I started working on it in the past, but later changed my mind. Nicehash revenue calculation is just `hashrate * price`, there is nothing more to it, so adding a calc for this seems like an overkill  Maybe showing the averages of last 3 and 7 days would be useful for some... will revisit this at some point. |
|
|
|
Network hashrate: 38.5 MH/s
Miningpoolhub: 1.4 MH/s
Suprnova: 4 MH/s
Nanopool: 3.7 MH/s
Coinmine: 7.3 MH/s
Flypool: 15 MH/s
I'm missing 7 MH/s.
Heard about solo mining ? Nicehash adds an additional 6.2 MH/s with the rest 0.8 MH/s probably from smaller pools and the odd solo miner(s). Edit: removed opinion about solo mining. No it doesn't, that mining power just flows through nicehash and is further rented to some miner who points it to some pool. https://explorer.zcha.in/statistics/minersExactly, the hashes on nicehash are later fired upon nova, coinmine, nano etc... Looks like those 7Mh are from solos. |
|
|
|
Network hashrate: 38.5 MH/s
Miningpoolhub: 1,4 MH/s
Suprnova: 4 MH/s
Nanopool: 3,7 MH/s
Coinmine: 7,3 MH/s
Flypool: 15 MH/s
I'm missing 7 MH/s.
Nicehash also has pool for zec. Edit: Actually I have never seen that pool and cant find it now... Was it just a rumour? |
|
|
|
Small update to single calculators. Some coin-specific fields will now be disabled by default for smooth recalc.  |
|
|
|
|
All cards updated for latest ZEC miner values. This means latest nicehash 1.7.3.5 and claymore v7.
480 takes values from bios for ETH for easy switching and better power efficiency.
|
|
|
|
Getting 158 Sol/s on stock Asus RX 480 4gb
Getting 168 Sol/s on stock Gigabyte RX 480 8gb
175 H/s on stock Sappfire RX 480 Nitro+ 8GB 166 H/s on stock Asus R9 280 X DirectCUII Top Ha I have the same 280x, mines the same. Funny how my other ETH-shitty elpida 280x is now doing more than the asus - 175h/s |
|
|
|
Please explain someone how should I consider 3rd column from right?
If you are talking about Rev. BTC and Rev. 24h - its your revenue in BTC. First taken for current "estimated rewards", second one for 24h value of "estimated rewards". Its just "rewards * coin_price_in_BTC" |
|
|
|
|
Any way to run nsgminer on new 4xx series cards?
Guess its the problem with 16.x drivers.
|
|
|
|
Anyone got problem with 280x doing 0 h/s in 5.0? Works just fine with 4.0. I have updated drivers from 15.7.1 to latest crimson 16.11.3 - same thing. This is a mixed with nvidia rig with 280x being the only AMD card present: ZEC: Stratum - Connected (equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3357)
ZEC: Authorized
Pool sets new share target: 0x01e1e1e1 (diff: 136H)
ZEC: Share accepted!
GPU #0: Tahiti, 3072 MB available, 32 compute units
ZEC - Total Speed: 0.000 H/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
ZEC: GPU0 0.000 H/s
Pool switches: ZEC - 0
Current ZEC pool share target: 0x01e1e1e1 (diff: 136H)
GPU0 t=47C fan=49% Reward is at 5.14 now, will get up to 10.0 - expect twice the price drop. Ok managed to fix it by copying `data.bin` and `data2.bin` from other working miner. Either I downloaded an early broken version or somehow this fucked when unzipping. |
|
|
|
Anyone got problem with 280x doing 0 h/s in 5.0? Works just fine with 4.0. I have updated drivers from 15.7.1 to latest crimson 16.11.3 - same thing. This is a mixed with nvidia rig with 280x being the only AMD card present: ZEC: Stratum - Connected (equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3357)
ZEC: Authorized
Pool sets new share target: 0x01e1e1e1 (diff: 136H)
ZEC: Share accepted!
GPU #0: Tahiti, 3072 MB available, 32 compute units
ZEC - Total Speed: 0.000 H/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
ZEC: GPU0 0.000 H/s
Pool switches: ZEC - 0
Current ZEC pool share target: 0x01e1e1e1 (diff: 136H)
GPU0 t=47C fan=49% Reward is at 5.14 now, will get up to 10.0 - expect twice the price drop. Please read previous posts. Run two separate windows. Use -di and -mport. Thats why I have written `This is a mixed with nvidia rig with 280x being the only AMD card present:` There are no other AMD cards there, this is the only claymore ZEC miner running. Anyway I have tried it to run with " -di 0 -mport 0", but still nothing |
|
|
|
Anyone got problem with 280x doing 0 h/s in 5.0? Works just fine with 4.0. I have updated drivers from 15.7.1 to latest crimson 16.11.3 - same thing. This is a mixed with nvidia rig with 280x being the only AMD card present: ZEC: Stratum - Connected (equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3357)
ZEC: Authorized
Pool sets new share target: 0x01e1e1e1 (diff: 136H)
ZEC: Share accepted!
