Like a three pronged attack on bitcoin
How events unfolded in the disappearance of satoshi
1) Wikileaks exposes bitcoin (Scares the shit out of Satoshi)
2) Bruce Wagner tells the newspapers its Satoshi
3) Satoshi runs
4) Gavin Adreeesseennnn dicusses bitcoin whitepaper with CIA
5) Bitcoin gets attacked non stop even ongoing today
Why is Bitcoin so dangerous?
First ever block exposes 2 things
1) The theory of everything
2) 500000 bitcoin on hold can be used to create a new currency reserve
The framing of your ideas expressed in this last part are a bit unclear to me.... because I agree that there are a lot of things going on in bitcoin, but it seems to me that there is even more going on and other logical connections that you have not captured in your above attempt. ..."that there is even more going on and other logical connections that you have not captured in your above attempt.".... That is the correct question!Fill in the blanks (More to add, a lot of resources) 1) Wikileaks exposes bitcoin (Scares the shit out of Satoshi) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3;sa=showPosts;start=0Satoshis last page of posts reflect hurriedly handing bitcoin off to Gavin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1735.msg26999#msg26999Wikileaks thread on bitcoin being exposed Basically, bring it on. Let's encourage Wikileaks to use Bitcoins and I'm willing to face any risk or fallout from that act.
No, don't "bring it on". The project needs to grow gradually so the software can be strengthened along the way. I make this appeal to WikiLeaks not to try to use Bitcoin. Bitcoin is a small beta community in its infancy. You would not stand to get more than pocket change, and the heat you would bring would likely destroy us at this stage. Bruce Wagner tells the newspapers its Satoshi MY LETTER TO THE AUTHOR OF THE ARTICLE: ( < keir@keirthomas.com> author of goo.gl/n0UQt ) I appreciate PC World finally doing an article about the most revolutionary and amazing new technology of the 21st Century so far --- Bitcoin. However, this really is lazy journalism. The article implies that Bitcoin was invented as a RESULT of Wikileaks troubles... as sort of an altrernate SOLUTION to Wikileaks donation funding troubles. That is NOT TRUE. The truth is: Most "Bitcoin.org Forum" members want no association with Wikileaks whatsoever. The Creator of Bitcoin, Satoshi, has even made a public plea to Wikileaks NOT to accept donations via Bitcoin. The truth is quite the opposite from the impression that this story leaves. Most in the Bitcoin Community do NOT want Bitcoin to be associated with Wikileaks in any way. Bruce Wagner New York City +1 646-580-0022 http://bitcoinme.com Is Satoshi Alive? Thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2757.140mewantsbitcoins Full Member*** Activity: 126 Merit: 100 Posts: 917 View Profile Personal Message (Offline) Re: Gavin will visit the CIA 28-04-2011, 07:59:08 This is a bad idea and gives me uneasy feeling But I guess if Bitcoin is going to survive, it will have to go through it. Although, if you declined their offer, it would most probably delayed any action against bitcoin Edit: and by reading satoshi's post I get the same feeling, that he wanted to keep bitcoin under the radar for as long as possible. I didn't know this topic still came up, are people still looking for him? He is not dead, but he does like his privacy.  Gavin Adreeesseennnn dicusses bitcoin whitepaper with CIA 28-04-2011, 05:00:26 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=6652.msg97181#msg97181I want to get this out in the open because it is the kind of thing that will generate conspiracy theories: I'm going to give a presentation about Bitcoin at CIA headquarters in June at an emerging technologies conference for the US intelligence community. Bitcoin gets attacked non stop even ongoing today (Need to add resources) a) DDos attacks forum b) Forum members as CIA stooges c) Discredit blockchain, blocksize debate create alternate coins create corrupt exchanges and hacks virus in wallets and miners create new blockchain with easy app addition (Ethereum) Bear market, Fud The rise of tokens The rise of forks blocksize debate 2 - distributed lightning network Why is Bitcoin so dangerous? blocks expose 2 things 1) The theory of everything #00000000000000000021e800c1e8df51b22c1588e5a624bea17e9faa34b2dc4a https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=172009.msg1789665#msg1789665https://blockchain.info/block-index/1707079/00000000000000000021e800c1e8df51b22c1588e5a624bea17e9faa34b2dc4ahttp://21e8.com/2) 500000 bitcoin on hold can be used to create a new currency reserve |
|
|
|
Like a three pronged attack on bitcoin
How events unfolded in the disappearance of satoshi
1) Wikileaks exposes bitcoin (Scares the shit out of Satoshi)
2) Bruce Wagner tells the newspapers its Satoshi
3) Satoshi runs
4) Gavin Adreeesseennnn dicusses bitcoin whitepaper with CIA
5) Bitcoin gets attacked non stop even ongoing today
Why is Bitcoin so dangerous?
