Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[mymenace]

...."So that is where we are today.

    Bitcoin BTC has been taken over by the Bilderberg Group / Blockstream, deliberately crippled by small blocks & high fees, so people will have to use the Lightning Network (which is where Bilderberg Group / Blockstream will profit). This was pushed through via brutal censorship on the #1 & #2 Bitcoin communities (rBitcoin & BitcoinTalk.org, which are both controlled by Theymos)

    Bitcoin Cash BCH continues with bigger block size limits, low fees, and the "P2P electronic cash system" vision as laid out by Satoshi Nakamoto's Bitcoin whitepaper."....


..."As Gavin & Mike were being pushed out, they tried to create the first "big block" fork of Bitcoin, called Bitcoin XT. The Blockstream / Bitcoin Core side hired a botnet operator to DDoS Bitcoin XT to death in its infancy."...


https://cryptoyum.com/discussions/how-bitcoin-btc-was-hijacked-and-why-bitcoin-cash-was-created/
Published on: May 24, 2018



Weird what you find


And where meant to believe backstabbing CIA snitch Gavin Andressen (Even has support of the;

CIA
News
Network

in their media articles)


They drag Theymos name through the mud


Current debate is between distributed (run away from this) lightning network or completely decentralized (another big blocker type attack)

Lightning Network (which is where Bilderberg Group / Blockstream will profit)

Now LN is the Illuminati?
Lol is this how far Bcash shilling can go?

See if there is a debate within the lightning network developers and community

1) Distributed or Indirect is the new word for centralization (Illumination Society, Bankers, Deep State)

2) If there is heated debate step 1 is true



hmmmmm...  it is true   - time to jump on board and kick "distributed lightning network' (Ruuuuuun!!!!, we a coming) to the curb

[Totscha]

See if there is a debate within the lightning network developers and community
1) Distributed or Indirect is the new word for centralization (Illumination Society, Bankers, Deep State)
2) If there is heated debate step 1 is true

I'm active in the lightning network developer community and this is the first of this "heated debate" nonsense I have heard.

The real LN community and developers are too busy working on improving the protocol, usability, and robustness - don't give a single flying fuck about these issues you speak of.

Stop making shit up, guy.

Do you by any chance propose that we instead switch to fact based FUD?

Blasphemy!

[Tyr808]

Bcashies.
*rolls eyes*

[mymenace]

See if there is a debate within the lightning network developers and community
1) Distributed or Indirect is the new word for centralization (Illumination Society, Bankers, Deep State)
2) If there is heated debate step 1 is true

I'm active in the lightning network developer community and this is the first of this "heated debate" nonsense I have heard.

The real LN community and developers are too busy working on improving the protocol, usability, and robustness - don't give a single flying fuck about these issues you speak of.

Stop making shit up, guy.

I agree there is no "heated debate"
misconception on my part,

why so critical?

 (happy to correct any inconsistencies)


sidechains are preferable to lightning anyways

if you cannot trust the blockchain there is no hope for bitcoin

(Why does bitcoin keep getting attacked? - because it truly is decentralized and tested)

[Tyr808]

Bitcoin is not for faggy everyday payments, here where both bcash and lightning network failed.

[fluidjax]

See if there is a debate within the lightning network developers and community
1) Distributed or Indirect is the new word for centralization (Illumination Society, Bankers, Deep State)
2) If there is heated debate step 1 is true

I'm active in the lightning network developer community and this is the first of this "heated debate" nonsense I have heard.

The real LN community and developers are too busy working on improving the protocol, usability, and robustness - don't give a single flying fuck about these issues you speak of.

Stop making shit up, guy.

I agree there is no "heated debate"
misconception on my part,

why so critical?

 (happy to correct any inconsistencies)


sidechains are preferable to lightning anyways

if you cannot trust the blockchain there is no hope for bitcoin

(Why does bitcoin keep getting attacked? - because it truly is decentralized and tested)

Sidechains in theory are great, but there is an unsolved problem of getting value out of them and back into BTC.
So at the moment they are almost useless.

[Last of the V8s]

Sidechains in theory are great, but there is an unsolved problem of getting value out of them and back into BTC.
So at the moment they are almost useless.

Utterly preposterous. I can't even begin to rationalize that train of thought.

You get your value out of it by opening / closing channels, acquiring something you desire via micropayment, or becoming an efficient router.

I mean, am I surrounded by fucking BCash morons today ?

sidechains Bob. he said sidechains

[Rosewater Foundation]

Isn't Liquid a working sidechain? Did I miss something important again? Should we rabble about this?

[vroom]

the bcash and noob posts are increasing. as a bull I obviously see this as an omen for the next bull run. please post more bullshit to help boost the rocket!

[fluidjax]

Sidechains in theory are great, but there is an unsolved problem of getting value out of them and back into BTC.
So at the moment they are almost useless.

Utterly preposterous. I can't even begin to rationalize that train of thought.

You get your value out of it by opening / closing channels, acquiring something you desire via micropayment, or becoming an efficient router.

I mean, am I surrounded by fucking BCash morons today ?

Lol, I'm a Lightning fan.... I'm talking about SIDECHAINS you fucking moron

[Rosewater Foundation]

the bcash and noob posts are increasing. as a bull I obviously see this as an omen for the next bull run. please post more bullshit to help boost the rocket!

Core is blocking the stream with sinister intentions to destroy Satoshi's vision.

(That should be worth something.)

[Last of the V8s]

https://hackernoon.com/what-are-sidechains-1c45ea2daf3

[Rosewater Foundation]

Ok. Now what's a blockchain again?

[vroom]

Ok. Now what's a blockchain again?

keep posting and we will reach 10k soon!

[Rosewater Foundation]

Yeah, not sure why you all don't just put your money in traditional financial instruments and institutions. Not sure about this whole "cryptocurrency" thing. IDK. Just doesn't seem real.

[jojo69]

Sidechains in theory are great, but there is an unsolved problem of getting value out of them and back into BTC.
So at the moment they are almost useless.

Utterly preposterous. I can't even begin to rationalize that train of thought.

You get your value out of it by opening / closing channels, acquiring something you desire via micropayment, or becoming an efficient router.

I mean, am I surrounded by fucking BCash morons today ?

Lol, I'm a Lightning fan.... I'm talking about SIDECHAINS you fucking moron

LOL!


also...

tulips!

[Rosewater Foundation]

I dabbled in these cryptocoins once, when I was green in experience and cold in blood. But our salad days are over, gentlemen. None of us is young anymore. Now sliver, there is a nice, stable hobby. Maybe? Or stamps? Hmm?

Also, have you considered Nazism?

[jbreher]

Really had it in for satoshi

Which, of course, perfectly explains why Satoshi left Gavin in charge. /s

[jbreher]

Now LN is the Illuminati?

While I'm not taking a position on the implications, presumably you are aware that:
- one of Blockstream's biggest investors was AXA
- at the time, Henri de Castries headed up AXA
- at the same time, Henri de Castries was also the Chairman of the Bilderberg group
- Bilderberg is widely considered as the core legal entity of the Illuminati

[Rosewater Foundation]

Sarcasm can be difficult. This?^