I don't know much about BCC-wallets yet, and which may be good or not, but this is an interesting article and gives a good overview about the current situation regarding wallets and exchanges:
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/these-bitcoin-exchanges-and-wallets-are-supporting-bitcoin-cash/



Edit:

P.S.: @factoo3, I've seen your post about Neucoin etc. Wasn't us who deleted it bust most likely a BCT-mod who recognized it as OT. I remember that I've given some examples of projects in that thread. And yes, it's often a good choice to check projects deeper who focus on delivery instead on hyping because there is a higher chance 1) to be in early and before a majority recognizes a project and 2) it's possible to just watch and wait for the progress. Even the best teams are not perfect, there will always be setbacks and delays etc., but good teams work and work and figure it out - they don't give up. Neucoin was a master-example of the opposite - they didn't only give it up but it wouldn't even have been possible to get it back on track because of it's economical design. That's why it was a safe prediction that it had to go down and I really felt sorry for those who have been unexperienced at that time but believed in the hype.

But, to also say that: Everybody loses from time to time. I've lost quite some money back in 2014 but I consider it as "Lehrgeld" (means something like "I had to pay that for education") ;-)

Technically yes but it would be displayed as Bitcoin. Not sure if Lykke plans to support Maid in future.

I own a few MAID myself and I use Omni:
https://www.omniwallet.org

What I've done is:

1) I downloaded electrum and generated address and private keys offline.
2) I've put that address as watch-only on Omni
3) Transacted Maid on it. Private Keys stay offline, so it's in fact a cold wallet.
4) Only if I want to transfer I import the private key (simple: just copy-paste)

Very interesting interview with Da HongFei:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gA5X69YY3yY

That's also my Nr 1 choice ;-)

Where have you seen such rumors? I see it as fact that Neucoin, because of it's totally disastrous design, couldn't ever survive and also makes it impossible to come back. And besides it's monster-premine and hyper-inflation there never was anything unique - a simple PoS-copycat. They've sold this for 4012 BTC (https://blockchain.info/address/3MrNuksZ1VePU3dGiSQFiouWerJUJgDkfH) to unexperienced Investors.

Measured at today prices: about $11 million. It was much less at the time of the ICO of course, but what is NEU worth now? Nothing. And NEU-Investors had about one year of total frustration and without any hope.

The appropriate word for this scheme is fraud/scam. Actually I'm surprised that the Scammers behind this got away with this so easy.

My reason to buy into the ICO (never bought into such an expensive one) was that I hope that Tezos will scale better than other Blockchains (Ethereum for example). If that will be the case is a bet of course, nobody knows right now. But if... I expect a very high valuation.

https://hackernoon.com/scaling-tezo-8de241dd91bd

Should be solved soon. Dev-Quote:

“We had an issue with 3rd party indexer component. Now it should be resolved and we will cover all missed operations during last days. Hopefully will be finished today.
Amount of users affected is not very high, but still sorry for inconveniences.”

It is planned to get LKK on other exchanges but there is no fixed ETA yet.

Good, glad to hear that!

Yes, I hope it will be fixed soon. It's an unfortunate situation to have money stuck of course. But your money is safe, because as you say, it's on the correct address and has enough confirmations. Problem seems to be that the App currently has a problem to detect the deposit so it's not displayed in your App while it's in fact there.

Hi Sanchoni25! No, it wasn't a mistake to deposit the private wallet directly. It seems as if the App sometimes doesn't properly detect a deposit - some other users have reported that issue as well. Please write a mail to support@lykke.com to make them aware of your case. I hope it will be fixed soon!

Lykkes Plan bezüglich Bitcoin-Cash:


https://www.lykke.com/company/news/Lykke-Policy-for-Bitcoin-Cash

Ok. Please write to support@lykke.com. In case you've already done that you can message me your ticket number.

As far as I know it should be fine now - do you still get the runtime-error?

Unfortunately several users report this issue. Hope it will be solved soon - they're working on it.

Hi DRguez!

The discrepancy between App and Blockchain-Explorer is because Lykke implemented Offchain-Settlement. In very short words:

The trading-wallet is a multi-signature wallet (customer holds one Private Key, Lykke holds the other one) and you can imagine Offchain-settlement this way: Lykke deposits Coins in the multi-sig-wallets of customers. And let's say you want to buy, the balance is just updated. That speed things up and is cheaper than settling all trades on-chain. Your App shows your balance but the Block Explorer shows balances of both parties until now. In future the Explorer will be improved to differ between both parties.

You can find more infos about it here: https://www.lykke.com/city/blog/lykke_offchain_settlement (especially questions 7,8,9)


If you should lose your App, let's say because you lose your phone or it's damaged, you should have stored the 12 words seed safe.


Ether is not displayed on the Block-Explorer because the Lykke-Explorer only shows Bitcoin and colored Coins (Colored Coins are technically fractions of a Bitcoin, so they also run on the Bitcoin-Blockchain). Colored Coins are LKK for example but also all Fiat-Currencies on Lykke are represented as colored Coins.

Shareholder-Fragen für die zu wenig Zeit während der Video-Übertragung waren haben sie in einem Blog-Post beantwortet.

Link zum Video ist im Artikel enthalten.



Lykke Annual Coinholder Meeting: Uncovered questions



https://www.lykke.com/city/blog/lykke_annual_coinholder_meeting_uncovered_questions