First ever block exposes 2 things
1) The theory of everything
2) 500000 bitcoin on hold can be used to create a new currency reserve
The framing of your ideas expressed in this last part are a bit unclear to me.... because I agree that there are a lot of things going on in bitcoin, but it seems to me that there is even more going on and other logical connections that you have not captured in your above attempt. ..."that there is even more going on and other logical connections that you have not captured in your above attempt.".... That is the correct question!Fill in the blanks (More to add, a lot of resources) 1) Wikileaks exposes bitcoin (Scares the shit out of Satoshi) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3;sa=showPosts;start=0Satoshis last page of posts reflect hurriedly handing bitcoin off to Gavin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1735.msg26999#msg26999Wikileaks thread on bitcoin being exposed Basically, bring it on. Let's encourage Wikileaks to use Bitcoins and I'm willing to face any risk or fallout from that act.
No, don't "bring it on". The project needs to grow gradually so the software can be strengthened along the way. I make this appeal to WikiLeaks not to try to use Bitcoin. Bitcoin is a small beta community in its infancy. You would not stand to get more than pocket change, and the heat you would bring would likely destroy us at this stage. Bruce Wagner tells the newspapers its Satoshi MY LETTER TO THE AUTHOR OF THE ARTICLE: ( < keir@keirthomas.com> author of goo.gl/n0UQt ) I appreciate PC World finally doing an article about the most revolutionary and amazing new technology of the 21st Century so far --- Bitcoin. However, this really is lazy journalism. The article implies that Bitcoin was invented as a RESULT of Wikileaks troubles... as sort of an altrernate SOLUTION to Wikileaks donation funding troubles. That is NOT TRUE. The truth is: Most "Bitcoin.org Forum" members want no association with Wikileaks whatsoever. The Creator of Bitcoin, Satoshi, has even made a public plea to Wikileaks NOT to accept donations via Bitcoin. The truth is quite the opposite from the impression that this story leaves. Most in the Bitcoin Community do NOT want Bitcoin to be associated with Wikileaks in any way. Bruce Wagner New York City +1 646-580-0022 http://bitcoinme.com Is Satoshi Alive? Thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2757.140mewantsbitcoins Full Member*** Activity: 126 Merit: 100 Posts: 917 View Profile Personal Message (Offline) Re: Gavin will visit the CIA 28-04-2011, 07:59:08 This is a bad idea and gives me uneasy feeling But I guess if Bitcoin is going to survive, it will have to go through it. Although, if you declined their offer, it would most probably delayed any action against bitcoin Edit: and by reading satoshi's post I get the same feeling, that he wanted to keep bitcoin under the radar for as long as possible. ???What satoshi post - this is after satoshi left on the Last Active: 14-12-2010, 02:45:41 I didn't know this topic still came up, are people still looking for him? He is not dead, but he does like his privacy. Gavin Adreeesseennnn dicusses bitcoin whitepaper with CIA 28-04-2011, 05:00:26 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=6652.msg97181#msg97181I want to get this out in the open because it is the kind of thing that will generate conspiracy theories: I'm going to give a presentation about Bitcoin at CIA headquarters in June at an emerging technologies conference for the US intelligence community. 5) Bitcoin gets attacked non stop even ongoing today Why is Bitcoin so dangerous? First ever block exposes 2 things 1) The theory of everything 2) 500000 bitcoin on hold can be used to create a new currency reserve |
|
|
|
Like a three pronged attack on bitcoin
How events unfolded in the disappearance of satoshi
1) Wikileaks exposes bitcoin (Scares the shit out of Satoshi)
2) Bruce Wagner tells the newspapers its Satoshi
3) Satoshi runs
4) Gavin Adreeesseennnn dicusses bitcoin whitepaper with CIA
5) Bitcoin gets attacked non stop even ongoing today
Why is Bitcoin so dangerous?