GPU #0: Tahiti, 3072 MB available, 32 compute units
ZEC - Total Speed: 0.000 H/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
ZEC: GPU0 0.000 H/s
Pool switches: ZEC - 0
Current ZEC pool share target: 0x01e1e1e1 (diff: 136H)
GPU0 t=47C fan=49% Reward is at 5.14 now, will get up to 10.0 - expect twice the price drop. |
|
|
|
What cpu should I buy to improve my solrate?
I have now celeron g1840 and my best rate is with -i 0,
with -i 1 is less and with -i 2 my rig freezes.
Higher "-i" have no impact even if I choose only one card with -di parameter :S
i have rx 480 rx 470 and r7 370
I have observed the same scenario and would also like to know the answer. Will Pentium help? (I guess no, but maybe latest skylake?) Will i3 be enough for 6, 7 card rigs, or we have to go i5? |
|
|
|
HW:
- 6x Reference Sapphire RX 470 OC 4GB (5x Elpida memory/1x Hynix memory)
- Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 3, Rev 1.0, Bios F8d (disabled USB3, lan, serial, audio, virtualization, and on chip vga)
- G1840 CPU
- 4G DDR3 1600MHz Single Channel
- 120GB Micron m600 m.2 Sata SSD
- RT73 USB wireless-n
- PSU: 1200W Corsair AX1200i
- 6x powered USB risers v006
SW:
- Win10 Pro 64-bit version 1607 (anniversary edition) fully updated, stripped out a little bloatware
- Crimson 16.10.3
- Claymore v 3.1 (-i 2 -dbg -1 -colors 0)
Results:
- Reported Hashrate: 335 sol/s (56 sol/s per card)
- Power: 610W
BIOS Settings
- GPU 1100 @ 900mV
- Mem 1900 @ 900mv with timings from 1500MHz
- Fan 3800RPM / 60%
Stable for a few hours with 47C card temps. Will retry with an i5 4690k and 8gb 2133 mhz ram tomorrow. Also tempted to try 16.11.x drivers.
How did you edit bios for elipda cards? It doesnt work in PolarisBiosEditor, right? |
|
|
|
 claymore could enter the nvidia support on your miner? I have 2 x 1070 waiting to work for good He already said there wont be a nvidia or linux version |
|
|
|
Right now unless you own some Tahiti/Pitcairn old GPUs you might as well go back to ETH.
With a RX 470 running at 28.3MH/s get 0.003211 BTC per day
With a RX 470 running at 45Sol/s on Nicehash gets 0.0028755 BTC per day (Should be lower given the higher miner fee)
You are basically losing at least 10% by mining ZEC.
It was a fun 10 days ...
Have you tried mining zclassic? might give you better returns what the heck is zclassic? |
|
|
|
So price drop 4x, ok.
And reward up from 2.872 (now) to 12.5 at block 20.000 == 4.35x
So profit will be same like now. I'm right?
Reward after block 20000 will be 10, not 12.5, as 2.5 will go to the founders. Founders will stop receiving ZEC after block 850_000 when the first halving occurs. At this point miners will receive 6.25 |
|
|
|
|
Remember that slow start will stop at block 20000 with a reward of 10.
We are currently at block 5720, which means price could still drop by a factor of 3-4.
|
|
|
|
So quick question: This miner says that I'm mining at 192 H/s. However NiceHash is reporting 140 SOLS/s. My question is does 192 H/s translate to 140 SOLS/s, or should NiceHash be reporting what the miner's saying which, again, is 192 H/s?
Miner H/s is the same what Nicehash names as Sols/s. Thing is that current hashrate can fluctuate. Make sure to check the average speed on nicehash. |
|
|
|
P.S. In http://www.whattomine.com/coins now and then appears UTC on top - currently 3.5$ profit for 280x. I am afraid, however, that this coin is in danger of delisting in Bittrex and the buy offers are pretty small. Yeah I have delisted it again as it was misleading. Sometimes the diff drops to the super low values and coin boosts on the ranking, but there are not enough buy orders for this to be sustainable. Btw anyone got their 380 faster? 30H/s is pretty slow  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
