is 2,300 ETH Now 40% of 2,300ETH and 10,000,000 token is 920 ETH and 4,000,000 token respectively. This is what I will receive. It does make sense. It also confirms that we won't get paid a dime in case the project's sale doesn't succeed. I would hope for at least some part of the salary to be fixed no matter what. When can you provide the project's WP/ann for review?
|
|
|
Hero only needs 480 activity and 500 merit.
I was so sure it was 500!!!! I guess I might become Hero 2 weeks earlier than expected. Congratz anyway for your new rank o_e_l_e_o
|
|
|
Because a false positive rating can do a lot more damage than a false negative rating.
This is a matter of perspective. The fact that in your opinion it is true, doesn't make it an universal reality. If someone was to falsely red tag someone who was launching his service, you have no idea how much money is at stake, and how much he might lose because of this rating. It can be very damageable in both ways. Edit: also how are you Hero with an activity of 490?
|
|
|
He is unbanned by the way. Oh I did not know that either, that is good news. He definately is a net positive for the forum, good to hear this I am happy this case has been reconsidered too. As for the net positive, only future will tell. If not, swinging the ban hammer again remains possible anyway. Not like this was a risky move!
|
|
|
Now should work the notification also for all those cases where the names are between tags like these, there can even be some space before or after the username:
Amazing enhancement. Thanks Looking forward to see the next new features. How is the plagiarism checking feature going you mentioned a few months ago?
|
|
|
|