First ever block exposes 2 things
1) The theory of everything
2) 500000 bitcoin on hold can be used to create a new currency reserve
The framing of your ideas expressed in this last part are a bit unclear to me.... because I agree that there are a lot of things going on in bitcoin, but it seems to me that there is even more going on and other logical connections that you have not captured in your above attempt. ..."that there is even more going on and other logical connections that you have not captured in your above attempt.".... That is the correct question!Fill in the blanks (More to add, a lot of resources) 1) Wikileaks exposes bitcoin (Scares the shit out of Satoshi) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3;sa=showPosts;start=0Satoshis last page of posts reflect hurriedly handing bitcoin off to Gavin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1735.msg26999#msg26999Wikileaks thread on bitcoin being exposed Basically, bring it on. Let's encourage Wikileaks to use Bitcoins and I'm willing to face any risk or fallout from that act.
No, don't "bring it on". The project needs to grow gradually so the software can be strengthened along the way. I make this appeal to WikiLeaks not to try to use Bitcoin. Bitcoin is a small beta community in its infancy. You would not stand to get more than pocket change, and the heat you would bring would likely destroy us at this stage. Bruce Wagner tells the newspapers its Satoshi MY LETTER TO THE AUTHOR OF THE ARTICLE: ( < keir@keirthomas.com> author of goo.gl/n0UQt ) I appreciate PC World finally doing an article about the most revolutionary and amazing new technology of the 21st Century so far --- Bitcoin. However, this really is lazy journalism. The article implies that Bitcoin was invented as a RESULT of Wikileaks troubles... as sort of an altrernate SOLUTION to Wikileaks donation funding troubles. That is NOT TRUE. The truth is: Most "Bitcoin.org Forum" members want no association with Wikileaks whatsoever. The Creator of Bitcoin, Satoshi, has even made a public plea to Wikileaks NOT to accept donations via Bitcoin. The truth is quite the opposite from the impression that this story leaves. Most in the Bitcoin Community do NOT want Bitcoin to be associated with Wikileaks in any way. Bruce Wagner New York City +1 646-580-0022 http://bitcoinme.com 3) Satoshi runs mewantsbitcoins Full Member *** Activity: 126 Merit: 100 Posts: 917 View Profile Personal Message (Offline) Re: Gavin will visit the CIA 28-04-2011, 07:59:08 +Merit #17 This is a bad idea and gives me uneasy feeling But I guess if Bitcoin is going to survive, it will have to go through it. Although, if you declined their offer, it would most probably delayed any action against bitcoin Edit: and by reading satoshi's post I get the same feeling, that he wanted to keep bitcoin under the radar for as long as possible. ???What satoshi post - this is after satoshi left on the Last Active: 14-12-2010, 02:45:41 I didn't know this topic still came up, are people still looking for him? He is not dead, but he does like his privacy. 4) Gavin Adreeesseennnn dicusses bitcoin whitepaper with CIA 28-04-2011, 05:00:26 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=6652.msg97181#msg97181I want to get this out in the open because it is the kind of thing that will generate conspiracy theories: I'm going to give a presentation about Bitcoin at CIA headquarters in June at an emerging technologies conference for the US intelligence community. 5) Bitcoin gets attacked non stop even ongoing today Why is Bitcoin so dangerous? First ever block exposes 2 things 1) The theory of everything 2) 500000 bitcoin on hold can be used to create a new currency reserve |
|
|
|
satoshi is a lizardman and he created bitcoin to enslave humanity. the bilderberger are also lizardmen and they developed lightning to speed up this process.
