Bitcoin Forum
May 28, 2024, 10:08:11 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 ... 95 »
601  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Afterburner dropping fan causing claymore to give me temperature error. GTX 1060 on: June 16, 2017, 11:22:06 PM
Its like that when you clock memory to high, drop it by -100mhz and your be fine, claymore start reporting problem as soon as part of NV driver fail for unstable GPU
602  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: ethermine.org..weird reporting...microseconds not being reported on found shares on: June 16, 2017, 12:29:59 AM
pool is overloaded more to somewhere else.........
603  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: excavator by NiceHash - multi-algorithm advanced NVIDIA & AMD GPU miner [1.2.5a] on: June 15, 2017, 06:28:25 PM
Can anyone report any kind of issues with lbry on NVIDIA? You should be getting around 400 MHs on 1080 and 300 MHs on 1070.

same speed as alexis which is logical  Grin
if used 2 threads per GPU on 5 card system 3,4 and 5th card need some time to initialize
604  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: 1070 owners - what are your dual-mining hashrates? on: June 15, 2017, 01:14:31 PM
do not dual mine with 1070 as you lose a lot with ETH so profitability is same and power use more......

claymore did not optimize mining with NV at all, or was it due lack of ASM tools duno
605  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. on: June 14, 2017, 08:41:40 PM
Never seen more then 33.3 mhs eth even with my record-breaking palit sjs samsung running 2200/2400 gpu/mem. Any proof  about 36mhs with genoil, sp?

You modded bios, and modded code to do 36MHASH stable, and this is too expensive for you my friend.

You know pascal bios is signed and protected even if you flash it somehow card would not start if you don`t crack signing....
606  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: excavator by NiceHash - multi-algorithm advanced NVIDIA & AMD GPU miner [1.2.4a] on: June 14, 2017, 02:47:14 PM
@ionlng
For me it works with json file and I use their restart scrypt just edit the json to mine what you like
excavator.exe -c %COMMAND_FILE%

zcash.json
[
   {"time":0,"commands":[
      {"id":1,"method":"algorithm.add","params":["equihash","eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333","t1aayCdxghMsbHTMYZqLrR8jWgFhdiCnDbY.rig6"]}
   ]},
   {"time":3,"commands":[
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","0"]},
      
607  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v9.5 (Windows/Linux) on: June 13, 2017, 12:42:47 PM
Is there option to disable Nvidia fan/temperature (NVML) monitoring?
Due high memory OC it makes me a problem and miner restarts more then it should with recent versions
608  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. on: June 12, 2017, 11:29:41 PM
A 580 makes more mining mainstream coins then a 1070 mining most niche coins (not mainstream). More then that, it makes 40% more if you mine mainstream coins. Why are there still people buying and continuing to saturate Nvidia hashrate on multiple algos? Do they not know how the game works?

Because AMD has no future with these cards. If you take ethereum away, AMD mines for shit. And the only reason we are in this situation is because nobody cared to adjust genoil's CUDA kernel for daggerhashimoto on latest Pascal cards with WDDM2.1.

do you think with that adjustment a 1070 might do better than 32MH?

Of course. And 1080 should do more, at least 35. And 1080 Ti should do 50+. If you check 1080 Ti, you can see it reaches 35, but memload is only 75% and you cannot change that no matter OC. There is something seriously NOT adjusted for GDDR5X.

wolf tried to do something for his GTX 1080 on ETH, as far I know he was not happy with results so he stoped
609  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SweepstakeCoin (SWEEP) - PoW/PoS, TOR, Sweepstake, Upgrade V1.3 on: May 31, 2017, 09:20:44 PM
Can someone send me a bootstrap (simple copy of blk0001.dat file) please?

updated bootstrap
https://www.mediafire.com/?wjzaddxgyqy7mav
610  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SweepstakeCoin (SWEEP) - PoW/PoS, TOR, Sweepstake, Upgrade V1.3 on: May 25, 2017, 07:58:43 PM
so i'm ahead of the block explorer, 51930....

51956

blockexplorer is just stuck frontend prolly
611  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SweepstakeCoin (SWEEP) - PoW/PoS, TOR, Sweepstake, Upgrade V1.3 on: May 21, 2017, 05:09:52 PM
I stop work on this coin, 4 transactions for all the time of a mining are lost
 


I suppose you never heard of orphan....... chain split, fork are not usual after initial period but orphans are
612  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SweepstakeCoin (SWEEP) - PoW/PoS, TOR, Sweepstake, Upgrade V1.3 on: May 20, 2017, 02:35:54 AM
if you mine on wrong fork diff can be >90% less, and its your job to check if you are on right one... especially on new coins

Bullshit. A properly functioning coin will ensure that we are on the right fork. The Op issued a new qt. If that is not working then it is on the Devs / Op not us you sanctimonious prick.

you never solo mined new coin?

tor+pos = truble
613  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SweepstakeCoin (SWEEP) - PoW/PoS, TOR, Sweepstake, Upgrade V1.3 on: May 20, 2017, 02:20:27 AM
sure its dead chain, you were prolly alone there, each block yours Wink
614  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SweepstakeCoin (SWEEP) - PoW/PoS, TOR, Sweepstake, Upgrade V1.3 on: May 20, 2017, 02:06:12 AM
if you mine on wrong fork diff can be >90% less, and its your job to check if you are on right one... especially on new coins
615  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SweepstakeCoin (SWEEP) - PoW/PoS, TOR, Sweepstake, Upgrade V1.3 on: May 19, 2017, 11:53:01 PM
Some fuckking retarded ashole is staking again, he gona fork it!!!!!
616  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SweepstakeCoin (SWEEP) - PoW/PoS, TOR, Sweepstake, Version 1.2 on: May 19, 2017, 05:40:43 PM
WTS 200 000+ sweep 0.2btc, right chain, whole wallet  Grin
617  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][EXCHANGE] Poloniex - Crypto Exchange with BTC/NXT on: May 18, 2017, 10:36:00 PM
As far I see withdrawal and deposit issue are up to ~4 days support delay or so...
Verification is a lot longer... they are still stuck, in 2 weeks I see support ticker ID rise by 30 000
618  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SweepstakeCoin (SWEEP) - PoW/PoS, TOR, Sweepstake, Version 1.2 on: May 18, 2017, 02:23:12 PM
looks like POS block are making forks........
619  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][EXCHANGE] Poloniex - Crypto Exchange with BTC/NXT on: May 17, 2017, 04:12:27 PM
Whats the average time on level 2 verification? I submitted mine 2 days ago and my withdrawal has been pending for around a day now.

could be 15-30 days prolly
620  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. on: May 13, 2017, 09:36:35 PM
Never boring everlasting gossip

pls rename thread to:

CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal gossip

 Grin
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 ... 95 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!