Don't forget that Vitalik is an alien too, the question is, he's a good one or a bad one? Lizardmen are bad or good? Also, EOS is an alien project too but went wrong (for now) ? Who gives a ratt's ass about Vitalik or EOS? You? But it is important Vitalik is supported by the Russian Oligarchy linked to the Khazaraian Central Cabal bankers EOS (Token based on Ethereum) was started by none other than renowned (I love my boys) Brock Pierce linked to Clinton Global initiative and the Khazarian Central Cabal bankers Got follow the monsters CIA Stooge Gavin Andresssessnnnn fits in their somewhere Like a three pronged attack on bitcoin How events unfolded in the disappearance of satoshi 1) Wikileaks exposes bitcoin (Scares the shit out of Satoshi) 2) Bruce Wagner tells the newspapers its Satoshi 3) Satoshi runs 4) Gavin Adreeesseennnn dicusses bitcoin whitepaper with CIA 5) Bitcoin gets attacked non stop even ongoing today Why is Bitcoin so dangerous? First ever block exposes 2 things 1) The theory of everything 2) 500000 bitcoin on hold can be used to create a new currency reserve (Gavin and Bruce have both been discredited and exposed as charlatans)  |
|
|
|
Really had it in for satoshi
Which, of course, perfectly explains why Satoshi left Gavin in charge. /s  Let's attempt to pump the credibility of Gavin, who essentially got booted (or demoted) from Bitcoin based on his crazy ass devolution into proclaiming that fraudster Craig Wright was Satoshi.... What a bunch of bullshit that showed that Gavin's true colors were not in the interest of bitcoin and had digressed way too far, and showed him as a kind of naked that had to be purged of his bitcoin powers.  Now LN is the Illuminati?
While I'm not taking a position on the implications, presumably you are aware that: - one of Blockstream's biggest investors was AXA - at the time, Henri de Castries headed up AXA - at the same time, Henri de Castries was also the Chairman of the Bilderberg group - Bilderberg is widely considered as the core legal entity of the Illuminati I cannot see you giving up on your own bitcoin bashing, any time soon. Gavin, is that you? Mr CIA stooge - Gavin Andressesesssn  |
|
|
|
Really had it in for satoshi
Which, of course, perfectly explains why Satoshi left Gavin in charge. /s Who cares Manifestly, you do. You are the one that brought him into conversation. Weewy, the weird is wunning wampant this week. <- read that in a Baba Wawa voice. Nah what I meant was that Gavin is a CIA stooge so why would anyone care if satoshi picked him or not Once a CIA stooge always a CIA stooge |
|
|
|
Really had it in for satoshi
Which, of course, perfectly explains why Satoshi left Gavin in charge. /s Who cares Gavin is a CIA stooge anyways |
|
|
|
See if there is a debate within the lightning network developers and community
1) Distributed or Indirect is the new word for centralization (Illumination Society, Bankers, Deep State)
2) If there is heated debate step 1 is true
I'm active in the lightning network developer community and this is the first of this "heated debate" nonsense I have heard. The real LN community and developers are too busy working on improving the protocol, usability, and robustness - don't give a single flying fuck about these issues you speak of. Stop making shit up, guy. I agree there is no "heated debate" misconception on my part, why so critical? (happy to correct any inconsistencies) sidechains are preferable to lightning anyways if you cannot trust the blockchain there is no hope for bitcoin (Why does bitcoin keep getting attacked? - because it truly is decentralized and tested) |
|
|
|
...."So that is where we are today. Bitcoin BTC has been taken over by the Bilderberg Group / Blockstream, deliberately crippled by small blocks & high fees, so people will have to use the Lightning Network (which is where Bilderberg Group / Blockstream will profit). This was pushed through via brutal censorship on the #1 & #2 Bitcoin communities (rBitcoin & BitcoinTalk.org, which are both controlled by Theymos) Bitcoin Cash BCH continues with bigger block size limits, low fees, and the "P2P electronic cash system" vision as laid out by Satoshi Nakamoto's Bitcoin whitepaper.".... ..."As Gavin & Mike were being pushed out, they tried to create the first "big block" fork of Bitcoin, called Bitcoin XT. The Blockstream / Bitcoin Core side hired a botnet operator to DDoS Bitcoin XT to death in its infancy."... https://cryptoyum.com/discussions/how-bitcoin-btc-was-hijacked-and-why-bitcoin-cash-was-created/Published on: May 24, 2018 Weird what you find And where meant to believe backstabbing CIA snitch Gavin Andressen (Even has support of the; CIA News Network in their media articles) They drag Theymos name through the mud  Current debate is between distributed (run away from this) lightning network or completely decentralized (another big blocker type attack) Lightning Network (which is where Bilderberg Group / Blockstream will profit) Now LN is the Illuminati? Lol is this how far Bcash shilling can go? See if there is a debate within the lightning network developers and community 1) Distributed or Indirect is the new word for centralization (Illumination Society, Bankers, Deep State) 2) If there is heated debate step 1 is true hmmmmm... it is true - time to jump on board and kick " distributed lightning network' (Ruuuuuun!!!!, we a coming) to the curb |
|
|
|
...."So that is where we are today. Bitcoin BTC has been taken over by the Bilderberg Group / Blockstream, deliberately crippled by small blocks & high fees, so people will have to use the Lightning Network (which is where Bilderberg Group / Blockstream will profit). This was pushed through via brutal censorship on the #1 & #2 Bitcoin communities (rBitcoin & BitcoinTalk.org, which are both controlled by Theymos) Bitcoin Cash BCH continues with bigger block size limits, low fees, and the "P2P electronic cash system" vision as laid out by Satoshi Nakamoto's Bitcoin whitepaper.".... ..."As Gavin & Mike were being pushed out, they tried to create the first "big block" fork of Bitcoin, called Bitcoin XT. The Blockstream / Bitcoin Core side hired a botnet operator to DDoS Bitcoin XT to death in its infancy."... https://cryptoyum.com/discussions/how-bitcoin-btc-was-hijacked-and-why-bitcoin-cash-was-created/Published on: May 24, 2018 Weird what you find And where meant to believe backstabbing CIA snitch Gavin Andressen (Even has support of the; CIA News Network in their media articles) They drag Theymos name through the mud Current debate is between distributed (run away from this) lightning network or completely decentralized (another big blocker type attack) Lightning Network (which is where Bilderberg Group / Blockstream will profit) |
|
|
|
Umm hmm.... umm hmmm. So one posted idea and one public statement is all it takes to become king. Got it. Perhaps your hat needs yet another roll of tinfoil. I am not the one on the defensive here Why are you so irate about BCash being developed by Gavin Most people who call other people conspiracy theorists, are the ones actually hiding something ..."Mr. Andresen doesn’t regularly post to his blog, but when he does, the Bitcoin developer community pays attention. Satoshi’s entrusted developer, who caused controversy early in Bitcoin’s existence by visiting the CIA to discuss the digital currency, had his commit access to the Bitcoin code repository stripped by Wladimir Van der Lann"... The core developer supports a larger block size. While there are many kinks that are being worked out, he shrugged it off in a sense: “Is scaling a big deal? I actually think it's not.” Then Andresen continued: "That may be what has to happen with the block size, frankly. I may just have to throw my weight around and say, 'This is the way it's going to be. And if you don't like it, find another project.'" Really had it in for satoshi |
|
|
|
and the line that runs it all stays constant? bitcoin has only one platform? if it was not for bitcoins multiple platforms Bcash would not have a platform Just a fun graphic, I am not sure. Bitcoin looks like a busy station which is good. Yep definitely fun, loved the sounds too great analogy as well, though misrepresented interesting code as well, centralized open to mass control (this whole cloudfare, amazon web, google coding monoploy), weird how the government loves it. thanks for the link, really enjoyed it |
|
|
|
and the line that runs it all stays constant? bitcoin has only one platform? if it was not for bitcoins multiple platforms Bcash would not have a platform |
|
|
|
Umm hmm.... umm hmmm. So one posted idea and one public statement is all it takes to become king. Got it. Perhaps your hat needs yet another roll of tinfoil. I am not the one on the defensive here Why are you so irate about BCash being developed by Gavin Most people who call other people conspiracy theorists, are the ones actually hiding something |
|
|
|
 very nice looks exactly like what bitcoin would do before EOFY |
|
|
|
|
I know you have gold and silver
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin seems like a leak to me too much hiding of the code until it was established then the attacks on bitcoin e.g. Segwit shit, etc etc etc https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/74wejs/exposed_how_bankers_are_trying_to_centralize_and/ Every bitcoiner should know about what DCG (Digital Currency Group) is, and call out publicly these crooks and the people they bribed that are working for the Corporations/Bankers against Bitcoin: Brian Armstrong, Winklevoss brothers, Bobby Lee, Peter Smith, Nic Cary, Haipo Yang, Rick Falkvinge, Jon Matonis, Wences Casares, Tony Gallippi, Mike Belshe, Ryan X Charles, Brian Hoffman/Sam Patterson/Chris Pacia (and all OB1 team)(see edit at the bottom), Gavin Andresen, Jeff Garzik, Mike Hearn, Roger Ver, Jihan Wu, John Mcaffe, Craig Wright, Barry Silbert, Larry Summers, Blythe Masters, Stephen Pair, Erik Voorhees, Vinny Lingham, Olivier Janssens, Jeremy Allaire, Peter Vessenes, Bruce Wagner, Brock Pierce, Aaron Voisine/Adam Traidman/Aaron Lasher (Breadwallet team), Glenn Hutchins (Federal Reserve Board of Directors), Bill Barhydt and Jiang Zhuoer. Ex clinton and obama advisors in there too Gavin Andresen - Bcash king Had different ideas on bitcoin than satoshi, the original posts outline the differences They will eventually (if not already) just track that too and close your account anyway. Gold, crypto, now microchips in cash they track you anyways they even in this thread - hello  |
|
|
|
No, The Khazarian Jews are running China. Been moving everything from west to east and selling crap steel to western military. Left the west wide open. Now the Chinese moving in Seriously Stuff I am talking about is why did Bruce sell Satoshi out Satoshi had concerns about deep state actors focused on wikileaks Basically, bring it on. Let's encourage Wikileaks to use Bitcoins and I'm willing to face any risk or fallout from that act.
No, don't "bring it on". The project needs to grow gradually so the software can be strengthened along the way. I make this appeal to WikiLeaks not to try to use Bitcoin. Bitcoin is a small beta community in its infancy. You would not stand to get more than pocket change, and the heat you would bring would likely destroy us at this stage. It would have been nice to get this attention in any other context. WikiLeaks has kicked the hornet's nest, and the swarm is headed towards us.
NSA Jim Simons This person basically outs satoshi, against his above protest and you never see satoshi again MY LETTER TO THE AUTHOR OF THE ARTICLE: ( < keir@keirthomas.com> author of goo.gl/n0UQt ) I appreciate PC World finally doing an article about the most revolutionary and amazing new technology of the 21st Century so far --- Bitcoin. However, this really is lazy journalism. The article implies that Bitcoin was invented as a RESULT of Wikileaks troubles... as sort of an altrernate SOLUTION to Wikileaks donation funding troubles. That is NOT TRUE. The truth is: Most "Bitcoin.org Forum" members want no association with Wikileaks whatsoever. The Creator of Bitcoin, Satoshi, has even made a public plea to Wikileaks NOT to accept donations via Bitcoin. The truth is quite the opposite from the impression that this story leaves. Most in the Bitcoin Community do NOT want Bitcoin to be associated with Wikileaks in any way. Bruce Wagner New York City +1 646-580-0022 http://bitcoinme.com Key Players Deep State Controlled Media Wikileaks Julian Assange Satoshi - knew the heat Bruce sold him out - The Creator of Bitcoin, Satoshi, |
|
|
|
... much of social interaction is stories, story-telling and pecking orders based on narrative delivery. Even in the elite technical journals and hardest of the objective studies, math, physics, etc the narrative is the final arbiter, after the necessary hurdles of the field are successfully demonstrated as having been mastered, equations, experiments, etc the studies with the best story behind them are the rulers of the roost. Some of the best crypto stories are just simply unbelievable or so far over the line that they are a hazard to one's financial or legal status so best kept to oneself, for now.  I recall one of those visionary posts from the 2011 era, I think by Vlad, that he said he felt like he was caught up in a Neal Stephenson story like Cryptonomicon, it's been a whirlwind ride and shows no signs of ending anytime soon. Some seriously crazy stuff has been going down that we will hear about eventually. .."Some seriously crazy stuff has been going down that we will hear about eventually."... Yeah seriously crazy  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
